SOURCE: Phaedo
AUTHOR: Socrates (through the writing of his student, Plato, though this account was acquired by Plato from another disciple, Phaedo)
DATE: Around 4th Century B.C.
BACKGROUND: In addressing the changes brought upon by the Iron Age, the Greeks looked more toward this world and created a culture that were essentially humanistic (human-centered) and secular (of this world) in the sense that they focused on humanity’s position within an observable universe of finite space and time. Thus social and political philosophy became prominent rather than theology. Many of these ideas are processed by the Socratic method of dialectical reasoning in which assumptions, opinions, and received wisdom are tested through a process of intellectual questioning and discussion. The following source, however, includes both a reasoned analysis of human conduct and their implications of the afterlife. This source comes at the end of Socrates’ life as he is to be executed in 399 B.C. for atheism and corrupting the youth.
And when real philosophers consider all these things, will they not be led to make a reflection which they will express in words something like the following? “Have we not found,” they will say, “a path of thought which seems to bring us and our argument to the conclusion, that while we are in the body, and while the soul is infected with the evils of the body, our desire is of the truth. For the body is a source of endless trouble to us by reason of the mere requirement of food; and is liable also to diseases which overtake and impede us in the search after true being: it fills us full of loves, and lusts, and fears, and fancies of all kinds, and endless foolery, and in fact, as men say, takes away from us the power of thinking at all. Whence come wars, and fightings, and factions? Whence but from the body and the lusts of the body? Wars are occasioned by the love of money, and money has to be acquired for the sake and in the service of the body; and by reason of all these impediments we have no time to give philosophy; and, last and worst of all, even if we are at leisure and betake ourselves to some speculation, the body is always breaking in upon us, causing turmoil and confusion in our inquiries, and so amazing us that we are prevented from seeing the truth.
It has been proved to us by experience that if we would have pure knowledge of anything we must be quit of the body—the soul in herself must behold things in themselves: and then we shall attain the wisdom which we desire, and of which we say that we are lovers; not while we live, but after death; for if while in company with the body, the soul cannot have pure knowledge, one of two things follows—either knowledge is not to be attained at all, or if at all, after death. For then, and not till then, the soul will be parted from the body and exist in herself alone. In this present life, I reckon that we make the nearest approach to knowledge when we have the least possible intercourse or communion with the body, and are not surfeited with the bodily nature, but keep ourselves pure.…And thus having got rid of the foolishness of the body we shall be pure and converse with the pure, and know of ourselves the clear light of truth.” For the impure are not permitted to approach the pure. These are the sort of words…which the true lovers of knowledge cannot help saying to one another, and thinking....
…And true philosophers…are always occupied in the practice of dying, wherefore also to them least of all men is death terrible. Look at the matter thus: –if they have been in every way the enemies of the body, and are wanting to be alone with the soul, when this desire of theirs is granted, how inconsistent would they be if they trembled and repined, instead of rejoicing at their departure to a place where, when they arrive, they hope to gain that which in life they desired—and this was wisdom—and at the same time to be rid of the company of their enemy. Many a man has been willing to go to the world below animated by the hope of seeing there an earthly love, or wife, or son, and conversing with them. And will he who is a true lover of wisdom, and is strongly persuaded in like manner that only in the world below he can worthily enjoy her, still repine at death. Will he not depart with joy? Surely he will, O my friend, if he be a true philosopher. For he will have affirm conviction that there, and there only, he can find wisdom in her purity. And if this is true, he would be very absurd…if he were afraid of death.
QUESTIONS FOR ANALYSIS
Did Socrates believe that the attainment of true wisdom is possible in this world? Why or why not?
What are the issues with living life on earth?
How does this document demonstrate logic and reason in action? Cite specific examples of Socrates’ reasoning.
FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION: According to this belief system, what is the meaning of life?