Lenin's Writings, Part III
DOCUMENT C
DOCUMENT C
BACKGROUND: The year 1917 brought momentous change to Russia. Mass upheaval in the cities and the countryside, derived in part from the suffering associated with the Great War, led to the destruction of the Old Order: the Romanov Dynasty and the landlord class. This revolution places the Russian Revolution in the category as the French Revolution. But the events of 1917 had an added significance, for the victorious Bolshevik revolutionaries did not seek to establish a Western-style middle class society. Instead, they proclaim socialism and communism as their goals. Vladimir I. Lenin, the indefatigable leader of the Bolshevik party and the first head of the Soviet regime, was able to seize control by the force of his ideas.
Modernizing Russia (1920)
The essential feature of the present political situation is that we are now passing through a crucial period of ·transition,: something of a zigzag transition from war to economic development. This has occurred before but not on such a wide scale. This should constantly remind us of what the general political tasks of the Soviet government are, and what constitutes the particular feature of this transition. The dictatorship of the proletariat has been successful because it has been able, to combine, compulsion with pursuasion. The dictatorship of the proletariat does not fear any resort to compulsion and to the most severe, decisive and ruthless forms of coercion by the state. The advanced class, the class most oppressed by capitalism, is entitled to use compulsion, because it is doing so in the interests of the working and exploited people, and because it possesses means of, compulsion and persuasion such as no former classes ever possessed, although they had incomparably greater material facilities for propaganda and agitation than we have.
We have, no doubt, learnt politics; here we stand as firm as a rock. But things are bad as far as economic matters are concerned. Henceforth, less politics will be the best politics. Bring more engineers and agronomists to the fore, learn from them, keep an eye on their work, and turn our congresses and conferences, not into propaganda. meetings but into bodies that will verify our economic achievements, bodies in which we can really learn the business of economic development.
While we live in a-small-peasant country, there is a firmer economic basis for capitalism in Russia than for communism. That must be borne in mind. Anyone who has carefully observed life in the countryside; as compared with life in the cities, knows that we have not torn up the roots of capitalism and have not undermined the foundation, the basis, of the internal enemy. The latter depends on small-scale production, and there is only one way of undermining it, namely, to place the economy of the country, including agriculture, on a new technical basis, that of modern. large-scale production. Only electricity provides that basis.
Communism is Soviet power plus the electrification of the whole country. Otherwise the country will remain a small-peasant country, and we must clearly realize that.
We are weaker than capitalism, not only on the world scale, but also within the country. That is common knowledge .. We have realized it, and we shall see to it that the economic basis is transformed from a small-peasant basis into a large-scale industrial basis. Only when the· country has been electrified, and industry, agriculture and transport have been placed on the technical basis of modern large-scale industry, only then shall we be fully victorious.
I recently had occasion to attend a peasant festival held in Volokolamsk Uyezd, a remote part of Moscow Gubernia, where the peasants have electric lighting. A meeting was arranged in the street, and one of the peasants came forward and began to make a speech welcoming this new event in the lives of the peasants. "We peasants were unenlightened," he said, "and now light has appeared among us, an 'unnatural light, which will light up our peasant darkness.'" For my part, these words did not surprise me. Of course, to the non-Party peasant masses electric light is an "unnatural?" light; but what we consider unnatural is that the peasants and workers should have lived for hundreds and-thousands of years in such backwardness, poverty and oppression under the. yoke -of the landowners and the capitalists.
You cannot, emerge from this darkness very rapidly. What we must now try is to convert every electric power station we build into a stronghold of enlightenment to be used to make the masses electricity-conscious, so to speak.
We must see to it that every factory and every electric power station becomes a centre of enlightenment; if Russia is covered with a dense network of electric power stations and powerful technical installations, our communist economic development will become a model for a future socialist Europe and Asia.