Having collected all my footage, it was finally time to move into my editing process. As mentioned previously, I ended up with a significantly sized portion of footage that needed to be adapted along with archival footage. During the production process, I believed the gogglebox style interviews would be a different type of interview to incorporate into my serious Pilger style documentary. However, on reflection having filmed, these two setups clash so will not be mixed together. This put me in a conundrum as I now have so much great and useable footage that won’t fit.
To remedy this, I decided to shake up my approach to this topic and FMP. Having researched both styles of documentary extensively, I decided to turn this into a thought experiment posing the question:
‘How does a different visual style alter your perception of the subject matter?’
In this post production stage, I aimed to explore the topic of Jamboree and Scouting to its fullest by editing 2 videos with different agendas:
Chaos in Korea: a factual John Pilger account of Jamboree, using international interviews, historical development and news coverage.
Gogglebox - 25th Jamboree: A relaxed reality TV show treating the cast as friends reminiscing on their time leading up to and in Korea.
In my evaluation, I will send these videos out together with a survey to find which format an audience like for which reasons and decide the format that this topic is better suited to.
Behind the Scenes folder
Naming Key: Footage
CiK = Chaos in Korea
V = Virtual
IP = In Person
BTS = Behind the Scenes
C = Camera
VT = Video Tape (Journal at top of the page
D = Day
Follow VT = Page (ie Research Page)
Before even getting to the videos, to cut down on the amount of footage I have and make life easier when compiling different interviews, I began my post production by multicam vision mixing each interview. For in person interviews I had 2 camera angles along with two additional sound mixes from Mattie for each interview, both serious and gogglebox, and had two angles for each virtual one as well, these being the screen recording and an additional camera in my room.
By mixing each interview, I was also able to timestamp every time I asked a question. I made a notes page of when all of these were asked so I could pinpoint the main topic each person discussed and make it easier for myself to find information when I come to editing as a whole. What I didn’t realise was that, thanks to a recent Premiere Pro update, opening an exported file in a new project keeps the markers in the timeline so finding these reference points became even easier.
In a couple of cases on the second road trip interviews (Ruby and Adam H) the files had been altered, giving me some problem solving to do. The videos were at 25% speed with no audio. I was able to solve this by increasing the speed and taking audio from Mattie’s sound kit directly. The Gogglebox interview for Ruby, Adam H and Zach also felt a slight tinny though this may have been tied to the previous issue. I tried my best to denoise and add additional effects to make it less noticeable though the other interviews were perfectly clear, making it stick out.
On the virtual interview front, my issue came from files being in different sizes. For the first couple, I had accidentally set my camera to be 4K, without checking it. After that mistake, I made sure to check settings ever time. I had one case where the call had connection problems bet this can be avoided in the edit as there is so much footage to draw from.
Continuing, I actually didn’t end up mixing much of my second in room camera to the virtual interviews as there was already a dialogue between two shots/ cameras in the screen recording of us talking. I mainly used this editing setup time to mark through the timeline for key answers.
The multicaming stage itself took about 2 days to complete as my focus wasn’t on point. I got distracted over the amount of work I still had to do and wanted to relax after the shoot. In a way, I became more motivated by the deadline being in less than two weeks by this point. Although this seemed like a tedious process, It massively quickened editing the final videos.
Naming Key:Gogglebox Example
T = Take
X + Y = Names of Interviewees
01 Millie = Interviewee Number to organise rather than name
Goggle = Gogglebox Style
E = Establishing
VUK59 = Country identifier
VUK59 = Unit Number identifier
An integral part of this project is my use of found/ archival footage. Following each interview, I asked if I could receive a few photos of that interviewee’s time in Korea which I could use as overlays during the Pilger documentary.
Along with this, I collated a series of news headline videos off YouTube from broadcasters such as BBC, ABC Australia and NBC. It was interesting to me that each of these reporters had a slightly different story to tell, including different statics like the number of people on site. Every one of these that I came across represented the UK Contingent’s departure from the Jamboree site with the same portion of footage playing, likely due to us on site not wanting to engage with the press. From this collection of news footage, I will be able to create an opening montage for my Pilger documentary as well as draw footage for the Survivor style intro VT in the Gogglebox video.
A third area of archival footage I also discovered was a series of aftermovies on YouTube. Many countries’ contingents uploaded an aftermovie, documenting high points from the Jamboree to be shared online. These feature a variety of timelapses, drones and close up shots of activities and general activity on site. This was footage I was unable to gain myself on the experience so will be heavily used in my documentary. The videos I found the most interest in were from Italy, Switzerland and Germany.
Finally, I have drawn archival footage from my own time on site. During the trip, I took on my unit’s social media, creating short videos and sharing photos of the event. Hence, I accumulated a large portion of the unit’s happenings which I was able to summarise into a promotional video of our trip on return last September. I believe a blend of this footage, alternate country angles on the ground and external news perception while strengthen the messaging of my documentary.
Naming Key: News Footage
CiK = Chaos in Korea
News = news Archive
00X = Shot Number
BBC = Source
The first style I wanted to edit in was Survivor as this needed little factual research and could get me back in the zone to edit before taking on the Pilger documentary. I wanted to more closely resemble the early 2000s version of the Survivor intro VT with lower quality text, flashy shot transitions and high saturation. This process took around 3 hours for a 1 minute clip including voice over and music.
I believe my 30 second montage captured everything about the Survivor style along with the ncessary information for external audiences to understand the video’s concept and roots. My research into the Jamboree could partially be found here but not in as much depth as will be used later in the Pilger documentary. All of the footage in this section, besides the two gogglebox behind the scenes shots, was archival footage from news and the after movies.
Next, I didn’t spend too long on the graphics as this was only going to be a test pilot and I needed to focus on the footage and messaging. I went with a Survivor font downloaded online and used a simple lighting effect on each name to make it glow, giving the video depth. As well as the Survivor font, I wanted to make it feel like the Gogglegonks series could go in different directions in terms of subject matter so inserted a neutral ‘Gonk’ font as a baseline.
(Gogglegonks is a play on Gogglebox but inserting my own branding)
When it came to music, rather than a tribal island track found in Survivor, I wanted to connect the music back to Korean culture, using a piece of traditional music. This is accented by the heavy drum beat and gong crash to give the video momentum and dramatize it further.
Finally, when the cast are shown on screen, rather than displaying them on the Jamboree as initially planned, I needed to tie this clip to the rest of the Gogglebox episode so manipulated footage from our filming days. Each household is represented by a different colour, much like tribes in Survivor, and the footage is slowed to add dramatics once more.
Overall, I was very happy with this opening clip as it is faithful to my style and technical research while giving my own flavour and depositing important information to the viewer that the audience will need. However, I wasn’t particularly happy with my voice over. Due to my unpreparedness for it by drawing up a script in this stage, I didn’t worry about mic levels and general sound quality. I fear this may be a theme in this stage of development due to the time limit before deadline. In future I should work more closely on my scripting and voice over early on.
Tracks in music file are simply named as the piece of music. These are not specific files to the project.
The next stage of editing I chose to do was the Gogglebox/ Gogglegonks main video. I wanted this to be the length of half a TV show slot so got the video to 11 and a half minutes. In cable TV, a 30 minute slot would be 22 minute program plus adverts. In that time, I only cover 3 of the slides from the presentation I showed the interviewees.
Over the 11 minutes, I wanted to establish a setup for a series along with longer talks with the cast and impliment a few stylistic choices of my own. I wanted the edit to frame each cast member as a character with an archetype, as seen on tv shows like this, with Abi becoming a chatterbox, Heather’s deep pan expressions and Millie always double checking her facts. This gives each person a story to tell in their way to engage the viewer.
The whole episode only took a few hours to edit as I’d already mulitcamed and marked each of the interviews to make it easy to find information. I had the same voice over issue as with the Survivor portion and that VT blended really well into the more comfortable style. Throughout, the font remained the ‘Gonk’ typeface to decrease the drama of the titles back to reality. I designed it this way as the intro is a dramatised version of the Jamboree, much like in the news and the standard perception whereas the rest of the video is a more relaxed take representing what was really going on.
As mentioned when multicam editing, I discovered that the sound on Zach's house sounded tinny and this became apparent compared to the others however it was too much hassle on a tight deadline to go back through the original interview to change. I am grateful to Mattie for recording sound in person for this project.
An issue I found was that it became a welcoming program to any Jamboree participants (or parents/ those looking to go in the future) which was my target audience but isolates a wider understanding. To solve this problem, I added in sections called speedruns to catch a casual viewer up on what is being discussed. A part from that, I believe this is faithful to my target demographic.
In hindsight, this is a distraction from my main Pilger documentary that wouldn’t have warranted all of my pages of research alone. I thought I may submit only this but that removes the relevance of a majority of my research. If I were to do this again, I would edit an episode 3 or 4 in this series as these would be about the main Jamboree, which my research is based on. I would also only stick to one video but at this stage I’ve tied my own hands due to the level of previous work I have put in.
Finally, it was time to move into the central goal of my entire FMP. This video was set to use a majority of my research topics to be a matter of fact documentary. I was very much aware my research is too lengthy and I needed to craft something that blatantly used it and qualified its existence.
However, unbelievably, with the footage I collected over my 2 week production phase, I didn’t believe this was possible. I always intended on revisiting my script but I needed narration to camera for visual variation and resemblance of John Pilger. During the first day in person filming, we attempted to capture a narration to camera which I discovered my discomfort in. Being a Youtuber, I am used to recording and editing videos for myself of myself so ‘performing’ with a crew twisted a nerve.
Naming Key: Narration Folder
CiK = Chaos in Korea
NA = Narration Attempt
S = Scene (Not chronological)
T = Take
C = Camera
SM = Sound Middle (both ears)
SL = Sound Left (Left Ear)
V1
V2
V3
To solve this in the post production stage, I redrafted my script a couple of times, factoring in reshoots in my study using a whiteboard in the background to display important information relevant to that section of the documentary. As this video will be a proof of concept and not a fully finalized documentary, I was contempt with the handwritten whiteboard text but, when doing this again, I will work with a blank board and add text in post.
I shot the reshoots in a couple hours, reorganizing my room to make it work although the space and timing didn’t allow for me to full light the scene, resulting in one strong key light without a fill to balance out shadow. In future, to avoid this situation, I must widen my production schedule to include narration from the start. My approach made it feel like an after-thought as I was so fixated on the logistics of the interviews.
Moving on, I took my premixed multicam interviews from earlier and a collection of news footage to pace between my narrations. Some of this narration was also carried out through voice over to blend the talking head with interview and archive footage. It very quickly became apparent that a majority of interview footage would not be used in this edit, cutting many down from over 10 minutes to mere seconds. This was so that I could represent everyone interviewed, presenting the breadth of this operation though only through a small lens.
The video I was editing is called a ‘Proof of Concept’, testing the waters on the idea and getting an overall vision to pitch the production further. The rest of this portfolio goes along with that in saying should this version be received well the research and footage is already captured to take it to the next stage. Due to this, I wanted to highlight as many points as possible in a short space of time, making it easier for moderation with a 14 minute cut rather than over an hour feature film. Unfortunately, this meant sacrificing many interesting conversations in interviews but made me focus on my editing to find the best content to represent them. You can find all the multicamed interviews above.
Naming Key: Photo Folder
BP = Baden Powell
GiS = Girls in Scouting
SFB = Scouting For Boys
EWSJ = Early World Scout Jamboree (with year)
Additionally, I needed to have graphics. Pilger sticks to white text on black so to keep things simply I did just that. However, I did originally find the white text too plain and difficult to find clearly so incorporated a black drop shadow for further depth.
Following the graphics, the video was missing sound diversity. I went back to Pilger’s work to find a common theme in music, rediscovering the dramatic thuds for title cards and heavy inspirational music to accompany narration. These act as a nice counterbalance from my constant droning voice. To fix that issue, I may ask around for a narrator in the full version (maybe even a group of narrators to secure my own style).
Continuing with sound, an issue I only realized after exporting was the levels of audio. The in person interviews needed to be bought up as many are too quiet compared to the calls and my narration. This can be easily fixed in future but I wanted to stick with this export for FMP as a major first try. I am grateful to Mattie for joining me on the in person interviews as the sound quality is professional.
A final area of discussion is the content covered. In order to explore all my research topics, I broke the video up into signposted sections. I leaned heavily on gender roles rather than scouting history as a whole to promote a major point of the documentary, keeping it relevant to the topic by including Matt discussing gender balance in the Jamboree unit. Later on, when discussing the history of Jamborees, I chose to include a montage of every Jamboree event badge which originally was planned as part of a Babylon style montage. However, I thought at this point there were too many styles at play and that remained the least necessary.
To conclude, in my opinion, this is a strong proof of concept as it highlights all the interviewees, topics and stories that would appear in a full length display only at a fraction of the time for ease of moderation. In future, I must more carefully plan out the whole production process, rather than tunnel vision on the interviews, in order to calculate how the footage will work cohesively in the end. There are minor fixes to be made such as sound levels but overall this is a good step into what this documentary should archive.
After completing this and the Gogglebox video, I am proud that I stuck with this ambitious and expansive FMP as the proof of concept edits are strong and faithful. If I did the process again, I would still try these different styles as a thought experiment to tell the same story as I’d like to see the response from my audience in where to develop this topic next. I’d much rather this than an upfront survey listing the potential styles as you can’t tell what those would look like until they were made. My central problem in this process has been focus as I became side tracked in different approaches. This is good for my curiosity and creativity while I have the time but must stick to timings and direction in future workplaces.
Following a page of the videos themselves, the next stage of the process was my final evaluation, in which I tie up these reflective journals to find the positives and negatives of the whole process.