Santiago A. De Guzman Elementary School (SADGES) is a public elementary school located in Valenzuela City, Metro Manila. Founded in 2007 and becoming fully independent in 2009, the school educates around 1800 students from grades 1 through 6.
Email: santiagodeguzman.es@deped.gov.ph
Landline: (02) 282-8876
FB: https://www.facebook.com/santiagodeguzmanes
Gatekeeper: Ms. Reah Pasaol, Math teacher
The Santiago A. De Guzman Elementary School envisions a high-standard educational institution developing the foundation of education of Filipino children with scientific and technological knowledge, skills and attitudes; creative and have positive values; lifelong learning skills to become productive and globally competitive scientists and technologists. It also aims to provide a learning environment to children that recognize multiple intelligences and gears toward the development of God-loving, nationalistic, creative, ecologically aware, scientifically and technologically oriented and skilled individuals who are empowered through lifelong learning skills.
The school was started in 2007, as an annex school of General T. de Leon Elementary School. They started with only 13 teachers – all of whom are still teaching at the school – and 700 to 720 students. In 2008 or 2009, the school became independent and began receiving its own budget from the government. Since then, the student body has steadily increased in size; the school now has around 1800 students from grades 1 through 6. This larger student body has also increased the school’s demands on its teachers, who must now teach as many as eight sections per grade level and have had to learn new, mostly computer-based, tools. The school’s academics have also significantly improved recently, with students now being able to join international olympiads.
Santiago A. De Guzman Elementary School is located at Tañada Subdivision, 2005 Karen Ave, Valenzuela, 1440 Metro Manila.
The pandemic has caused the immediate closure of schools all over the Philippines, with most moving to a purely online setting. This lack of face-to-face interaction has made teaching and learning significantly harder – especially for young children, where the social aspect of face-to-face classes is of paramount importance (Preeti, 2020). Additionally, literacy rates among young children have also dropped during the pandemic: according to the World Bank (2021), the number of young children who cannot read simple text has increased from 53% to 70% in this year alone.
Remote learning has had worrying effects on the lives and workload of teachers. According to a survey by YouGov (2021), 45% of teachers have had their workloads "greatly increase" since remote learning was implemented. Overall, meanwhile, 84% of primary school teachers have said that their workload has increased. This increase could have damaging effects on their mental health and overall well-being, potentially causing them to consider leaving the profession entirely.
Our project aimed to create learning guides for students taking SADGES' sixth grade math curriculum. By doing this, we hoped to ...
Phase 1 (March 9-11, 2022) - We first met with our partnered organization in google meet to talk about the details of our cooperation. We discussed the topic to be included and the number of learning guides we would create. To gauge the effectiveness of our learning guides, we decided that a pretest and post-test were needed.
Phase 2 (March 19-23, 2022) - The pretest was given to the students to be done and a total of 70 respondents answered. The pretest was composed of 20 questions – covering fractions, rates, sequences, and geometry – with each question testing a different skill. After getting the results of the pretest, we scheduled another meeting with Santiago A. De Guzman Elementary School to confirm the details.
Setback (March 19 - April 9, 2022) - Some setbacks happened and communication between us and Santiago A. De Guzman Elementary School was dead for 3 weeks.
Phase 3 (March 19, 2022-April 19, 2022) - Learning guides for fractions, rates, sequences, geometry, and problem solving were created with emphasis put on topics the majority of the students were weak in. Step-by step instructions on how to solve every pre-test problem were included in the modules. Additionally, post-test was also sent along with the modules for the student to answer on their discretion. The post-test was designed to mirror the pretest, with each question testing the same skill and having the same level of difficulty as the question with the same number on the pre-test, to better analyze how much our modules helped improve each specific skill.
Phase 4 (April 25, 2022) - We then compared the results of the pretest and post-test to gauge the effectiveness of our modules. The results of the students who answered the pretest but did not answer the post-test and vice-versa were excluded from the analysis.
Phase 5 (April 26, 2022) - Finally, we reported the results to Santiago A. De Guzman Elementary School for their approval.
A total of 70 students answered the pretest exam. The exam was composed of arithmetic, fractions, geometry, patterns, and word problems. After getting the results of the post-test, we removed the ones that did not answer the post-test.
The average score was not passing, with the most common score being 8/20 and the median score being 10. The highest score was 19 and the lowest score was 3. We looked through the answers of the students and found that most got the rate problems wrong and had difficulties in the sequence and fraction portion.
Most students found the test to be extremely difficult. With almost all of them answering with a difficulty of 5 or above, with only 3 outliers. Among the outliers, the student who answered 1 got 8/20, the student who answered 2 got 13/20, and the student who answered 4 got 11/20. The 2 students who answered with a difficulty of 10 got 9/20 and 3/20.
"On a scale of 1 (easiest) to 10 (hardest), how easy was the test?"
After voiding the students that took the pretest after the release of the module and the students that didn't take the pretest, we were able to get the mean, median, and range of the scores. We decided to not include a question asking how difficult the test was as all the questions remained the same except for the values. There also might be bias in them answering it relative to the pretest.
The average score was 12.47, which is a passing average score. Most students got 15 points with the median being 13 points. The highest score that the students were able to achieve is 20 and the lowest score is 1.
The result of the post-test is significantly (p < 0.1) better than the pretest. The average increased by an entire 2 points and the median by 3 points. The range, however, is concerning as 1 person got a score of 1 and there's more that got low scores compared to the pretest.
In analyzing these results, it is important to note that the post-test was designed to mirror the pre-test.
Overall, the project can be considered a success. The modules helped improve the students' scores and achieve a passing grade. The collaboration with Santiago A. De Guzman, albeit bumpy in the first half, successfully pulled through.
From the experiences that we had, we recommend conducting meetings as often as possible to ensure that the problems encountered during the implementation can be addressed properly.
Do not be afraid to ask them questions. You should clarify what the organization wants and needs from you. However, you need to express the boundaries of what you can do so that they know what they can expect from you.
When scheduling your work, you should allot more time than what was needed so that you won't end up pressuring yourself.
Members:
BJ P. De Luna Gerard Elmer Ilagan
Jethro Asahel Roxas Lucas Khan
Uriel Orpilla
"The greatest good is what we do for one another" -Mother Teresa