TAP Agreement
Smart Question 00189:
- How’s TAP Agreement different from agreement in today’s world?
TAP Response 00189:
- TAP Agreement establishes two different forms of agreement on either side of a linear continuum that features disagreement or uncertainty or unawareness between the two opposite forms of agreement.
Smart Question 00190:
- What are these two opposite forms of agreement?
TAP Response 00190:
- With any group voice, the top of the list always features ‘positive agreement’ or the possibility that the group agrees are the best possibility for fulfilling the intent of the case. At the bottom of the priority list emerges what TAP refers to as ‘negative agreement’ or the possibility that the group believes to be the worst things that could fulfill the intent of the case.
Smart Question 00191:
- What do you mean by the middle of the list being uncertainty or unawareness - in addition to disagreement?
TAP Response 00191:
- When any new possibility item gets added to a case’s list - it is automatically placed in ‘as close to the center of the list as possible.’ It is automatically placed in every specific case-list participant’s personal case-list. The moment a new item is added most TAPPERS are unaware of it showing up. So they have not yet assessed the new item for proper positioning. This is why it first positioning is NOT necessarily established group disagreement - instead it might be there simply because of awareness. Uncertainty is another logical reason for the center positioning of an item. After assessment the TAPPER is not sure if it is positive or negative possibility. Independent of why an item presently exists in the central zone of a list - this zone becomes a set of possibility items the group should not focus much time or energy on. Things will naturally move out of this zone once even a single mind has assessed the item.