transcript to 79min podcast of Tucker Carlson Interviews RFK Jr_ Joining Trump, Pavel Durov’s Arrest, CIA, The Democrat Party
https://rumble.com/v5cloed-tucker-carlson-interviews-rfk-jr-joining-trump-pavel-durovs-arrest-cia-the-.html 

We're honored to announce that JD Vance, the vice presidential nominee, is confirmed for a live tour stop in Hershey, Pennsylvania next month. Tickets are on sale at tucker carlson.com. We hope to see you there. It'll be in cities all across the country starting next week. But first, our interview with Bobby Kennedy junior, his first since endorsing Donald Trump on Friday.

Here it is. So people were shocked. I know a lot of people, you know, well, were shocked when you endorsed Trump. I was not shocked because for all the areas where you disagree on specific issues, there's a consistent theme that I have noticed in both of your lives, which is you've both spent the majority of your life well, in your case, your whole life in the American ruling class. And both of you decided that it was corrupt, and that you were gonna say so out loud at great risk, at great risk to both of you.

And so it was probably just a matter of time before you aligned in some way. Is that how you see it? Yeah. I mean, I you know, I think there's been a bunch of realignments, political realignments, right, about 4 or 5 throughout American history. And I think we're going through one right now with the Democratic party.

And with both political parties really changing in this very dramatic way, and even I talked, earlier about the transformation of a Republican party, the party of environmentalism. Yes. And, you know, the Democratic party has one now one environmental issue, which is this carbon orthodoxy, which ends up benefiting, you know, the oil companies and BlackRock and, Goldman Sachs with offshore wind and carbon capture, a $100,000,000,000 carbon capture projects, which is part of just the strip mining of the middle class. And that's the only issue you can talk about in the Democratic Party. I got into the environmental movement to do habitat protection, to do wildlife conservation Exactly.

To get toxics out of our kids. Amen. And none of these are issues that democrat it's a party itself. Democrats care about them, but the party itself doesn't. There's been these big profound realignments, and it's not only on that issue, it's really the, you know, the domination of, this this corrupt merger of state and corporate power that's happening in Washington DC now, where our democracy has really been subverted by the industries that have taken over the regulatory agencies, and they become and transform them into sock puppets for corporate profit taking.

And, and basically, a wholly owned subsidiary is of the industries they're supposed to regulate. And the democrats, for a variety of reasons, and I watched it happen over many, many years, have, have clung to this illusion of these democratic institutions that they're still democratic. And they have a belief, we all have the capacity to judge ourselves on our intentions rather than our actions. Right? I've been there.

So and the Democratic party judges itself. It sees itself, my friends who are Democrats, see themselves as part of the the good guys, the white hats. And that, you know, they're it's kind of they're they're like the the good guys who are in Fort Apache surrounded by the, you know, the the forces of barbarism that are about to disarm the gate, and they're the only ones. The only way to to keep it at bay is to elect a president who, has dementia. And because you're voting for the apparatus Yes.

And you're not voting for, you know, or or another president there, then to handpick a presidential candidate with without any elections, to basically get rid of democracy in order to save it, and handpick a candidate who in 40 days now has not given a single interview on any media outlet. And I think about what my uncle and father would think about that. You know, they prided themselves on on being able to go debate on on debate. It was the centerpiece, you know, to the whole, you know, function of democracy was to anneal ideas in the furnace of debate and and have them rise up in, you know, the marketplace of ideas. And the idea that, you know, and and we had this British tradition of Churchill and the others in the House of Commons, you know, and being able to defend their policies and being forced to defend their policies Yes.

Articulate eloquently. And, you know, my uncle and father just thought we should ideas are important, and we should be able to defend them. And if you can't defend them, there's something wrong with you. Yes. And you know why?

So we have a presidential candidate that was selected by the Democratic party who can't do that. And you know, one of the things that my uncle and father were always thinking about is how do we look to the rest of the world? Right? They they were conscious that America was the template for democracy. When we created a modern democracy in 17/89 or 17/91 when the Bill of Rights was ratified, We were the only democracy on earth.

By 18/65, during the end of the civil war, there were 5, and they were all modeled on America. And by the time my uncle took office, it was about a 150, and by the time by the end of the sixties, there's a 190. They're all based on the American model. And, you know, we very much were the exemplary nation. We were the example of democracy around the globe, and people and they were very conscious.

They were, you know, they were embarrassed at first by the civil rights movement, because they said, what is the rest of the world gonna think about it? And then they realized, well, we better correct, you know, the problem. Yeah. Because, but they everything that they did, they were conscious, they were being watched. What is the rest of the world think of American democracy right now?

That, you know, that we we have in one party, selected a man with dementia to lead the free world, and then turned around and picked a person, a woman who cannot give an interview. She cannot defend American, her vision, or America's record in the world. And then she gave this, you know, vice president Harris gave this speech at the convention that was written by neocons. And they had CIA directors talking at the Democratic Convention, military people talking at the Democratic Convention. My father and my uncle were the party of of anti war.

My uncle was asked by his best friend, Bill Ben Bradley, one of his 2 best friends who ran the Washington Post, what do you want on your graves, on your epithets? And my uncle said immediately, he kept the peace. He said the primary job of a president of the United States was to keep the country out of war. He said he he didn't want children in Africa and Latin America and Asia When they heard about the United States of America to think of a man with a gun, they wanted them to think of a Peace Corps volunteer and the Alliance for Progress and USAID, which were programs that he created to build the middle class to end run the oligarchs, military hunters that used to receive the USAID, and instead go directly to the poor and build institutions, education, and health, and and all the institutions of democracy to continue to model it for the rest of the world and live up to what we're supposed to be doing, which is to encourage the growth of of democratic rule. So now, you have a, you know, we have a system that's produced people who, you know, a candidate in the in the the the Democratic party who, who can't even defend America's record in the world, and who is who is parroting this kind of war mongering, you know, military domination ideology that's gotten us in such trouble.

It's it's caused a calamity in our country. It's gutted the middle class. It's made us a pariah around the globe. It's create and it led to the rise of bricks. It's leading to the rise of totalitarianism all over the world.

And, you know, I I'd say this finally that if you really look at what's happening in the Democratic Party today, it's a party that the word demos in Greek means people. But it's a party that's always facing the people. It's a party that needs ironclad control. So they didn't trust anybody during to have a real election. They got rid of the primaries because they didn't trust the people.

They then pick handpicked vice president Harris with no election, no even pretense of election, because they didn't trust the people. And, you know, you have and they're they're the party now of censorship. And How can you have a democracy with censorship? You cannot have a democracy. They're absolutely incompatible.

And everybody knew that everybody you know, you and I were raised reading Orwell and Alice Huxley and, and, you know, Robert Heinlein and Alexander Solzhenitsyn and, and all of these other books that were part of classical literature that was taught in every American classroom. It said the first step to totalitarianism is always begins with censorship. It's the first step to end that slippery slope. And there's no time that we look back in history and say that people who were censoring speech were the good guys. They're always the bad guys.

Because we knew, you know, we know that they're the guys who are gonna end up racking the whip on us all and and, you know, being our our overlords. And so and then, you know, the whole thing about, like you and I have talked about that clip of of, Tim Walz, governor Walz saying that government should be the ultimate arbiter of what is protected speech and what is not. You know, he said, if something that the first amendment does not protect, misinformation and disinformation, but it does. The first amendment was was written to protect not only true speech, but false speech. And speech that not not it wasn't there, and it's unnecessary to protect the kind of speech that everybody wants to hear.

It's there to protect the kind of speech that nobody wants to hear. Right. And and and especially speech that is critical of the people in charge. Exactly. And so in their current formulation, misinformation is defined as any speech that criticizes the god that they're doing.

So with that in mind, you see the Biden administration encouraging France, Macron, to arrest the owner and founder of Telegram, Pavel Durov, who's now, as of right now, in a French prison. That seems like I mean, that's the hallmark of dictatorship, it sounds, to me. Yeah. Well, you know, we've lost Europe. Europe is now does not have free speech.

You know, look what's happened to Elon Musk. Elon Musk should be the hero of the Democratic Party. If the old Democratic Party, he wouldn't be the hero. Somehow, he became a villain because he was actually the only, the only platform that would allow free speech on his platform. And he's now become a villain because of it, because the democratic party does not believe in the people.

If you don't if you if you if you don't believe in free speech, it means because you don't trust the people, you don't trust them to to figure it out on their own, you know, to to to have information on which they can base their ideas, and their notions, and their beliefs. And their votes. And their votes. And that the government has to, has to protect them from dangerous information, from things that might put bad ideas into their heads. And it's very patronizing, but it's also very manipulative and conniving.

And really, it's exactly the opposite of democracy. And you will not find a single democrat who will, who will criticize it. It's really astonishing to me because the democrats always like them. You know, when I endorse Trump, the big, you know, the big it's kind of the the fulcrum of the centerpiece of the text of hatred that I got back, this kind of seething anger. I'm so many democrats was, well, look what he did on January 6th.

Okay, January 6th was a bad day in American history. And what president Trump did there, in my view, was was was very bad. It was reprehensible. But was the was the republic really at risk? You know, we have the US military, we have the National Guard, you have, you know, they have all the institutions, we have Congress, we have all these institutions of government, and and there was a mob of people, most of them probably didn't know what was happening.

Some of them were very badly intentional, we're breaking the law. But it it wasn't a threat to the Republic. What is a threat, and this is what I you cannot explain to a democrat now, and it's astonishing to me. What is a threat is when the government is censoring your speech, political speech. And you know, I just won Tucker last week.

But that was the centerpiece of democratic ideology was free speech. Exactly. I mean, the word liberal means free speech. That's where it comes from. Oh.

Is that must be weird for you being named Robert f Kennedy junior and spending your entire life in this world. Like, what what's that like? It, it I mean, I I I you know, I I let me just say this. I won a lawsuit. I won a a a new judgment in my lawsuit, Kennedy versus Biden, last week.

And Kennedy versus Biden was part of 2 lawsuits that were brought, 1 by the attorney generals of of Missouri and Louisiana, and the other by me for the same issues, which was the Biden administration's censorship of speech. And so there's a series of decisions. There's a 155 page decision. The the attorney general's case went up to the Supreme Court and was rejected because they, the Supreme Court found that those attorney generals didn't have standing to sue because they weren't directly harmed. My case this week, the federal judge, Doty, said Kennedy does have his antics.

So and he reinforced re reissued his injunction against the Biden administration. Oh, I have an administrator an injunction right now against the Biden White House to enjoin them from censoring me, which they've been doing. They the the 155 page decision by Judge Dodi details everything that happened. 37 hours after he took the oath of office, President Biden's White House opened up a portal for the FBI to begin to have access to social media posts on all the different social media sites. And they the FBI then invited in the CIA, DHS, the IRS, and SAISA.

SAISA is this new agency that is the center of the censorship industrial complex, that is in charge of making sure Americans don't hear things that their government doesn't want them to hear. And those agencies and other agencies, including the health agencies like CDC, were given access to go into the social media sites and change posts, and slow walk things, and, and shadow ban posts. That it was part of that effort, and they removed my Instagram account. I had almost a 1000000 followers. I they say it was from misinformation, but they could not point to a single post that I ever made that was factually erroneous.

And they actually Facebook pushed back in the email chain. You can see Facebook pushing back at the White House and saying, wait a minute, he's not, this isn't misinformation. This is not factually erroneous. What they're saying is actually true. And they had invented a new word, which is called malinformation, which is information that is factually true, but nevertheless inconvenient for the government.

And that became disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation. That's what that is. So, everybody, and isn't that illegal? That's illegal. Yeah.

And the and the emails show that Facebook people said this, these they were saying about the White House in their private emails with each other. These people are cynical, you know, terrible people, and they knew what they were doing was breaking the law. But they were under tremendous pressure. Facebook has all these deals with the government, and you know, as do all the media companies with the intelligence agencies and elsewhere. Plus, they were the White House was overtly telling them that they were going to, if they didn't comply, that their section 230 immunity was in jeopardy.

A section 230 immunity is the, you know, is is, just so that your listeners know what it is, I used to write for the New York Times regularly. Every time I wrote lawyer an article, lawyers would call me and fact check everything in that article. Because if I wrote something that was defamatory in that article, and somebody was defamed, that person could sue me, but they could also sue The New York Times. Oh, the social media side said, we cannot hire lawyers to look at every post and call the people and check on it, when, you know, on Facebook or Instagram. So if this industry is gonna function, we need to be able to not be liable for what is published on our site.

And that is called section 230 of the Communications Act. Congress said, if you are just a platform, a mere platform, that, for other people to publish, like Facebook is, like Instagram, like Twitter, or the X, that you you're immune. Nobody can sue you. They can sue the person who wrote the post, but they can't sue Facebook. So for Mark Zuckerberg said, if they take away our Facebook, our section 230 immunity, it is existential, meaning we will no longer exist.

And so they were terrified because congress was actually considering removing section 230 immunity. And the White House was telling them, if you don't censor our political critics, we're gonna take away your section 30 2 30 immunity. If president Trump did that, the democrats would go berserk. Well, that's criminal behavior. If I mean does that, it's a criminal.

Right. They're they're violating the the first amendment, the constitution for starters. Yeah. And, so that's what happened. And, you know, my my idea is that if somebody does something bad, it shouldn't matter whether they're Democrat or Republican.

I agree. It is, you know, we should all be going after them, and we should be going after them as a society. How much does it cost you to use the Internet? Well, it's free. Right?

Google's free. Facebook is free. Instagram, totally free. That's what you've been convinced of, but it's a trick. None of it is free.

In fact, you're paying with your data. Everything you do online can be seen and sold, not just to companies, but to governments, including foreign governments and often is. So how do you reclaim your online privacy? It's important. Well, there is one way.

It's called encryption. Strong encryption protects your right to privacy online and defends you from your many potential enemies online, including your own government. And it gives you back the freedom to read what you want, to write what you want without prying eyes spying on you. So how do you get this freedom through encryption? I'll tell you how we do it.

ExpressVPN. ExpressVPN reroutes 100% of our online activity through secure encrypted servers. Now normally, if we didn't use it, Internet providers would be able to read and see everything that we do online. In the United States, they could even sell it as we said. But because we use ExpressVPN, they can't see any of it.

0% approximately. We also use it when we travel abroad because that same encryption shuts out hackers who might try and steal what we're doing. Things like passwords or credit card details over sketchy Wi Fi. Free Wi Fi, that's not free either. It also shuts out foreign governments that might try and spy on us or censor what we're doing online.

What we especially like about ExpressVPN is they're not a black box that promises privacy and tech solutions. We have to trust them. They've actually opened up their servers to professional auditors at PwC and KPMG, as well as independent security experts to evaluate the claims they're making about what they're doing, their privacy policy and their trusted server technology. So people are watching them. So it's a carefully designed server architecture that runs on volatile memory only.

That means it never stores user data because it cannot store user data. It's impossible. It's private by design. They couldn't keep your stuff if they wanted to. So in a world where it seems like every corporation wants more and more of your private information to sell and manipulate, it's nice to find a company that actually goes the extra mile to protect it.

That's their business, protecting your privacy. So if you want freedom online and freedom means privacy, there's never been a better time to get it through ExpressVPN. You can use our special link to get 3 extra months of ExpressVPN for free at expressvpn.com/tucker. That's express, expressvpn.com/tucker. What I don't understand, and it is baffling to me having known a lot of Democrats, but you've been in that world your whole life.

Like, how do they not see that? How do people who say they believe in civil liberties suddenly think it's okay for the government to prosecute its political opponents and silence them? How do they think that? You know, to me, it's a it's a I've I've thought a lot about that. I bet.

And it's about, it's about tribalism you know, that people put themselves in these tribal categories, and and we're hardwired for tribalism. That's why orthodoxies are so popular that, you know, people get sucked into various kind of orthodoxies, whether it's ideological orthodoxies or religious orthodoxies. And and that impulse is really it's not a religious impulse, it's a biological impulse. And it's an impulse that's hardwired in us from the 20,000 generations we've spent wandering the African savannah and tiny little groups that were warring each other where there was always a male leader, where at where, you know, the women were traded as chattels because you couldn't marry your sisters. So there you knew from the beginning she was gonna be a trade good, and you were gonna trade her for somebody else.

She wasn't had no power. And, and where you all had to ascribe to an orthodoxy, no problems with people who were within your your in group, and people who are outside were subhuman, and they could be killed. And if they made a mistake, you know, you wanted to talk about it. Everybody would talk about it. We're all hardwired that way because that's where our, you know, our our wiring comes from.

And when somebody gets subsumed in an orthodoxy, it's very very difficult to unravel. And and there are all kinds of psychiatric treatises about how do you deprogram somebody, you know, how do you how do you talk somebody out of an orthodoxy? And and, you know, what I the little that I know about it is that if you challenge them directly, you challenge their belief, it it pours concrete on it, and it makes them less able to move off that, or they they get very defensive and that, you know, the way to approach them there are ways to approach them. There's deprogramming, protocols, and they usually include a lot of Socratic method of asking them questions about their belief. But it's a 1 on 1, it's a 1 on 1 project enterprise, and it's not something that you can do with the whole Democratic party overnight.

Something has to happen that's gonna make this, you know, this, this tribal thinking unravel because it's really destroying our country. And the polarization, which is happening on both sides, is, is put on steroids by these social media algorithms that, that reward people for staying on the site as long as possible. So the algorithm all the algorithm knows is I've gotta keep as many eyeballs on the site as possible. It turns out why that the way people stay on the site is if you fortify their existing opinions. Of course.

If you feed them if you feed them information that consolidates their worldview. Yes. And so, you know, we have this problem now where it's not just polarization like the civil war, but it's polarization on steroids because you've got machines that are that are manipulating us to hate each other more every single day. So knowing all this as you do and have for a long time, the, you know, the most radical step you can make if you're a democrat is endorsing Donald Trump. So there are political calculations involved.

There are ideological calculations, but there are also, of course, personal calculations. How so you know once you do that, you've burned your boats. Like, that's it. You're not going back to wherever you were 10 years ago. How hard a decision was that for you personally?

It it was a very good it was an obvious decision for me. It should have been. But it was a very, very difficult decision. And we had, you know, I have a very, very good team around me. And, I was most worried about my wife, who was, about Sheryl, who, you know, who, you know, was not comfortable with it.

She is a, you know, a lifelong Democrat. She comes from, she's not the aristocracy, she comes from a very, you know, I would say poor family in North Florida. But she found her way through, through idealism to the Democratic Party, and that, and she shares a lot of those values. And her industry is very, very much aligned with the Democratic Party, probably more than any industry in our country, and more than any, town in our country. So this, for me was likely to have huge impacts on her.

And ultimately, if she had told me, you can't do this, I wouldn't have done it. So, but I'm very I'm very grateful that she overcame. She allowed me to do it. She was not embracing it, but she said, I understand why you have to do this. And, her and we had a a 4 day meeting, and up in Hyannis, it's important my home where kind of everybody, my family members, my kids, many other people, Tony Robbins, attended remotely, and a number of other kind of spiritual leaders, just people who care deeply about our country, chimed in and and made case on both sides, and people from the campaign organization did.

Here was a calculus that ultimately was persuasive for me. My, if I all of our internal polling showed from the outset, and if I say it in the Democratic party, I was going to get, president, Vice President Harris elected. 57 to 60% and even more, sometimes up to 66% of my voters. So my followers said that if I withdrew from the election, they were gonna vote for Trump, which is ironic, by the way, Tucker, because president Trump and the RNC did nothing to prevent me from being on the ballots. They didn't have a a big major organization sending private privatized out.

You know, I, the Democratic party, was interviewing literally everybody I've ever met in 70 years to to collect dirt on me. I I got a call They've been doing that, I I know for a fact, for over a year, as you know. Yeah. And they had her they were open about it. This is what we're gonna do.

They put a person in charge of it named Liz Smith, who's, you know, who's that's the kind of person she is. She this is what she does. She does negative research on people and tries to characterize Elizabeth Elliott Spitzer's old girlfriend? Yes. Oh.

And she was in charge of that team. And then there was other people as well, Mary Beth Cahill had been my uncle, Teddy Sheeb of Staff, who I know. And Liz Smith was in charge of the, you know, the negative research, or what they call negative research euphemistically. And I got calls from, you know, for example, a guy that I met at an AA meeting 40 years ago, and he received a call. Most of my family members received calls, contacts, either text or telephone calls from people who said, I'm doing intelligence for the DNC, and, you know, we'd like to talk to you about Robert Kennedy, and if you have any negative information about him.

So I was getting that. You know, I What could possibly be the justification for that? Well, they didn't want me running, and that's the thing is it's not democratic. It wasn't, you know That's such a mafia tactic. Yeah.

Yeah. So, I mean but the point is, it was weird. It was it was not smart because I was actually helping the democrats, and if they just let me stay in and they didn't run this campaign up against me, they probably would win this election. And because I was hurting Trump, oddly, Trump didn't do anything about it. He's, you know, he was kind of, he made a couple of statements about me that I was a communist, etcetera.

They were sort of good natured, you know, the stuff that you you're like, okay. That's okay. They weren't, like, calling my old girlfriend saying, you know, what, you know, what did he do? Or, you know, whatever. They were asking him.

So, but the DNC was up to that. And and were you shocked by that? Was I shocked? I don't know. I mean, I was I'm I feel like I'm I'm in a place now and nothing surprises me.

I bet you are. So but, I don't know. I mean, anyway They're gonna drop all that stuff now, obviously. Right? What?

Are they gonna get rid of Liz Smith and put her on some other project? I don't know. I just you sort of wonder how does Liz Smith live with her I mean, that's so repulsive. Like, how does she justify that to herself? I have to I mean, and I I met her.

She's not stupid. But it that is disgusting. No. The I mean, you've lived a life famously, and if you have a team of researchers digging into it And I have not led a careful life, by the way. Well, I mean, I know.

I said, you know, my first my first I'm on during my announcement speech, I said, you know, I I had told my wife to told Cheryl this a couple days before, I said, I have so many skeletons in my closet that if they could vote, I I could run for king of the world. Oh, I know I know stuff's gonna come out about me because I led, let me put it, a colorful life. Yeah. And, and you know, people have all kinds of stories about me, but so I was I'm ready for, you know, I'm ready for I I was I never done anything criminal in terms of, like, stealing money or self enrichment. I did a lot of stupid stuff and a lot of Have you gotten rich off pointless foreign wars?

No. I have not done that yet. Oh, you haven't? Okay. You haven't forced people to inject substances in their bodies?

Okay. No. I've not never done any of that. But anyway, so it became clear to me that if if Kamala got elected, the issues that I cared about, which is ending the foreign wars, you know, the the unjust wars, immoral wars, the wars of joys like Ukraine, stopping the censorship, which I think is existential for our democracy, and then protecting children from this extraordinary exploding chronic disease epidemic. Those are the three reasons that got me into the campaign.

That's why I ran for president. Those are the three reasons. And if she got elected, I'm 70 years old, that 8 years from now our kids are gonna be lost. And that and if she's president for 8 years, my chance to do anything about it would be gone. Yes.

And that and then I got a contact from Cali Means, who you know well. Yes. You've, you know, made one of the best Oh, this morning. One of the best shows, ever put on TV, ever aired, was your interview with Cali and his wife. Casey, and Cali, for those of you who haven't seen the show, his his show is a, is an expert, a genius, brilliant, articulate, eloquent, and incredible encyclopedic knowledge on the food system, and what is corrupting it, what is causing the corruption at FDA, at that actually profit on the sick children.

One of the things that Cali said, the the the capture of those agencies, by the processed food industry, by the chemical industry, by the pharmaceutical industry, that actually profit on the sick children. One of the things that Cali says, there is nothing more profitable in our society today than a sick child because it all of these entities are making money out of them. The insurance companies, the hospitals, the medical cartel, the pharmaceutical companies have lifetime annuities. I mean, any child that and the earlier that kid is sick, they don't wanna kill them. They want them sick for the rest of their lives.

And we have now a whole generation when my uncle is present. 6% of Americans had chronic disease today at 60%. When my uncle was president, do you know what the the, the cause the annual cause of treating chronic disease was in this country? 0. There weren't even any drugs invented for it.

0. Today it's about $4,300,000,000,000. When your uncle was president And none of it is necessary. What what was the autism rate in 1960? Do we know?

In 1960, the autism rate there's about 4, 5 studies, and the highest rates say about 1 in 2,500, 1 in 1500, 1 in 2,500, 1 in 10,000. So that, you know, it was it was somewhere between 1510110,000. Today, it's 1 in every 34 kids according to the CDC. And in some states, like California, I think maybe Utah and New Jersey, 1 in 22. 1 in 22 kids, and, you know, these kids should be healthy.

These kids shouldn't be our our highest performing kids, and they instead are are, you know, have this extraordinary disability that's gonna keep them dependent, and not, you know, a lot of these with your full blown autism, you know, it's a nonverbal, non toilet trained, head banging, stimming, toe walking. These are kids that will never throw a baseball, will never graduate high school, they'll never go out, take a girl on a date, they'll never use the toilet alone, they'll, they'll never write a play, they'll never write a poem, they'll never vote. Never have children. Never pay taxes. Here's something you may not have known.

Back in 2015, the Congress of the United States repealed something called the country of origin labeling act. Now why is this relevant to you? Well, it means among other things that when you buy beef at the supermarket that says made in the USA, it may not actually be. In fact, it could be, likely is, from a foreign country. It means that repackaging foreign meat can be enough to get the made in USA designation.

It's a lie. It's an absolute lie. Most people don't even know what's happening. So how can you be sure that the meat you're eating is from the United States and has been raised with the highest quality standards and is the tastiest? It's truly made here.

Well, it's simple. You can go to our friends at Merriweather Farms. Merriweather Farms is an American small business. It's based in Riverton, Wyoming. We know the people who run it and they're great people.

And they have great meat. They ship the highest quality meat raised free from growth hormones and antibiotics directly to your doorstep. It's delicious. We eat it a lot, including at this table. These are Americans.

These are American made products. And because they're cutting out the grocery store middlemen, their prices are actually cheaper, 10 to 30% cheaper for the best meat. They are the real deal. Again, we eat that meat at this table from Riverton, Wyoming. They're the best.

Meriwetherfarms.com. Use the discount code Tucker 10 and you get an extra 10% off. Again, that's meriwetherfarmsmeriwetherfarms.com. It's worth it. So that just seems like such an emergency.

For me, yeah, for me, that like, if I could save 1 of these kids, it would be worth giving my life for it. I'm 70 years old. To save 1 kid at birth, it would be worth dying for. And to the opportunity and and need for me to save all of these kids, I would do anything for her. I would literally do anything for her.

When you're talking about breakfast, I'm sure your perception is different because we're talking about you. But, you know, for 15 years anyway, there was not a single story about you that didn't dismiss you as a dangerous crackpot for questioning why autism is much more common than it once was. Much more. I mean, exponentially more common. And you've written a lot about this, and you were attacked.

I don't see those attacks very much anymore. Well, they're still in the mainstream media. That's still part of the, you know, the litany of of of my crimes. But, you know, anybody who uses their hand any of and they and that's one of the reasons they won't let me speak on the media. I mean, when when Ross Perot ran, he he was running for 10 months.

He was on mainstream media 34 times interviews, and you remember him. He was on it seemed like he was on Larry King every week. Of course. But and I got in 16 months, I had 2 live interviews on all of those networks, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC too. And and they and, you know, they're just basically mouthpieces now for the DNC.

And there was this obligatory litany of defamations and pejoratives that were used to describe me anytime I mentioned my name was mentioned, you know, that I was not a crackpot. And, you know, I was like a supervillain. And I'm not complaining because that's that's just, you know, I I knew what I was getting into. But anyway, the idea that, you know, I had these meetings with president Trump, and they were partly because of you. You know, you were the one who Callie Mains called me about, I'd say, 3 hours after president Trump was shot.

Callie Main's call although it doesn't seem possible because, but I think it was only 3 hours after his shooting. And It was Saturday night. Yeah. Saturday night. And and and Cali Maine said to me, you know, he told me Cali had been advising me for a long time and my campaign.

He told me that night, I've also been, I've been advising president Trump, which delighted me because I thought, oh my gosh, there's another candidate beside me that is is listening to the truth. And, he said that, that there was interest in the Trump campaign by the president of of including me at the end. He talked about vice president, which I wasn't interested in. And but he said, you know, would you be interested in talking with Trump, with president Trump? And I said, I don't think so.

And then and part of this was I just thought it was a nonstarter with Cheryl. And I called Cheryl up, and she, said to me, you should hear them out. And so I immediately called Cali. I texted Cali back and said, I'm interested. And then I got a text from you, and you and I have each other's cell phones.

And you had an unknown cell phone number, which you had linked me into, which was president Trump's number, and you said, you know, he's waiting for your call. And so I called him that night. I had a great conversation with him, and then, he and he asked well, we decided to talk, and I met him the next day. He was at that point at, Bedminster, which is his golf course and home in New Jersey. And he had he had driven there from Butler, where he had been shot.

And then I went to, and so I flew out to mini Minneapolis the next day, and I had a, probably a 2 hour meeting with him and Amarillo, who's my daughter-in-law, who is running my campaign, the smartest person I've ever met, and Cheryl, and Susie Wiles. And it was a really interesting meeting because he was so open about, about, first of all, not liking the neocons. Yeah. And, you know, I never imagined that because I you know, for me, he was the guy who brought John Bolton and Mike Pompeo into office and, you know, but he was really disillusioned with them, to say the least, you know. And then, you know, he was he was deeply interested and and well informed as he is on any, you know, as as much as he is on any subject, about what's what's happening to our kids, chronic disease.

And then he was absolutely adamant about stopping the censorship and, you know, and making sure that we had free speech. And so we talked a little then and, didn't really come to any, you know, talked about the possibility of working together. After that, and then but then we we put it on hold, they wanted me to do something at the convention. I said, no, I'm not gonna do that. And we still, at that point, there was still a chance that I could get into the debate.

That chance was diminishing. And because I was not allowed on any media, and because, and you know, my really my only chance of winning the election, I believe I would have won if I had gotten on the debate stage. But my only chance was to get on the debate stage. And it was that was that, possibility was vanishing. And, so I was looking at kind of my options.

I then contacted Harris's campaign because I thought I should talk to them and see if they're interested in any of these issues, which I suspected they were not because a camel then was still an empty, you know, an empty slate. Kamala, excuse me, was empty slate. So, you know She pronounced it both ways herself, so it's okay. It's it's, you know, I I wanna I wanna respect people and give them Yes. You know?

So I I reached out to her, and I reached out to a number of people who who including some relatives of mine who are very, very close to her personally into the democratic party, and they just said that's a non sorry. You there's no way in the world that she's gonna talk to you. And they said, we can we can get you a meeting with a low level campaign official. And I said, okay. I'm I'm not interested in that.

Why wouldn't it's it's interesting. Why wouldn't Kamala Harris meet with you? Maybe the same reason that she hasn't given an interview. You know, I think it seems to me that there's a lot of handlers involved and that and, you know, even when you talk to Democrats about, you know, do you really think it's a good idea to be, electing somebody who cannot give an interview? They say, well, you're not electing her.

You're electing the people around her. You're electing the apparatus. And the apparatus, but the apparatus, the apparatus I don't have any faith in. It's an apparatus running that are neons like, you know, like Anthony Blinken, and, and who are, you know, running us right up into a world war 3. And there are people who, you know, who mastermind the censorship from inside the White House.

That's the apparatus that they wanna reelect. And to me, that's an apparatus that has no these are the people who are censoring me. These are the people who try to throw me out of the party, who canceled the primaries. That's the apparatus. You know, if it was a Democrat who said I can think on my own, I understand what this country is supposed to look like.

I understand what what democracy is supposed to look like. And I, you know, and I think that's great. Great. Let's do that. But it's just it's strange from her perspective.

First of all, electing the apparatus is not how democracy works. That's an oligarchy, just in point of fact. But as a political calculation, your presence in the race running third party hurt Trump, no one disputes that. The polling's really clear on that. So if you're the Harris campaign, kind of a win, right, to get some alignment with you.

Why even human curiosity, you'd think, would compel her to wanna meet with you. Like, take a meeting. Like, why do you care? But she didn't even talk to you. I think that's I think it's very weird.

It's weird, but not I mean, I can't stress this. Not not being able to give an interview. I mean, your your whole life is in public life. That's what you do. That is the currency.

Right. I give I I give you know, this day is a really solid day because I'm doing one interview with you. On a typical day, I do about 7 or 8 interviews, some days, 10 or 12. And I do that every day, and I've done that for 16 months. I if anybody wants to go I mean, we have a list now, 4,000 people wanna interview me, but we're I'm interviewing as many people as possible.

So I wanna get my voice out, my vision out, my concerns out, and I it's incomprehensible to me that you would be in public life, and and president Trump does the same thing. He's not scared of an interview. No. He likes it. It's Theoban.

Yeah. He's on you. He's on he does anybody. He does people who don't agree with him. He's not he's he's not censoring you.

No. He he's doing, you know, he's talking to reporters who write crappy articles about him all the time, you know, from from New York Magazine. Maggie Haberman at the New York Times. New York Maggie Haberman has never written a nice word about Donald Trump, and he talks to her how often? A lot.

Yeah. A lot. So, you know, it's and, you know, my uncle Teddy, who was exactly opposite of Ronald Reagan ideologically. And he ran against Carter. Yeah.

Teddy did. And and Carter and he had an antipathy toward each other that was almost, you know, like nothing I'd ever seen. Teddy really Teddy didn't hate people, but he really, I would say, loathed Carter. He just had he had complete disdain for him. And I and he then like he liked Reagan.

And because I was more ideologically aligned at that point, I was I'd say to him, you know, why do you like Reagan? And he said, because even though I don't agree with anything he said, he was able to invigorate our country. He was able to inspire people. He got people excited about his vision and proud to be Americans. And that is one of the functions of a president.

It's to it's to explain to us why we should be proud of each other, and why we're part of a community, and why our country is great, and, you know, what our future is gonna look like, and get us and and, you know, inspire all of us with that vision. And and that is what a real leader does. How in the world can you do that if you cannot give an interview to a to a a news worker? To a friendly news worker. To a friendly news they can't even do a setup interview in 40 days.

I saw the the only interview she did that was unscripted was when she got off a plane, I think it was at Andrews Air Force Base, and and so there was a reporter waiting there that, you know, with one question, when are you gonna do an interview? And she said, I've told my team that to try to get one done before September. This was the 3rd August, and I'm doing I'm doing, you know, 7 or 8 interviews a day. Tells you a lot. And I'm but I'm and I'm not, you know, blowing my own horn or anything.

I'm just saying that's what you do if you're in public life. And what what's the point of being in public life if you don't wanna promote your vision? If you don't wanna inspire people. Yeah. Well, that I mean, so, it I'm sure this is a sensitive subject, but I can't help but notice that you ran for 15 months with no secret service protection at all.

You were denied that by the Biden administration. Trump, during the convention in Milwaukee last month, noted that in public. They immediately, under pressure, respond and give you secret service protection. Now they've withdrawn it. You're without it again.

Yeah. Is that true? Yes. Meanwhile, Tony Fauci has it. He's not a federal employee anymore.

I think Mike Pompeo has secret service protection, former CIA director, but you don't. How is that? I think the, you know, I'm technically still running for president. I'm running for president in 30 state, 40 states. So, I'm not, you know, I did not, I did not terminate my my campaign.

Did you know this? No. I didn't. Yeah. So, you know, I'm running in the I there there's there's 10 states where I heard president Trump, and there are battleground states.

Oh, I've taken my name off the ballot in those 10 states. But in the blue states, all blue states, all red states, I'm on the ballot. And I could technically win a contingency election if the other 2 vote, you know, and and they if the other 2 get 269 apiece. And, and then congress cannot work out a compromise, which is entirely possible. They have to go to the 3rd vote getter, which would be me, and that's why I left my name on the ballot in those states.

And so, you know, that's highly unlikely to happen, but it has happened twice before in American history. And actually, in our polling now shows them at exactly 269 to 269. Oh, it is possible that it would happen in this So campaign. So I so the and I you know, we worked this out with the Trump campaign. They only wanted us off in 10 states, because that's the states where you heard them.

And the other states, people can vote for me, I'm re and I and they're not gonna hurt their candidate. They they can vote for me even if they like president vice president Harris, and without hurting her, and they can vote for me if they like president Trump without hurting him because we already know what's gonna happen in those states. Yes. Well, I'm, I'm So all the more reason that you should have what Tony Fauci has and what Mike Pompeo has and a lot of other, by the way, noncurrent federal employees have, which is government bodyguards. But they withdrew them immediately from you.

So what's the message of that? Well, the message I think is a bad message, which is that our, our federal enforcement agencies have been weaponized against the American people. I mean, again, politically weaponized politically, not against the American people, but politically. When my father took office in the Justice Department, and my father was appointed a US attorney general in 1961 by my uncle, his brother. And my father, the 1st week in office, he had run my uncle's campaign so he's a political guy.

He called together all the division chairs, all the branch chiefs in the DOJ, and he made us into his big cavernous office. And he said to them, we're gonna make one rule here, which is there's no politics. We never ask whether a potential defendant is democrat or republican. The people of this country have to know that their enforcement institutions, the Department of Justice, are, are are the justice is blind here. We are, free of any kind of political prejudice or by or bias or favoritism.

And they started putting in jail. He prosecuted my uncle on my mother's side, for antitrust violation. He prosecuted friends of his, friends of his father's, who father did not want him to prosecute. And they just said, it doesn't matter. We've gotta we've gotta apply it even handedly because the American people need to understand that their institutions are are are free.

We need to respect them and know that they're not biased in one way. And we're losing that now in our country. And the Biden administration has really accelerated at the most the most shocking thing to me. And Democrats can't even hear this story because it touches so many sort of culture war buttons, but it's it's a true story. People need to understand it and appreciate it.

In the 2020 election, when, there was a 100 buttons laptop a week before the and we only know this this whole story recently because of a release of documents. But the when president Biden's, the 100 on Biden's laptop suddenly became an issue about a week before the debate. And Anthony Blinken, who is now the secretary of the state, and who was then the director of president Biden's campaign, went to Gina Haspel, who is the head of this director of the CIA, and and said to her, we need help with this. She then got 51 CIA, current and former CIA officers to sign a public letter, which they published, I think, in the New York Times, but they published it somewhere that, that said that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian hoax. That was part of a Russian disinformation effort to tamper with the, with the presidential election campaign.

So you had a the CIA, which is forbidden by its charter from involving itself in any American politics. And you had 51 top officers, former and current, who now do a disinformation campaign against the American public to tamper with the election, while accusing the Russians of tampering with the election. And then a week later, president Biden, when he's asked about his laptop on the debate, he says that has been debunked by the CIA, by the CIA officers. And that was the end of the issue because it was debunked. All the newspapers picked that up, and it's highly likely that that had an impact on the election.

So, you know, we that that was the entree of president Biden getting into office. And again, you know, Democrats who hear me say this story are gonna say, oh, he's just saying that because, you know, he's a republican now. Right? Which I'm not, but he that's what they're gonna say. But it's not that.

It's just that this was wrong. The big tech companies censor our content. I hate to tell you that it's still going on in 2024, but you know what they can't censor? Live events. And that's why we are hitting the road on a fall tour for the entire month of September, coast to coast.

We will be in cities across the United States. We'll be in Phoenix with Russell Brand, Anaheim, California with Vivek Ramaswami, Colorado Springs with Tulsi Gabbard, Salt Lake City with Glenn Beck, Tulsa, Oklahoma with Dan Bongino, Kansas City with Megyn Kelly, Wichita with Charlie Kirk, Milwaukee with Larry Elder, Rosenberg, Texas with Jesse Kelly, Grand Rapids with Kid Rock, Hershey, Pennsylvania with JD Vance, Reading, Pennsylvania with Alex Jones, Fort Worth, Texas with Roseanne Barr, Greenville, South Carolina with Marjorie Taylor Greene, Sunrise, Florida with John Rich, Jacksonville, Florida with Donald Trump Junior. You can get tickets at Tucker Carlson dotcom. Hope to see you there. So the CA I mean, a lot of roads lead back, unfortunately, to our most powerful intelligence agency.

Would if you were asked, would you run it? Would you become CA director if you were asked? I would never get, yes, I would. But I would never get senate confirmation. As you know, the the intelligence agency, are protected by, by very, very powerful committees in the senate and in the house that are already into the project.

And the people who serve on those committees are, are are people who would, you know, they would not they they would they're they're safeguarding that directorship, and I would be very, very dangerous for those those committees. So I don't think that And yet in his, in, you know, in your joint, appearance on Friday, president Trump introduced you by saying that he plans to, if elected, establish a commission to declassify the remaining documents surrounding your uncle's murder in 1963. Yeah. And I and I think everyone at this point knows the truth, which is the CIA is implicated in that. Those documents protect CIA, maybe among others.

Well, whether they do or not, I mean, it's odd that they've not allowed them to be released because What could possibly be the explanation? More than 60 years after my uncle's death, almost 65 years. Oh, 62 years after his death. And there's none of the people who were implicated in that crime are alive now. Yes.

And the last ones have died off in the last year or 2. And so it clearly is an, to protect the institution. Yes. And that's wrong. It's just wrong.

And it's it's wrong for a Democrat, and it's wrong for Republicans. It's just interesting though that a bipartisan list of presidents, lo these these 6 decades, have kept those files classified. Well, you and I have both I was astonished that Trump, didn't declassify him because he promised it during the campaign. That was Mike Pompeo who did that. Yeah.

And that and that I talked to president Trump for the first time about that this week. And What'd he say? He said that, he said that Mike Pompeo begged him to, and I don't think I'm telling tales out of school here. No. I'm fine.

He told the same thing to you. That's true. But he said Mike Pompeo called him and said, this wouldn't be a catastrophe to release these. You need to not do it. And then, you know I wanna say again, I think Mike Pompeo is a criminal, so that's my view.

He threatened to sue me for saying that, but I hope he will because it's true. But that that kind of tells the whole story right there. Right? That the CIA is Oh, yeah. So that's the Why would the CIA be trying to keep these files classified if they had nothing to do with the murder?

I don't really get that. Yeah. And but the subject we were talking about was the weaponization of the federal agency, and that's just one of them. And then then they get, you know, then they open up these censorship portals, the 37 hours after president Biden takes office, where now you have the FBI involved in American politics, and, you know, which we ran them out in the sixties, you know, because we were outraged that they were even they were bugging Martin Luther King and the Black Panther Party. And Americans were indignant about that.

Why are they think this I mean, why are we have we gotten to the point where it's so normalized, and now we're okay with the FBI running a portal to censor political speech in our country, and then inviting in the CIA and the SAISA and the IRS. I don't know what they were doing in there. I think they did. NIH and, you know, CDC and all these other agencies, DHS, which all had a hand in censoring American speech. So that was another thing.

And then the use, you know, which we saw for the first time in American history of the of the judiciary, to to, to get rid of candidates. You know, what they tried to do to me, they're suing me now in a dozen states. I've had I've been in trials for the past 3 weeks. You know, I've I've spent most of my time not campaigning, but being sitting in court, in cases that are trying to get me off the ballot. So, like, I had a 1000000 people, 1000000 American citizens sign petitions more than any candidate in history.

Everybody said, I'd never do this. They impossibly be in the ballot in 50 states. Well, guess what? We got on the ballot in 50 states. And we did it by getting a 1000000 citizens to sign petitions saying that they wanted to vote for me.

And the democratic party now is suing me in all those states to make sure that those people cannot vote for the person they wanted. When I was growing up, the democratic party was of RFK and and JFK was the party that was fighting for voting rights. It was fighting to make sure that every American could vote for the candidate of their choice no matter whether black or white or where they lived or Democrat or Republican. Now the Democratic party, today's Democratic party, feels so unconfident about the candidates that it's putting forward. And it feels the only way it can win the election is by getting rid of the opponents.

And, and you know, either using the courts against president Trump to lock him in jail and to embarrass and humiliate and discredit him, or using the courts against me to, just to throw me off the ballot even though the voters, you know, New York's aide, I had to get 45,000 ballot signatures in 13 congressional districts. I got I got a 137,000 in all, 26 congressional districts. I did twice when anybody wants, and we did it easily because people wanted to see money on ballot, New Yorkers wanted to see me on the ballot. Why is the Democratic Party suing me in frivolous cases? I spent a whole week in in in a trial for that case, for 2 cases they brought, and another week in another trial, for another case.

You had to pay for this? It's causing me $10,000,000 to defend myself. But on what grounds are they suing you? Like you don't have they don't like you, so you don't have a right to be in the ballot or what what what? In New York state, they're suing me by they they can't challenge our signatures because we got 5 times as many signatures as we required.

So that, you know, normally what they were doing in the first states, they're taking our signatures, and they were calling everybody. They can get their numbers, and they can get their, you know, cell phones, etcetera. And we're contacting everybody who's signet and trying to talk them out of it. Trying to say to get them to say, you know, you're hurting democracy, and, you know, you should, you know, weren't you fooled when you did this to try to get they they never succeeded. They're they're in New York state, they're suing me because they say that I did not I don't live in New York state.

So I have 3 residences. 1 is in New York, one is in my home in Massachusetts, which, you know, is part of my family compound that we've owned for, you know, a 100 years. And, and then in California, where I live with Charlotte, so I moved with Charlotte, California in 2014, so 10 years ago. And I lived in New York all of my life. I lived there since I was 10.

My father ran for senate there and was the senator. I moved there when I was 10. I've only voted in New York. I've always considered myself a New York resident. I've lived in the same town for 40 years in Bedford.

I've lived in 13 different residents in that town at various times. And but I always wanted to stay there. And when I moved out west with Cheryl, I made an agreement with her that, you know, when she retires, we're going to come back to New York because I feel like I'm a New Yorker. I didn't want to vote in California because I don't know anything about the politics out there. I was raised in New York.

I know all the politics, all the politicians, And so, I wanted to vote. So I kept an address there. I voted that address. That's my only place I've ever voted. I, my car is registered there.

My driver's license is there. My law office is there, I pay income tax, almost all my intact income taxes from New York state. My law license is there. I don't have a law license in California. And, my hunting license is there, my fishing license Most importantly, yeah.

I have a falconry license there. So I have all my birds there, you know, I keep them there. And so, you know, but they're suing me saying I'm not a real New Yorker. I'm I'm, you know, I I contrive the address out of fraud, and it's a sham. And, here's the thing, is that I consulted a lawyer when I when we declared independent and began getting ballot signatures.

I consulted the best ballot access attorney in the country, Paul Rossi. And I said, I got these 3 different residences, which one do I put on the ballot? You have to put the same residence in all 50 states. So you can't choose another resident. You know, you can't I can't put California in one state and Massachusetts in another state, New York.

I have to tell the people, otherwise I'm lying to somebody, right? Right. So in a couple of states, for example, Maine, where we are right now, and in New Hampshire, those states say the only place you can put down as your domicile is the place where you vote. And in New Hampshire, I actually had to take an oath in front of a notary that I voted in New York because otherwise, I couldn't have put it down. So I had to put New York in every state because I had to put it in Maine and New Hampshire and a bunch of others because you have to put the place you vote.

Anyway, the DNC is suing me saying I defrauded the public because I really live in California. And and they got a, you know, they got a judge who was, you know, right out of the democratic machine, and who violated the constitution and every precedent to say, yeah, they're right. So, you know, I lost in the lower court, which is what happens. We're doing that. We're losing in these lower courts, and then we win the appeals.

There's a 100% chance I'll win in the appeal, but they don't care. Because it's gonna take me a while, and they get the headline saying he was thrown off for fraud. So these I mean, I I saw Kamala Harris just the other night, at her convention speech talk about how voting access is like a I know. While she was doing that, I was in court in New York, you know, trying to get on a ballot while she while that you know, in her or the entire The the John Lewis Voting Access Act were gonna get through. Everybody has a right to vote.

Yeah. It's not. Except for their opponents. So does this it feels to me like this is, you know, obviously, it's a big political story. You're endorsing Trump.

It's a big big change in your life as a lifelong Democrat, still a Democrat. But, it also feels like, as you said at the outset Well, I'm an independent out, so I registered as an independent when I ran. And when I talk with president Trump, the, you know, the thing that we talked about is that, I you know, that we were gonna do a unity government, with the independent, not not the kind of endorsements that a lot of people make. An endorsement like Abraham Lincoln's team of rivals, where we would be able to continue to differ publicly on issues, but that we would, on the issues that we agree on, that we were going to strive to get into government together in order to make sure that those issues are, you know, are, you know, are the priority for our country. And, you know, he was really good about that and about, you know, me being able to continue on there's some issues.

There's a lot of issues like the border where we agree, and, you know, censorship, the wars, the neocons, the, you know, forever wars, child health epidemics. Those are the most important issues. There's other issues that I do that I'm gonna disagree on with president Trump, but he was happy with that. And that's how our country ought to be. We ought to be able to So what is this realignment that you mentioned at the outset?

Because this does feel like Yes. It's bigger than just this November. Yeah. I mean, there's been a a series of these realignments throughout American history, and, you know, there there's history books that are written about the, you know, the the realignments. I think there's about 5 of them.

And, and one of those is clearly happening now because you you see, on so many issues, you know, that you've had an inversion. The the Democratic party has become the party of the elites. It used to be the party of the poor and the working class. In fact, there was a study that came out just recently that I saw that showed that 70% that the people who voted for Biden owned 70% of the wealth in this country. The people who voted for Trump owned 30%.

And, and so I believe that. Right? So you're seeing this realignment happen where the elites, you know, where Wall Street, or the big tech, big pharma, the big banking houses are all now Democratic, and that the, and that the working class, the middle class, the cops, the firefighters, Sean O'Brien, head of the team, you know, spoke Great guy. Yeah. A great guy.

Great, great guy. Really love him, but he spoke to the Democratic Convention. I mean, the Republican Convention rather than Democratic Convention. So you're seeing this just this bigger alignment, and even on environmental issues. It's so weird to me because the Democrats have been become subsumed in this carbon orthodox, and you and I have talked about this, that the only issue is carbon.

And what that's done is it's forced them to do something that you should never do if you're an environmentalist, which is to commoditize and quantify everything. So everything is measured by its carbon footprint, how many tons of carbon it produces. And, you know, you're basically, you're you're putting everything in that kind of box of of being able to quantify it and explain its value by, you know, by a numerically. And the reason that we protect the environment is just the opposite of that. The reason that we protect the environment is because there's a spiritual connection.

There's a, you know, there's a love that we have. We, you know, I got into the environment because, I I wanted, you know, this connection to the fishes and the birds and the wildlife and the and the whales, and, and the the Purple Mountain's majesty, and that you know, I understood it the way, you know, God talks to human beings through many factors, through each other, through organized religion, through the great prophets, through the wise people, the the great books of those religions. But nowhere was the kind of detail and texture and grace and joy as through creation. And when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine, understand who God is, and what our own potential is, and duties are as human beings. And that I I hope what you just said, by the way, is chopped up and put all over every social media platform in the world.

When we destroy nature, we degrade our own ability to experience the divine. Yeah. And that that, you know, it's not about quantifying stuff. That's what the devil does. He quantifies everything.

Right? And that is, you know, what he wants us doing. Put a number on it. And the reason we're preserving these things is not is because we love our children. You know?

And it's it's because we we get nature enriches us. Enriches us economically and spiritually and culturally and historically. It connects us to those 10000 generations of human beings that were here before there were laptops. And it, you know, and it connects us to the the most important spiritual lesson. Every every all of the organized religions in, you know, that that we know of today, the central revelation of every one of those religions always occurred in the wilderness.

You know, Moses had to go into the wilderness to, to to listen to to hear God's voice and see the burning bush. He had to go to the wilderness of Mount Sinai to get the commandments. Muhammad had to, who was a city boy from Mecca, had to go to the wilderness of Mount Harrah on a camping trip with his kids and wrestle the angel Gabriel in the middle of the night to have the first stanzas of the of the Quran squeeze from him. Buddha had to go into the wilderness to sit under the, you know, and wander for years, and then sit under the Bodhgaya tree to get his first revelation of Nirvana. And Christ had to spend 40 days in the wilderness to discover his divinity for the first time.

And his mentor was John the Baptist, who lived in a cave in the Jordan Valley and ate honey of wild bees and locusts. And, you know, and then all of Christ's parables come from nature. I'm in the vine, you are the branches, the mustard seed, the little swallows, the scattering of seeds on the fallow ground. Because that is where we sense the divine. God talks to us through the fishes, the birds, the leaves, they're all, you know, words from our creator.

And that is why we preserve nature. Yes. It's not because of the, you know, it's not because the, you know, the quantity of carbon. And by the way, I feel what you said so deeply, I can hardly even express it. And thank you for saying that.

And by the way, we, the best thing that you can do for climate is to is to restore the soils. The soils are the solution to everything. The soil will absorb all that carbon. If, you know, if and it'll absorb the water, it'll stop the flooding, it'll give us healthy food, and that's what our national policy has to be. It has to be restoring the soil.

And that is, you know, everybody listen, If you talk if you wanna unite America and talk about these things, talk about the fishes, the birds, the wildlife, and just talk about ending mountaintop removal mining, Talk about ending the mountain cutting here. Talk about getting rid of, you know, the democrats are putting these offshore wind farms that are exterminating the whales. I know. Most of us got into this because of the whales, and they're about to extinguish the right whales, the last ones on earth, because with these monstrosities that are, you know, that are costing us 3 times the amount, we don't need them. They cost 33¢ a kilowatt hour when you can get onshore wind for 10¢ a kilowatt hour.

And who's making the money? Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, foreign governments. And the other thing that they're funding, 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars. This is what they're calling this is what climate has turned into. It's these climate capture pipelines and are wreaking havoc with the agricultural lands across the Midwest, stealing people's property rights with, you know, eminent domain.

And who's making the money? BlackRock. And it's a useless technology that does not work. It's just all a boondoggle. And that's what's become the environmental movement in this country.

And if you depart from that orthodoxy, you're expelled from it. If you if you wanna make Americans fight each other, talk about carbon. If you wanna bring Americans together, talk about habitat protection. Yeah. I know that.

And you know It's a little weird for I mean, you literally spent your life with river keepers as a environmentalist, environmental lawyer in the environmental movement. I mean, that that that's that's your life work product. Or have you been expelled from the movement? Pretty much. Yeah.

You know, the weird thing is I think of you as a radical environmentalist. Well, I definitely am. Yeah. I you are. I haven't showered inside in 10 years.

Yeah. Yeah. No. I feel it so strong like it. Also, you know, you love nature, you're against these big projects that are are destroying it.

And, you know, you you talk about toxics, and the environmental movement no longer talks about toxics anymore. They don't care about it. They don't care that we're mass poisoning our children. It's so weird to me, and a, and, you know, I saw you, I for for 40 years, I've been fighting to get against endocrine disruptors. Endocrine disruptors are a class of chemicals that chain they they alter us hormonally, and they change our our they can change sexual conduct, they can change sexual development, they can affect fertility, and we've already lost 50% of our sperm count.

You know, we're having, girls in this country that are achieving puberty on average between 10 13 years old. That's 6 years less younger than they were, you know, 80 years ago. We we we have the lowest puberty levels on any continent in the world here because we're just bombarding our children with endocrine disruptors. And at you know, there are there are chemicals like PCBs, olechlorinated Biphenol to atrazine, which can turn male frogs into females and produce fertile eggs. That's how potent they are as an endocrine disruptor, and it's in 63% of our water supply.

PCBs, which I've been fighting since the day I became an environmental lawyer, and getting them out of the Hudson. So and and for 40 years, I've been trying to get Republicans to talk about it. I talked Roger Eells all the time with both of us now, who, who would let me occasionally onto Fox News to talk about it. But there was so much hostility from the Republican party because it was like you're attacking corporate profit taking, and that these are chemicals, they're molecules, who cares? You know, they can't hurt you.

And there was just And then you do this incredible show on endocrine disruptors. And I'm like, oh my god, Tucker Carlson has just done the best show that's ever been done, showing, you know, what's happening with endocrine disruptors, how they're just destroying us. And the Democrats went after you and the environmental movement, and I'm like, what? You know, this is what we've been trying to get for 40 years, the Republicans to care about these issues. And they said, oh, he's saying that chemicals turn people gay, and he's anti gay, and all this stuff.

And that wasn't what you said at all, and that's not what anybody said. And what what we're saying is we're we're destroying our children. That's what we're saying. Yeah. And God's creation, which is not ours to destroy.

Your description of why we protect nature and its role in our lives, and what happens when you're cut off from nature and animals by being part of nature, is the best I've ever heard ever. And that's that oh, I mean it. And when that, you know, when it becomes a a matter of quantifying things for profit, then that kind of corrupts the whole, enterprise. So where do you my last question, what happens now? You had this kind of amazing announcement with Donald Trump on Friday.

It's now Monday, I think, which is 3 days ago. How do you spend from here until election day? I'm gonna work to get him elected, and, and, you know, I'm working with the campaign. We're working on policy issues together. I will, I've been asked to go on to the transition team and, you know, to help pick the people who will be running the government.

And, I'm, I'm looking forward to that. And I, you know, I I'm I'm in a fight. I don't know what would happen to me if we lose. Well, that's that was that's kind of I mean, a lot of people I know personally and I'm friends with are have gone to prison. One of them is in prison right now, Pawel Durov.

There are others. Like, what happens if he loses to you? If, you mean if Trump loses and Kamala Harris becomes president. I don't know. But, I mean, I listen.

I know. I don't I never really think about that. I wanna I think is Oh, good. What I think is, okay. Here's what I gotta do today.

And, you know, get up every day and say reporting for duty, sir. And then go do that. And, you know, nothing's a crisis. Everything's a task. Right?

And, and so that's what I'm gonna be, kind of a happy warrior. You know, I'm I know what I have to do, so I'm gonna do it. Robert f Kennedy junior. Thank you. Thank you.

That was really that was a blessing. I appreciate it. Thank you. To watch the rest unlock our entire vast library of content, you can visit tucker carlson.com and activate your membership today. In the name of free speech, we hope you will.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

transcript to 17min podcast YOU ARE IN A MILITARY KILL BOX katherine watt
https://rumble.com/v5a3h5h-you-are-in-a-military-kill-box.html
And the basic idea is that public health has been militarized and the military has been sort of turned into a public health front or Potemkin village such that they are using public health language and public health laws to actually carry out a military campaign and I would not call them DOD vaccines, I would call them DOD weapons. So I call it the kill box because the first sort of lead that I had was Todd Callender's January 30th, 2022 interview on Elizabeth Leavlete's podcast called Truth For Health, and he described it as a kill box. And then I looked that up and it turns out it's a military term for establishing a geographic space or three-dimensional area for a military attack by air and by surface to kill the people who are in it and then dismantle the kind of, framework and move on to the next campaign. And what the DOD and the World Health Organization intend to do and have gotten quite far in doing, but not completely, reach their goals is to set up the entire world as their geographic terrain, their target population as all the people in the world, the duration of their campaign as permanent, and the weapons that they're using are, number 1, informational, that's the propaganda piece and the censorship piece.

Number 2, psychological, that's the fear and terrorism piece of telling people they need to be afraid all the time and they need to listen to the government. And then the third piece is the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons, which are called in their campaign pharmaceuticals vaccines, but are actually toxins and pathogens. So I started after I heard that interview, I had already been wondering what was going on, but I started trying to, track down some of the things Todd Callender talked about in his interview and figure out what the legal frameworks were and how they were set up and what the financial coercion mechanisms were. My finding, which many other people have found in various from various other angles, was that this project has been going on for centuries. It's basically globalist central bankers and lots of related organizations trying to get complete control of human beings through banking programs and through military programs.

And they kicked it into higher gear in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act, and then they kicked the public health aspect of it into higher gear starting in the 1930s 40s. Before the 1960s, they mostly did it through orchestrated armed conflicts and financial depressions and wars, which are very loud and messy and destructive to infrastructure, and it makes it difficult for them to have plausible deniability and legal impunity for what they're doing. So in the mid sixties, they got much better at inducing suicide and homicide by fraudulently labeling poisons as medicines or as vaccines or as prophylactics and telling people that submitting to that poisoning process was their civic duty. And that's, we saw that in COVID with the shorthand for do this or you're gonna kill your grandma. And the way that the pharmaceutical method is primarily useful to them is that plausible deniability is much easier and legal impunity is a lot easier.

They can achieve the same goal of killing lots of people without their fingerprints being all over it. I looked into the coercion cascades, mostly financial. Not gonna go into a lot of detail with that, but it starts at the top with the bank for international settlements, and they can use their control of other federal central banks' access to financial systems, and then all the way down through state governments, national governments, local municipal school districts, hospitals, everything, if you comply with what they're telling you to do as far as masking and testing, isolating yourself, taking injections, then you will get the financial access that you need to run your business or to have a job. And if you don't comply, they can cut you off from those services. And so that is one of the main mechanisms through which the whole thing was carried out.

And then on the legal side, at my website, I do trace it back farther, but I'm gonna start at 1969 just for the sake of starting somewhere. The US Congress passed a law to set up the chemical and biological warfare program. And in that law, which is 50 USC chapter 32, there are very important key terms including protective, prophylactic and defensive, which is how they justified doing it. They were using those words because the international community of ordinary non insane people, were concerned about biological and chemical weapons and they were working on international treaties to prohibit them. And so they needed to build in loopholes and the loopholes they built in were we're not going to do biological and chemical research and weapons development except for protective or prophylactic or defensive purposes.

And that's a false characterization because all biologically active products are intrinsically aggressive and toxic and lethal and that's where we get disciplines or that's the thing that disciplines like toxicology, pharmacokinetics, genotoxicity, drug drug interactions are all related to that fact that everything that goes into the human body or any living body has some effects which can be toxic. So that was the way they tried to get around that. And then the foundational public health emergencies platform, came out in 1983 when Congress passed the Public Health Service Act amendment and that set up the public health emergencies program under the 1944 law that had originally set up the public health service, which is a branch of the military. And it also, in 1983, Congress and Reagan set up a $30,000,000 slush fund and that has continued. It's got a different name now than it did then, but it's still being funded as recently as the NDAA and the Consolidated Appropriations Act in December of 2022.

The other thing they did in the 80s was set up the 1986 National Vaccine Program and National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and that's the one that set up the liability exemption for manufacturers and funneled anyone who was injured by a vaccine into this different compensation program and that's been used as a model since the, COVID started for the countermeasures injury compensation program. So the international piece, the cornerstone is the World Health Organization, which is not a health organization, it's a military organization because of this merger that I'm talking about. It's sort of the military arm of the the one world government that they're trying to set up. And they did a set of amendments to the International Health Regulations in 2005 that entered into force in June 2007. But basically, the IHR, which are currently going through another round of amendments to make them worse, called on national governments to strengthen their own domestic laws and fund more programs for surveillance, testing, detention and quarantine, physical control, and forced treatment during international outbreaks of communicable diseases.

And the pretext that they used, because it was bankers who were doing this, was that they needed to protect international trade from disruptions caused by disease outbreaks. But the real intent was to set up these legal systems that transfer sovereign government from the nation state to the World Health Organization and the BIS automatically when a public health emergency of international concern has been declared. And Congress and US presidents and the cabinet complied with that demand from the World Health Organization. So 2 of the key years were 1997 and 98. That was when the beginnings of the emergency use authorization program was set up.

And when they transferred the CBRN weapon stockpile from DOD classification, I guess, to HHS or CDC classification and control. It was the same products, as far as I can tell. It was just a relabeling and a re homing of them. And the yeah, the e way that was kind of a 2 step thing. At the time, the public was really upset about the use of unapproved vaccines for anthrax on military troops and the horrible adverse effects they were having.

So congress passed a law in November to kind of revoke authorization for testing or using unapproved products on military troops. But 3 days later, in a different law, made it so that the same programs could be done, but the target population would be expanded from just military troops to the entire American population. Then around 2000 to 2,002, using the momentum from 9 11 and the anthrax attacks on congress, they set up through the statutes again, program management sort of structures. They did that through the 2000 Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act through the 2,001 authorization for use of military force and people talked about this at the time. It was construed as putting the country into a permanent state of war, the global war on terror with every other country in the world.

So there was no geographic limitation. There was no time limitation. There was no identified enemy other than terror. And through that, I think other people figured this out at the time and then it sort of got suppressed. But, it made everyone in the world into a presumptive combatant or enemy target.

So it was essentially a de facto covert global martial law act by the US government. And then in those early 2000s, we also got the Patriot Act, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act, and the Homeland Security Act. And those were just more of the merging of the DHS, the DOJ, the HHS, the Department of Defense, all of the cabinet agencies. So since then, 2003 to 2009, there have been lots and lots of executive orders on these things, lots more statutes and appropriations, lots of agency regulations, guidance reports that were circulated to state, local and tribal authorities and law enforcement so that they would know that under a public health emergency, they are subordinated to the federal military. FDA issued a lot of guidance for industry documents and sent those out to the pharmaceuticals and to the academic organizations and NGOs to let them know about how FDA was going to handle experimental products like vaccines, gene therapies, biologics.

And they did more test runs like 2,003 SARS, 2,006 MERS, and 2,009 H1N1. That brings us up to the other transactions authority and this was revealed through Pfizer's, April 2022 motion to dismiss whistleblower Brooke Jackson's False Claims Act case. They said this was not a vaccine. It was a DOD prototype and we were never obligated to do valid clinical trials. We were never obligated to prove safety or efficacy to anyone.

We never had to get FDA authorization through any of the normal guidance for industry channels because it was a prototype. On October 4, 2022, the US government endorsed that view and filed a statement of interest and support for the motion to dismiss, basically saying that clinical trials were never material or necessary for DOD to pay the contractors for producing and distributing the bio weapons known as COVID-nineteen vaccines. And so all of this became visible from 2020 to the present when the World Health Organization Secretary General issued the public health emergency of international concern at the end of January 2020 and the HHS secretary immediately triggered the domestic frameworks through the determination that a public health emergency exists, followed by Prep Act declarations for medical countermeasures which are the weapons. And then congress and the presidents, Trump and Biden, passed several additional congressional acts, funding and reinforcing the structure of the kill box and issued more executive orders under the Defense Production Act, under the Stafford Act, under the National Emergencies Act to sort of build out the program. Basically what it built is a huge public and private funding stream for military led, bio weapons research and use, eliminated a form consent by reclassifying people who could potentially be carrying a disease as presumptive national security threats, so that you can do anything you want to them because you're on a war footing.

And to shield the products and weapons from product liability, to shield all the people involved from criminal liability and civil liability, and to shield the government funders, developers, and regulators from criminal prosecution under the other laws which are in place but are sort of superseded by this framework for use of bio weapons, use of chemical weapons, terrorism, things like that. I see it as a joint project between the US Department of Defense, a coordinating committee of that, the criminal prosecution under the other laws which are in place but are sort of superseded by this this framework for use of bioweapons, use of chemical weapons, terrorism, things like that. I see it as a joint project between the US Department of Defense, a coordinating committee of that, the Federal Reserve and the World Health Organization and the Bank For International Settlements, and the United Nations. But the World Health Organization is like a subsidiary of the UN. And there are things that the globalists do not like.

They don't like constitutions and charters. They don't like the conflicting statutory frameworks around, bioterrorism, war crimes, genocide, torture. They don't like any of that stuff. They don't like when states and provinces and counties and, like, towns pass their own laws protecting informed consent, protecting people from for consumer safety. They actually put out a report in October 2022, state laws limiting public health protections hazardous for our health.

And there's a whole bunch of things in there that states have started doing that the globalists do not like. So doing more of those things, more bringing control back to the state, more using article 10 of the constitution to reclaim state authority, those are all extremely useful and I do think it's gonna break. I think there's gonna be a tipping point and the criminal prosecutions are gonna start. And we have all the evidence and every time they try to answer what we're talking about by saying national security, they reinforce that this is the right way to go. This is what they're doing.

They're doing war crimes.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

TRASCRIPT TO 14MIN PODCAST WEF Memo Reveals Plan To Depopulate the World of 1 Billion White People by 2030

https://rumble.com/v58w9i5-wef-memo-reveals-plan-to-depopulate-the-world-of-1-billion-white-people-by-.html 

The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030. If you thought the great replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy w f report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world's problems including climate change and colonialism. And in the interest of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority. The WF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan, and the results are already playing out before our very eyes. Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven't already and join the people's voice locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel.

The Netherlands has become one of the global elites testing grounds for the most extreme policies. Just as the Netherlands was ground 0 for the elites war on farmers, Dutch cities are also operating as laboratories for the elites' plans to depopulate the world and radically alter demographics. Eva The Hague, 58% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam, almost 60% migrants.

And of course, most of these immigrants come from non Christian, non Western, African, and Middle Eastern countries. Conclusion, the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities. But that looks let's look onwards. London, 54% migrants. Again, conclusion, native population outnumbered.

Brussels, color me shocked, 70% migrants. Conclusion, native population majorly outnumbered. And other Europeans will, of course, follow suit soon if they haven't already. So I'm going to draw the forbidden conclusion here. The great replacement theory is no longer a theory.

It's reality. And what's interesting about replacement is that the establishment will either deny its existence or when they admit to it, they say that it's a good thing that the native European population is soon no longer a majority on its own continent. Dutch national disgrace and dubbed climate pope, Van Stimmermans, already stated in 2015 that diversity is humanity's destiny, and that Europe will be diverse. And of course, by now, I think we all know what they mean with the word diversity. It means less white people, less of you.

Imagine this in an Asian or an African country. Imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be a majority in their own country. Absolutely unthinkable. Unimaginable. What is wrong with our leaders?

They are fully bought and paid for by compromised reprobates who have hitched their wagon to the globalist agenda and take their orders directly from Davos. Catching the elite in mask off moments is nothing short of terrifying. Take, for example, footage of a top CDC official saying that the elites must get rid of all the whites in the United States and replace them with immigrants to create a more compliant society. Doctor Carol Baker was describing what she described as the solution at a panel discussion in New York City. The solution.

Every study published in the last 5 years, when you look at vaccine refusers, I'm not talking about, well, hesitance, most of them we can talk into coming to terms, but refusers. We'll just get rid of all the whites in the United States. You won't be surprised to hear that Baker was appointed chair of the CDC's advisory committee on immunization by Barack Obama's health and human services secretary in 2009. She was also honored with the 2019 Albert b Sebengold medal at a DC ceremony sponsored by Pfizer and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Is anyone surprised that a Bill Gates connected CDC official is openly suggesting depopulating America of white people who don't cooperate with the elites vaccine agenda?

This is the same Bill Gates who told world leaders that it's time to talk about death panels that will sentence ordinary law abiding people to death for the crime of being no use to the elites. You know, is spending $1,000,000 on that last 3 months of life for that patient, would it be better not to lay off the those 10 teachers and to make that trade off in medical costs. But that's called the death panel, and you're not supposed to have that discussion. So you, of course, make it interesting thing you just said, which is just the last 3 months in life for 1 person or something because we haven't had a discussion of how to allocate that money, it means we lay off 3 teachers to do so. I mean, in other words, we haven't had this type of allocation We're making that trade off because of huge medical costs that are not examined to see which ones actually have no benefit whatsoever.

But wait And because of pension generosity, we will be laying off over a 100,000 teachers, which, you know, I'm very much against that. And the whole AFT will agree with me on that. This is the psychopathic world Bill Gates and his associates of the WF are determined to usher in as part of their great reset and great replacements. But it gets even worse when you understand how far and why their evil ideology has spread. Today's sponsor is pillsforever.com.

If you think big pharma have your best interests at heart, think again. Under Biden, the price of medicine in America has skyrocketed, and there are certain medicines big pharma don't want you to know about. That's why I've partnered with pillsforever.com. All of their FDA approved medicines are the cheapest you'll find anywhere. More importantly, you can order medicines that big pharma don't want you to have, such as Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and fenbendazole.

Speaking of fenbendazole, not only does it get rid of parasites that live inside your body, there have been studies that show fembendazole can help with cancer. Listen to this testimony of Joe Tippens, a cancer survivor, thanks to fenbendazole. 2 years ago, Joe Tippens says he was told to go home, call hospice, and say his goodbyes. The doctors were unanimous. He was going to die of small cell lung cancer.

Once that kind of cancer goes that far afield, the odds of survival are less than 1%, and the median life expectancy is 3 months. Tippen says he got a tip, not from a pharmacist, but a veterinarian. And in his desperation, he turned from people medicine to dog medicine, specifically fimbendizole. My insurance company spent $1,200,000 on me with traditional means before I switched to a $5 a week medicine that actually saved me. Get 15% off using coupon code Peoples Voice at the checkout.

Please click the link below this video or call 256-664-4170 to take advantage of this fantastic offer. The globalist elites are no longer hiding their plans to depopulate the world by reducing the number of white people. This is a multipronged attack, and we are now seeing what it looks like in real time. Of course, the mainstream media is still operating under instructions from the elite to attack anybody who dares to express what they can see with their own two eyes. They'll attack you, shout you down, and pressure your employer to fire you.

You might even lose your bank accounts. You are simply not allowed to talk about the human tragedy of Biden and Harris's open border. Even though Biden is on record laying out his great replacement vision in 2015 in plain English for everybody to understand. An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017, will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America.

Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on, will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a that's a source of our strength. An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop.

Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017, will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing.

That's a that's a source of our strength. Biden is a compromised puppet politician who's been shamelessly selling out America to the globalist for decades. Now that he's been sacrificed by the global elites in favor of Kamala Harris and appears to have been replaced by a body double who's approximately 8 inches taller than the latest version, it's worth pointing out that the elite think we are incredibly stupid. They really think that we're not paying attention to the mountains of evidence proving the multipronged attacks may mean killing the population all have one thing in common. Chem trials and mRNA disproportionately target white people in a way that's statistically impossible unless it's by design.

Of course, the plot to depopulate the world has been planned out in detail. The COVID vaccines have long been exposed as a bioweapon designed to cull the herd and depopulate the world. But it gets even worse. As Robert f Kennedy junior explained in New York City, the bioweapon is targeted to take out white people and spare other races. And we need to talk about bioweapons.

Well, I know a lot now about bioweapons because I've been doing a book on it for the past two and a half years. And, and, you know, what we the technology that we now have with all these microbes, we have we've put 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars into ethnically targeted microbes. The Chinese have done the same thing. In fact, COVID 19, there's an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID 19 attacks certain races disproportionately.

The, the the the the races that are most immune to COVID 19 are because of the structure of the, the genetic structure of genetic differentials among different races of the, of the receptors of the ACE 2 receptor. COVID 19 is targeted to attack Caucasian and and, and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and, and Chinese. And but at night, we don't know whether it was deliberately targeted or not, but there are papers out there that show the, you know, the, the racial and ethnic differential impact to that. We do know that the Chinese are spending 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars developing bioweapons, and we are developing bioweapons.

That's where all those labs in the Ukraine are about. They're they're collecting Russian DNA. They're collecting Chinese DNA, though we can target people by race. We can't allow the evil logic of ethnic bioweapons to become the new normal. Here at the People's Voice, we are determined to expose the agenda of the globalist elites, but we need your help.

Subscribe to the channel and share this video with anyone who needs the information. And join the People's Voice locals community to support the channel and gain access to the community. I hope to see you there. Today's video is brought to you by ipv6ers. Are you a content creator who wants to publish information online without big brother spying and censoring your every move?

Ipv6es is set to revolutionize the way information is disseminated on the internet by eliminating the need for big tech companies to provide unreliable overpriced services such as self hosting email and data management. I p v sixes enables an easy and accessible way for you to host your own web and email server with direct end to end connections and enhanced security. This means no snooping for big brother and no interference from the technocratic elites. If Hillary Clinton can get away with running her own server, why shouldn't you? Go to the people's voice dot tvforward/ipv6 to sign up, or click the link below this video to take back control of the Internet and win the info wars against the globalists.

If you like our content, help support our sponsor, ipv6ers. And go to the peoplesvoice.tvforward/ipv6 today. Thank you, ipv6ers, for making this video possible.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

transcript to 11min podcast There is No Spike Protein! – Video #81 TheFreedomArticles

https://rumble.com/v4igth0-there-is-no-spike-protein-video-81.html 

Welcome truth seekers and freedom lovers. This is Makiya with the Freedom articles. And in today's video, we're gonna, reacquaint ourselves with the knowledge that there is no spike protein, and there never has been, and there probably never will be. And I'm going over this because I I first wrote this article way back when COVID was starting about how, you know, whether it's SARS variants, the SARS COV 2 virus, alleged virus itself, spike proteins, they they all rest on one big fat assumption, which is that you can actually isolate the virus and you can isolate parts of the virus like the spark the spike protein or you can isolate, variants of the virus. But, unfortunately, this is this is the point with modern virology.

You can't. That that they have never proven that no matter what they've done to try to pull the wool over people's eyes. There's never been the definitive proof of isolation. So we can't trust any of the downstream reasoning, like that there's spike proteins or variants or anything. So, Just as a reminder.

I did write this article talking about all the different ways that SARS CoV-two is an imaginary and theoretical virus coming from computer databases And, there's there was just so many great doctors that spoke up, researchers, doctors, scientists, all sorts of people who spoke up during the COVID's pandemic, whether it was doctor Stefan Lanka, the famous German, man who proved that Viral G was based on a lie in a court case. We have doctor Tom Cohen, doctor Andy Kaufman, doctor Mark Bailey, doctor Sam Bailey. There's so many others I can't mention here, but all these people were speaking up and pointing out that There was no isolation that the virus was not real was based on a lie But in this video what what I really want to address is that there's still this idea out there that people think, well, okay, maybe there's not a real virus and maybe there's not a spike protein from from the actual virus. But they are the COVID vaccines are real, and and and people got injected, and they instruct the body how to make a spike protein. So so that's real.

Right? We need to be worried about that. Right? Well, no. The answer is no.

We don't. And to explain why, first of all, the synthetic the synthetic mRNA and lipid nanoparticles and everything that's in the vaccine are known to be toxic in and of themselves. So any kind of toxin can generate blood clots. You don't need a spike protein to do this. And this is not even to mention the evidence of all the nanotechnology that that may be in the the shots, as found by La Quinta Columna, doctor Anna Maria Melhesia, and and lots of others.

But leaving that all aside for now, the basic lie upon which virology is founded that the lack of true isolation applies to the effects of the mRNA and the DNA vaccines just as much as it does to isolating viruses in other contexts. So if vaccinated people really produce the spike protein, it would be easy enough to test it by isolating it from such people. But this has never been done. Instead, mainstream doctors try to prove it indirectly through the presence of certain antibodies. But this does not constitute proof.

The antibodies produced are not specific, meaning they would be similarly produced against other foreign antigens entering the body, and It's it's just more of this pulling the wool over the eyes because it's indirect It's like well we found an antibody and so therefore because this antibody was produced by the human body in response to the spike protein, therefore, the spike protein exists. It's it's ridiculous logic, and it doesn't hold up to cross to close scrutiny. I wanna direct, you to a great video by, doctor Tom Carwin where he's interviewing a great Italian doctor Stefano Scoglio. And he was Stefano Scoglio was one of the many who was speaking up during the COVID pandemic about the lack of true isolation and all the all the lies that were told. And in this interview, they go through five reasons why the mRNA vaccines don't make spike protein.

I'm just gonna summarize them all for you before I play an excerpt. So the first reason they say is because as soon as synthetic mRNA enters the body, it is attacked by enzymes called endonucleases or ribonucleases, which degrade the mRNA straight away. Then the second reason they give is that there's no proof of endocytosis, and this is a cellular process in which the substances are brought into the cell. And it turns into exocytosis, which is where the cell is pushing something out, in in which case this pushes the the RNA out. The third reason is that there is a system inside the cell called the endosome lysosome system, which attacks and kills 98% of foreign matter that enters it.

The 4th reason is that we have similar degrading enzymes within ourselves, the endocellular ribonucleases, to get rid of foreign matter within the cell. And then the 5th reason is that synthetic mRNA is supposed to be highly immunogenic, meaning, you know, immunogenic is defined as the ability of a foreign substance, such as an antigen, to provoke an immune response. So they say because mRNA, synthetic mRNA is is so highly immunogenic, the correct dose is impossible to know. If there's too little, the cells don't make antibodies, and if there's too much, the cells overdo it. So any antibodies produced by any antibodies produced by all of this are general proteins for repair, and they're entirely nonspecific.

The body's immune system attacks a synthetic mRNA and explodes it. So these are the five reasons, and you can go back, in this interview because he he lists them all in his first 15 minutes. But I do wanna quote now what Solio was about to say because he wrote a book, and in that, he talks about a a study on the biodistribution of the fire COVID vaccine and how, basically, 50% of it got excreted and 50% was in the body, but all of it, whether it was the half that got excreted or the half that was in the body, was completely unaltered. It had not been taken into the cells at all. So listen to what he says specifically on this.

And that study looked what did they do? They took, the they injected into the mice, the the Pfizer vaccine, and then they codified 2 of the lipids, 2 types of of the lipids included in there with this, luciferase enzyme that it's actually, luminescent to see where it goes where it goes, right, into the bone. And what they found is that of that material that was injected, one type of, of, lipid, 50% was excreted unoaltered, and the remaining 50% remained unaltered in the body and distributed in the body. For the other one, only 17%, if I remember well, was excreted, excreted but altered, modified, meaning metabolized. But the the metabolites that were produced were actually produced extracellularly, and that's why it be it was excreted.

Otherwise, if it was intracellular, it couldn't be excreted. It would be Right. Be part of the cell. Right? So and then remaining again found.

The the remaining gauge 2% found unaltered all over the body, all over the organs. Now what that unaltered means and why is key is because if the material enters the cell, of course, it's modified. Right? Yes. It's degraded.

It's modified. It's metabolized, so you wouldn't find it unaltered. And they found all of it except the one that was excreted unaltered all over the organs of the body, mainly in 4 organs, which we which are the the inventory organs, like like, you know, liver, spleen, kidneys, and female ovaries. Those are the 4 organs where most of it was found, but it was found also in the brain, in the lungs, in the heart, everywhere. Right?

So this study, it's a it's a complete confirmation of what I saw in the literature before. No chance of entering the cells. So these are just toxic bombs, essentially, that the body handles by trying to diffuse them, diffuse these bombs. Problem So we'll stop at that. So, basically, to summarize all that, the the study found that the mRNA was not in the soles.

It was unaltered, and it was excreted or left in the body, but it was unaltered no matter where it was. And so the body basically just handled it by trying to by keeping it out of the cells and then trying to get rid of it. So that may be a relief for some people that worried that, if they did get the VACS or they were around someone, they get the they got the vaccine. So they they may be, making their body may be making spike proteins or they may be, suffering from other people's shedding, but it doesn't doesn't appear that there's any evidence that's the case. There's another professor, researcher here, doctor Anita.

So professor Anita Baxas, And she talks about she has a really great article here. It's worth checking out, where she says, well, first of all, there's no evidence the virus ever existed as I've been saying. And then she goes through the different studies that tried to where they tried to prove spike protein or they tried to kind of, assume that it existed and then went further and and tried to prove something. But she breaks down how these studies are nonsense and explains why. So if you want another detailed explanation from another point of view, this is this is a good article.

But to summarize, basically, doctor Tom Cowen and doctor Scoglio think that although the COVID vax is poisonous, its actual ability to modify genes is exaggerated. They think that the COVID vaxx is dangerous for its synthetic mRNA, and they don't go into the other areas of this research such as the adjuvants like graphene or hydrogel or other nanotech. But what we can say is that basically there is a lot of evidence that that that this this vaccine never never really worked as intended. So they they lied about so many aspects of it to us. It appears that they also lied that the vaccine was capable of making spike protein because to do that, it would have had to have been the mRNA would have had to have gotten into the cells and and and, you know, encoded them and changed the genetics and and done this.

And it doesn't appear from this information that the COVID vaccine was able to do that. So I'm presenting this as the information that I think is is important and as always, I'm not, claiming that this is a 100% the truth. There may be new information that comes out to replace this. So as always, don't take my word for it. Do your own research.

Please leave your comments and all links are placed in the show notes below every time. If you like this video and feel that I've earned it, please like, share, subscribe, and follow, and I'll see you in the next one.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

transcript to 25min podcast 20 Key Questions Exposing the Trump Assassination Hoax – Video #120

https://rumble.com/v57a9vd-20-key-questions-exposing-the-trump-assassination-hoax-video-120.html 

Welcome truth seekers and freedom lovers. This is Makiya with the Freedom articles. And in this video, we're gonna take a look at 20 key questions exposing the Trump assassination hoax. And, yes, I do believe, having looked at the evidence, that this is a staged event, and I'll explain why. But before we get into that, we need to remember a couple of things here.

First of all, politics. What is it? Well, as Frank Zappa so eloquently said, it is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex. So what you're seeing here is entertainment. If you haven't already seen a very important video I made, please check it out.

It's video number 56 the attack on your basic perception of truth and reality because what's really going on here with the entire conspiracy is that they're trying to hijack your perception. They're trying to get you to believe what they want you to believe, even if it is in contradiction to your basic senses, to your sight, to your hearing, to everything. They want you to give over your senses to them and let them dictate what is is reality and and what is happening and this is why it's so dangerous and this is why we need to look really really closely at all of this. It's super important also not to take sides to get caught up in left or right or any other division because that affects your ability to analyze the data logically and dispassionately. We're seeing so much of that happen now where all the different camps take their sides based on their own ideologies.

So, you know the, the true alternative media would would do this naturally. It would analyze something logically and dispassionately without taking sides, but unfortunately, we have a a MAM, a mainstream alternative media, which does get caught up in its own ideologies a lot. So let's take a look at this. First question. Why was the building not secured?

So why did the SS, the secret service ignore the crowd telling them that there was a shooter climbing up and crawling along the roof. Yeah. Yeah. Someone's on top of the roof. Look.

Gary is right there. Yeah. Right there. You see him? He's laying down.

See him? Yeah. He's laying down. So there was widespread knowledge that there was someone on the roof and yet the Secret Service didn't act. Doesn't make any sense.

Question number 2. Could the shooter have possibly done this all alone? Well, there are other expert snipers, veteran snipers who say no way. This guy is Canadian sniper. There's a big article on the daily mail about him and he's saying that no way he had help and you can actually listen to him here if you like as well talking about this.

Good morning. I keep getting asked about this so I'm just gonna let you know my opinion. I am talking about the assassination attempt on former president Donald Trump. I know everyone's gonna have some crazy opinion. Everyone's gonna have a different opinion.

It's gonna be very wild for the next little while, but, just if you don't know me or new to this page, I spent, just about 17 years in the military, 14 of which just about 14 of which were at 1 special operations unit called JTF 2. Our sniper team has the world record for the longest confirmed sniper kill, and a huge part of our job while I was there and while I was a sniper, was doing close protection for VIPs up to and including the the prime minister when he would go to, you know, dangerous countries like Iraq or Afghanistan, we would be in charge of that security. So I'm very familiar with the layout of these types of things and what the job should be. And yesterday, what happened, I have I have no doubts in my mind that the shooter had help from somewhere within an agency, an organization, or the government. The second I saw that aerial photo of of what they were saying happened, immediately made no sense to me.

You cannot, in broad daylight, get onto a rooftop within it looked like maybe a couple 100 yards, if that you can't get into that position with a gun when there's a president speaking. It cannot be done. It's it's not like, you don't even need to be a sniper to know that it's the most fucking obvious thing and obvious place in the whole world. You could be a 7th grader and be like, what do we need to do for security here? Well, let's look at these rooftops that are almost within 0 range of a of a rifle.

So it's something happened, and I'm not pointing fingers at anyone. I'm just it's too obvious, that this guy had helped getting there. So whether it's someone turned a plan a blind eye or it was strategically planned, I mean, it had to be planned to a certain level because, It had to be planned to a certain level. Yes, of course. So let's move on to question number 3.

There was a ladder placed on the, allowing the PET C to get up onto the roof. So why? Why was there a lot of place there allowing the shooter to climb up? Well, it turns out that some new piece of evidence has apparently emerged and now they're saying that the shooter made a visit to Home Depot prior to assassination and what did he do? He bought a ladder.

So this this is, for me really just one of these ridiculous little details that they try to put in and it sounds very much like the way they just happened to find the hijackers passports on 911. So just watch out for these little little things that they put in to try to bolster the narrative and control your perception. Question number 4. Why did the police officer who was bolted up to the roof with the sniper then retreat? And why did the counter snipers not fire right away then if the sniper was aiming his gun at the police officer?

So here's what they say, the part about the officer being vaulted up to the roof sounds like something Inspector Clozot would do after being vaulted up to the roof, why did the officer then retreat down the ladder? If Crooks turned his rifle on the police officer who was vaulted onto the roof, why didn't the countersniper, who was watching Crooks through his scope, shoot crooks then? That is why didn't why did the countersniper wait for crooks to return his aim away from the bowling police officer and back at Trump long enough to fire at Trump. Yeah. It doesn't it doesn't make sense.

These guys are just waiting around. And, we lead on now to question 5. Why did the counter sniper team wait 42 seconds and wait until after Trump had supposedly been shot out just to shoot the sniper? I'm getting this 42 seconds here. This is a clip from a Jimmy Dore video, but we're gonna get to that later in this video because actually it turns out that, the shots that you're hearing are not from the Patxi or the sniper.

They are actually from the counter sniper, but we'll get to that. Alright. Question 6. This is a big one. Why did Secret Service move people in the crowd about 10 seconds before the shots that Trump began?

Were they clearing the angles? Check out this video. To our country, probably 20,000,000 people. And you know, that's a little bit old, that chart. That chart's a couple of months old.

And if you, wanna really see something they're sad, take a look at what happened. You see something that said, take a look at what happened. So that's highly suspicious. The fact that right then we're talking 5 to 7 seconds before the secret service start directing people that are right in the line either in the line of fire or or having a very important view of Trump. Now, Tim Truth has done some good videos in this already and he starts, in this video talking about, the angles that basically they're trying to clear, people away from certain angles because the people from this angle right now are going to be able to see Trump's right ear.

The one that apparently gets shot or maybe not and there's this big guy here, who I'm circling now with the mouse. He has a photographer. He's a photographer. Right? So he's gonna be able to catch really important shots and he he gets moved away.

Let's take a look. We have behind the scenes footage catching the Secret Service clearing the backstage behind Trump. As far as stage magic goes, these would be some of the key vantage points, the key angles, the key lines of sight to see if something was applied to Trump's ear, if any fake blood was applied, etcetera, and to see the moments after Trump falls to the ground. Remember, his ear is turned to the right, I think, deliberately. So nobody in the front of the stage can see any blood until he stands up with his fist in the air.

And they moved the photographers to the front of the stage, knowing, I think, that Trump would stand up, fist in the air, bloodied ear, for the photos to be seen around the world. So it's unclear exactly the role of the photographers in all of this, if they were waiting for the signal or if they're just oblivious and just pawns in the game. I'm not sure. But let's do a deep dive and analyze this crucial new piece of evidence. And so if you watch this whole clip, as always, all links from the show notes below, you'll see that the photographers are then running around the front of the stage trying to get good shots after they've been escorted away.

Is this some sort of collusion between the photographers? You know, basically, they were in a really good position now and they're in the front and they're in a worse position. Tim Truth's asking is this some kind of collusion? I would say as we keep going on and looking at the evidence, there appear to be a lot of people here that were in the know, whether it's photographers or the people sitting here. Okay.

Let's move on to question 7. Why was Trump allowed to do a fist pump in the open after being shot rather than being covered and kept down? I mean, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that this is insane. If if if you are trying to protect someone like a president in an active shooter situation, why on earth would you let them, break break free of the ring and not be covering their head to get out fist pumps which totally look like propaganda perception just trying to do this for a good photo op. It does not look like protecting Trump was the key motivator at all times.

So that it just seems ridiculous honestly that he was allowed to do that. Question number 8. Is it just a coincidence coincidence that Trump's path to the presidency has now been cleared so much of in the last week, including lawsuits against him being dismissed, being given the Republican nomination at the RNC, and now we have we have this, attempted assassination or, well, a staged assassination, in my opinion. All of this is is, giving him a clear path to the presidency. Is it just a coincidence that all this is happening or has someone very high up suddenly flipped a switch and said, okay.

We want Trump, and we're gonna clear the path for him to do it. Question number 9. Why did 5 current or former US presidents, Bill Clinton, George W Bush, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Trump himself all come out to praise the Secret Service rather than criticize it for its failure. It is extraordinary that former presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama along with Biden and Trump have issued statement statements thanking the Secret Service for their swift intervention. Think about this for a minute.

To get 5 presidents, including the nearly assassinated Trump, to issue thanks to the Secret Service, thanks not justified by the Secret Service's failure, took organization. That this presidential support came so quickly implies prior organization, which supports the hypothesis of a planned attack on Trump. It is a pity that Trump himself was roped into participating in what could be a pre planned cover up. Yes, it is, but I would I would suggest that that's actually giving too much sympathy to Trump. Trump must have been in on this and there's no pity he chose to to partake in this and basically try to pull the wool over everyone's eyes.

It's it's disgraceful, but all these guys at the top, this is what they do. They they specialize in fooling people, they don't they don't care about lying. So let's move on to question 10. Is it a coincidence or is it NLP neurolinguistic programming that right before being shot Trump says if you want to see something really sad and then this also leads into question number 11 this video clip. Why is Trump's right ear hidden from the camera site when shot?

And why do the media watchers of the people in other words, people watching the TV not see it until he gets back up? So let's just, look at this clip from Tim Truth again. No context at all. Saying, and if you wanna see something really sad, which could have very well been the cue for the shots to fire off. You wanna see something very sad, somebody in the chat points out, that's neurolinguistic programming right there.

You wanna see something really sad, think about how many people heard that before their favorite idol got the head wound. That's what they believe anyway. Now, his excuse is that he's looking to his right, and there's a sign over there. And he's indicating the sign over there to the crowd. But to me, this is the perfect cover, so that they can buy some time until his ear can be bloodied up.

By directing everybody's attention, misdirection, to the sign over at the right, everybody who was filming the event turned their camera to the sign. The media cameras, which were looking straight ahead at Trump, watch very closely how he ducks and covers very deliberately trying to hide his right ear from the camera. To me, this makes it obvious that this is choreographed ahead of time And that the point was to not have to fake anything on live video. To not have to fake anything from the front. Because they would have to fake it moving, becoming bloody, etcetera, etcetera.

So I think the plan was, Trump, you look to the right, shots are gonna go off, grab your ear, and then fall to the ground. Make sure that your right ear stays blocked from the cameras. And before we shoot the shots, direct everybody's attention. The classic magician's misdirection, to this big chart that we'll put up on the right side. And then, the building that the shooter was on will be to the right, so that the angles can be explained away.

It's just happenstance that this was all off camera. Very interesting points there. So this is all stage magic. And all of this, the NLP, the the misdirection, all of it is is not coincidental. This this is this is really key evidence that this was set up.

It was planned. Trump was in on it. A lot of these people here we're looking at are in on it. I don't have time to go into every every bit of evidence in this video, but we will be looking more at some of these people. And if you wanna do your own research, I encourage you to look at the faces of some of these people here.

Some of them may be genuinely shocked, but there are other people that are not. Alright. So let's move on to questions 12 and 13. Question 12. Why is there no blood on Trump's hand a few seconds after he's shot and he puts his hand on that ear?

And why is there also no blood on Trump's right hand after he gets up even though by the time by that time he'd been holding and covering his right ear? And then question 13. Why had Trump's ear already stopped bleeding less than 2 minutes after the shot? That is a really incredibly short time for it to suddenly be just totally sealed up and and stopped. I mean, that's that's way too short for for most human bodies.

First of all, it's not continuing to bleed. The bleeding apparently magically stopped as soon as he got up. Also, the blood doesn't seem to act like real human blood. I think any of us who've been cut can look at this ear and see that blood doesn't work like this. I think they had some liquid blood that they squirted.

And you can see it dripping down in 3 directions. 1 is down into the ear. The second is across his face. And the third is a little bit lower across his face. But the key trick here as far as the blood goes is the putty like dew blood that they put around the exterior of the top of his ear.

I think the idea here was to make it look like a serious wound that was bleeding profusely. And if you just squirt a bunch of liquid blood, you run the risk of it coming off and showing that there's no real wound there. I think this is another reason why Trump has no blood on his hand. Because he didn't wanna mess up the fake blood movie magic. You don't want all the blood to come off and people to see that you weren't actually shot.

Also, I'm amazed at the level of sellouts in this so called alternative media who have no skepticism and just believe whatever they're shown. Alright. Let's move on to question 14. Why is there no blood on Trump's shirt? This is a white collared shirt that Kanye normally wears.

I mean think about it. Even if a bullet only grazed your ear, let alone if it if it did it more than a grace, Imagine the amount of blood that is that is in your ear squirting out. Are we to believe that not a single drop of blood is getting on Trump's, collar at all? That his collar is completely white and completely fine and nothing no problem at all with it? I mean, it's just it really is just not believable.

So question 14. Let's have a look. There's no I've I've already mentioned that there was no blood on Trump's hand right after the incident. Right like when he grabbed his ear and then went to the ground and and things, but now he's doing the fist pump. This is a bit later.

But by this point, he's he would have been touching his ear for a while and yet there's still no blood on his right hand. That was his hand that was touching his ear. And note, there's no blood on his right hand that can be seen. He makes the mistake of opening his hand a couple of times and not just doing the fist in the air. And when you see his palm, there's no blood.

Even though he had put his hand up against his right ear to indicate that he had been hit visually before he falls to the ground. Why would all the blood be on the top right of his right ear? Like Question 15. Why do photos show that Trump is not missing any parts of his ear? Now I understand that, maybe this this is supposed bullet from the supposed shooter grazed him, but still, it looks like it's completely intact.

So I went to believe there's not even a little chunk missing, like the ear is completely intact? Dad, where exactly are they saying he got hit? And how does this blood pattern make any sense? There's a big blob right above his ear canal, and then there's this blob of goo, colored like blood, on the top right of his ear. To me, this looks like a totally intact ear that's covered with fake blood, all things considered here.

So just to be clear, they're saying that Trump had his ear hit off camera, and nobody can see any blood until all these Secret Service agents and or makeup artists gather around him and block off all the visibility to the outside world. Then Alright. Question 16. Why are some members of the crowd behind Trump calm, unaffected, and even stopping to film during an active shooter situation? Were they in on the event?

Let's take a look. Watch this shit, dude. Watch. Watch. She sits down.

Yep. Watch this. If you, want her What's the sign up? Something that said, take a look at what happened. Oh, shots pull up.

She's com She's completely normal. And then watch. And then she's got her What the fuck? What the fuck? People are freaking out?

And she's filming. And she's just, like, right there. She's not even freaking the Yeah. Very, very strange behavior. Unless, of course, she knew exactly what was happening and wasn't scared because there was blanks being fired or there were bullets being fired in the other direction.

So speaking of that, let's move on to question 17. Why did the 3 shots we hear come from the gun of the counter sniper? In other words, the supposed police or the Secret Service that were there to protect Trump and not the sniper. The evidence for this is from, this great video because it's taking, people that were there is taking taking their footage from different angles and so check this out. Video and you will see that the that the sound of the bullets that hit Trump came from his own secret service agent, whoever the sniper for working for him on this roof, and he's firing 400 feet away to another sniper that works for them.

And that's, this guy. K? And, I'm gonna prove to you without a shadow of a doubt, you can't I mean, this is all totally 100% stage and that's my job. That's what I do. So here we go.

We're gonna hear this guy fire, and he's gonna go down saying he got the bullet. And you know that's a little bit old, that's that's George. That's George's a couple of months old. And if you, wanna really see something this said, take a look what happened over Down. Okay?

Three shots came from this gun. No bullets went into that direction. Let's play it again. And you know that's a little bit old, that that that that that's a couple of months old. And if you, wanna really see something this said, take a look what happened That's 1.

You see the gun move? That's 1 bullet. There's 2. I got it. And 3.

You saw the gun move 3 times, and Trump is down. So the sound of the bullets came from this sniper, and there's no way in hell the other sniper killed Trump. Do you know why? Because this guy supposedly supposedly just killed this guy who was a sniper that supposedly was trying to shoot Trump. It's also Yeah.

So that's, not conclusive, but it's very strong evidence that this is just another layer of deception going on. The shots were coming from the counter sniper and not the sniper. Let's move on to question number 18. Is it just a coincidence that the Patio scapegoat in this case, Thomas Matthew Crooks has three names like Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wilkes Booth, and Osama Bin Laden. This is more NLP since the cadence of three names has a hypnotic effect.

Also, the last name crooks is a plural of the word crook which means criminal. So this is yet more programming trying to convince you subconsciously that this 20 year old Patsy was the criminal. Question, number 19. Is it just a coincidence that the alleged shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks appeared in a BlackRock ad? BlackRock is the world's biggest financial, management firm, with with 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of of assets under its watch.

Take a look at this ad. I'm Delalo. I teach AP and honors economics in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Financial well-being to me is knowing that I can be free to do the things that I love to do. I hope when I retire someday, they say, you know, that guy made this place a special place to come to school.

There he is. Gave as much as he could to help the community. There he is. You know, that guy made this place a special place to come. That's him.

So you don't just get in a BlackRock ad. Okay? You're thoroughly vetted. They're not just gonna randomly shoot kids without, all sorts of release forms and disclaimers and all this. So how was it that this guy is in an ad by the biggest financial company in the world?

Well, obviously, this is predictive programming. This is putting this image in people's heads before the event, which they do all the time with these kind of, staged events. Alright. And lastly, question number 20. Is it just a coincidence that before the attempted assassination, Biden said it was, quote, time to put Trump in the bull's eye?

Let's talk about the conversation this has started, and it's really about language, what we say out loud and the consequences of those. You called your opponent an existential threat. On a call a week ago, you said it's time to put Trump in the bull's eye. There's some dispute about the the context, but I think you appreciate that word. Crosshairs.

That's what I'm gonna focus on. So Biden's gonna try to talk his way out of that. So very, very suspicious the whole thing. I think this, these all these pieces of evidence and more show that this was a staged event, that this Trump assassination event is a hoax, and that Trump was not really shot. And I'll just finish off the video by saying that, guess what?

Israel has chimed in and says, well, the Trump assassination attempt is good for us. Why? Because it's gonna take, the focus off their genocide where it's it's a very incredibly one-sided thing where they're just going in and slaughtering wholesale all these Palestinians with the death toll up to way beyond 40 or 50,000. There are actually some people saying that it's 4 times as much as that. It should be something more like a 186,000.

And then this isn't this isn't a small area of Gaza where the population is only 2,000,000. So if it really is something like a 186,000 that is 10% almost of the entire population just being slaughtered and Israel is continuing to do this. So sad note to end it on but anyway, as always, leave your comments in the show notes below. I'm interested in your opinions thoughts Reflections all the links are in the show notes, and I'll see you in the next one

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

transcript to 4min podcastThe Power of Antibodies: Unveiling the Truth behind Artificial Immunization Dr. Kevin Stillwagon
https://rumble.com/v4wx7fi-the-power-of-antibodies-unveiling-the-truth-behind-artificial-immunization.html
Antibodies are powerful, that's for sure. Their significance is prominently highlighted in the context of life saving anti venom administration after a poisonous snake bite. Anti venom consists of antibodies produced in another person or animal that has been subjected to the same venom. The key to the effectiveness of these antibodies is that the person or animal who produced them was exposed to the pure, unaltered venom in all its complexity. This unmodified exposure allows the immune system to generate robust and powerful antibodies capable of neutralizing the venom effectively.

Effectively. In fact, long ago, the Department of Defense recognized the unparalleled efficacy of antibodies from convalesced individuals as a counter measure to infectious diseases or toxic exposures. This recognition underscores a fundamental truth about the immune system. Natural exposure to a pathogen or its toxins leads to the production of highly effective antibodies. These antibodies develop through a process that involves encountering the entire spectrum of antigens presented by the pathogen, allowing the immune system to mount a comprehensive and potent response.

But somewhere along the way, scientific approaches to immunization became muddled with the idea that injecting only parts of pathogenic organisms into the human body could confer protection against infection. Unfortunately, this method does not fully replicate the natural immune response. Effective immunization requires natural exposure to the pathogen through the mucosal epithelial barrier, a route that ensures all parts of the pathogen are presented to and remembered by the immune cells guarding these epithelial barriers. This process leads to the production of secretory mucosal IgA antibodies, which play a crucial role in preventing future infections at the entry points of the body. In contrast, injecting antigens into the body primarily stimulates the production of serum IgA antibodies.

While these serum or humoral antibodies that are inside the body can respond to infections, they do not provide the same level of protection as mucosal IgA antibodies secreted to the outside, which are essential for preventing infections at mucosal surfaces that separate the inside of us from the outside. Moreover, because the injected antigens are only parts of the pathogen, any mutations in these specific antigens can render the induced antibodies less effective or even obsolete. This mismatch means that individuals who receive such injections might believe they are fully protected. But in reality, their immune defense is suboptimal and not as robust as it would be following natural exposure. This flaw in the concept of artificial immunization by injection calls for a reevaluation of our approach to immunization.

It is time to acknowledge that injecting antigens or the message to make the antigens in a product called a vaccine completely bypasses the epithelial barrier. This artificial immunization procedure can stimulate an immune response, but it does not fully mimic the natural comprehensive immune defense developed through exposure to the entire pathogen through its natural mode of entry through the epithelial barrier. A shift towards understanding and utilizing the natural mechanisms of immune protection, such as those observed in natural exposures, could lead to more effective strategies in combating infections and enhancing public health.

xxxxxxxxxxx

transcript to 34min podcast Do viruses exist? kevin stillwagon

https://rumble.com/v3tafrv-do-viruses-exist.html 

I wanna talk to you today about viruses and whether they exist or not. Now I've written about this before and done a few videos, but this one's probably going to get me into the most trouble due to differing opinions with people that I know. And that's probably a good thing because humanity never really advances until we openly debate and question the nature of things. There is confusion among the health freedom movement over the existence of viruses. Most of the confusion arises from the terrain theory versus the germ theory, so let's look at the germ theory first.

So the germ theory has 4 key concepts. The first of which states that an organism called a pathogen is the cause of disease symptoms. Now this pathogen can be a large parasite like you see here or fungus visible to the naked eye or a smaller bacterium or a protozoan that's visible to conventional light microscopes or an extremely small virus visible only to electron microscopes. Now these are supposedly influenza viruses that were grown in canine kidney cells and spun down with a centrifuge to purify the sample. Now this image is not completely pure because some cellular debris remained that you can see right here.

Now the second key concept is that the pathogen can transmit between humans, between animals and humans, and from surfaces or food or water to humans. It can be direct contact like you see here, or it can be droplets or surfaces, and these are called fomites. Or it can be food, water, insects or animals. And these are all called vectors. The third key concept is that the pathogen can multiply within the human, and this leads to disease symptoms.

What you see here is the bacteria called E. Coli multiplying, viewed with a conventional light microscope. And the 4th concept is that the disease can be controlled by targeting the pathogen. Now there are some partial truths in these four key concepts. So let's look at each one.

A German physician and microbiologist named Robert Koch developed Koch's postulates in 18/84 that are used to prove the first key point that a specific disease is caused by a specific pathogen. Now Koch's postulates also have 4 key concepts. So let's look at those 1 by 1 also. First, the pathogen must be present in all cases of the disease. Now that statement is false.

Over the years, we have found that the pathogen can be present in people who do not show disease symptoms. A classic example is the streptococcus bacteria that most of us have in our throats right now. Yet we do not display symptoms of strep throat. Second, you must be able to take the pathogen out of the sick person and grow it in a cell culture. This is done all the time.

The problem is you can also grow pathogens from people who are not sick. And you may have even done this yourself in science class by swabbing your mouth and watching nasty stuff grow in a petri dish. The problem is, and virus deniers are very quick to point this out, is that you can grow bacteria in a petri dish dish because bacteria are living things. But you cannot grow viruses in a petri dish because viruses are not alive, and they need living cells to be reproduced. 3rd, you must take the pathogen you just grew and expose it to a healthy, susceptible person without symptoms and create the disease symptoms in that person.

Now this has also been done, but it does not work every time. The person or animal must be susceptible, and that's a significant problem for proponents of the germ theory. The most recent example of this was done in 2020 by challenging 36 healthy young adults to the SARS CoV 2 virus. They all got the same exposure, but only half of them got symptoms. And you can read that study right here.

4th, you must be able to isolate the pathogen from the newly infected person and show that it is the same as the one that they were exposed to. Now, this has also been done. But as we found out earlier, you can also isolate the pathogen from people without the symptoms. So Cox postulates demonstrate clearly that the first key concept of the germ theory is false. Pathogens are involved for sure, but they are not the cause simply because some people exposed to the pathogens never display symptoms.

Epidemiology, the study of how communicable diseases move through the populations establishes associations, not causation. Now the second key concept of the germ theory is that the pathogen can transmit. And we know that is true. The PCR test proved that millions of people tested positive for the presence of the virus, but they never got sick. In fact, they could test positive one day negative the next and positive again a few days later.

And some of these positive tests were false due to excess cycling of the machine, but some were true positives. And this shows us that pathogens move between humans all the time, and they do. In fact, it is estimated that we all inhale about a 100,000,000 various viruses every day. Some are associated with disease. Others are not.

Nevertheless, this transmission is an inescapable fact and cannot be stopped any more than we can stop the ocean tides. The third concept is that the pathogen can multiply within the human and this will lead to disease symptoms. Now part of that is true, but not all of it. In fact, if you look at polio, you will see that 70% polio infections where the polio virus has been found inside the infected person after it multiplied are completely asymptomatic. You can read that right here on the CDC website.

The 4th concept is that the disease can be controlled by targeting the pathogen. Well, that's obviously true, but the problem is when you start trying to kill them off, they can become stronger and more resistant. So it's more effective and safer to control the vector than the actual pathogen. So due to all of these questions and problems, along comes the terrain theory to challenge the germ theory. Now while the germ theory proposes that diseases are primarily caused by microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses, the terrain theory suggests that it's the internal environment or the terrain of the body that plays a more significant role in determining health and disease outcomes.

The terrain theory emphasizes the importance of the body's internal environment, including factors like pH toxicity, nutritional status and overall health in influencing disease susceptibility. It suggests that maintaining a healthy internal terrain can protect against these outward illnesses. The terrain theory recognizes that individuals have varying levels of susceptibility to disease based on their unique internal terrains. It suggests that factors like genetics and lifestyle choices can contribute to these differences. Proponents of the terrain theory often advocate for the preventive measures that support and strengthen the body's internal terrain, such as proper nutrition, detoxification, and stress reduction.

While the germ theory attributes diseases primarily to specific microorganisms, The terrain theory acknowledges the presence of microorganisms, but suggests that they are opportunistic and become pathogenic only when the internal terrain is compromised. In this view, microorganisms are seen as secondary contributors to disease rather than the primary cause. The terrain theory highlights the role of maintaining balance and homeostasis within the body as crucial for overall health. Balancing the diet, lifestyle, stress, and environmental exposures are believed to keep the terrain in homeostasis with external factors like bacteria and viruses to maintain health. And that health is not always the absence of symptoms.

Comparing the 2 theories, the terrain theory seems to be more valid. The terrain theory recognizes that microorganisms are always associated with a disease process, but they are not the ultimate cause for if they were, everyone who came in contact with them would have the disease. But somehow, some proponents of the terrain theory take it a step further and claim that viruses do not even exist. And here's how that came about. In order to prove that viruses exist, three things need to happen.

They must be purified, isolated, and then viewed with an electron microscope separate from everything else. Now this has actually been done many times. Virus deniers will even admit that it was done with a certain type of virus called a bacteriophage that is specific to bacteria, not human cells. What they do is they purify bacteriophages by filtering out the large bacterial cells first and then they use a centrifuge to separate the remaining particles out by density into these layers that are absolutely pure. Once that's done, they pull off the layers that do not contain bacteriophages so that nothing is left but bacteriophages that's called isolation.

And you can see that being done right here. Then they are viewed with an electron microscope. Now, bacteriophages have a very unique shape that is not ever seen in human biology. So this is probably why virus deniers will admit that the bacterial phage virus does exist because we clearly see the unique shape that is seen here. There is no way to refute this.

It has been done millions of times. Scientists have even taken this a step further and tagged the bacterial phages with fluorescent molecules that will illuminate bright green and then can be seen with a conventional light microscope. Here we see the bacterium making copies of the bacterial phages until it bursts apart and is destroyed. Notice that the bacteria that are not infected are growing, but the infected ones don't get any bigger. That's because the bacteria is using all of its resources to make more bacteria phages, not more of itself.

It's important to know that bacteria phages and viruses are not living things. They are not capable of making copies of themselves. The truth is living bacteria make copies of the bacteriophages and living cells will make copies of viruses. You might be wondering if this fluorescent tagging has ever been done to particles that are supposedly viruses and filmed them being taken in by cells. Well, the answer is yes.

This is the replication of HIV in epithelial cells that was published in May of 2018 by a team of French researchers. Here is the link to the publication and the videos. You may also be wondering how they do this fluorescent tagging. Okay. We got to get into some deep science now.

Every living organism, including you, is made of proteins and fats. Now the message to make those proteins is in your DNA that is in the nucleus of your cells. So when proteins need to be made, an enzyme called RNA polymerase separates your double stranded DNA into a single strand that is used to make this messenger RNA that you see happening here in a process that's called transcription. The messenger RNA then migrates from the nucleus of the the cell into the cytoplasm, and that's what you see happening here. The messenger RNA is then used by structures in your cells called ribosomes to actually make the proteins.

So messenger RNA is a string of nucleotides of which there are only 4, adenine, uracil, guanine, and cytosine abbreviated a u g c. Now the order of these letters is the genetic sequence and will determine what protein will be made. So the single strand of your DNA is the template for making this messenger RNA. And the messenger RNA then becomes a template for making a protein. Now the transfer RNA that are in the cytoplasm of your cells are what are going to bring in the 20 different amino acids that are going to chain together to actually make the proteins.

Each transfer RNA has 3 nucleotides that will bind to 3 nucleotides that are on the messenger RNA. These are called codons because every 3 nucleotides codes for a certain amino acid. Now in this process of making proteins, a will only bind to you and g will only bind to c. The ribosome change the amino acids together, the transfer RNA falls off and gets used again. The messenger RNA template is also broken down into individual nucleotides so that they can be used again also.

This messenger RNA is a template for what is going to be used to make the protein in a process called translation that you saw happening there. The transfer RNA will bring in the amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins and the amino acids get chained together. So scientists have learned how to chemically modify the order of the letters to have those ribosomes make whatever protein they want. And that should concern you because that's exactly what mRNA shots do to you. They're telling the ribosomes of your cells to make a different protein that is not you.

So what they do with the message that is in the genome of the virus to make virus proteins is they modify it so that a fluorescent protein will be part of the protein shell of the virus. Then you can see them when enough of them are present. That's just one way they do it. There are other ways by modifying fluorescent dyes to attach to viral proteins without actually modifying the genetic code of the virus. So here's the problem that's pointed out by virus deniers.

How do you know that what got tagged is really a virus and not something else that's moving between cells and entering cells, which happens in biology all of the time. Since electron microscopy is only a still image, how do you know if this thing that looks like a virus is leaving the cell through a process called budding or entering the cell through a process called endocytosis. There's no way to tell. Also, little things called exosomes that can look exactly like viruses and are similar in size and shape can leave the cell, be taken up by cells, and move between cells just like viruses do. There can also be cellular fragments that look like viruses, but they're not viruses.

There is a big difference between them, though, and this is very important. The difference is exosomes do not cause antibody production because they are made of self. But virus particles do result in antibody production because they are not self. Viruses are made of foreign proteins that result in antibody production that can be detected and measured. Exosomes, although they can look exactly like viruses, do not result in antibody production.

So looking for the presence of antibodies is a way to tell the difference, but that is not gonna be good enough for virus deniers. So we could take it a step further to show that the particles are not exosomes. We can do what is called genetic sequencing. Now here's how that works. We do exactly what was done before by filtering and centrifuging to purify the layers based on density.

And after the layer is isolated, they take it a step further by dissolving the protein coat of the bacteriophages or the viruses with enzymes called proteases. Then you purify the layers again with centrifugation, and you isolate the layer that contains only the genetic material. The genetic material that remains is the complete genome of the virus. A long continuous strands of letters, if you will. It's not all chopped up.

And this is proven by a process called electrophoresis. The smaller strands of genetic material are going to migrate out here, but the longer strands stay down here. This proves that they have long strands, not little chopped up pieces. Then they get the sequence of the long strands by highly accurate and repeatable procedure that's called Sanger sequencing. Here's a basic description of Sanger sequencing.

It is known that cytosine and guanine always bind together. And thymine that's in DNA, or it would be uracil and RNA, will only bind with adenine. So they add those individual nucleotides to the substrate that contains this unknown long continuous strand of letters, and then they heat up the mixture so that the nucleotides will start binding to the string. And this is called the extension process. But here's the secret.

They purposely modify some of the nucleotides so that the extension process will immediately stop when the modified nucleotide is bound, chopping off the long string into shorter strings. Also, the modified nucleotides have fluorophores added to them that will light up a different color based on which nucleotide lights up when it was hit with a laser. Then they run these small strings through a process called electrophoresis that can determine the lengths of strings by one nucleotide difference. This allows the scientists to determine the order of the letters with a high degree of accuracy, and it is repeatable between different laboratories that are doing the investigations. In other words, you can give different labs the same unknown genetic strand.

They can sequence it and come up with the results that are almost exactly the same without consulting each other. This is real repeatable science that virus deniers have a hard time explaining. The differences between laboratories that sequence unknown genetic strands without telling them what it is, is less than 1 nucleotide in a strand of 1,000. The virus deniers want you to believe that the genetic sequences are just made up by sophisticated computer software that strings together small genetic sequences into a large one that is unique from its source, like this human liver cell that you see here, and then they call that a viral genome. They say it's all just made up and the sequence does not really exist.

So here's how that misinformation got started. Decades ago, when we didn't have the sophisticated detection mechanisms that we use today, Cell cultures were used to get enough particles we call viruses to look at. You need living cell cultures to get more viruses because the cells use their own resources of nucleotides and amino acids to make more viruses. Again, it is the living cell that is making more viruses, just like the living bacteria makes more bacteriophages. The virus is not making copies of itself as it has no intelligence to do that.

The living intelligence within the cell is copying the virus, and the message to make the virus is within the virus. The nucleotides, the transfer RNA, the amino acids make the proteins that make more viruses. And this is all coming from within the cell. This depletes the cell resources sometimes to the point of cell death. But virus deniers are quick to correctly point out that cells in cell cultures will always die, whether materials that contain viruses were added to them or not.

And when they die, cell fragments can appear that look exactly what viruses are supposed to look like, and you can see them here. All of this is true. This is a scanning electron microscope image of a cell dying through normal death. And this is called a pop ptosis. Here is the link where you can see the image and read more about it.

Also, once cells die, their genetic material ends up getting fragmented into smaller strands. Here is a transmission electron microscopy of a strand of genetic material. Now these strands, after cell death, are generally about 100 to 200 base pairs long. Virus deniers admit that these smaller strands can be sequenced, and this is done all the time by the Sanger method. Then they say that these smaller genetic strands that were sequenced and verified can be assembled with sophisticated computer software to come up with a made up long sequence that is thousands of letters long, unique and different from the cellular genome that it originally came from.

And then record that as a made up viral genome. Now you can certainly have a computer randomized these short strands into something very long and unique. But I propose that you will not be able to end up matching a verified genetic sequence of a virus. So here's an experiment that needs to be done. You take the same cell culture and you separate it into 2 groups, one of which you will add a substrate purported to contain viruses and the other you will not.

You treat both these groups the same as far as nutrients, antibiotics, and chemicals to be added. Both cultures will experience cell death either by necrosis due to viral infection or apoptosis due to starvation or chemicals. Either way, you will end up with cellular fragments. This part of the experiment has already been done, but we need to go further. In both groups, we need to use ultra centrifugation to purify all of the particles into different layered densities.

Most likely, you will end up with similar layers in both groups. Then you isolate the layers. And in the layer that purportedly contains viruses have at least 2 different labs sequence, the long continuous genetic strand that will be there without consulting each other and their results should be the same. Next, you take the similar density layer from the culture that the viruses were not added to, and you sequence that as well. The long continuous sequence that was found in the viral sample should not be there.

You will have smaller sequences that resulted from cellular death or apoptosis, and they will be 100 to 200 letters long. Next, have the sophisticated genomic sequencing software, try to assemble these fragments into a sequence that will match what came out of the viral sample. My guess is that they will not be able to do it. They will be able to do it if they would use enzymes called nucleases to break these genetic fragments into smaller pieces that are just a few nucleotides long, but that would be cheating. Now to my knowledge, this experiment has never been done.

If it has, I would like to see it. Another major complaint of virus deniers is that cell cultures are used and that viruses should be able to be purified and isolated directly from clinical samples without that cell culture step. Viruses have been imaged directly from clinical samples using various techniques since the early 1980s. And here is one study from 1981. But virus deniers will still ask, how do you know what you're looking at is really a virus?

Well, consider this very recent study where antibodies against influenza viruses were coated with magnetic nanobeads. Antibodies will not attach to ecosomes or other cellular fragments, but they will attach to viruses. The magnetism aggregated the virus particles together directly from a clinical sample, not a cell culture. And then they were viewed by electron microscopy. You can read it right here.

My opinion is that viruses do exist in the form of minuscule transmissible particles that are not alive. They have no intelligence and no desire to attack you. So what good are they then? What is their purpose for existence? Well, here's my theory, and it's not new by any means.

Doctors and scientists have been considering this for a very long time. Life is about survival. And in order for man to survive the poisons and toxins and radiation that we keep insisting on putting into the air and the food and the water, We need to adapt cellular functions to tolerate these things, or we would die off as a species. So to change cellular functions, we need to make new proteins. So where could the message to make these new proteins be coming from?

You were born with the DNA from your parents. And in that DNA is the message to code the proteins that make you what and who you are. The message is transcripted into messenger RNA here and then translated into proteins here. But if you need to make a new protein to change cellular function in a particular cell line, the message to make that protein has to come from somewhere else besides your DNA. Now admittedly, there is editing of the genetic sequence of the natural messenger RNA that happens all the time due to little segments of genes that are called transposons that move around and jump around and also due to the actions of APOBEC enzymes that are in your cellular cytoplasm.

But these changes are going to be minor. If you need a really big change, the message must come from outside the body. It's very possible that these messages could be contained in transmissible virus particles that reverse transcribe into our DNA that will ultimately result in new protein production that help us adapt to the environmental changes that we ourselves created. And the fact that human cells have receptors that will only attach to certain viruses means that we were meant to communicate with these things. Viruses could actually be an interspecies communication mechanism to keep our genomes updated.

And when man tries to block this communication from happening by using drugs or shots called vaccines, The cells of our bodies will mutate the virus so that it can continue to transmit. Always remember that it is us that mutates the virus. It is not the virus mutating itself. That is it is not alive and it doesn't have the intelligence nor the desire to do that. When science and organized medicine finally recognizes that viruses are a necessary part of the ecosystem that we should be coming into harmony with instead of trying to destroy them.

The way we look at communicable diseases will change forever. If you want to learn more about the immune system, consider taking my comprehensive 4 module course available here. Thanks for watching, and thanks for staying smart.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

transcript to 27min podcast Why viral infections are necessary dr stillwagon

https://rumble.com/v2z73vu-why-viral-infections-are-necessary.html
Human characteristics are wrongly placed on viruses. The virus wants to attack us. The virus wants to selectively mutate in order to survive. The virus is under tremendous pressure. None of that is true.

Viruses are not living things. They are genetic information surrounded by a shell made of proteins and sometimes fats and proteins depending upon their origin. They cannot think. They cannot metabolize. They can't move on their own, nor can they reproduce.

Viruses are manufactured by replication in the cells of other living organisms, such as bacteria, fungi, plants, animals, and even other humans. The viruses are then secreted or released or shed by the cells of these organisms. And as we discussed in module 1, this is theory. We have the biological explanations as to how this can happen, but nobody has actually seen it happen, nor will we ever be able to see it happen. So what happens is the virus particles ultimately end up in fluids, excreted waste or exhalations, making it possible for the transmission of viruses or genetic material from one organism to another so that the genetic information in them can be utilized.

And this happens all the time, regardless of lockdowns, social distancing, or even masking. It happens whether you have symptoms or not. This is nature, and it cannot be stopped any more than you can stop the ocean tides. So the bold new thinking is that the genetic material, the genetic information contained in virus particles is necessary and can be used to make proteins or help us gain function in other ways to adapt to our ever changing environment. Now once we make physical contact with a virus, the virus is either eliminated by our innate immune system or it is allowed to attach to receptors on that barrier that we talked about.

So the fact that our cells even have receptors that will accept the virus indicates that we were meant to communicate with them. And once the virus particle attaches, its genetic material is not injected by the virus. It is actually pulled in by the cell. The intelligent living cell is making this transfer happen, not the non intelligent nonliving virus. Our innate immune system is also communicating with universal intelligence and other innate immune systems from other humans around us by exosomes, which are virus like particles.

Now many philosophies and religions have stated that we are all connected, and we are all connected. And it is not by magic or some invisible thread. It is chemical, biological, and atomic, and some of the connection is physical, and these exosomes or virus particles that contain the genetic information are part of the biological connection. Even some doctors who deny the existence of viruses admit that there is genetic material that can be transferred between humans. Now the mechanism of the transfer is debatable.

What is not debatable is that you can find this genetic material in people with symptoms and people without symptoms. The PCR test proved that. Millions of people tested positive for the presence of genetic material, but they never got sick. So the genetic material can transfer, but the symptoms do not transfer. This is clearly evident by the simple observation that members of the same family can eat the same food, breathe the same air, and drink the same water, yet only one family member gets symptoms and the others do not.

So whether or not a person will display symptoms seems to have something to do with the condition of the immune system on two levels. 1st, its ability to prevent the infection from happening in the first place, And secondly, how it reacts to the infection if and when it does happen. Now we discuss these concepts in describing the innate immune system that protects you from infection, primarily with the actions of these 3 cells, the natural killer cell, the dendritic cell, and the activated t cell. And we also discussed the adaptive immune system and how that reacts to infections primarily with the production of antibodies. So the ability to prevent the infection, as you learned, happens at this epithelial barrier.

Now you can, of course, bypass that protective barrier and inject something directly through it. And as I have said many times, the easiest way to spread a bioweapon is to convince people to willingly inject it, thinking that it will somehow be able to protect them. Slowly but surely, science is recognizing that stopping the virus at the point of entry will prevent infections, while injecting something into the body will not be able to prevent infections. Fauci is clearly admitting this now. So they will try new ideas like spraying IgY antibodies that are created in birds, like chickens, directly into the nasal passages of humans.

These IgY antibodies will block some virus particles from attaching to human receptors, thereby preventing the infection right on that barrier. They will try the same idea by having you swallow them to get into the intestinal mucosa, but they will also learn the hard way that sometimes infections are necessary to keep humans alive on this planet. Blocking these infections from happening could have serious consequences to the survival of the human species. So the bold new idea that was presented earlier is that sometimes virus infections will need to happen. This will allow the genetic material from the virus to get into our cell lines to make new proteins that changes cellular function so that we can adapt to the environmental changes that we ourselves created.

This can affect one cell line in particular, the liver cells, for example. If the genetic information needs to spread through the human population, the virus particle will be replicated in the epithelial layer and allowed to go back out into the environment so that it can be experienced by others. This is called horizontal transmission. If man tries to block the horizontal transmission by using shots called vaccines or other drugs. APOBEC enzymes within our cells will intelligently mutate the virus so that it can continue to transmit.

The mutations occur not because of pressure on the virus. The pressure is on our species to continue the necessary transmission. The virus has absolutely no ability to direct or cause these mutations. Now random mutations will always occur in RNA viruses like the SARS CoV 2 virus, because when they are being translated into proteins, occasionally, the letters get mixed up. But these are meaningless and will not propagate through the population.

The mutations that will propagate are directed by the innate intelligence within us that is in communication with universal intelligence. So when you hear scientists talk about the vaccine driving viral mutations, that is absolutely true, but it is not the virus mutating itself. It is us mutating the virus. If the genetic information needs to be permanently integrated into the human genome, it will do so by affecting the sperm or egg so that the new human will have the new genetic information in every cell of the body, and that will pass on to future generations. This is called vertical transmission.

So for any of this to happen, the genetic information must get inside the body. Once that happens, the body must have a way to stop it from happening over and over again, and that is called immunity. Now how does this genetic information get in? Well, the way it gets in is from a natural infection by contacting the epithelial barrier, either by breathing it in, swallowing it, or having it directly contact the surface of the eyes. There can also be contact in the genital urinary tract through sexual activity.

Now all of those areas are covered with mucus where the particle will get trapped. Now if the person has been previously naturally infected, there will be IgA antibodies present to attach to the virus or bacteria and neutralize it so that an infection will not take place. Now remember, the virus is not intelligent, and it does not have the desire to attack you. If there are no IGA antibodies in the mucus or it penetrates the mucus and nears the epithelial tissue, the next step will happen. Now the virus is not inside of you yet.

It is still outside of you on this epithelial barrier. There will be an attachment of the virus particle to the receptors that are on the epithelial cells. Now this attachment is purely biochemical based on proximity. The virus has no intelligence, no ability to move on its own and no desire to attack you. And just because there is an attachment does not necessarily mean that it will be invited inside.

The instant this attachment happens, Toll like receptors that you learned about that are on these epithelial cells will notify the immune system through cytokine signaling exactly what is going on. Now here is where it gets really fun and interesting. The dendritic cells that you learned about reach through the barrier, grab the particle, take it inside of itself, and chop it up into smaller protein parts. These parts are then shown on MHC one sites to memory t cells that are near the epithelial barrier to see if they remember any of those parts from previous infections. If they do remember them, these t cells immediately become cytotoxic and will order these epithelial cells to kill themselves by apoptosis before you even get infected.

But this is a unique new virus particle with unique new antigens. So those memory t cells do not get activated. The dendritic cells will then migrate in the lymphatic system, and eventually, naive t helper cells will be found that match the unique new antigen. And this is due to the VDJ recombination that we talked about that makes it possible for these naive t cells to recognize any possible protein that could ever exist in the entire universe. Even one scientist like Fauci haven't even thought of yet.

This is what will protect you from any bioweapon that they could ever think of. So this is the T cell training now that is so important for helping B cells to make proper antibodies and for T cell memory for all parts of that particle, not just one little piece of it. So while that t cell training is going on, there will be an intelligent merging of the membrane on the virus particle with the membrane that's on the epithelial cell surface. This involves what is called cleaving of the proteins in the receptor binding domain so that they will change shape, and that allows the merge to occur. Remember, as we learned, there are toll like receptors on those epithelial cells that will instantly notify the immune system that something is attached to this barrier.

After the merge happens, the contents of the virus are then pulled into the cell, not injected by the virus. It has no ability to do that. Another thought is that the entire virus particle is pulled into the cell in what is called an endosome, which gets broken down late later. Now these are biological explanations as to how this can happen, but we will never be able to see either of these things happen live, real time. That is why some doctors and scientists will deny the existence of viruses as you learned about in module 1.

The virus particle is now inside of the cells that make up the epithelial barrier, but you are not infected yet. The particle must be inside the barrier, in your blood or lymph for you to be infected. And when science figures out a way to easily detect the genetic information in your blood, not out here in your snot, the way we look at communicable diseases will change forever. So now that the virus is inside the cells of the barrier, their MHC one sites that you learned about will disappear. The natural killer cells that you learned about in module 3 will recognize this and will normally send a signal to the cell to kill itself by apoptosis.

But this is new genetic information that needs to be there. So interleukins that you learned about are secreted and have switched off the ability of the natural killer cells to send that apoptotic death signal. But you are not infected yet. You now have viral DNA or RNA in the cytoplasm of the cell, Ribosomes and other organelles within the cell that we didn't even talk about, including endoplasmic reticulum, microtubules, and Golgi apparatus are then used to package a new virus particle. These are then released back into the mucosal layer to transmit to other humans.

They are also released to the inside of you, into your blood and lymph to affect other cells that are inside of your body, and now you are infected. So as these new virus particles make their way through your blood and through your lymph, Some will get phagocytized by antigen presenting cells chopped up, and the parts will be shown to these t cells. But many will not get phagocytized, so the infection will continue. But as these t cells become educated and become activated cytotoxic t cells that you learned about at module 3, they will clone themselves so that many more are now available. And within a few days, the innate immune system in healthy individuals without involving antibodies will be able to completely eliminate the viruses from the body.

This is done mostly by these activated t cells that have been trained to recognize all parts of the virus. Bacterial infections are not like that, though. If bacteria or other large organisms get in the blood or lymph that do not belong there, they are attacked immediately either by phagocytosis or direct activation of the complement system that you learned about at the very end of module 3. Bacteria. In your blood or lymph that do not belong, there are dangerous because they secrete toxins that can hurt you.

So alarm signals go off right away and the immune system will immediately go after these things. There are complement proteins that react to stuff on the surface of those large organisms, and the complement cascade cascade is then activated so that the membrane attack complex will put holes in the membranes of these organisms so that they will leak and die. But this is a virus particle, so it is allowed to move around for a while. It must use receptors on tissue cells inside of your body to attach. So, obviously, it will only attach to tissues that have those receptors.

And when the particle is pulled in by those tissue cells, April Beck enzymes that you learned about help decide whether or not to replicate the virus or just use parts of the genetic material that's in the virus to make new proteins. Or part of the genetic information can be integrated into the DNA of that particular cell line, and it will remain there for the rest of that person's life. This viral replication and translation into proteins is modulated by the interleukins that you learned about in module 2 so that this process does not become overly inflammatory or out of control. Now, depending upon the condition of these individual immune systems, many different levels of symptoms will occur from none to mild to severe and even to death in some people. Remember you learned in module 1 that 70% of all poliovirus infections are completely asymptomatic yet still will result in lifelong immunity, and less than 1% end up with lasting paralysis.

What we should be doing is trying to figure out how to make the less than 1% group look like the 70% and not injecting something into everyone, trying to protect the less than 1%, an idea that clearly does not work. Now while this replication and protein manufacturing is happening inside of the tissue cells, The t cells are communicating with b cells to make perfect antibodies for all parts of this new virus and remember them for the rest of your life. Most of the time, the infection is completely gone by the time these refined perfect antibodies show up. Again, it is the cells of your immune system that are going to clear the viruses, not antibodies. Antibodies are only there to mark the pathogens for destruction.

Here's how that works. If the person's immune system was weak and the infection has persisted, these new perfect antibodies will now attach to the virus particles, blocking them from entering new cells. The tails of those antigen antibody complexes will then attach to phagocytes like macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils. And over a few days, the viruses are completely eliminated, and the infection is over. The plasma cells that made the antibodies now turn into long term memory b cells that will reside in the bone marrow to quickly react to subsequent infections if and when they happen.

And the t cells that got trained will also have memory to all parts of virus and will be deployed to areas near the epithelial barrier to protect you from further infections. These are called tissue resident memory t cells. The t cell memory is what prevents infections from happening. If this didn't happen, we would not be immune to anything ever. Kind of like what the jab people are experiencing now because their T cells got trained to remember a protein created from the shot, and this protein does not exist on natural viruses anymore.

Therefore, they will continue to be infected. So as the infection winds down, about 90% of the T cells are going to end up killing themselves. 10% of them are going to become these tissue resident memory T cells. And when they see the intruder again, they will become cytotoxic and will destroy the cells with the viruses in them before you get infected. Now this only works where the original infection was, like your nasal membranes.

So there are going to be effector memory t cells then. And these are the ones that patrol your lymph and blood looking for the same antigen that activated their ancestors just in case one sneaks in elsewhere. Then you're going to have what are called central memory T cells that stay in the lymph nodes and will produce more cytotoxic t cells if they recognize something. This system is so powerful that when you come in contact with the virus again, and you most certainly will, You won't even notice it, most likely for the rest of your life.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

TRANSCRIPT OF STATEMENT TO MEETING OF MEDICAL DOCTORS FOR COVID ETHICS INTERNATIONAL AND TO THE WORLD ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANO ON 3 JANUARY 2024

https://rumble.com/v44yj43-archbishop-carlo-vigan.html 

Archbishop Vigano: Yes, thank you for giving me this opportunity to address you on this occasion.

And I share with you some matters regarding the present situation in the world and in the church.

For the past four years, we have been witnessing the implementation of a criminal plan of world depopulation, achieved through the creation of a false pandemic and imposition of her false vaccine, which you now know to be a biological weapon of mass destruction, designed with the aim of destroying the immune system of the entire population, causing sterility and the onset of deadly diseases.

Many of our friends and acquaintances have died or been severely damaged by the adverse effects of these experimental gene serums.

Many have discovered too late that they have been the victims of a global plan with a single script and a single direction.

What is even more serious is that this new Malthusian project of mass extermination, to which is added the will to control each of us through graphene oxide nano structures, has been announced to us for some time by those in the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum who conceived and implemented it.

The rulers of the western states, hostage to Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab, have become accomplices to this crime, demonstrating their malice and premeditation by their behaviour of falsifying data on alleged infection, doctoring statistical data to attribute death and adverse effects to covid-19 but not to the gene serums, prohibiting effective treatments and imposing harmful protocols that have no scientific basis, banning autopsies and preventing accurate reports to authorities.

In this attack, unprecedented in the history of the human race, we have witnessed the complicity of all national and International institutions, the entire medical profession, and the media.

A social engineering operation has been carried out to manipulate consensus through terror threats, blackmail, and the violation of citizens’ most sacrosanct fundamental rights.

The Judiciary has been silent.

The armed forces have looked the other way.

The teachers and priests have zealously cooperated.

We are well aware of the perpetrators of this crime against God and Humanity.

Of course, the multinational pharmaceutical corporations have profited disproportionately from mass vaccination and they are now prepared to accumulate still more billions of dollars from the need for treatments against the turbo cancers that their serums have caused.

Those who peddle the vaccine and profited from administering this poison to pregnant women children and elderly, have funded the self-styled experts, paying them to propagandize false efficacy and safety through the mainstream media.

Multinationals have profited and due to the lockdowns they have taken the place of small businesses, restaurants and local shops.
Energy suppliers have profited and are still profiting out of the crisis created by the system.

They have made huge profits by the costs of electricity and gas that are forcing businesses to increase prices and close.

Those who took advantage of the restrictions to work from home, those who sold mask that were not only useless but actually harmful, those who provided plexiglass barriers and hand sanitizers, and those who manage the measurement of fever in public places also took their cut of profit.

Many of them who understood perfectly well what was happening preferred to remain silent so as not to miss the opportunity to make money off the lives and health of the rest of us.

But it’s not just money that is the motive for this crime.

Behind the motivation of many is the will to power of the subversive Davos elite, which aims to establish the New World Order.

The psycho pandemic has been a dress reaction for the attack they are now making against the economy, the social fabric and indeed the very life of humanity.

15-minute cities, digital identity, returning money and the destruction of agriculture and ranching all serve the same purpose stated in the agenda 2030 and the Rockefeller foundation’s great reset project.

The wars in Ukraine and Palestine have also the same purpose, to destabilise the international order, create permanent crisis, and fuel conflict that will impoverish individual Nations and feed the globalist Leviathan.

Gaza’s oil fields are tempting targets for those who want to appropriate them in order to keep Europe and United States under blackmail, especially when the same people are imposing insane energy policies in the name of a fake climate emergency.

Today the perpetrators of these crimes have a name and a face, their accomplices in governmental institutions are guilty of high treason and very serious crimes.

All come from the World Economic Forum and were students of his program called Young Global Leaders for Tomorrow.

Others like George Soros supported them by means of philanthropic foundations that fuel social strife, Civil War and colour revolutions around the world.

This Global coup d’état must be denounced and those responsible must be tried and judged by an international Court.

But above all it is necessary for all of us to understand that this all-out war against humanity is not motivated only by their lust for wealth and power but mainly by a religious motive, a theological reason.

This reason is Satan’s hatred: hatred of God, hatred of God’s creation and hatred of man who is created in the image and likeness of God.

Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, George Soros and their hundreds of servants whom they blackmail in government all hate God, and they hate life, which only God can give.

They hate love which comes only from God.

They hate peace, which can reign only where Christ reigns.

As Tucker Carlson said a few days ago, we are facing people who serve Satan and the Demons of hell.

Just as the normal people worship and serve God.

This is a battle in which body and soul, matter and spirit, are made the objects of mortal attack by men and spiritual powers.

But let us not forget that if our enemy avails himself of the help of infernal Spirits we have on our side the Lord God of all armies arrayed, Dominus Deus about and all the hosts of angels and Saints infinitely more powerful.

God is Almighty.

Let us never forget that.

He is father. He does not abandon his children in time of crime.

And therefore, I exhort you dear friends to fight this battle with the spiritual weapons that God places at your disposal: prayer, trust in the Lord and the awareness that this enemy will not be defeated where it is most organized and fearsome but by striking it where it is weak.

This weakness comes from his corruption, from his being subservient to evil from the (toll) of all sins that it has committed and still commits: sins against God’s little children.

Because the men and women who in these four years have submitted to enduring lockdowns, violation of their rights, job deprivation and social segregation are not willing to tolerate the crimes that this cursed network of perverts and paedophiles commits against children.

Therefore, bring to light and courageously denounce the network of complicity and crimes of politicians, bankers, actors, journalists, prelates and famous people who are united by their blood pact.

And the whole castle of lies and deceptions that they have hatched will collapse, dragging with it the entire Globalist plan, woke ideology, gender theory, the fake climate emergency and fraud and digital currency.

“Simul staben, simul caden” says the Latin maxim: “just as they stand together, so also they will collapse together”.

Stay strong therefore under the banner of Christ and in the army of God, who is Almighty and who won the cross, has already won the world that is now entering in his final stages.

Gather around the Lord, call His holy name and this will give impetus to your battle.

Remember the words of Saint Paul: “I can do all things through him who strengthens me”.

May God bless you all.

Charles Kovess: Thank you. Thank you, Your grace. That is that is most powerful important and thank you so much for sharing.
Stephen. Please say hello to the Archbishop and we got started because we had him at the start.

Stephen Frost: So Archbishop Vigano I’m so grateful to you for actually seeing my email. I thought you hadn’t seen it. But you had and thank you for coming on and standing with us and speaking to us today. That’s so nice of you.

Archbishop Vigano: Thank you. I will, just had that but I mentioned that several times in my intervention that also the church and in particular the Holy See had been infiltrated in this battle from the side of Satan.

This is the situation for that we need now to to for ourselves this and use this weapon spiritual weapons that I mentioned in my address. May God bless you.

Stephen Frost: Thank you.

*

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

read transcript to 54min podcast Bombshell interview with Dr. Murakami reveals global plan for self-replicating vaccines.

https://rumble.com/v4zj7wr-bombshell-interview-with-dr.-murakami-reveals-global-plan-for-self-replicat.html 

Welcome to today's interview here on Bryteown.com. I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Bryteown, and I believe that the interview we're about to engage in may be one of the most historic international interviews that you've ever seen on this platform. We're about to interview researcher and immunologist, doctor Murakami. He's joining us from Japan today to raise the alarm about a new emerging technology that appears to point in the direction of self amplifying, never ending replication of mRNA technology in human subjects. Now, to introduce doctor Motokami is, Michael Young, well known by this audience.

Welcome, Michael. Great to see you. Thank you, Michael. Yeah. I'm here actually with Masako Kanaha as well.

She'll be translating if if if there's any difficulty at all. Actually, doctor Murakami Hello, Masako. She she's off to the side. You'll see her in a moment. Now, yeah, as you know, normally, when you see Masako and and me somewhere, we're somewhere incredibly important such as the dairying gap or Netherlands on the food supply issues.

And likewise, now in Japan, many Americans are asking why are we in Japan? Because this self replicating mRNA vaccine, quote, unquote, we know that's not the right word, is absolutely deadly and absolutely as existentially threatening as the non borders that we have. Right? I mean, literally, the open borders will kill the United States. We know that, but so will this.

Right? That's why we're here because Japan is the epicenter for this. This is the Yeah. Yeah. This is it.

So and and doctor, Murakami will tell you all about it. So he's also good friends with the discoverer of ivermectin. That's another very important, side channel to to talk about. It's very important to talk, and he speaks English well, as well. Another another very important thing is doctor Murakami was friends with former prime minister Abe, Shinzo Abe, who was assassinated.

And there's an incredibly important story to tell about Russia, Ukraine, and, his I'll let doctor Murakami tell the story. I need to get offline now because what he has to say is incredibly important. We are we're we're very honored to have you on, and thank you so much for speaking to our, American and English speaking audience about your research. And we wish you prayers for the assassination of Abe who was, you know, very much highly regarded by many in the international community. But, please, I I introduce you as a researcher with a background in immunology.

Can for our audience, can you please describe a little bit more about your focus of research before you get into your findings? Yeah. Okay. I have I have been working on on nimmunology field for 30 years. I produce all sorts of antibodies, including influenza antibody, which which are utilized for, influenza type a type b b diagnosis.

And it is used in all over the world. And the share was almost 90%. So many companies are using my antibody for in order in order to detect influenza virus. All can all countries. So you you have you also looked at topics like, interference RNA?

Yes, I do. Yeah. I am doing lots of experiment using RNAs as well. And originally, I was working as, various viruses, including SV40, adenovirus, and so on. I was originally a biologist.

And after that, I moved I moved to immunology field. Okay. So this explains then your understanding of the application of this technology in human biology. I mean, you you are able to bridge both of these fields. Yes.

That's right. So actually, I I am very good at immunology as well as, virology. Okay. So Yeah. Why I understand the mechanism of mRNA vaccines early on.

Okay. Yeah. Then let's now we're gonna show some clips from your presentation here while while you're talking. I watched it before the show and I thought it was a very very good summary explanation of the fact that this technology you're talking about today allows the replication. This is the replicating replication of the mRNA.

Injected mRNA will be replicated in the new format. That's an important thing. Yeah. Right. Exactly.

But what you're bringing to light that very few people have spoken about is that this replication expands beyond just the spike protein sequence. The replication also replicates the replication engine. All the sequence will be be replicated. All mRNAs, all mRNAs will be replicate in the injected people. So that allows for the replication engine itself to be replicated.

That's right. Yeah. In other words, now we're talking about a exponential production of the Spike Pro 2. That's right. Yeah.

You are exactly right. Yep. And then you expressed concerns about whether this could then cause passage of the self replicating payload from one person to another person? Yes. Yeah.

Yeah. I think I think it it is very likely. I think it has to be, denied before application. Applying to In other words, what you're saying is that in in in terms of safety, it's critical that we prove it cannot happen in order for it to be considered safe and that that proof has not been achieved. That's right.

Yeah. Okay. So there remains a possibility that this can replicate from person to person? Yeah. Yeah.

That's right. Yeah. Yep. Yep. If that's the case, you mentioned in your presentation that there's no stopping.

There's no what what term did you use? No stopping at all. Yeah. So this if this replicates in the way that you're concerned it may and spread from person to person, it can never be stopped. That's right.

And then we're talking about unknown consequences for humanity. That's right. You're exactly right. And we already know that the spike protein itself is attacking nervous systems, heart tissue, cardiovascular tissue. Yes.

It yeah. Yep. Highly toxic proteins. Right. That's why.

So is it possible that the the entire human race then could be subjected to a scenario where there is a wave of of spike proteins being expelled by from the bodies of of everybody walking around who hasn't yet died from it? Yes. Yeah. I do not want to imagine the situation, but, it it may be happen. Important thing is yeah.

Yeah. In October, injection of that new format of embedded blockchain will start in Japan to a large large number of people. That's a real problem. So just just to explain the contrast to our audience in a normal vaccine, not mRNA, if something has gone wrong with the vaccine, it may harm the people injected, but it cannot harm a second generation of people beyond that. But with this technology, the self replicating payload of replication, if something goes wrong that may be discovered even years later, it can never be pulled back.

That's right. Yep. And are you aware of this technology being prepared for deployment in actual vaccines for humans at this point or is it still only in the research phase? Yeah. That's the most important problem.

In Japan, injection will start in October. It will start this year? Yeah. That's right. The doctor, 4,000 more than 4,000 already injected.

Already many people have been injected of this new vaccines already. Do you have any knowledge about, in the US, the FDA status of this technology? Only Japanese government have approved that. So so Okay. As far as I know, I yeah.

As Japan with the BG, only country which will inject new mRNA vaccines. Okay. So so Japan appears to be then as far as you're aware, is Japan the the the first start date of this in the world? Fasting fasting's out loud. Injecting many people, 1,000,000 people and so on.

And how what is the mood in Japan in terms of embracing this technology? Are there are there many people who are very actively seeking this out? They want this? Yeah. We we are making big ram to to many people, but, you know, major media do not, incorporate our information.

Not at all. So all reminder, media is presenting our stuff, our information. Yeah. Would you say that the the alternative media in Japan is gaining audience and gaining ground in terms of of questioning the safety? Yes.

Yeah. Yeah. In Twitter, essentially, essentially, many people are watching my movies, and I think they have already realized the danger of that new vaccines replicating mRNA vaccines. Yeah. I've seen many videos, some sent to me by Michael there, videos of Japanese people marching in peaceful protest against the the vaccine, vaccine mandates or vaccine rollouts.

Are those kinds of, public reactions? Are they growing in scale now in Japan? I think growing a lot, but important thing is major media did they do not, focused on that. They neglected. Yes.

Yes. Absolutely. And and let me apologize in advance for asking this, such a sensitive question. But given the history of Japan and the use of technology to harm large numbers of people, are you concerned that this may repeat some of those same mistakes now in our modern age? So important issue is like this.

If, essentially, in Japan's, government with new technology, Essentially, replicating mRNA vaccines. If it's okay, I think USA you US US government will import that into your country? Well, Japan is known as such a world leader in technology in so many areas, you know, excelling in, precision manufacturing and sciences and medical technology. But You're right. But why in your view why has the precautionary principle seemingly been abandoned in this case because technology without caution can be very dangerous.

Well well, so one reason for that is Japanese government is controlled by a US company like Pfizer, Moderna, American, and so on. Well and so is our government, in the US. Our government's controlled by the corporations as well. And there's, many people would say that there's such a strong American government influence in Japanese policy also that is there a sense there that that the Japanese government is being pressured to embrace this vaccine technology in order to benefit western corporations? Yes.

Yeah. I think it is very likely. I do not have a strong evidence, but it is very likely, I think. Yeah. Do you feel and, again, please accept my apologies for asking such direct questions.

But do you or do do people in your movement there, which I would loosely call a health freedom movement or a health awareness movement, is there a sense that the Japanese people are being unethically exploited as human experiments by the pharmaceutical companies in order to test this in a modern country. That's right. Yeah. I I have I have been alarming to, many peoples, But, yeah, my, my effect is limited to 11,000,000 people like that. How how can we help you expand the reach of your of your warning?

So it's important, yeah. Important question. If you people in US have a strong discussion about the 3 replicating work genes, it should be very useful It it will be very important. You know, the the United States of America is well known for engaging in what we call economic imperialism where yes. And and and I understand that economics perhaps is not not your area of focus, but let me provide some context to our audience.

The United States has used economic sanctions against countries in the past like Taiwan in order to force Taiwan to accept marketing of Marlboro cigarettes, for example, or the US has economically punished European countries for trying to block, genetically engineered organisms or GMOs. Is there a sense or is there do you have any knowledge of is the is the US threatening economic sanctions of any kind or coercion against Japan, in order to try to push this technology into Japanese mainstream medicine. Yeah. That's right. Yeah.

I think yeah. It may be useful. As a Japanese government, have a strong influence over USA government. So it is very important, I think. Yeah.

Are the Japanese people aware of how many injuries and deaths have already occurred following the the initial COVID vaccines? Yes. They have. Yeah. Yeah.

Yes. They have. But, I think the number is still limited. So maybe 1 tenth of the old population maybe. In your knowledge of the homogeneity of the Japanese genetic code, is there any advantage or disadvantage to the Japanese people compared to American people who are very genetically diverse, or diverse, in terms of exposure to this possible self replicating spike protein payload?

Well, well, yeah. It is also important question. I think, yeah. I think there is one possibility. We may be okay for a new technology, but in USA, many people will be affected by, new vaccines.

We are relatively homogeneous in terms of human genomes. So we may be okay, but you know, in USA, you may be either way, very harmful. Right. Right. Possibly, they they might roll it out in Japan and say, oh, hey.

No problems in Japan. So let's take it to America and then suddenly there are more problems. My other question is the Japanese diet is well known to involve the intake of more, for example, seaweed which contains iodine and other beneficial different different substances that are found in seaweed that that are that support and enhance, immune function. Is there a dietary advantage to the Japanese people because of their traditional diets that may offer them protection against this vaccine that's not that the American people don't benefit from. I yeah.

It is also likely. I think it is possible. As part of your research in immunology, have you looked at, phytochemicals or phytonutrition in terms of immunological modulation? So essential I say vitamin d is very important in order to have a strong immunity as well as zinc. Absolutely.

Usually Japanese people are taking iodine as well. But but the Japanese people, I would think, right now, in the modern age, suffer from a lack of vitamin d in the same way that most Americans do because they live their lives indoors and they work indoors. Yeah. I think so. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

You are right. The important thing is Yeah. Yeah. I think here is one important thing. Many people have already injected mRNA vaccines.

It did work against immune system. So it will weaken immunity to, virus and the stool muscles. So I think Japanese people have very weak immune ability in these days after injecting mRNA vaccines. About IC models, 80%. See, I I think I think the American people share that.

I think I think immune function has been strongly compromised across the United States. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. And because in part because of the spike protein injections, but also I think, because of the of the atrocious diets that look, The American diets, as you know, are among the very worst in the world, nutrient depleted, heavily processed foods, full of calories, but lacking nutrition. So recently, many Japanese people are learning food over the USA. They are taking American style food as well. Increasingly, yes.

I I'm I'm aware of that. The the the American fast food chains are very popular in Tokyo and, other other Japanese cities. Yeah. Something like that. Right.

But but this brings up then the question of, comorbidity factors. So this new technology you're referring to, the self amplifying mRNA technology, what are the possible interactions of this with existing comorbidities such as, obesity or, early cardiovascular disease or diabetes or or blood glucose disorders? We we do we do not have the answer yet, but, yeah. We have to look at it. Yeah.

Carefully. In your research, is there any hint of which which, physiological systems may be most susceptible to spike protein damage? Probably not yet. Yeah. If we start injecting many peoples, we can easily observe the efficacy, effect of the injection easily.

But right now, only one fraction people injected the set of duplicative actions, in this moment. So, yeah. Okay. Alright. Next question then is concerning the the non vaccines, they inject a certain mass of, mRNA.

Let's say, 250 micrograms or maybe maybe less, maybe more, something in in that area. And and that only affects a certain number of cells in the body that then produce the spike protein proteins. But through the self replication mechanism that you're describing, if that then spreads to other cells in the body, takes over other ribosomes in those cells, is there a point of oversaturation where the cells that normally produce the the normal proteins necessary for sustained human physiology, they are occupied producing spike protein instead and the normal human proteins are not getting manufactured in sufficient quantities? Well, I think it is very important important aspects. And we have no evidence of such phenomena yet.

Because we do not have the, real action. Yeah. We we do not have access to the real ampl self amplifying work chain. Okay. So but what would we look for?

So you say it's going to be released in October, I think you said. And I'm I'm gonna call this the spike protein storm. So the spike or spike protein tsunami in the body. Okay? Spike proteins flooding the body from the inside.

If the if the normal spike proteins I'm sorry. If the normal human proteins are not being produced in the quantities that are needed for human life, what symptoms would would emerge that we would be early warning signs to us that something's going wrong? Okay. So I think there is one important issue, I g g four issues. Do you know IgG4?

IgG4 is inhibiting the regular immune system. And if you have a high level of IgG4, your immune system doesn't work. So you're talking about hyper autoimmune Hyper autoimmune. Hyper autoimmune. Hyper hyper autoimmune.

And as far as, we analyze many Japanese people has high level of IgG for antibody against spike protein. And it's not so good. And it will inhibit you regular immunity against tumor and also viruses. So is it when I say hyper autoimmune disorders, is is that is that a fair description of of what you think might happen? I see IgG4 is a different issue.

Highpower autoimmunization is also important issue as well. So Okay. Alright. So essentially what I think you're saying is that we won't know until until the injections begin. And once the injections begin, it may be too late to ever stop whatever it's unleashed upon humanity.

No. That's right. Yeah. Okay. Why why I am alarming strongly to many people.

Now in your lectures and presentations about this, have you brought people's attention to the fact that let me share this with my audience as some context. But back in the 19 nineties in South Africa, the apartheid regime was heavily researching self replicating vaccines as a genocidal weapon against black Africans. So I'm I'm just bringing in some history here, and this was thought of as a genocidal weapon system to exterminate a particular ethnic group. At the time, the technology was not mature enough to be fully deployed. Otherwise, well, you know, all the black Africans in South Africa might have been murdered, you know, decades ago.

So thank goodness that technology did not exist, but the technology does exist now. And instead of it being presented as a genocidal weapon against a specific group, it's being presented as medicine to cure co or, you know, whatever infection. Yep. You are right. I think yeah.

I think introducing mRNA method is very important. Recently, do you know it? Repeat nano particle. That's a very important method to, introduce mRNA into human cells. And and okay.

I I didn't quite follow that. Can you explain more? Yeah. So, usually, introducing mRNA into inside of the cell is very difficult. By using lNMP, it it becomes easy, very easy and effective introducing mRNA into cells.

Oh, okay. Okay. Lipid nanoparticles you're referring to? Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Lipid nanoparticles. Yeah.

I mean, I I believe that that is widely deployed in the current technology. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So are you saying that the lipid nanoparticles combined with the self replicating payloads of the mRNA technology that you're announcing?

Yep. Yes. That's right. Yeah. Exactly.

Now we're talking about increased permeability of the cell membranes? Yes. That's right. Yeah. So, introduce deprecating mRNA effectively into human cells by using the Gnab heat method.

What has been the reaction to your warning by the the, the Japanese science medicine establishment? Any question. I think, it is very question. One fraction of researchers are, yeah, accepting my alarm. But majority people do not believe self replicating vaccine is dangerous.

I don't know the reason. I think they are accepting money from, I think they are accepting research money from Japanese government. So I said they do not want to, follow my alarm. Are there are there sectors of science and medicine in Japan that are recognizing the importance of the alarm that you are sounding and recognizing the precautionary principle as as a as a key pillar of science? I hope so.

But, actually, yeah. In reality, very small number of the scientists are alarming like this. Only one fraction, only small number. Okay. So what, what is going to be necessary, you do you believe, in in Japan in order to change that equation and bring more people to the awareness that you are alerting people about?

Yeah. We we are having a numerous meeting, and we have movies aligned with Japanese people, and we are conflict distributing. We are doing many things. But still, effect is limited. Now let me ask you about the Japanese American people.

Yeah. Japanese Americans. They there was very high vaccine uptake among Japanese Americans during COVID. Yeah. There was also high uptake among Chinese Americans, Korean Americans, Vietnamese Americans, and so on.

For whatever reason, the Asian American populations tended to be much more compliant with vaccines. Yeah. Whereas black Americans and Native Americans said, no. Maybe not. Maybe I'm gonna say no.

Do you do you think that that will hold true with this this vaccine techno self replicating vaccine? Will will Asians in America and elsewhere around the world continue to be more, let's say, compliant? I see. Yeah. It is a very difficult question to to answer, but, yeah.

Very well. I don't know. Okay. Alright. Well but, I mean, clearly, you are willing to speak out against the the mainstream consensus.

Right? And there are many others. I mean, you have Masako there, and and I've seen you know, you have some of your protests have been tens of 1,000 or more people. So, you know, clearly there's a contingent of of population in Japan that is, concerned about this. Now what about let me ask you about relatively recent history, what, 12 or 13 years ago, but also involving science, which was the promise of safety of the nuclear power reactor at Fukushima.

So yeah. Yeah. Fukushima accident. Yeah. Yeah.

Yes. The accident. So isn't that another case where the government largely told the Japanese people, don't worry, everything's fine. It's engineered perfectly. There's no risk.

It's perfectly safe. And that turned out not to be true. Yeah. That's right. Yeah.

We have a big accident in Fukushima, but interestingly, new factory for mRNA vaccines are in Fukushima. What? Really? Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. New new self replicating vaccines are really produced in Fukushima. I almost can't make this up. It's like, I guess, the ionizing radiation is really helpful for mutating proteins. Okay.

That's that's bizarre to me. But but also I wanna point out that the Fukushima nuclear power facilities were engineered by an American company, General Electric. Right? So here's another case of an American technology that has been deployed in Japan with assurances of safety from the American government and American industry. And and now just as Fukushima then was actually right next to a fault line, they should have anticipated a tidal wave, you know, a tsunami.

Is this vaccine, which is also I I I believe most of the technology is initially engineered in America, Isn't this potentially following the same path? I think so too. Yeah. Yeah. Amazingly, new factory is at Fukushima, located in Fukushima.

Essentially, they are preparing numerous amount of mRNA vaccines, which will be sufficient for all the population all over the world. Okay. So so I don't again, I don't mean to be insensitive, but how is it possible that the that many of the Japanese people have so quickly forgotten Fukushima? What happened there? How they were lied to by American companies about the safety of their technology?

I was I was also learning the yeah. I was also learning the, the danger of the radiation as well. But recently, Fukushima people have accepted the mRNA vaccine. Okay. So so let's talk about this.

So as you know, radiation has a half life. Right? So after 10 half lives, the radiation is considered to be mostly gone. And I believe one of the key isotopes in Fukushima was the cesium 137, and the half life I believe is 29 years or so. So 3 centuries before that will be, you know, gone, so to speak.

However, the inverse of half lives is self replicating technology, which is what you're talking about with vaccines. So whereas radiation can disappear or dissipate over time according to the laws of decay in physics, the self replicating vaccines exponentially multiply over time. That's right. Yeah. One reason for why Hashima has built up the new new facility for emerging network chains is, in that area, almost no people at all in that area.

So all the people are gone from Fukushima area. So in that area, we have a lot of space space therefore constructing anything. Essentially Japanese government is working for that. They are supplying large amount of money to the companies. That's the reason why they have a large mRNA blockchains, factory in Fukushima.

So so the government is providing economic grants to try to rebuild Yes. Yes. Affected areas? Yeah. Almost 1 100 100% of cost for building the factory.

Okay. Alright. That that that's interesting, but but I I wanna redirect you back to my my last point, which is that even in Fukushima, the mistake vanished over time or the catastrophe will vanish over time. This potential catastrophe with self replicating mRNA will never vanish if your worst fears are correct. It will multiply over time, and it can never be stopped.

So it's it's very important because human beings do not understand exponential growth. The the the mind thinks in a linear fashion. Right? Does not accurately model exponential phenomenon, in the real world. So is it possible that the Japanese regulators who are approving of this technology are cognitively incapable of accurately assessing the future ramifications of a present day mistake?

That's one reason why I am alarming to that government. They are ignoring me. It's okay. Safe. It is not dangerous.

Yeah. I am yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.

I am lying or something like that. And we we appreciate you so much for sounding the alarm and also for taking the time here today. May I ask Masako, Masako, am I leaving anything out here? I'm I'm asking the questions that come to mind, but what am I missing? So maybe it's, very interesting for you to ask doctor Murakami about, the scientist who discovered Ivermectin.

He is Absolutely. Friends with doctor Omura. Doctor Omura. Yeah. And, along with this line, you would like to ask about, prime minister Abe trying to, make ivermectin and other medicine that's or effective available.

But what happened to him is Okay. May possibly those kind of topics. Okay. Thank you, Masako, for that reminder. Yes, please.

We are all fans of ivermectin here on this channel. Actually, essentially, early days of this pandemic, I was working with Prime Minister Abe. I was making lots of lots of advices. And, yeah. We have we have a discussion with Abe san, Prime Minister.

And he he understand he understood the real story of this pandemic. And he he do not he does not want to start injection of the mRNA vaccines. I insist I insisted that we should not do that. But after, after that moment, he became ill and he he stepped down from the prime minister. Okay.

Okay. Wow. Now now Ivermectin, it's a it's a Nobel Prize winning medicine as I understand it. And wasn't it originally discovered from soil microbes? Soil yeah.

That's right. Yeah. In Japan, even in Japan, we can get it from a Japanese company. We are importing from India. You know, Ibermectin is originated in Japan and important medicine.

Even even in this situation, we cannot obtain hyphen vaccine in this country. We have to import from India. I actually Wow. Well obtained lots of hyphen vaccine from India India company. Well, I mean, India has a lot of economic advantages for synthesizing molecules.

That's that's very clear. And and they also I mean, India is is very good at that. But, yes. I'm sorry, Michael. I think he means because the Japanese government's not letting them get.

Is that true? That's right. Yep. Oh, it's more than just a cost issue. Yeah.

That's right. Yeah. Important thing is our government allowed, allows the company to sell them. So So so we need to yep. Well, so this is a case where Japanese innovation created one of the most important molecules or or I should say discovered and then and then harnessed one of the most important molecules for human health, arguably.

And then the Japanese government doesn't allow That's right. Japanese companies to manufacture it. Against against to Ivermectin. Wow. Wow.

You know, in order to, in order to accept new medicine from Merck and Pfizer, Merck and Pfizer, I've been mixing Do not have to to be effective. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yeah.

Yeah. You know, emerging medical, emerging medical usage. In order to accept emergency emergency medical usage of the, Max, Max drug and Pfizer Drug. Ivermectin should not be effective. Well, I I mean as a general rule I say, yes?

May I ask one question? Yes. Doctor, when did the Japanese government forbid Japanese from getting ivermectin in Japan? Originally, the minister Abe wanted wanted to accept Abelemycchi and Avigan as well. But Khosero, image LW, Ministry of Health was against for that.

And Abhishek was, yeah. He was blocked to accept hyphenmectin and Avigan in Japan. So do you think that this was one of the one of the reasons why Abe was targeted for assassination? Yeah. It is very important question.

1 one day before his assassination, I have been we have a meeting with people over Amazon's office. And we are we are negotiating about the schedule for mRNA work change movement. In order to stop mRNA vaccines, we would like to have a meeting with Prime Minister Abe and his wife. And one day after that meeting, he was assassinated. My goodness.

Okay. Okay. And I I I would offer this as as an American to to anybody in Japan who may watch this interview, never trust large American corporations because what they export to Japan is toxic. They export poisons in the food, in the personal care products, in the vaccines, in the nuclear, power plants are are not safely designed and so on. It's it's like I'm ashamed of the fact that as an American, I have to say this, but it's true.

The American corporations are exporting poison to Japan, not to mention, you know, also cultural poisons and things like that that are beyond the scope of this interview. But always beware of American corporations. So recently, I think Japanese people are something like experimental animals. Like mouse, mouse, rat, injecting, you know, new style of mRNA vaccines in Japan first. So we are like experimental animals.

Well, the the US has a long history of that, using secret biological facilities in Africa and running, experiments on African people. There are bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine that have been exposed in the last 2 years. So this this is something the US is known for, sadly, is experimenting on humans. I see. I think another reason why Abhisatt was assassinated was, he was very he was familiar with Russian president Putin.

He was a nice friend of Putin, and he was going he he was going to peace meeting with Ukraine and Russia. Wow. Wow. In that time. Yep.

Uh-huh. He was concerning the meeting, and I think that is the most strongest reason why he has been assassinated. Because because nobody in the west wants peace. I mean, the the leaders don't want peace between Ukraine and Russia. Yeah.

Yeah. No. We're we're seeing other evidence of that as well. Anybody who calls for peace is being called a traitor. No.

It's it's it's a crazy situation. Alright. Doctor Murakami, is there anything else you would like to add here that I have failed to ask you? Yeah. I think that's all.

Yeah. Yep. It was a very interesting meeting. I was very excited to have a discussion with you. So Well, I'm I'm thrilled to have a discussion with you.

I understand you have your own you have a laboratory. I have a laboratory too. I have a mass spec laboratory in America. Oh, mass spec. Okay.

Yeah. Yeah. We do a lot of mass spec testing for, food, food contamination. What what kind of lab do you run? Actually, I have essential molecular biology laboratory and we have also animal health as well.

Oh, wow. Okay. So molecular biology. Molecular biology and also, yeah, immunology. We are raising many antibodies for using animals.

Wow. Okay. Well, the only animals in my lab are my lab techs, and they, they they run the ICP MS instruments. But that's fascinating. But, in these days, usually, Japanese people are like experimental animal.

That's a real problem. You know, they will Absolutely. Need type of replicating waxing. Absolutely. Weedingly.

That's the problem. That that's what's extraordinary to me because I I think what you and I both agree on and also Michael Jan there and Masako, we all agree on the dignity of human life. That's right. That every human being, Japanese, American, African, Ukrainian, Russian, you name it, Chinese, you name it, all have value in our world and must be respected as a human being. Yep.

I agree. Yep. And the technology you're talking about, it's almost like the self replicating mRNA payload technology is a disassembly virus for human biology. Yeah. Almost like a new virus.

Atif Sarovirus. Almost like Right. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

But a virus that disassembles human biology, like, it the spike protein takes apart neurology and cardiovascular systems and blood viability through clotting mechanisms and so on, reproductive systems, endocrine systems, you name it. Right? Wow. Well, thank you, sir, for sounding the alarm on this, and, we we honor your efforts here in America. Thank you very much.

Yep. Alright. Thank you, doctor Murakami. And, thank you very much. We honor you.

We appreciate you. Michael or Masako, do you have anything to put on the end of this? Yeah. I would like to introduce you, this organization. Doctor Murakami is the vice president of this organization.

It's called United Citizen for stopping mRNA vaccines. This is the organization who are in the epicenter of this battle. Awesome. And what's the website for that? So if you type United Citizens for stopping mRNA vaccines, then you can find the website.

And, also, recently, he joined FLCCC. Now he's a senior fellow. Fantastic. Now is that website available in both English and Japanese? Yeah.

English version will be available very soon. I will promise. Okay. Okay. Fantastic.

Alright. Well, we will share that website with the viewers. Yes, please. Yes, please. Yep.

Okay. Anything else anybody would like to add? Okay. How about how about the Michael? Michael?

That was easily one of the most important interviews I've heard in years. Really? Wow. Well well, thank you, Michael, for helping to arrange, and Masako and doctor Motokami. We will we will do this again, and, I'm at your service.

If there's anything that we can do to help you get the word out, please, let us help. I would appreciate it. Thank you very much. Okay. Thank you.

Have a wonderful evening or day there. Have a nice day. Have a wonderful day. Okay. You too.

Have a have a wonderful day. Yep. I I will. Thank you so much. Okay.

For those of you watching, I hope you learned a lot from this interview. Of course, you are free to repost this interview on other channels and other platforms. Of course, I'm Mike Adams, the founder of briteon.com, and we are here building the infrastructure of human freedom to serve humanity and to honor humanity across our world in every nation, every ethnicity, every color, every religion, you name it. So thank you for joining us today. We are on team humanity.

God bless you all. Take care. Back in stock at the Health Ranger store, we now have the elderberry echinacea tincture combo, which is outstanding for the immune system that's in the middle there, back in stock. We've also got quercetin available, which is a very popular item as everybody's learning about the supportive benefits of quercetin. We have broccoli sprout powder in capsules now back in stock.

We also have a little bit of the actual powder as it's shown there in that canister. All these available at healthrangersstore.com. Go to the website. Find out what we have there. We've got a lot of new products, a lot of products back in stock.

And then also we have the pea protein back in stock. Now for those who like plant based proteins, pea protein, it's very smooth. The texture here is very smooth. It's also one of the cleanest well, I think the cleanest plant based protein you can get in terms of lab test results. Whereas rice protein sometimes, depending on the source, can have, you know, arsenic in it.

We've seen that in rice protein, some lead, some cadmium. But, pea protein is very, very clean. Some people prefer a whey protein taste, but if you're used to to doing vegan proteins, then pea protein is more in your, like, wheelhouse of what it's supposed to taste like, and that's a really great clean, smooth product right there. That's back in stock at our store. But check out our hundreds of other products at healthrangerstore.com, and remember that every purchase helps us with our big lawsuit that we filed.

We're suing Google, Meta. We're suing Twitter or X. We're suing the Department of Defense. We're also suing Homeland Security, NewsGuard, and various NGOs for censorship collusion. In our lawsuit, we're exposing the censorship industrial complex, and we're working to dismantle it to compel the court to actually dismantle the censorship complex so that the free speech rights of the American people can be restored as is supposed to be guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights under the United States Constitution.

But we have to fight for it, and we need your support in order to carry out and fund that fight. So shop at health rangers store dot com and help us take this fight to the censors to dismantle the censorship industrial complex while at the same time enhancing your health and nutrition with laboratory tested certified organic ultra clean products that we offer. Again, healthranger store dot com. Thank you for your support. A global reset is coming, and that's why I've recorded a new 9 hour audiobook.

It's called the Global Reset Survival Guide. You can download it for free by subscribing to the natural news.com email newsletter, which is also free. I'll describe how the monetary system fails. I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections. So download this guide.

It's free. It's my gift to you simply because I want like minded people to survive.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Japan’s Most Senior Cancer Doctor: COVID Shots Are ‘Essentially Murder’

https://www.globalresearch.ca/japan-most-senior-cancer-doctor-covid-shots-murder/5858153 

Dr. Masanori Fukushima has called on the World Health Organization to lead an investigation of the harmful outcomes of the COVID shots.

By Emily Mangiaracina

Global Research, May 27, 2024

LifeSiteNews 14 May 2024

Region: Asia

Theme: Science and Medicine

print

Translate Website

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Global Research Wants to Hear From You!

***

The most senior medical oncologist in Japan recently slammed the COVID-19 mRNA shots as “the work of evil” that has caused “essentially murder.”

In an interview published April 19, Dr. Masanori Fukushima, who spearheaded the first cancer outpatient clinic at Kyoto University and launched the first course in pharmacoepidemiology there, listed a slew of problems with the COVID mRNA jabs, evidencing what he called an evil “abuse of science.”

Click here to watch the video

He pointed out that “turbo cancers,” a kind “previously unseen by doctors” that progress extremely quickly and are typically in stage four by the time they are diagnosed, have started to appear after the jab rollouts. These “turbo cancers” are emerging along with excess mortality due to cancer in general, which Fukushima says cannot be explained only by lost opportunities for screenings or treatment during the COVID outbreak.

As a tragic example of the fatal danger of the COVID shots, the oncologist shared the story of a 28-year-old man who was found dead by his wife when she tried to wake him in the morning, five days after he received his second Pfizer shot. 

“The doctor who did the autopsy said that when he tried to remove the heart, it was soft and had disintegrated,” Fukushima said. “And even just one case like this shows how dangerous this vaccine can be.”

He pointed out that these severe harms, including death, have been afflicting people – post-jab – who have a history of good health.

“It’s serious. It’s essentially murder. In the end, I want to state clearly that this is my view,” the doctor said.

He lamented that the media, including newspapers, generally have not reported on these harms, and that in fact those who question the safety of the COVID shots – just as with the flu shots – have been characterized as anti-science “heretics.” He described the attitude of those who shut down the voices COVID “vaccine” critics, however, as far from scientific, and “more akin to faith, hysteria or even cult behavior.”

“I am now deeply concerned not only about a serious crisis in medicine but in science and democracy,” Fukushima said.

He highlighted the fact that countries that most aggressively pushed the COVID shot, such as Israel, saw the highest rates of death and infection, as shown by studies comparing Middle Eastern countries, including Jordan, Syria and Egypt. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arranged a special deal with Pfizer to use Israelis as lab rats in a national injection program with the Pfizer Covid “vaccine.”

“Israel led in early and widespread vaccination but also had the highest death and infection rates. The less aggressively vaccinated areas saw less harm,” said Fukushima, noting that “Israel was quick to halt the vaccine.” 

There were problems, moreover, with the very technology used to administer the mRNA – the lipid nanoparticles – that the doctor said result in “off-target effects” on various organs, including the ovaries, brain, liver, and bone marrow.

Worse, the spike proteins produced by the mRNA have been detected in the human body more than a year after the administration of the COVID shot, noted the oncologist, indicating “a severe problem.”

The doctor took aim at the World Health Organization (WHO) for “hastily” pushing the COVID shots without proper investigation, and moreover for trying to enforce a one-size-fits-all approach in countries with widely varying “medical circumstances, habits, and systems,” calling it “somewhat absurd.”

He argued that it is “crucial” that the WHO take responsibility for the harms of the COVID shots, which he called “an abuse, a misuse of science and an evil practice of science, to be frank.”

Fukushima pointed out that the WHO is “aware” of harms from the so-called vaccines because they are compensating for these damages in certain countries, and yet they are not properly addressing the COVID shot-induced death and injury through an investigation and report.

“Imagine finding your spouse dead in the morning. It’s no joke. A vaccine that causes such outcomes, even a single death, is unacceptable,” said Fukushima, adding that in Japan alone, the government has documented 2,134 deaths reported due to the COVID shot, which is likely a low estimate.

“There are tens of thousands of people who must see a doctor because of vaccine-related issues,” he continued, asserting that a big chunk of them – 30 percent – are “suffering from ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis) or chronic fatigue syndrome.” 

This is just the beginning, according to Fukushima, because the rates of all sorts of diseases have been spiking since the COVID shot rollout, including “autoimmune disease, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and infections.”

“It’s as if we’ve opened Pandora’s box… We must take these damages seriously and address them earnestly. Any efforts to dismiss these damages as if they didn’t happen are frankly the work of evil. This is a quintessential example of the evil practice of science,” Fukushima said.

He called on scientific and medical institutions, led by the WHO, to directly confront these outcomes through research efforts in order to “shine the light of science” on the shots.

“We should never again use such vaccines,” he said. “This is a shame for humanity. It’s a disgrace that we did this.”

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

“Unprecedented Vaccine Disaster”: An Interview with Professor Masanori Fukushima

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/01/01/unprecedented-vaccine-disaster-an-interview-with-professor-masanori-fukushima/ 

BY PHILIP PATRICK 1 JANUARY 2023 9:00 AM

On November 25th there occurred a singularly rare event in the ongoing COVID-19 saga – truth was spoken to power. A distinguished medical doctor and infectious disease expert was given free rein to interrogate a government official, unmediated and without apparent time restraint. The doctor in question was the distinguished oncologist, professor emeritus at Kyoto University and Representative of the Learning Health Society Institute (LHSI) Masanori Fukushima. His rigorous and passionate berating of an official from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) on COVID-19 vaccine safety and government transparency made for gripping viewing. A recording swiftly went viral, elevating Doctor Fukushima to a new status as leading critic of the COVID-19 vaccines in Japan.

I interviewed Professor Fukushima via Zoom on December 28th. He began by giving me some background to his career and explaining why he had become involved in the COVID-19 vaccine issue before moving on to the specific harms, his views of the Japanese Government’s response and the way ahead.

Philip Patrick: Professor Fukushima, thank you for allowing me to speak to you. Could I start by asking you to give me some background to the event on November 25th and how you came to be involved in the COVID-19 vaccine safety issue?

Masanori Fukushima: I majored [in] biochemistry at Kyoto University post graduate school and actually I am the eldest medical oncologist in our country. I opened in the academic sector the first out-patient clinic for cancer patients in 2003 when I was Professor at Kyoto University. I [became involved in] pharmaco-epidemiology in 2000. This is the study of stop[ping] drug disaster[s]. That’s the mission, the raison d’etre. That’s why I’m involved with the COVID-19 vaccine problem. Because no scientists and only a few physicians have spoken out about the problem of vaccines.

So, when I heard that Government and EU and USA started the messenger RNA program my first impression was this is so stupid. Because messenger RNA is evolutionary, and the cell system is degraded always in a very short time. Messenger RNA is fragile and should be degraded promptly in the body. But this vaccine is modified and manipulated to be stable and to be incorporated in nanoparticles. Nanoparticles are the second problem as it is always incorporating in any type of cells, particularly stem cells. Stem cells are very important for repairing any types of cells. And the third problem is that there is no specificity of delivery. It (messenger RNA) is injected into the body and goes all around the body expressing spike proteins. This is a major problem. The spike protein is very dangerous.

So, when I first heard that the Government was using this vaccine and the PMDA [the Japanese regulatory agency, equivalent to the FDA] had approved it I was very, very concerned, But it has became a kind of religion. Still, they believe in the effectiveness of the vaccine – it’s like a Messiah.

PP: Why is the spike protein dangerous?

MF: The spike protein binds to receptor proteins which [are] expressed [in] most cells. So it [the spike protein] attacks all types of cells particularly endothelial cells in the vascular system, which can lead to coagulation. If the endothelial cells bind to the spike protein coagulation is triggered.

PP: So, we’re talking about heart attacks?

MF: Yes, if the major artery is affected it can lead to major impacts, such as heart attacks or strokes. And the FDA has detected the signal of the frequency of pulmonary thrombosis.

PP: And you have written in your reports [published in a Japanese journal] that there have been 2,000 deaths reported to the Government [MHLW] as very likely to have been the result of the vaccine. But in one of your reports, you described it as “the tip of the iceberg”. How much bigger could it be?

FM: One estimation is five-fold. The reports are mainly from doctors who cared for the patients, but most vaccination is not done in clinics but in vaccination centres run by the prefectures with the injection done by the nurse [so in most cases doctors are not directly involved in the chain of event and unlikely to report vaccine problems].

The cases are accumulating but the Government has denied causality even for the autopsied cases, in which the pathologist has pointed out the causality. There is clear evidence of a significant increase in heart problems and vascular problems such as strokes and pneumonia-like symptoms and others.

PP: But the argument that people who believe in these vaccines always put forward is that despite a few problems the vaccines are saving far more people than they are damaging. What is your response to that?

FM: I asked the government to disclose the COVID-19 mortality in vaccinated and non-vaccinated people. This statistic is critical. If there is no difference, then the vaccine induced deaths do not justify the use of the vaccines. I officially requested this information with my attorney on August 1st. And the first answer was “wait two months”. And then the final answer was “no, we do not disclose”. So, the next step is to sue the Government.

PP: You are planning to sue the Government?

FM: Yes, based on the Information Disclosure Act.

PP: So, they are refusing to disclose vital information which the public need to know and which could save lives?

FM: Yes, that’s right. It’s like a joke. Because the Government disclosed such information last year. And there is evidence that for under 65 year-olds the mortality rate for unvaccinated people is lower than the vaccinated people. It is funny – no, not funny because there are many deaths, so we don’t laugh; but the behaviour of the ministry is very stupid.

PP: So, they previously disclosed and then stopped disclosing, presumably because it is embarrassing. So, it is impossible to find the information that we need to find out if the vaccines are working or not? At one point in the video you said “it looks like you are hiding data”.

FM: Yes, and I think they were upset. There are so many deaths. It is an unprecedented vaccine disaster. I can’t imagine how many people have really died. 2,000 is the minimum, the tip of the iceberg.

PP: And it is all ages, isn’t it? One of your reports had a 28 year-old man who died after the second vaccine with no health problems?

MF: That’s right, no health problems. Five days after the second vaccine. It’s very tragic.

PP: Do you think the scale of this is so enormous and the scandal is so big that the government simply cannot accept it? They would prefer to go on and pretend the vaccines work than admit the scale of the disaster? Is that their position?

MF: So… it’s not an appropriate analogy but you say if you kill one person, [it] is legally murder, but kill so many people and it’s like war and you don’t go to jail.

PP: Someone once said that the bigger the lie the easier it is to get away with. Why are the Japanese still getting vaccinated?

MF: But I think the rate is going down. Many people are stopping. And apparently mass media do not encourage vaccination as much as previously.

PP: So, in the media there is less encouragement, there is nothing on vaccine injuries, but less encouragement to get vaccinated? The message has subtly changed.

MF: Yes, that’s the Japanese way. But this problem is growing bigger and bigger. One very popular magazine is publishing a series on the vaccine problems. Their influence is very big, so next year a change will occur.

PP: And three other doctors have come forward (Kojima , Sano and Nagao). What is the feeling among doctors generally?

MF: Yes, Dr. Nagao has got in touch with me and wants a dialogue. And Professor Sano was with me at the meeting on November 25th. He was on the same table. And there is also Professor Kojima from Nagoya University. Professor Kojima is a very significant person who identified the vaccine problems using very important analysis.

PP: So, the group is getting bigger?

MF: Bigger, but I am not [organising it]. I am involved because I was asked to write papers about COVID-19, and one was on how to avoid COVID-19 and deal with COVID-19. I advised appropriate use of steroid therapy without delay. When COVID-19 arrived in Japan for the first time in February 2020 I gathered information from China and concluded that the critical point was to stop the development of interstitial pneumonitis. The answer is to detect the drop in oxygen level in the blood. If it is below 95% then check the CT and if there is an infiltration sign, start the treatment.

PP: So existing treatments were enough?

MF: Principally yes, and if you attack the virus with an anti-viral drug it [just] evolves. Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, etc. All viruses evolve through communication with the host. This is a biological principle.

PP: So, the vaccines are useless?

MF: Useless. I think so.

PP: One theory is that interventions such as lockdowns, separating people, closing schools, etc., have influenced the development of the virus, interrupted its natural evolution, possibly causing it to become more transmissible. Would it have been better simply to behave normally, allow the virus to spread, and just treat the sick promptly, as you have described?

MF: This is quite difficult to give a clear-cut answer [to]. The virus evolution is based on communication with host so we can’t [exactly] predict the evolution of the virus but in general viruses develop to become more symbiotic with the host. At first, I thought COVID-19 would be similar. The mortality rate has decreased and plateaued, and I cannot totally disprove that vaccines have been effective but really, we have to think that doctors have improved their techniques and that the virus has become less toxic.

PP: So, it’s not justifiable to link reduced mortality to the virus. It’s post hoc ergo proctor hoc reasoning.

MF: Yes, and one more point – the clinical guidelines for treating COVID-19 is now in its 8th edition. It’s very meticulous and helpful. If the practitioner adheres to it the patient will be more likely to recover.

PP: A few more medical points. In the recording you said that the Japanese were relatively lightly hit because they had prior immunity perhaps because of previous exposure to coronaviruses?

MF: Yes, and this finding is very important. There is evidence from doctors at Kanagawa Dental University and they found that non-vaccinated non-infected care givers had high percentage of cross reactive IgA to SARS-Cov2 virus in their saliva. This is very important because if we make a vaccine for such a respiratory disease, we have to make a mucosal or nasal vaccine, not [an] injection, because injections make only IgG, not secretory IgA anti-bodies. Injection type vaccines only produce serum level IgG just blocking the virus in the body. We need to make an oral or nasal vaccine, but it is still difficult.

PP: Finally, in your reports you said, perhaps particularly the booster shots, are damaging people’s immune systems, opening them up to all kinds of problems?

MF: Yes, this has been known from the early days of the vaccine, that it may trigger ADE which is when the antibody accelerates cellular infections. And if you are repeatedly dosed this can lead to original antigen sin. The first-generation vaccine was designed to attack the first variant and second Delta. This was already clearly demonstrated by Catherine Reynolds’ report. So, vaccinated people do not produce appropriate anti-bodies for Omicron. The vaccines can shut down the innate immune system due to the first design of the vaccine.

PP: People are finding that old conditions are coming back because the immune system has been damaged by the vaccine?

MF: Yes, yes.

PP: I don’t know if you know Dr. Aseem Malhotra in the U.K. He first defended the vaccines, then his father died, and he is now an articulate and powerful critic of the vaccines. And his position is that they should be stopped immediately – until a thorough analysis of vaccine harms has taken place. Would you agree?

MF: Yes, of course. Stop immediately. Governments around the world have the data. Release the data. Stop the immunisation and start the scientific discussion. And we need to examine the long-term effects of the mRNA vaccines. The Government should not hide and manipulate the data.

PP: Thank you professor. And thank you for speaking truth to power.

Philip Patrick is a freelance journalist based in Tokyo.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Japan: 'Billions of Vaccinated Will Die - Those Responsible Must Pay'

https://rumble.com/v4zl88z-japan-billions-of-vaccinated-will-die-those-responsible-must-pay.html 

Japan has issued a formal apology to the unvaccinated, admitting that the government bowed to pressure from the international elite to employ totalitarian psychological warfare tactics on the public to brainwash citizens during the pandemic. According to Japanese officials, it's time to prepare to say goodbye to vaccinated loved ones because billions of people will soon be dead as a consequence of a crime worse than the holocaust, and the world will never be the same again. As the tsunami of deaths among the vaccinated continues to accelerate and the Japanese people continue to rise up against the elites, the truth is starting to emerge. And the villains behind the pandemic are left with nowhere left to hide. Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven't already.

Join the People's Voice locals community to join our incredible team and support the channel, and check out the brand new free speech forum at community dot the peoples voice dot tv. Governments around the world fell into line during the COVID pandemic and gaslit their citizens into giving up their freedoms and complying with draconian orders, including unscientific mask mandates and experimental mRNA gene therapy techniques. Remember the White House's claim that the unvaccinated would suffer a winter of severe illness and death. For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for unvaccinated for themselves, their families, and the hospital will soon overwhelm. But there's good news.

If you're vaccinated, you have your booster shot, you're protected from severe illness and death, period. Number 2, booster shots work. 3, boosters are free, safe, and convenient. About 60,000,000 people have 1 have been boosted. So go get your shot today.

Go get boosted if you had your first two shots. If you haven't, go get your first shot. It's time. It's time. It's past time.

And we're gonna protect our economic recovery if we do this. We're gonna keep schools and businesses open if we do this, and I wanna see everyone around enjoy that. I want to see them enjoy the fact that they're able to be in school, the businesses are open, and the holidays are coming. The history books will remember that as the moment the illegitimate US president told citizens to be happy while they were injected with their dose of life shortening poison. It wasn't only the US.

How about the w f captured UK government stark warning that unvaccinated family members were set to begin dropping like flies? I've gotta be clear. We all gotta be clear. This is the worst public health crisis for a generation. Some people compare it to seasonal flu.

Alas, that is not right. Owing to the lack of immunity, this disease is more dangerous, and it's going to spread further. And I I must level with you, level with the the British public. More families, and many more families are going to lose loved ones before their time. There was no season of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated.

You can't find an unvaccinated person who regrets their decision. Meanwhile, the Internet is full of vaccinated people desperately seeking remedies for their manifold health problems. Unfortunately, for those who believe the likes of Biden, Johnson, and the world's most powerful doctor Bill Gates, the season of turbo cancer, heart attacks, strokes, facial paralysis, and dying suddenly has arrived. The vaccinated are dropping like flies. And for some reason, nobody is allowed to talk about it.

Could it possibly be because the mainstream media is kept afloat with big pharma dollars? This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by Pfizer. Good morning. America is brought to you by Pfizer. CBS Healthwatch sponsored by Pfizer.

Anderson Cooper 360, brought to you by Pfizer. ABC News Nightline, brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference, brought to you by Pfizer. CNN tonight, brought to you by Pfizer. Early start, brought to you by Pfizer.

Friday night on Aaron Burnett out front, brought to you by Pfizer. This week with George Stephanopoulos is brought to you by Pfizer. Pfizer. Today's countdown to the royal wedding is brought to you by Pfizer. And now a CBS sports update brought to you by Pfizer.

Meet the press data download brought to you by Pfizer. This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by Pfizer. On how to find the hidden sugars in the American family diet, sponsored by Pfizer. Western mainstream media is completely beholden to big pharma, but Japan is different. And the people are rising up against the tyrants who unleashed the pandemic on the masses.

This revolution is moving quickly, and every day is bringing incredible new results, proving that the elite can be held to account for their crimes. Today's sponsor is pillsforever.com. If you think big pharma have your best interests at heart, think again. Under Biden, the price of medicine in America has skyrocketed, and there are certain medicines big pharma don't want you to know about. That's why I've partnered with pillsforever.com.

All of their FDA approved medicines are the cheapest you'll find anywhere. More importantly, you can order medicines that big pharma don't want you to have such as Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and fenbendazole. Speaking of fenbendazole, not only does it get rid of parasites that live inside your body, there have been studies that show fembendazole can help with cancer. Listen to this testimony of Joe Tippens, a cancer survivor, thanks to fenbendazole. 2 years ago, Joe Tippens says he was told to go home, call hospice, and say his goodbyes.

The doctors were unanimous. He was going to die of small cell lung cancer. Once that kind of cancer goes that far afield, the odds of survival are less than 1%, and the median life expectancy is 3 months. Tippen says he got a tip, not from a pharmacist, but a veterinarian. And in his desperation, he turned from people medicine to dog medicine, specifically fimbendizole.

My insurance company spent $1,200,000 on me with traditional means before I switched to a $5 a week medicine that actually saved me. Get 15% off using coupon code PeoplesVoice at the checkout. Please click the link below this video or call 256-664-4170 to take advantage of this fantastic offer. Last week, Japanese citizens took to the streets in their millions to protest against the crimes perpetrated by globalist organizations, the World Health Organization, and World Economic Forum during the pandemic. During a speech at the protests, Kazuhiro Harugoshi, the former Japanese minister for internal affairs, delivered a powerful and emotional apology for the huge numbers of deaths now occurring as a result of the deadly mRNA rollout.

With a deep sense of sincerity, Hariguchi extended his condolences and took responsibility for the failings of the government who pushed the jab on the masses. I apologize to all of you. So many have died and they shouldn't have, he said. Part of, bandivomectin, a drug developed by doctor Satoshi Amura, which could have played a significant role in combating the pandemic. As Harigashi explained, economic interests were prioritized over public health.

Haragashi then shared a deeply personal story about his own experience with the jab. After receiving the vaccine, he developed an aggressive form of cancer and lost his eyebrows and hair. This devastatingly honest account of his battle with turbocancer, which included significant physical changes like hair loss, struck a chord with the audience. After all, many of them have loved ones who suffered the same fate. Japan's leading oncologist has slammed the mainstream media and big pharma in the west for covering up the extent of the medical crisis engulfing the world.

Professor doctor Masanori Fukushima was ordered by the Japanese government to investigate why excess deaths soared by an enormous 400% after Pfizer's 3rd dose booster shot was rolled out in 2021. Fukushima's findings were conclusive. MRNA has destroyed immune systems and opened a Pandora's box of autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and infections. The professor has a dire warning for those in the west. Do not listen to mainstream media and big pharma as they're not engaged in science, but rather a eugenics experiment.

And they have proven themselves to be enemies of the people. These are critical times. And here at TPV Towers, we are determined to expose the elite and hold them to account before it's too late. Join us in our mission to wake up the masses by subscribing to the channel and joining the People's Voice locals community to join our amazing team. I hope to see you there.

Today's video is brought to you by ipv6ers. Are you a content creator who wants to publish information online without big brother spying and censoring your every move? Ipv6 is set to revolutionize the way information is disseminated on the Internet by eliminating the need for big tech companies to provide unreliable, overpriced services such as self hosting email and data management. IPv sixes enables an easy and accessible way for you to host your own web and email server with direct end to end connections and enhanced security. This means no snooping for big brother and no interference from the technocratic elites.

If Hillary Clinton can get away with running her own server, why shouldn't you? Go to the people's voice dot TV forward slash ipv6 to sign up or click the link below this video to take back control of the Internet and win the info wars against the globalists. If you like our content, help support our sponsor, ipv6ers, and go to the people's voice dot tvforward/ipv6 today. Thank you, ipv6ers, for making this video possible.