How might educational leaders clearly and continually communicate assessment practices to students, parents, and other stakeholders?
PISD maintains comprehensive assessment systems that are directly reflected in the instructional practices at PHS. This comprehensive system is composed of multiple levels of assessments that provide data for distinct coalitions fulfilling various purposes. One highly prioritized purpose is a strong emphasis on essential standards stemming from the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills curriculum mandated by the state, which includes corresponding standardized assessments taken annually (Conley & Darling-Hammond, 2013). Specific district curriculum is created with the collaboration and feedback from teachers with expertise and experience in content, working in tandem to prioritize meaningful and equitable learning and create curriculum documents with guidance for instruction and assessment. Ideas for formative assessments, or any assessment activity that guides learning, are provided as options to aid consistent and rigorous instructional strategies that promote meaningful engagement (McMillan, 2000). Summative assessments are categorized in the curriculum documents as performance tasks, evaluating a student's knowledge and mastery after a period of learning (NFER, 2022). Performance tasks provide students with cycles of feedback during the process of learning, and allows teachers to enhance or adapt instruction based on student needs. Within their guiding documents, PISD states that the focused areas for district improvement for the current school year include measurable outcomes and accountability structures. This focus is apparent across each campus in the district as the Campus Improvement Plans include statements of intention to create efficient and data-driven Professional Learning Communities. The focus of PISD, and therefore PHS, includes the protocols and norms for collecting, interpreting, adapting and monitoring instruction based on data. Prosper High School recognizes the need for consistent assessment practices based on essential standards, as well as a movement towards common formative assessment protocols throughout courses and grade levels. Lastly, PHS shows a commitment to focus on authentic, real-life skills based competency goals through the use of various assessment types including performance tasks, self-assessment and feedback loops with instructors and students (Conley & Darling-Hammond, 2013).
Evaluate small content areas
Encourage students to reflect on their academic progress
Focus on improvement rather than attainment (not yet attitude)
Encourage self and peer (1:1 or small group) assessment for the purpose of feedback
Use assessment data to inform decisions on instruction and intervention
Use informal questioning to assess learning progress
"Assessment is inherently a process of judgement..." -James McMillan
There are tensions between two influences when writing assessments:
learning vs. auditing
formative vs. summative
criterion vs. norm referenced
value added vs. absolute standards
traditional vs. alternative
authentic vs. contrived
speed tests vs. power tests
standardized tests vs. classroom tests
These factors influence the nature of the assessment.
All assessment contain errors, but good assessment is:
evidence should be based on consequences
absence of bias, equitable treatment of all students, equality in outcomes and opportunities to learn
takes rights of test takers into account
a series of measurements through multiple methods
balancing time, methods, and score results
incorporates technology appropriately