40-:02
in general, it must be said that at that moment in time the church felt quite freely in our country, though
it was not a single Russian Orthodox Church, it split into several groups that were at enmity between owever, even though some priests, some bishops do not recognized others means they were perceived as citizens of our states and were also allowed to vote for The Cossacks allowed not only to participate in elections, but also to form military units, by the way, using the example of the goat of the Cossacks, you can show that such a myth, here we are
you noted that people most often form images of the past under some emotional impact read some terrible event that this man killed hundreds of millions of people there and of course we can't hear to agree with any of this man's good grades we mean we know
about the fact that as a result of decossackization on the Don, almost a million Cossacks were killed and
of course, the curse has increased against Trotsky, his bright address resounds with this is very harsh, but if we return to the facts, it turns out that because the decree and the so-called story
what some accepted arch bureau ck party 3442 people were shot this number was calculated and by the Whites this number was confirmed by both Soviet historians and historians of the current couple checking all this data do not see more victims before there were casualties as a result of trench warfare before were casualties general red terror, but a general red terror for the whole country to establish
order to deal with the notorious circuit hypocrites is just a only about 80 thousand people, and the victim of white terror is almost 650,000 people in almost
10 times more but not a white terror no more than the terror that was built against of our people, the invaders, they invaded our country before
in total to port cities and on their conscience more than a hundred thousand of our dead compatriots respectively civil and in any case bad but
and it’s probably very bad to measure like this on whose side there were how many victims, but
if behind the red victims the least means is it wise to talk all the time a red terror and if we know that general Krasnov took the lives of more than 40 thousand Cossacks of the Don Army region for the fact that they they supported the Bolsheviks for not being for the Reds, and the Red, in turn, was executed, only was just 3442 people, then you still need to somehow stick to reason and stick to what is called historical truth,
-
The same is true when talking about Stalin when we talk about the difficult thirties when we consider all these ups and downs, which means we must understand at what cost victory was given and at what cost was success given and what did we pay for it and what was at the heart of the motivation of the behavior of leaders of that era if it were only the lust for power would be the desire to enslave your people and make them slaves of the people would never enthusiastically support this government and support the people would never reflect this in good good songs in such an emotional upsurge in patriotic rallying people then understood the essence of the events taking place in the country, shared politics state and in general what we now call repression, they actually did not notice, but the fact that returned freedom they saw it delivered actually became one of the authors of not only the ideas of the constitution, but also many articles of the constitution
wrote it himself and this still period of time kharik is characterized by the fact that in schools
the teaching of national history returned after the revolution, in the history of the Russian state they did not talk about
Russians said how these times of the family are you suddenly such a turn we are rehabilitating this part of the history of Stalin
iving an assessment to one of the works of demyan poor with which he showed the Russian people in a very bad light
defended the Russian people and, moreover, defended Christianity by declaring that to accept
Christianity in Rus' was a progressive decision, a progressive action, that is
Stalin generally pursued a policy different from politics
of his predecessors, in fact, these were the first of the 30s, we began to create......1935
a new country and by the mid-30s they lived in a completely new country in the thirty-sixth year a new
constitution on the new constitution had to hold elections was discussed 1936
and such an election format, firstly, a bloc of communists and non-party people is being created
parties, that is, non-partisan ones, can participate in elections as deputies of any level of government and what is likely
elections should be held in general, even by competitive alternatives when several
candidates and this one
-------
continued at
8 AND 9
https://sites.google.com/site/rsrshares/home/stalin-era-holy-era/8-9-holy-era