List of KNOWN JESUITS in the Seventh-day Adventist movement:

• 1. Arthur Grosvenor Daniells - Jesuit A. G. Daniells put all Adventists necks in the Judas suicide noose by betraying, selling out our medical education work when he brought accreditation (to be molded by Babylon teachings/doctrines) into SDA schools beginning at Loma Linda. “The whole question of medical education is -becoming an increasingly difficult one . . But our necks are in the noose.”—P.T. Magan, letter to Professor H.J. Klooster, September 1, 1937. C

1. hanges in our educational work dramatically changed the entire fabric of our denomination. Learn more in the book called "The Broken Blueprint" by Vance Ferrell, and another of his books called "Solving Our Church Crisis" states on pages 14-16 that A. G. Daniells pushed through accreditation of the our new medical Loma Linda schools. This set in circumstances how the AMA gained control of our schools and changed what we taught from the truth of natural remedies to counterfeit "healing" through prescription drugs, the sorceries aka witchcraft. Learn how prescription drugs are one of the MARKS of the beast here.

2. Le Roy Edwin Froom (October 16, 1890 – February 20, 1974) - known Jesuit, buried in a Masonic plot, also known as the most dangerous man in the Adventist church

• 1. Robert H. Pierson (1911-1989) President of GC in 1966. Attempted to gain control of Adventist studies. He tried to hide that the leadership has rejected the early SDA pioneer doctrines of the Sanctuary, the Trinity, and so many more doctrines. Modern SDA church denomination, having apostatized, meaning rejected the early SDA Protestant Pioneers doctrines of the Advent movement from 1830-1894, the modern 501c3 Adventist leaders today falsely claim William Miller was not a great scholar because of the 1843/1844 dates. See video of this here notice he mentions Raymond Cottrell (1911-2003). "In a representation which passed before me, I saw a certain work being done by medical missionary workers [ROBERT H. PIERSON?]. Our ministering brethren were looking on, watching what was being done, but they did not seem to understand. The foundation of our faith, which was established by so much prayer, such earnest searching of the Scriptures, was being taken down, pillar by pillar. Our faith was to have nothing to rest upon--the sanctuary was gone, the atonement was gone" E.G. White, The Upward Look, 152. And Pierson wanted to keep this fact HIDDEN from the laity. He wanted to keep it a secret that the doctrines had been changed while the foolish laodicean virgins slept on. Learn more here.

1. The Trinity doctrine throws out the Sanctuary Doctrine long held by SDA. The Trinity actually invites Satan to be part of the Godhead....he replaces the power and personality of God with himself as the Spirit, thus the confusion and utter lack of sense that is the Trinity doctrine. It makes no sense, and it is not mentioned in the Bible anywhere.

“Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.” 1 Corinthians 10:14

The Trinity is the god of the dead:

Trinity: "Osiris, god of the dead: Killed by his brother Seth, Osiris was brought back to life by his wife Isis and by Anubis, who embalmed his body. Osiris, however did not return to earth where he once reigned, but became the god of the dead (trinity worshipers)- who, if his teachings were followed, could also grant eternal life (eternal DEATH really)" The Encylopedia of Ancient Egypt, page 200.

Does the Bible Support the Idea of the Trinity?

While the word Trinity is not found in the Bible, is the concept of the Trinity taught clearly in it?

The Encyclopedia of Religion Vol. 15 1987 admits: ‘Theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of the Trinity.'

The New Catholic Encyclopedia: ‘The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not taught in the Old Testament.'

The Encyclopedia of Religion says: ‘Theologians agree that the New Testament also does not contain an explicit doctrine of the Trinity.'

The Encyclopedia Britannica 1976 observes: Neither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament.'

Protestant theologian Karl Barth (as quoted in The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology 1976) similarly states: ‘The New Testament does not contain the developed doctrine of the Trinity. The Bible lacks the express declaration the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are of equal essence.'

“Some will tend to resist this doctrine (the trinity) because it is NOT found expressly stated in the scriptures.” Adventist Review Aug 20, 1993, Page 8.

"While no single scriptural passage states formally the doctrine of the Trinity, it is assumed as a fact by Bible writers and mentioned several times. Only by faith can we accept the existence of the Trinity" Adventist Review, Vol. 158, No. 31, p. 4. 1994:

“Likewise the Trinitarian understanding of God, now part of our fundamental beliefs, was not generally held by the early Adventists. Even today a few do not subscribe to it” William G. Johnsson, Adventist Review, January 6, 1994, p. 10,11.

1990 Herbert Ford, news director for the SDA denomination, told the Indianapolis Star that Adventists who want to cling to the church’s historic anti-Catholic beliefs represent only about 1,000 of the church’s 750,000 North American members. ARKANSAS CATHOLIC, July 29, 1990, Page 8.

1. Dr. Kellogg - Jesuit influenced?

2. Jesuit Dwight K. Nelson

   1. Jesuit Neal C Wilson Meet the Wilsons. Info about Ted Wilson's father who was a 33rd degree Mason! Download and print this PDF document.

   2. Ted Wilson - what has HE done? He fulfilled Ellen White's LAST WARNING Message - he made of none effect the writings of Ellen White in the 2015 GC conference session. More info about Ted N. C. Wilson here.

3. Jesuit Louis Were (Were was endorsed by Hans K. LaRondelle, Th.D., a prominent pastor who worked to bring New Theology into the denomination, and Cottrell worked with Edward Heppenstall on his revision of Daniel 11. Heppenstall was one of the first to try to instill the doctrine of original sin into the church. "The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new (501c3 non-prophet/profit/tax-exempt) organization would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy (metaphorical / hypothetical / symbol / figure of speech / pretend) would be introduced" —{Selected Messages Book 1, p. 204.2}. "These kindred heresies (The Trinity from which springs ALL false doctrines like Immortality of the Soul and Sunday Sacredness, etc), and the rejection of the truth convert the church into Babylon" —1MR 302.2.)

• 1. Jesuit Raymond F. Cottrell 1911-2003 - Raymond Forrest Cottrell (April 21, 1911, Los Angeles, California – January 12, 2003, Calimesa, California) was a controversial Adventist theologian, missionary, teacher, writer and editor. He was an associate editor of both the Adventist Review (the church's official news magazine) and the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary. Raymond Cottrell, is seen by some as a "progressive Adventist", as he disagreed with certain traditional positions of the church, including the investigative judgment,[The 'Sanctuary Doctrine' – Asset or Liability?" by Raymond Cottrell, presented publicly in 2001 and 2002] and served in an editorial role for the independently owned and operated magazine Adventist Today. He was a consulting editor to Spectrum magazine, another independent Adventist paper, both which leaned to progressive Adventist viewpoints. He was the first Adventist to become a member of a scholarly theological society, and was instrumental in the founding of the Biblical Research Institute along with Jesuit Le Roy Froom. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Cottrell. Raymon Cottrell independently owned the magazine called "Adventist Today". Raymond F. Cottrell (1911-2003) taught biblical exegesis at PCU, one of the first schools to be accredited. Raymond F. Cottrell did not believe foundational doctrine of the Sanctuary was found in the Bible. He rejected the Sanctuary doctrine: "Those who try to bring in theories that would remove the pillars of our faith concerning the sanctuary or concerning the personality of God or of Christ, are working as BLIND MEN. They are seeking to bring in uncertainties and to set the people of God adrift without an anchor” MR769.5. "These men were constantly saying, “God is with us. We stand in the light. We have the truth.” I inquired who these men were, and was told that they were ministers and leading men who had rejected the light themselves, and were unwilling that others should receive it." EARLY WRITINGS, PAGE 241. Raymond Cottrell believed James and Ellen White were WRONG and he tries to teach people another way to study the Bible that is different from William Miller and all the early SDA pioneers taught here. The knowledge of Sanctuary is and was the truth that God gave to the SDA Church in sacred trust. Anyone preaching fanciful tales other than the Sanctuary is a false voice on the periphery of Adventism.

"The correct understanding of the ministration in the heavenly sanctuary is the foundation of our faith" Lt 208, 1906 (June 29, 1906) par. 4.

• Ellen G. White, in a statement written on April 21, 1847, declared in endorsement of the Crosier article on the sanctuary question: CIHS 5.2. “The Lord showed me in vision, more than one year ago, that Brother Crosier had the true light, on the cleansing of the sanctuary, etc.; and that it was His will, that Brother Crosier should write out the view which he gave us in the Day-Star Extra, February 7, 1846. I feel fully authorized by the Lord, to recommend that Extra, to every saint.”—A Word to the Little Flock, 12. CIHS 5.3. You can read it [Crosier’s Article “The Law of Moses,” The Day-Star Extra, February 7, 1846, online here, or download a pdf of it here. Learn how to enter the secret hiding place of God so you will be a Berean "Prepper" here and not receive the 7 last plagues here.

“Those who seek to remove the old landmarks (changing to the Trinity doctrine from the early SDA pioneers non-trinity stance) are NOT holding fast; they are not remembering how they have received and heard. Those who try to bring in theories that would remove the pillars of our faith concerning the sanctuary or concerning the personality of God or of Christ [Trinity/Sanctuary doctrine], are working as BLIND MEN. They are seeking to bring in uncertainties and to set the people of God adrift without an anchor” MR769.5.

"In the balances of the sanctuary the Seventh-day Adventist Church is to be weighed. She will be judged by the privileges and advantages [great light setup at the beginning of Adventism = Old SDA pioneer doctrines, the platform of eternal truth] that she has had. If her spiritual experience does not correspond to the advantages that Christ, at infinite cost, has bestowed on her, if the blessings conferred have not qualified her to do the work entrusted to her, on her will be pronounced the sentence: "Found wanting." By the light bestowed, the opportunities given, will she be judged" —LDE 59.3.

“The subject of the sanctuary and the investigative judgment should be clearly understood by the people of God.”—The Great Controversy, 488.

“I know that the sanctuary question stands in righteousness and truth, just as we have held it for so many years. It is the enemy that leads minds off on sidetracks. He is pleased when those who know the truth become engrossed in collecting scriptures to pile around erroneous theories, which have no foundation in truth. The scriptures thus used are misapplied; they were not given to substantiate error, but to strengthen truth.”—Gospel Workers, 303; Christ in His Sanctuary, p. 1.2 (Ellen G. White)

"In a representation which passed before me, I saw a certain work being done by medical missionary workers. Our ministering brethren were looking on, watching what was being done, but they did not seem to understand. The foundation of our faith, which was established by so much prayer, such earnest searching of the Scriptures, was being taken down, pillar by pillar. Our faith was to have nothing to rest upon--the sanctuary was gone, the atonement was gone." E.G. White, The Upward Look, 152.

SDA 2015 GC Session Proposal: replacing Ellen White for teachers from Babylon. https://youtu.be/tJcHQKsPxZU

The Last Deception of Satan

Satan is ... constantly pressing in the spurious—to lead away from the truth. The very last deception of Satan will be to make of none effect the testimony of the Spirit of God. “Where there is no vision, the people perish” (Proverbs 29:18). Satan will work ingeniously, in different ways and through different agencies, to unsettle the confidence of God's remnant people in the true testimony.—Letter 12, 1890. 1SM 48.3

There will be a hatred kindled against the testimonies which is satanic. The workings of Satan will be to unsettle the faith of the churches in them, for this reason: Satan cannot have so clear a track to bring in his deceptions and bind up souls in his delusions if the warnings and reproofs and counsels of the Spirit of God are heeded.—Letter 40, 1890. 1SM 48.4

Excerpt from the Jesuit Oath:

"I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus. In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever! All of which, I, _, do swear by the Blessed Trinity and blessed Sacraments, which I am now to receive, to perform and on my part to keep inviolable; and do call all the heavenly and glorious host of heaven to witness the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further with my name written and with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and sealed in the face of this holy covenant" http://www.reformation.org/jesuit-oath.html.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/08/why-i-am-polite-to-devil.html

If you read Principles of Ecclesiastical Law you will realize that all corporations on Earth are subject to the Roman Curia and the Roman Pontiff.

These corporations--- IBM, Exxon, Pepsi-Cola-----things which we personify much as we do the Church, are not really things. They are organizations of men. Many of these organizations of men don't realize that their corporate charter is issued by the Pope, but, in the end, so it is. The Roman Curia invented corporations as an entire concept---- foundations, trusts, cooperatives---you name it, they invented it. They hold the patent of patents on the fictional world. It is their enchilada entirely. And, as such, they are responsible for it, by Maxim of Law.

Link to Principles of Ecclesiastical Law: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM

This includes all the "non-profits", the 501c3's that "think" they are or ONCE WERE, Protestant denominations. But when they partook of Satan's dangled carrot, they became "CATHOLIC" and are now hopelessly trapped. You can't discriminate against a minority group, like woman's ordination - the Bible does not teach that women should be ordained ministers, another minority group, LBGTQ: Lesbian, bisexual, gay, transgender, queer/questioning. Gender identity: A person's sense of their own identity as a female (girl or woman), a male (a boy or man), or other gender (for example, transgender, bi-gender or gender queer which is a rejection of the traditional binary view of gender). If you tell what the Bible teaches about this today in any 501c3 denomination you will have your non-profit status revoked and be liable for all back taxes, interest and penalties back to the original filing date. This would bankrupt the church who has been bound and gagged by the corporation and the Federal 501c3 IRS. The tax status a 501c3 provides. They did not need to ask the government for something they already possessed as an inalienable right from God.

It gets so much deeper. It is the mark of the Beast, for anyone to adopt doctrines in common with the Papacy like the Trinity, Sunday worship, immortality of the soul, Eucharist, the belief that we cannot be sin free, etc.. These are counterfeit doctrines setup to deceive the whole world and keep them from obeying the plain law of God found in Exodus 20.

Bottom line, we need Jesus. The TRUE Jesus. There is also another Jesus! Yes, hard to believe, but there is a counterfeit Jesus. See 2 Cor 11:3-4.

2 Corinthians 11:3-4(KJV) 3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with (beware of) him.

This counterfeit Jesus name is Tammuz, born on Dec 25th. The TRUE Jesus was born in the Spring, the time when the Spring lambs were born, around the last of March and the beginning of April.

The book called the "TWO BABYLONS explains this in great detail and is an amazing book.

It is imperative that we understand who the false Jesus and the True Jesus are in these end times or else we will be deceived by this false Jesus doctrines. Nearly all of the whole world bows down and worships - this false Jesus on December 25 by the Catholic CHRIST-MASS. Mary Christ Mass. Merry Christmas is really Mary Christ Mass for Tammuz the Catholic false Christ.

I know, it's hard to change the traditions and ideas that have been steeped into our minds for centuries.

How much do we want of Jesus? Jesus said to forsake ALL and follow Him. How much are we willing to forsake? We must study like our life depends on it, because it does. Our eternal life.

List of KNOWN JESUITS in the Adventist church:

Louis Wereʼs and Raymond F. Cottrellʼs writings which date from about 1949 and 1943 respectively, and is emphatically NOT a landmark of our faith. In the book, An Exhaustive Ellen G. White Commentary on Daniel Volume 1, page 381, under the heading of “What Church Leaders Say About Louis Were”, we find the following endorsement by Harold West, Ministerial Director: He says, “Louis Were was one of the first (emphasis supplied) to speak out of the Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo syndrome that had possessed SDAʼs for so long.“

Now if Louis Were “was one of the first to speak out of (or against) the Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo” interpretation, then this should be all the evidence that we need to prove that the original, or pioneer, position was the “Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo” position. (We will find that another reason Were vilifies the “Valley of Megiddo” teaching is because the King of the North, and a literal interpretation of the Battle of Armageddon are inseparably linked together in prophecy.)

Shouldnʼt we be asking ourselves “Who were these men?” and “Are we in the right camp here?” Perhaps there should be a more thorough investigation into the books of Louis Were and Raymond F. Cottrell. What other changes did they attempt to bring in? (We will look at this briefly in the next chapter.) It would be well to note that this was at the same time the New Theology was being insidiously introduced into the denomination by several church “leaders”. Incidentally, Were was endorsed by Hans K. LaRondelle, Th.D., a prominent pastor who worked to bring New Theology into the denomination, and Cottrell worked with Edward Heppenstall on his revision of Daniel 11. Heppenstall was one of the first to try to instill the doctrine of original sin into the church. Ellen White was shown what these men, and others, would do and described it this way:

As a people we have been greatly humiliated by the course that some of our brethren in responsible positions have taken in departing from the old landmarks. … We need to realize that God has given us a decided message of warning for the world, even as He gave Noah a message of warning for the antediluvians. Testimonies, Vol. 7, page 107 (emphasis supplied)

The ideas of New Theology insidiously undermined our doctrines of the Nature of Christ and the Atonement. Could it be that while the Champions for Truth rose up to form a movement against New Theology errors, they were so intent on combating those errors that they overlooked the prophetic errors that Louis Were was introducing? We will find that not only was he “the first to speak out of the Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo” position that our pioneers had always taken on prophecy, but he was also one of the first to introduce New Theology into his books, even as early as 1949! [1949 was also the year that the “Fallen Nature” of Christ was removed from the book Bible Readings for the Home.]

Godʼs people, and especially those in leadership positions, who have stood by and allowed these errors to come in and didnʼt stand up against them, should consider very carefully the following counsel:

These men who have been trusted to keep the fort have well-nigh betrayed it into the hands of the enemy. They have opened the gates to a wily foe, who has sought to destroy them. Men of experience have seen stealthy hands slipping the bolts that Satan might enter; yet they have held their peace with apparent indifference as to the results. …These persons do not realize that God holds them responsible for every advantage gained by the foe who is admitted to the fort. The desolation and ruin following lie at the door of the unfaithful sentinels, who, by their neglect, become agents in the hands of the adversary to win souls to destruction. Testimonies, vol. 4, pages 211-212

• Jesuit Roy Anderson

Jesuit Clifford Goldstein

http://fgildemeister.blogspot.com/2013/07/clifford-goldstein-jesuit-influence-at.html

• Since more and more Adventists have heard about his links to the Jesuit Order, they've quit reading the Quarterly altogether pursuant to Proverbs 14:7 -- "Leave the presence of a fool, for there you do not meet words of knowledge."

• Elder Goldstein's agenda is simple: substitute Sunday worship for the Sabbath, and trash the good news of the Second Coming.

• "Who needs the Second Coming?" (Clifford Goldstein, Enlightenment Woes, Adventist Review, 14 Jan 2015, p 21)

FIRST THE 501c3 ADVENTISTS ENDURE THEIR LEADERS APOSTASY, THEN THEN THEY EMBRACE THE MARK OF THE BEAST, 666 AT THE SUNDAY LAW LEGISLATION AND FINALLY REALIZING THEY ARE ETERNALLY LOST COME AND BOW BEFORE THE SAINTS FEET and confess that they are:

1. "God is glad for us to go to church both days [Saturday and Sunday]. He wants us to worship Him both days....Anybody who takes a whole day out of every week to spend with God will have more of God’s power in his life, and God can do more through him and in him." Signs of the Times, March, 1990, p 22-23.

2. Here is a quote from the man who writes the Sabbath School quarterlies:

3. "While the Sabbath commandment has a distinct practical value, the specific day, in and of itself, doesn’t. Thus...keeping any other day could ‘work’..." A Pause For Peace: What God’s Gift of the Sabbath Can Mean for You, p 114, by Clifford Goldstein, published by the Pacific Press Publishing Association in 1992.

4. "We have far more to fear from within than from without. The hindrances to strength and success are far greater from the church itself than from the world. Unbelievers have a right to expect that those who profess to be keeping the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus, will do more than any other class to promote and honor, by their consistent lives, by their godly example and their active influence, the cause which they represent. But how often have the professed advocates of the truth proved the greatest obstacle to its advancement! The unbelief indulged, the doubts expressed, the darkness cherished, encourage the presence of evil angels, and open the way for the accomplishment of Satan’s devices." Selected Messages Book 1, p. 122.3

Books and papers promoting Sunday worship are being published by the SDA church that have "denominational approval" See more proof of 501c3 SDA's worshiping on Sunday by clicking here and opening a new tab:

"When the finished product carries the stamp of a standard publishing house, it bears denominational approval. It is then a denominational, not a private, publication. It has a measure of authority and dignity not otherwise possible." Ministry, December, 1948, p 23, Review and Herald Publishing Association.

1. "Sunday-keeping is an institution of the first beast (Papacy doctrines), and ALL who submit to obey this institution emphatically worship the first beast and receive his mark, 'the mark of the beast.' .... Those who worship the beast and his image by observing the first day are certainly idolaters, as were the worshippers of the golden calf." (Advent Review Extra, pages 10 and 11, August, 1850)

2. Those who, understanding the claims of the fourth commandment, choose to observe the false instead of the true Sabbath; are thereby paying homage to that power by which alone it is commanded. But in the very act of enforcing a religious duty by secular power, the (501c3 non-profit/tax exempt) churches would themselves form an image to the beast; hence the enforcement of Sunday-keeping in the United States would be an enforcement of the worship of the beast and his image. {GC88 448.4}

When do her sins reach unto heaven? [Rev. 18:2-5] When the law of God is finally made void by legislation.--ST June 12, 1893.

"But in the very act of enforcing a religious duty by secular power, the (501c3 non-profit/tax exempt) churches would themselves form an image to the beast; hence the enforcement of Sunday-keeping in the United States would be an enforcement of the worship of the beast and his image (copy/likeness/reflection of the Papacies doctrines). {GC88 448.4}

Pioneers who once taught but gave up the Three Angel's Messages of Revelation 14:6-12:

• D. M. Canright apostized from eternal truth - some of the brightest lights will go out from the Three Angel's Messages:

Here is an excerpt from a letter Canright wrote after leaving the Adventist church:

My Present Standing

By D. M. Canright

When a prominent man leaves one church or party and joins an opposing one and gives his reasons for it he may expect that his old associates will reply to him. I expected no exception in my own when I renounced Adventism, so have not been disappointed. The great majority of my former brethren have been very friendly to me and treated me kindly. A few, a very few, have done otherwise. Their object has been to counteract my influence against what they regard as God's work. These few have started the report that I have been sorry I left Adventism, that I have said so, have tried to return to them, have confessed that my book was false, and some have said that I was very poor, a physical and mental wreck, with no hope of salvation, etc. These reports are accepted as facts by honest brethren and repeated till they are believed by many Adventists the world over. I have denied them in every possible way, but they are still believed and repeated, and doubtless always will be. I leave God to judge between us.

I now and here for the hundredth time solemnly affirm before God that I renounced Adventism because I believed it to be an error. I have never once regretted that I did so, have never intimated to any one that I have had the least desire to go back to that people. It would be impossible for me to do such a thing and be an honest man.

I am now (1915) well in body and mind, have a good home worth $10,000 or $12,000, and have four grown children, of whom any man would be proud. On leaving the Adventists I joined the Baptist church at Otsego, Mich., and became its pastor till it was built up into a prosperous church. They have been my ardent friends to this day. Twenty years ago I moved to Grand Rapids, Mich., took a new mission and built this up, organized it into a church which has become one of the strong churches of the city, having several hundred members with a fine edifice. Have twice been its pastor, always an active member. At present I teach a large adult Bible class every Lord's day and often preach for them. Have always been in perfect harmony with the church. They honor me as their father, consult me on all important matters, and hotly resent the foolish reports which some circulate concerning me.

Out of scores of printed testimonies before me I select only a few which speak for themselves. —Seventh-day Adventism Renounced by D. M. Canright, p.9.

-------------------------------