Zoom sur les découvertes prédites sur les sites de Ringwould et Tudeley dans le Kent.

D'après nos calculs et nos observations, il devrait y a voir des cercles de pierre datant du néolithique sur ces deux lieux.

• Ringwould : à mi-chemin entre Stonehenge et Anvers, et à 217,64 km d'Anvers (notre prédiction étant de 217,77 km). A la latitude de Stonehenge.

• Tudeley à 1/3 du chemin entre Ringwould et Stonehenge, soit à 72,64 km de Ringwould. A la latitude de Stonehenge.

La distance de 217,77 et donc 1/3 de 217,77 ont été calculées par rapport aux mesures standard du Cadran du Pilat (k x U). Sachant que U/k = 0,82944 (un détail qui ne change rien à la nécessité de vérifier le modèle sur place)

Ces deux sites ne sont répertoriés sur aucun rapport d'archéologie. Ni visibles sur des cartes ancienne comme des sites remarquables.

Point prédit, à inspecter par tout moyen non invasif (photo, topographie, geotopo etc...)

• 51.17811, 1.36436

• 51.17896, 0.32417

Pour aller plus loin : la carte

Question I try to solve, that directed me to look at easy ways to navigate in a neolithic landscape with no map and no compass, is how this guys where able to travel from Italy to Britany, and then from Britany to Spain, Italy again, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain. For the purpose of carnacean jadeite axes manufacturing and distribution.

Which means they could go from one point to another. Not for hunting or living in new places, but for long distance high value transportation of light goods. And navigate. Most rapid is the straight line and most accessible is to head at cardinal directions or vary simple to define headings. Nothing magical but rather what we would do also if asked to go from Italy to Carnac for instance.

We need your help to discover 3 neolithic sites in England or to dismiss our 'crazy enough' archeology predictive model.

There are 3 potential neolithic stone circles in England that we have positioned by a calculation from an archeologic discovery in France. Your help is required to check on the field the existence of those remains, or non existence, and confirm our model, or dismiss it.

None of the sites in this reality check have already been documented or even identified by archeologist. Two of them have good probability of being interesting thanks to aerial views, but one of them is even not visible from sky. So if anything proven, we could develop further the model, explain its dynamic and discover more. And you are the one who puts proofs on those, you will make a discovery!

Step by step we've established potential positions of neolithic sites from France to England, through Belgium. That network of places could be a traveling network based on very simple directions (North South, East West) and standard distances. In this case distances are 217,77 km or a fraction of it.

• Site 1: Ringwould 51.17811, 1.36436

• Site 2: Tudeley 51.17896, 0.32417

• Site 3: Elstead 51.17893, -0.71799

We count on you who can go on the field in England to take pictures if any standing stone or solid feature is visible, measure distances (size of circles) and most of all to not touch anything. These are private properties and archeology is a serious matter where damage will certainly not help understand why those elements have been installed here. (if anything there of course).

Any picture should come with a GPS position, if possible not from the smartphone but a professional one. Precision of distances measured at this field level is expected to the centimeter.

Non euclidian geometry applies to Pilat Quadrant homothetic projections. We leverage properties of 7 24 25 triangles and conservation of these properties on a spherical geometry:

• distances and proportion, ratios

• right angle

Points considered

• Beigua jadeite Quarry 44.437 8.575

• Locally - Pierre des Trois Evêques 45.30207 4.48927

• Locally - Viseur des Ecrins (Ecrins view finder) 45.3015724 4.491825111

We evaluate distances between point using this formula:

ACOS(SIN(RADIANS(B2))*SIN(RADIANS(B3))+COS(RADIANS(B2))*COS(RADIANS(B3))*COS(RADIANS(C2-C3)))*RadiusEarth:

Earth radius = 6371.08545 km (when average radius is 6371 km), calibrated to have Pierre des Trois Evêques to Beigua = 336 km (exact)

Ref: Lessons on Non-Euclidean geometry | Math History | NJ Wildberger

Results

Local Triangle 7 24 25 with Hypoténuse = Pierre des Trois Evêques - Viseur des Ecrins = 0.20736 km. Hyp = 51,84 x 4 (100 Nippur cubit x 4) or 1 Unit of local triangle = 82.944 dm

• Large triangle 7 24 25 with Hypoténuse = Pierre des Trois Evêques - Beigua = hyp 336 km

• Unit of large triangle 13.44 km

• Ratio (proportion large triangle / local) k = 1,620.37037037037

• U / k = 82.944 dm (reference value of the megalithic Yard - not recognized by academic studies)

• k x U = 217,778 km (distance Anvers to Ringwould)

Map

Presentation of use around Pilat Quadrant use of Pythagorean Triangles

Refs : Plimton 322 Until 6:43 / Numbers and base 60 Until 7:46 Map