jsmc-10185

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MODIFIED MALLAMPATI TEST, INTER-INCIZOR GAP, UPPER LIP BITE TEST, THYROMENTAL DISTANCE AND ALL IN COMBINATION AS PREDICTOR FOR DIFFICULT INTUBATION

Taha Qadir Hussein a and Amir Morad Khudadad Boujan b

a Department of Anesthesia, Shar Hospital 

b Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Submitted: 15/8/2018; Accepted: 15/1/2019; Published 21/3/2019

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10185 

ABSTRACT

Background 

Patients need to be assessed preoperatively in order to predict difficult intubation, because difficult or failed intubation is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Prediction of difficult intubation lowers these risks. Modified mallampati test, upper lib bite test, thyromental distance and inter-incisor gap are used to assess difficult intubation.

Objectives 

To find and compare sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the tests alone and in combination.

Patients and Methods

We used randomized double blinded diagnostic trial for our study. We collected 130 patients of both gender who were aged more than 16 years and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I, II, III. Moreover, the patients underwent elective and emergency operation and required tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. The study was performed at Sulaimani Teaching and Sulaimani Emergency Surgical hospitals. Furthermore, an anesthesiologist assessed the airway and documented the findings and another one did the induction. In addition, induction was standardized for all patients and the anesthesiologist recorded the Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopic view after intubation.

Results

We found that thyromental distance has higher sensitivity (42.9%) for predicting difficult intubation but combination of all the tests increased this percent to 71.4%. Moreover, upper lib bite test had higher specificity (95.7%) to predict easy intubation, even higher than in the combination of all tests. When we combined all of the tests, sensitivity increased significantly but specificity decreased. 

Conclusion

Combinations of the tests together are better predictor of difficult intubation than using each test alone.

Keywords: Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopic view, Difficult intubation, Inter-incisor ga, Mallampati test, Thyromental distance, Upper lip bite test .

KEYWORDS

Cormack and Lehane laryngoscopic view, Difficult intubation, Inter-incisor gap, Mallampati test, Thyromental distance, Upper lip bite test.

References 

1. Kayhan Z, Editor. Endotracheal Intubation. Clinical Anesthesia, 3rd ed., Istanbul: Logos Publishing; 2004: 243-73. 

2. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Editors. Clinical Anesthesia, 4th ed., Ankara: Oncu Printing House; 2008: 91-116.

3. Stoelting RK, Miller RD, Editors. Basic Anesthesia, 5th ed., Ankara: Detail Printing House; 2010:207-39. 

4- Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway. With special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1991; 75(6):1087–1110. 

5. Finucane B, Tsui BCH, Santora A. Principles of Airway Management. 4th ed., New York: Springer; 2011.

6. Robinson N, Hall G, Editors. How to survive in anesthesia a guide to trainee. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.

7. Kecik Y, Alkis N, Yorukoglu D, Alanoglu Z, Editors. Basic Anesthesia. Difficult intubation. 1st ed., Ankara: Gunes Medical Bookstore; 2012: 907-15. 

8. Basunia SR, Ghosh S, Bhattacharya S, Saha I, Biswas A, Prasad A. Comparison between different tests and their combination for prediction of difficult intubation: An analytical study. Anesth Essays Res. 2013; 7(1):105-9. 

9. Enterlein G, Byhahn C, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task F. [Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: update by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force]. Anaesthesist. 2013; 62(10):832-5.

10. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985; 32(4):429-34.

11 Gupta S, Sharma R, Jain D. Airway assessment: predictors of difficult airway. Indian J. Anaesth. 2005; 49(4):257-262.

12. Bradley P, Chapman G, Crooke B, Greenland K. Airway Assessment. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA). August 2016. http://www.anzca.edu.au/documents/pu-airway-assessment-20160916v1.pdf. Accessed November 27, 2018. 

13. Iohom G, Ronayne M, Cunningham AJ. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003; 20(1):31-6.

14. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, Vierra M, Saidman LJ. Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94(3):732-6; table of contents.

15. Gwinnutt C. Clinical Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Blackwell; 2004. 

16. Wajekar AS, Chellam S, Toal PV. Prediction of ease of laryngoscopy and intubation-role of upper lip bite test, modified mallampati classification, and thyromental distance in various combination. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015; 4(1):101-5.

17. Badhe VK, Deogaonkar SG, Tambe MV, Singla A, Shidhaye RV. Clinical comparison of five different predictor tests for difficult intubation. APICare. 2014; 18(1):31-37. 

Full Text

 © The Authors, published by University of Sulaimani, College of Medicine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.