jsmc-10059

MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOME OF TERM PREGNANCIES PRESENTED WITH REDUCED FETAL MOVEMENT

Sundus Yousif Kellow * and Hala Adnan**

* Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sulaimani.

** Sulaimani Directorate of Health.

Submitted: 1/11/2013; Accepted: 7/3/2014; Published 1/12/2014

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10059

ABSTRACT

Background

Maternal perception of fetal movements is the most common method to assess fetal wellbeing in most communities nowadays. It is regarded as unstructured screening on which most pregnant women depend.Significant reduction or sudden alteration in fetal movement is a potentially important sign of impending fetal death. Studies of fetal physiology using ultrasound have demonstrated an association between reduced fetal movement and poor perinatal outcome.

Objectives

To observe the outcome of pregnancies presented with reduced fetal movement (RFM ) at term regarding intra-partum complications, time and mode of delivery and neonatal outcome.

Methods

A prospective case –control study. The data collected at Sulaimania Maternity Teaching Hospital throughout the period from the 1st of September 2012 to the 1st of March 2013. One-hundred low risk pregnant ladies at term were included in the study; fifty of them with reduced fetal movements and the other fifty with good fetal movement. After taking full history and examination including fetal heart rate and manual non stress test(MNST), they were sent to ultrasound (US) examination for amniotic fluid index and Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetery. Then they were followed up until delivery when intrapartum complications, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome were recorded and tabulated for comparison between the two groups.

Results

Regarding the mode of delivery, although the rate of C/S for fetal distress was more among the cases (45.8%) than control (29.4%) it didn’t reach significant statistical difference. The number of stillbirth were just 2 babies in the case group. There were significant neonatal complications as birth asphyxia 24% with meconium

aspiration syndrome 16%, seizures 10% and early neonatal death 6% in the studied (case) group.

Conclusion

Reduced fetal movement is an important symptom that should be taken seriously and manage accordingly, to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality. Each maternity hospital should have a protocol to deal with every pregnant presents with reduced fetal movement.

KEYWORDS

RFM, Kick count, Doppler, NST, Hypoxia, Meconium aspiration syndrome.

References

1-Lt Col G Singh ,Maj K Sidhu.Daily fetal movement chart reducing perinatal mortality in low risk pregnancy. 2008 MJAFI :64:212-213.

2-Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Green-top guideline 57 - Reduced fetal movements; 2011. Available from URL: http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/reduced-fetal-movements-green-top-57

3-Preston S, Mahomed K, Chadha Y et al for the Australian and New Zealand Stillbirth Alliance (ANZSA). Clinical practice guideline for the management of women who report decreased fetal movements. Brisbane, July 2010. Available from URL: http://www.stillbirthalliance.org.au/guideline4.htm.

4-Maria D. Velizquez ,MD, and William F.Antenatal evaluation of the fetus using FM monitoring.2002 clinical obstetrics and gynecology :4:993-1004.

5-O Sullivan ,Stephen G and Stray Pedersen B et al .Predicting poor neonatal out come in women with RFM .2009 J obstetrics gynecology:29(8) :705-710.

6- Mangessi L and HofmeryerG .Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal well being.2007:corchane database 24(1):cd 004909.

7- Grant A, Elboure D, Valentin L and Alexander S.Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of ante partum late death. 1990 Lancet 12;2:345-9.

8- David A. Thompson, M.D. 2. Pregnancy –Decreased fetal movement.2010.

9- QiXi . Juan Du . Ling Shao .Clinical study on detecting false non reactive NST by improved acoustic stimulation.2011:274-284.

10- Eli Saatad , Julie VectoriaHolm Tveit et al .Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of reduced fetal movement and stillbirth in primiparous women .2010 BMC research notes:3:2.

11- Julia Unterscheider and KeelinO, Donoghue.Reduced fetal from preconception to post partum.2012: available from: http:/www.intechopen .com/books/from-preconception-to-postpartum/reduced –fetal –movement.

12- Dr.MamataBaral M.B.B.S (2002). Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement and fetal outcome. December 2002 ,poush 2059.

13- Niamh Daly ,Donal Brennan et al. CTG as apredictor of fetal outcome in women with reduced fetal movement.2011 ejog vol.159, issue 1:57-61.

14- Heazell AE, Green M , Wright C , et al . Management of women with reduced fetal movements.2008:87:331-339.

15- Whitty JE,Garfinkel DA and Divon MY. Maternal perception of RFM as an indication for antepartum testing in low risk population .1991: AMJ OG 165:1084-1088.

16- Sinha D. Sharma ,Nallaswamy et al.Obstetric outcome in women complaining of RFM.2007:J O G 27(1):41-43.

17- Dubliel M,Gudmundssons, Jonsson A and Marshal K. Doppler velocimetry and NST for predicting outcome of pregnancy with RFM.1997:AM.J perinatal14(3):129-144.

18- Segent F, Lefevre A, Verspyck E and MarpeauL.Decrease fetal movement in third trimester :what to do?.2005:GynecolObestetFertil 33: 861-9.

Full Text

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.