Embedded Files
COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN KURDISTANCENTER FOR GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN KURDISTANCENTER FOR GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Ali Fadhil Al-Najjar *
* Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani.
Submitted: 5/8/2015; Accepted: 1/8/2016; Published: 1/12/2016
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.17656/jsmc.10098
ABSTRACT
Background
ERCP has become widely available for the diagnosis and treatment of benign and malignant pancreaticobiliary diseases.In this retrospective study, the overall complications rates for therapeutic ERCP were identified in Kurdistan Center for Gastroenterology and hepatology-Sulaimani-Kurdistan region-Iraq.
Patients and Methods
This retrospective case series was carried out in Kurdistan center for gastroenterology and hepatology in Sulaimani city-Iraq from January 2014 to January 2015. The records of 806 ERCP were evaluated to collect procedure related data and the overall complications rate for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.
Results
All cases examined by ERCP in the KCGH in Sulaimani over a period of one year (from January 2014 to January 2015) were 806, 471 females (58.43%) and 335 males (41.56%). Less than quarter of patients were referrals from Iraqi governorates other than Sulaimani governorate. The mean duration of ERCP procedure was 27.5 min. Deep cannulation was successful in 749 (92.92%) patients. There were 57 (7.07%) failure of cannulation. In cases who had successful cannulation a cholangiogram was obtained which showed bile duct dilatation. In cases of failed cannulation pancreatic stent deployed in 26 (3.22%). Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 472 (58.56%) patients, followed by stone extraction in 341 (96.05%) patients, stenting of common bile duct in 422 (52.35%) ,stent removal in second session of ERCP. The overall complications rate was 9.42%. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was the most common and occurs in 34 patients (4.23%), Bleeding occurred in 19 patients (2.35%) and was related to a therapeutic procedure in all cases. Sixteen patients had cholangitis (1.98%), most cases being secondary to incomplete drainage. There were 4 perforations (0.49%). All other complications totaled 1.12%.
Conclusion
Despite the potential benefits of ERCP for the treatment of benign and malignant pancreaticobiliary diseases, it is associated with morbidity and risk of mortality. The most frequent ERCP-related complication was pancreatitis. Bleeding was second complication and mostly associated with sphincterotomy. Other complications such as
cholangitis and perforation were rare. Patients’ comorbidities and therapeutic procedures can increase the risk of post-ERCP complications.Our interventions and their complications rates are comparable to those reported in other countries.
KEYWORDS
ERCP, KCGH Sulaimani, Endoscopic sphincterotomy, Pancreatitis, Duodenal perforation, Duodenal haemorrhage.
References
1. Salmon PR. Fibre-optic endoscopy New York, NY: Pitman Medical, 1974; 1-14.
2. Sivak MV. Gastroenterologic endoscopy Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1987; 2-19.
3. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21:385-394. CrossRef, Medline
4. Topazian M, Kozarek R, Stoler R, Vender R, Wells CK, Feinstein AR. Clinical utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46:393-399. CrossRef, Medline
5. Sugawa C, Lucas CE. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in surgery of the pancreas and biliary ducts. In: Silvis SE, Rohrmann CA, Ansel HJ, eds. Text and atlas of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. New York, NY: Igaku-Shoin Medical, 1995; 3-21.
6. Siegel JH. Indications, contraindications, and preparation. In: Siegel JH, eds. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: technique, diagnosis and therapy. New York, NY: Raven, 1992; 7-11.
7. Aliperti G. Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1996; 6:379-407. Medline
8. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37:383-393. CrossRef, Medline
9. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:909-918. CrossRef, Medline
10. Cotton PB. Outcomes of endoscopic procedures: struggling towards definitions. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:514-518. CrossRef, Medline
11. Fox CJ, Harry RA, Cairns SR. A prospective series of out-patient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12:523-527. CrossRef, Medline
12. Tzovaras G, Shukla P, Kow L, Mounkley D, Wilson T, Toouli J. What are the risks of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Aust N Z J Surg 2000; 70:778-782. CrossRef, Medline
13. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10. CrossRef, Medline
14. Freeman ML. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopy 1998; 30:A216-A220. Medline
15. Silvis SE, Meier PB. Technique for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In: Silvis SE, Rohrmann CA, Ansel HJ, eds. Text and atlas of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. New York, NY: Igaku-Shoin Medical, 1995; 22-50.
16. Siegel JH. Endoscopic technique. In: Siegel JH, eds. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: technique, diagnosis and therapy. New York, NY: Raven, 1992; 12-22.
17. Zissin R, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Oscadchy A, Pomeranz I, Leichtmann G, Novis B. Retroperitoneal perforation during endoscopic sphincterotomy: imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 2000; 25:279-282. CrossRef, Medline
18. Sarr MG, Fishman EK, Milligan FD, Siegelman SS, Cameron JL. Pancreatitis or duodenal perforation after peri-Vaterian therapeutic endoscopic procedures: diagnosis, differentiation, and management. Surgery 1986; 100:461-466. Medline
19. Kuhlman JE, Fishman EK, Milligan FD, Siegelman SS. Complications of endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy: computed tomographic evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol 1989; 14:127-132. CrossRef, Medline
20. Baille J. Complications of ERCP. In: Jacobson IM, eds. ERCP and its applications. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1998; 37-54.
21. Testoni PA, Bagnolo F, Caporuscio S, Lella F. Serum amylase measured four hours after endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reliable predictor of post procedure pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:1235-1241. CrossRef, Medline
22. Shimizu S, Kutsumi H, Fujimoto S, Kawai K. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1999; 31:74-79. CrossRef, Medline
23. Roszler MH, Campbell WL. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: association with urographic visualization during ERCP. Radiology 1985; 157:595-598. Abstract, Medline
24. Simchuk EJ, Traverso LW, Nukui Y, Kozarek RA. Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis. Am J Surg 2000; 179:352-355. CrossRef, Medline
25.Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E. Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 1994; 193:297-306. Abstract, Medline
26. De Vries JH, Duijm LEM, Dekker W, Guit GL, Ferwerda J, Scholten ET. CT before and after ERCP: detection of pancreatic pseudotumor, asymptomatic retroperitoneal perforation, and duodenal diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:231-235. CrossRef, Medline
27. Balthazar EJ. CT diagnosis and staging of acute pancreatitis. Radiol Clin North Am 1989; 27:19-37. Medline
28. Paulson EK, Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Low VHS, Nelson RC. Acute pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: spectrum of findings on contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:609-613. CrossRef, Medline
29. Kalfarentzos FE, Kehagias J, Kakkos SK, et al. Treatment of patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis based on prospective evaluation. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46:3249-3256. Medline
30. Vitellas KM, Paulson EK, Enns RA, Keogan MT, Pappas TN. Pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: evolution of findings on contrast-enhanced CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23:898-905. CrossRef, Medline
31. Stanley RJ, Semelka RC. Pancreas. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Heiken JP, eds. Computed body tomography with MRI correlation. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1998; 873-960.
32. Genzlinger JL, McPhee MS, Fisher JK, Jacob KM, Helzberg JH. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:1267-1270. CrossRef, Medline
33. Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 2000; 232:191-198. CrossRef, Medline
34. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery 1999; 126:658-665. CrossRef, Medline
35.Scarlett PY, Falk GL. The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 1994; 64:843-846. CrossRef, Medline
36. Manbeck MA, Chang AC, McCracken JD, Chen YK. Cystic duct perforation as a complication of endoscopic stone extraction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:592-594. Medline
37. Patel R, Shaps J. Intramural duodenal hematoma: a complication of ERCP (letter). Gastrointest Endosc 1982; 28:218-219. Medline
38. Hahn PF, Stark DD, Vici LG, Ferrucci JT. Duodenal hematoma: the ring sign in MR imaging. Radiology 1986; 159:379-382. Abstract, Medline, after diagnostic ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39:824-827. CrossRef, Medline.
© The Authors, published by University of Sulaimani, College of Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page updated
Report abuse