SCP-294's Addendum

Addendum 294 : 1

This addendum will focus on clarifying how SCP-294's internal systems process any given inputs. For the following, an input is considered anything typed into SCP-294's keyboard, and a keyword is any word or phrase that will solicit an output from SCP-294. To properly indicate what keyword corresponds to which SCP-294 instance, hover your mouse over the item in your hot-bar or inventory and it will be displayed as "SCP-294-(Keyword)". 

SCP-294 will always require an exact match for a keyword to be considered valid, however, if an input contains more text within it than just a keyword; a drink will still be outputted as long as the keyword remains fully intact. Suppose a keyword is altered in any way that removes letters from the full word or phrase. In that case, SCP-294 will not recognize the modified version as a valid input, for example, changing the valid keyword "Damage" to "Damaging" by removing the final "e" results in the input being marked as invalid by SCP-294. On the other hand, SCP-294 will still consider an input like "123Damage123" as a valid input; as "Damage" remains unmodified and fully intact. 

Addendum 294 : 2

This addendum follows up on the previous, during further testing, when presented with a single input that contains multiple valid keywords; SCP-294 will always dispense an output, however, the output cannot be 'obviously' predicted as of now. 

As this has been replicated numerous times on small scales, a pattern has arisen that essentially proves that SCP-294's internal database contains a static list of its known valid keywords that will not change. Results gained through testing appear to indicate that whenever an input is taken by SCP-294, it will cross-reference the entire input with every instance within its database, and will only stop moving down the list when it selects the first matching keyword that it encounters within the sequence, not necessarily the first one in the input itself. 

When conducted in testing, the three keywords "Oil", "Krill", and "Soap" were utilized; whenever an input contained Oil, it'd be the first selected, between Soap and Krill, Soap was selected, and this pattern of hierarchy rankings of 1. Oil, 2. Soap, 3. Krill remained consistent throughout different rearrangements. Should be noted that this is not due to fewer characters, as previously alphabetical selection, character-dependent selection, and ordered selection were all disproven as plausible theories.