A. Coherent body of works

Evidence: curatorial rationale, the submitted artworks, exhibition text and exhibition photographs/video

To what extent does the submitted work communicate:

Candidates who fail to submit the minimum number of artworks cannot achieve a mark higher than 6. 

B. Technical competence

Evidence: curatorial rationale, the submitted artworks, exhibition text and exhibition photographs/video

To what extent does the submitted work demonstrate:

Candidates who fail to submit the minimum number of artworks cannot achieve a mark higher than 6.

The work demonstrates effective application and manipulation of media and materials to reach an assured level of technical competence in a chosen forms and the effective application and manipulation of the formal qualities. 

C. Conceptual qualities

Evidence: curatorial rationale, the submitted artworks, exhibition text and exhibition photographs/video

To what extent does the submitted work demonstrate:

Candidates who fail to submit the minimum number of artworks cannot achieve a mark higher than 6.

The work visually elaborates ideas, themes or concepts to a point of effective realization and demonstrates the subtle use of complex imagery, signs or symbols that result in effective communication of stated artistic intentions.  

D. Curatorial practice (SL only)

Evidence: curatorial rationale, the submitted artworks, exhibition text and exhibition photographs/video

To what extent does the curatorial rationale justify:


D. Curatorial practice (HL only)

Evidence: curatorial rationale, the submitted artworks, exhibition text and exhibition photographs/video

To what extent does the curatorial rationale demonstrate: