Orientation to Master’s Studies
Session 2
Focusing on good academic practices
Table of Contents
Taken from session's slides
Every word has to be justified
The title should be fully explanatory when standing alone
Abstract is the most important part of the article (biggest advertisement of your research)
Choose keywords carefully
In results present your core results without interpretation
In discussion, present how you advance the existing scientific literature, add practical limitations
Conclusions are similar to abstract but a broader version of it
The goal is to understand core principles of open science
Open science = working together
The motto of open science: the challenge is to be open as possible but as close as necessary
Open science can mean different things in different phases of the research, for example sharing data collection with other research units or sharing results via conferences and research papers
Created with Napkin.ai, based on (OECD, 2015:7)
The decision-making for publishing one's research work is an important process. Selecting an appropriate journal is significant because it represents one's self as an author and their scientific work. A publication in an untrusted source can be damaging to one's career & research.
You should always use a checklist to identify predatory journals
Created with Napkin.ai based on list by Shamseer, et.al. 2017
Step 1: THINK
Can I trust this journal with my research? Do I need for more information before I decide?
Step 2: CHECK
Can you tell which organization publishes the journal? Is there editorial policy ...... Are they clear about publication fees?
Step 3: SUBMIT
If you can say yes to the above questions, then you can Submit your article
Also, use databases to identify guality journals to decide where you will publish your work!
During the end of my bachelor's studies, I completed my thesis, based on which I later submitted an article that was published to a conference's proceedings.
After some time, I was contacted in my student email from an American Academic publishing company, with the email title being 'Invitation from [Journal Title] - We are interested in publishing some new papers from you'
When I first saw the email, I wasn't suspicious about it, I was actually very surprised and excited that someone had taken interest in my work and wanted to publish it. I had even started to think about how I was going to re-write my article to fit the writing specifications - and how to translate it in English because it was in my mother tongue.
It was not until I re-read the email many times and checked their website which looked very outdated, that I got suspicious. My first reaction was that I googled 'is [Publishing Company Name] a scam?' for which I didn't find any clear answers, but nothing stating the opposite as well, so I decided to ignore the email.
Looking back at this experience now, it's blatantly obvious that it was a predatory journal, but at that time I was not exposed to those kind of incidents. I present some sections of the email that I know understand are completely aligned with the predatory journal characteristics.
Language targets author personally [1]
Language targets author personally [2]
Asking for submission through email