Search this site
Embedded Files
A.Kardiakou
  • Welcome
  • OuLu LET
    • LET Learning Journals
      • LET LJ Course 01
        • 1st Entry: Goals and Expectation of LET
        • 2nd Entry: Researchers Presentations
        • 3rd Entry: Research Presentations
        • 4th Entry: Perspectives on studies
        • Study Culture in LET
        • Doctoral Defence
        • Academic Reading & Writing
          • Session 1
          • Session 2
          • Session 3
          • Final Assignment
      • LET LJ Course 02
        • Week 1
        • Week 2
        • Week 3
        • Week 4
        • Week 5
        • Week 6
        • Week 7
      • LET LJ Course 03
      • LET LJ Course 04
        • Session 1 - 29.10
        • Session 2 - 5.11
        • Session 3 - 12.11
        • Session 4 - 14.11
        • Session 5 - 19.11
        • Session 6 - 21.11
        • Session 7 - 25.11
        • Session 8 - 28.11
        • Session 9 - 2.12
        • Session 10 - 5.12
        • Session 11 - 9.12
      • LET LJ Course 05
        • Quantitative Methodology - Lecture 1
        • Quantitative Methodology - Lecture 2
        • Quantitative Methodology - 29.01
        • Quantitative Methodology 5.02
      • LET LJ Course 06
        • Qualitative Methodology 17.03
        • Qualitative Methodology 20.03
        • Qualitative Methodology 24.03
        • Qualitative Methodology 27.03
        • Master's Thesis Kick-off
      • LET LJ Course 07
        • Emerging Technologies 14.01
        • Emerging Technologies 16.01
        • Emerging Technologies 21.01
        • Emerging Technologies 23.01
        • Emerging Technologies 27.01
        • Emerging Technologies 29.01
        • Emerging Technologies 04.02
        • Emerging Technologies 11.02
        • Emerging Technologies 14.02
        • Emerging Technologies 18.02
        • Emerging Technologies 21.02
        • Emerging Technologies 25.02
      • LET LJ Course 08
        • Playfulness and Playful Learning
        • Game-based Learning
      • LET LJ Course 09
        • Learning Profile
          • Prompt 1: My expertise
          • Prompt 2: Routine and adaptive expertise
          • Prompt 3: Ongoing learning
          • Prompt 4: Collaborative problem-solving
        • Lecture Notes
          • Session 1 - 16.09.25
      • LET LJ Course 10
      • LET LJ Course 11
      • LET LJ Course 12
      • LET LJ Course 13
      • LET LJ Course 14
      • LET LJ Course 15
      • LET LJ Course 16
        • Reflective Diary
          • Topic 1: Self-Regulated Learning
          • Topic 2: Metacognition in SRL
          • Topic 3: Emotions and Emotion Regulation
          • Topic 4: Motivation Regulation
          • Topic 5: Collaborative learning theories
          • Topic 6: Supporting collaborative learning
        • Lecture Notes
          • Session 1 - 28.10
          • Session 2 - 29.10
          • Session 3 - 4.11
          • Session 4 - 5.11
          • Session 6 - 8.11
      • LET LJ Course 17
        • LEnv About me
        • LEnv Theme A Workshop 1
        • LEnv Theme A Lecture Reflections
        • LEnv Theme B Workshop 3
        • LEnv Theme B Workshop 4
        • LEnv Theme B Workshop 5
        • LEnv Theme B Lecture Reflections
        • LEnv Theme C Workshop 6
        • LEnv Theme C Workshop 7
        • LEnv Theme C Workshop 8
        • LEnv Theme C Lecture Reflections
        • LEnv Theme D Workshop 9 + 10
        • LEnv Theme D Workshop 11
        • LEnv Theme D Lecture Reflections
        • LEnv Theme E Workshop 12
        • LEnv Theme E Workshop 13
        • LEnv Theme E Workshop 14
        • LEnv Theme E Workshop 15
        • LEnv Theme E Lecture Reflections
        • LEnv Final Project The Projrct
        • LEnv Final Project Project Reflections
      • LET LJ Course 18
        • EduTech Project 28.01
        • EduTech Project
        • EduTech Project 06.02
        • EduTech Project 20.02
    • LET Semester Diaries
      • 1st Semester Diary
      • 2nd Semester Diary
      • 3rd Semester Diary
      • 4th Semester Diary
      • Graduation
    • LET Learning Profiles
    • LET Miscellaneous
      • Kummi Family
      • UniOulu Ambassadors Journey!
      • Mindcraft Events
      • Playlab AI PLC
      • ICE Method in Writing
      • HI Data Forum
      • David Lynch & the AI era of things
A.Kardiakou

LET Learning Journals

Orientation to Master’s Studies

Academic Reading & Writing

Session 2

⮜⮜

Navigating: Academic Reading & Writing Sessions

⮞⮞

Focusing on good academic practices 

Table of Contents

Recap of IMRaD Format
Open Science
What happens when you are finished with your research work and want to publish it?
How to identify predatory journals?
Clear Signs of Predatory Journals
How to choose a trusted journal?
Reflection on my own little experience with a predatory journal
Some sections of the email:
Useful resources

Taken from session's slides

Recap of IMRaD Format

  • Every word has to be justified

  • The title should be fully explanatory when standing alone

  • Abstract is the most important part of the article (biggest advertisement of your research)

  • Choose keywords carefully 

  • In results present your core results without interpretation

  • In discussion, present how you advance the existing scientific literature, add practical limitations

  • Conclusions are similar to abstract but a broader version of it

Open Science

  • The goal is to understand core principles of open science

  • Open science = working together

  • The motto of open science: the challenge is to be open as possible but as close as necessary

Open science can mean different things in different phases of the research, for example sharing data collection with other research units or sharing results via conferences and research papers


Created with Napkin.ai, based on (OECD, 2015:7)

What happens when you are finished with your research work and want to publish it?

The decision-making for publishing one's research work is an important process. Selecting an appropriate journal is significant because it represents one's self as an author and their scientific work. A publication in an untrusted source can be damaging to one's career & research.

How to identify predatory journals?

  • You should always use a checklist to identify predatory journals

Clear Signs of Predatory Journals

Created with Napkin.ai based on list by Shamseer, et.al. 2017

How to choose a trusted journal?

Step 1: THINK

Can I trust this journal with my research? Do I need for more information before I decide?

Step 2: CHECK

Can you tell which organization publishes the journal? Is there editorial policy ...... Are they clear about publication fees?

Step 3: SUBMIT

If you can say yes to the above questions, then you can Submit your article


Also, use databases to identify guality journals to decide where you will publish your work!




Reflection on my own little experience with a predatory journal

During the end of my bachelor's studies, I completed my thesis, based on which I later submitted an article that was published to a conference's proceedings.

After some time, I was contacted in my student email from an American Academic publishing company, with the email title being 'Invitation from [Journal Title] - We are interested in publishing some new papers from you'

When I first saw the email, I wasn't suspicious about it, I was actually very surprised and excited that someone had taken interest in my work and wanted to publish it. I had even started to think about how I was going to re-write my article to fit the writing specifications - and how to translate it in English because it was in my mother tongue.

It was not until I re-read the email many times and checked their website which looked very outdated, that I got suspicious. My first reaction was that I googled 'is [Publishing Company Name] a scam?' for which I didn't find any clear answers, but nothing stating the opposite as well, so I decided to ignore the email.

Looking back at this experience now, it's blatantly obvious that it was a predatory journal, but at that time I was not exposed to those kind of incidents. I present some sections of the email that I know understand are completely aligned with the predatory journal characteristics.

Some sections of the email:

Language targets author personally [1]

Language targets author personally [2]

Asking for submission through email

Useful resources 

⮜⮜

⮝⮝

⮞⮞

© 2025 Athina KardiakouHelp • Subscribe • Contact me
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use✉  Athina Kardiakou
In the media
Google Sites
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse