- In this video, I'm gonna show you how to create completely undetectable AI content. Google will have no clue if it's written by an AI and neither were humans. Want proof? An AI content piece pulled a 100% guaranteed AI score before I worked my magic on it. Then after I used just one of the techniques I'll show you in this video, we now have 100% original. Okay, cool, so I can pass AI detection tools. So what? How does that translate into anything useful? Well, when you can produce high quality undetectable AI articles, you can generate enormous amounts of content like it's no one's business, which is gonna sprout a massive traffic for your website so you can then start printing money like Papa Powell. Now, there's multiple ways that people claim they can beat AI detection tools, such as rewriting the content with QuillBot, the emoji trick, and quite a few more. I'm gonna test each of them out to see which ones work. But first, let's generate some AI content and plug it into each of the detection tools so we can get a baseline. To avoid ChatGPT lag time and usage blackouts, which have been rampant as of late, I'm gonna use OpenAI's playground to generate my test content. Here's my prompt and thank me later if you're an '80s fan. Write me an article on "My Big Trouble in Little China" is a better movie than "Top Gun." Bam, here's the content. Now let's go on over to Originality.ai to see if it busts me red-handed for using AI. This is a paid tool so let's hope it diagnoses it correctly. You plop in the content here, let it run, and here we go. Originality says there's a 98% chance of being AI content. Good for you, Originality. Now let's toss it into aicheatsheet.com, one of the free tools. As expected, 100% certain the text was written by AI. And lastly, let's test out OpenAI's own detection tool, AI Text Classifier. Okay, then the classifier considers the text to be very unlikely AI generated. Pretty sus that OpenAI's own tool misses the mark, but noted. So here's where we stand. Article one is 98% likely to be AI on Originality, 100% AI on Cheat Sheet, and unlikely on OpenAI's own tool. Let's keep going and create a few more test cases. Keeping up with the retro theme, OpenAI, write me an article on why rollerblading is dead. 4% chance it was AI according to Originality, 100% on AI Cheat Sheet, and unclear according to OpenAI. So putting all these results together so far, we're starting to see some inconsistency at least with the first tool. OpenAI's tool is still lost AF. Before we start tricking these tools, let's generate one more test case. Write me an article on proper form for bench press. AI, do you even lift, bro? Apparently it does, and here's the content. So this time, we have Originality with 99% AI, AI Cheat Sheet with 1%, and OpenAI itself still confused. Here's our baseline. Ultimately, both Originality and AI Cheat Sheet are inconsistent, and OpenAI's tool can probably just be ignored. Let's start to do some magic tricks to see if I can improve these scores. But first, make sure to sign up for my free SEO training masterclass by using the link in the pinned comment. It goes over all the magic I'm doing today to get sites to the top of Google. Now, back to the show. The first AI undetection technique, is that even a word? Anyways, the first technique I'm gonna use is QuillBot for rewriting your content. You do this by going to QuillBot, dropping in your content, and then hitting paraphrase. Once I put in the '80s movie AI text, we get this new content on the right. Let's just copy this new text and paste it back into Originality. Well, well, well, Originality said it was 98% fake before, now it's 95% real, that was easy. Now let's drop into AI Cheat Sheet, 100% AI content before, and now it's 59% chance of its human written, or in other words, 41% chance of it's AI. Then we have OpenAI itself with possibly AI generated. That's actually an improvement for the tool from their previous unlikely classification. Bringing the same QuillBot process over for the two other test cases, we end up with the following results, which are interesting. If the articles were previously super detectable by the tools, then QuillBot is for sure gonna improve it. But if they were already passing with flying colors, QuillBot will likely make it worse, which is expected. If it's not broken, don't try to fix it. QuillBot requires a paid account if you input any significant amount of characters. So let's move over to testing some of the free techniques. The following few are all under the umbrella of telling the AI not to write like an AI, starting with perplexity and burstiness. What? - There's this post on Medium where the author shared the following prompt to pre-train your AI before it starts word vomiting. Hey ChatGPT, regarding generating writing content, two factors are crucial to be in the highest degree, perplexity and burstiness. Perplexity measures the complexity of the text. Separately, burstiness compares the variations of sentences. Humans tend to write with greater burstiness, for example, with some longer or more complex sentences alongside shorter ones. AI sentences tend to be more uniform. Therefore, generated text content must have the highest degree of perplexity and the highest degree of burstiness. The other two factors are that writing should be maximum contextually relevant and maximum coherent. Take this word block, drop it into your AI tool, and then ask it to create a content. Based on the above, write me an article on why "Big Trouble in Little China" is a better movie than "Top Gun." Originally says it's 78% AI, which is an improvement from the 98% before, AI Cheat Sheet went from 100% AI to only 11% AI, and OpenAI itself went from possibly to likely. Adding in the results for the other two test cases, we end up with a table like this. I'd say that this perplexity prompt is pretty damn inconsistent. It did decently for the first test case but bummed ass on the second two, skip. By the way, if you're curious as to why we even care in the first place about passing AI detection software, first off, yes, it's very important, and I'll dig into why after I finish up these tests. Next, we have another pre-training prompt that tells the tool how to write like a human. Try to sound like a human writer, writing for a blog, writing in the first person giving advice. Try to sound unique and write in an unpredictable fashion that doesn't sound like GPT3. Here's how it performed. For test cases one and two, it screwed the pooch, but for the bench press content, it did really well. How about if we asked the AI itself how to write undetectable AI content? What are the key attributes of conversational content that is undetectable as being written by an AI. OpenAI tells you that this content would include human-like grammar, punctuation, and spelling that would look human, context-based content creation, and so forth. And then you ask it to generate your content. Now we're talking. Based on all the simple pre-training exercises we've used so far, asking the AI directly how to pass detectors gives the most consistent result. What if we ask the almighty AI how to fix content that's already written? Let it first write your content in vanilla mode. Then you ask it to rewrite the above content so that it is not detected as AI content by AI content writers, and here's a result. Winner, winner, chicken dinner. This is our best performing technique so far, simply asking the AI to rewrite itself for passability results and great scores for all the tools. - Whoa. - Thank you to Affiliate Lab member in Chiang Mai buddy, Chris Manak, for that tip. Next, if you haven't already seen my case study where I broke 50K traffic with a pure AI site, make sure to check it out after you finish here. Link in the description. In that video, I mentioned that I've been using a beta version of Surfer's upcoming AI tool that will generate AI content on the fly that's actually SEO-optimized. It looks at the top ranking articles to determine how to create the article outline, how long to write the content, and what entities and critical keywords need to be in your content, and at what frequencies. It actually does a lot more than that but let's see how detectable it is. Bear in mind, the Surfer tool generates full articles and longer content has a much higher chance of detectability, so here goes nothing. The Big Trouble article hit 28% AI on Originality, AI Cheat Sheet guarantees it was a human who wrote it, and the OpenAI tool choked up on it probably because it's too long. - That's what she said. (chuckles) - Ladies and gentlemen, we have a new champion. The Surfer content bamboozled these detection tools better than any other technique so far. Now there's something I wanna mention. I gotta admit that was more than a bit nervous putting the Surfer tool to the test, not only because I'm an investor, but because I'm putting this content on my freaking websites. So seeing these results was a huge relief. And if anyone would like to verify that I'm not making these numbers up, I'm happy to share the content with you so you can run the tools yourself. If you're interested in applying for the Surfer AI beta test, use the link of the description. The next technique we have is a fun one and that's the emoji trick. You ask it to generate your content but insert an emoji after each word. And then when it's done, you ask it to remove the emojis. While the emoji trick did perform super well in the bench press article, it definitely fell short in the other two. In my opinion, this isn't consistent enough, so let's call this myth busted. Next, the comma trick. Write me an article on proper form for bench press, but remove as many commas as possible. The comma technique seemed to work on Originality and OpenAI's detector in a test case or two, but it's definitely not consistent enough to add to your process. Now we're about to get into why this all matters, but let's take a look at the final results. The winners are clear. Surfer's AI performs the best, followed by the rewrite the content technique, and then good old, you tell me how to write human-like content. Google has gone back and forth on their stance on whether or not AI content is against their guidelines or not. In April of last year, they were like, "Nah bro, AI is fully against our guidelines. Specifically if you're using machine learning tools to generate your content, it's essentially the same as if you're just shuffling words around or looking up synonyms or doing the translation tricks that people used to do. And that doing that is still automatically generated content, that means for us, it's still against the webmaster guidelines." But then in February, they released an official statement in Google Search Central and said they'd reward high quality content however it's produced, okay, but that's not surprising. They have to take the stance 'cause they're clearly gonna be using AI themselves in their search results to compete with Bing's ChatGPT integration. And Denny Sullivan clarified this with quote, "Content written primarily for search engines rather than humans is the issue. If someone fires up 100 humans to write content just to rank or fires up a spinner or AI, same issue." Sure, I agree that the ultimate goal would be to create content that humans would enjoy and encourages them to do what you would want them to do on your website, namely generate you money through ads or conversions. But ultimately, as a search engine professional, I'm obviously producing this content so it performs well in Google or any other search engine for that matter. But there seems to be an unclear line that you're not supposed to cross. In the Affiliate Lab, we have a private mastermind group with the top performers who have sold businesses for six figures or more. One of the members, Dave Gibbons, has a theory which I gravitate to the most. "Google will treat it just like it does with plagiarism or duplicate content. AI will be allowed but it will be deemed a lower quality article than a unique piece with equivalent other SEO factors." I agree 100%. Google needs to incentivize people for creating real original content. Otherwise, what in God's name will the AI be able to scrape its information from? So if you're gonna be using AI in your SEO strategy, the name of the game is to make it appear human. I told Dave that this was a very good theory. After which, he sarcastically responded with, "If only I was in a group with someone with an engineering background that could build a hypothesis from it and do a (beeps) load of tests and then let me know the reality." Touche, my friend, touche. And that's what I'm up to right now. I'm running single variable tests right now to see how AI content performs against human content in the actual search results. Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss my findings.

hi Jason here it's been a little while since I've done a video on an AI detection and how you can bypass AI detectors but if you want to see results like this where we're able to go and get a 100 original AI detection uh score on one of the hardest detectors there is which is originality then keep watching this video because I'm going to give you the solution and it's taken me a long time a lot of messing around a lot of trial and error so first of all let me give you the the background to all of this um you can go ahead and get obviously chat GPT or any of the other main article writers like copy Ai and writer.com and all of those guys any kind of GPT powered writer will generate articles and blog posts and essays and all of those different kinds of content but the problem is is that sometimes people don't want uh the maybe Google to know that it was an AI generated piece of content and they therefore want to in some way rewrite the content to appear more human so it did work for quite a long time but when I last did a video on AI detection how to kind of beat them we were able to take an article that I we have had written in say chat gbt and I I've just said there create a 400 word article explaining the benefits of solar power we were able to go to quill bot paste in the text and then uh just click paraphrase and we can use these different methods I think when I first did this I was using the standard method so we'll just we'll just do that again there we go so now we've got this standard paraphrased article now if we go to originality and we try this out we'll get rid of this one we have here let's paste in the original article first which was this so we'll copy that paste that in and that should if originality is doing its job come up as definitely AI which it has there you go straight away 100 AI uh confident now I've got a whole load of different AI detectors and you're very welcome to check out my site which is chat gbt detectors it's like a Free Directory you can try them all out here the originality is there AI detector Pro winstonpass.ai I've got just about everyone you can imagine they're all here on this one site I'll put a link to it below so we'll grab this content here and we'll now take that newly written piece of content go over to originality paste it in there we go it starts with a form of renewable energy click scan and now we would go and get ourselves like a 100 original but uh originality doing what they're supposed to do and detect AI content um did a very good job in in figuring out the paraphrasing was not the one um and so it's figured it out it figured out quill bot and even put out um an actual blog post here about paraphrasing um is quill bot uh plagiarism but then it also was saying how they have managed to detect it and you can see their originality.ai AI detection plate plagiarism Checker and then paraphrase and none of the others did and to be fair that is that is true none of the others also were able to do this so I started figuring out and playing around with with quill bot to see if there was a way around this by changing the fluency um increasing the number of synonyms go into creative mode and eyes could not not get it to go through any way I tried to beat this detector couldn't do it but I found another piece of software this one's called undetectable to AI again there's a link underneath for this and you can try out I think it's about 120 125 words for free just to try it out and then you can use it to buy just pasting in the content like this so there's that actually that's not the original article that's the other one this one this one right here which starts with solar power as a type of renewable energy that is the original that was written by chat GPT so there it is and I'm going to say readability high school and then the purpose just general writing and we'll click check for AI first and what this does which is really useful look at that it does it in seconds it checks all of these different um the chances of it being detected on all of those and it's gonna say no chance you are done it's going to pick that up as AI generated content so now if we go to a humanize we press the humanize button and now it's just going to work its magic on that content which is down there the original submission and then um it will check the likelihood of it being detected on those things however we won't trust it we will try it on originality as well which it doesn't have listed there but funnily enough just today just today I happen to see uh somewhere along here where is it uh just here um very recently in fact yesterday May the 8th uh they basically have said that undetectable.ai has managed to beat originality.ai in terms of creating undetectable content and it's kind of funny as an outsider to watch these companies battling it out one company is trying to hide AI content and all these other companies are trying to detect it they're going to try and make money out of uh I guess mainly like educational institutions who want to subscribe to say originality and all these other AI detectors to try and catch out people submitting AI generated work maybe businesses as well who who are hiring human writers on from freelance website and they want to make sure that they're not paying out for AI generated content um when they can just do that themselves or just have someone sit there and do it so there's two battles going on and there's money in both sides here to be made so it's interesting to watch the these two big kind of uh companies battling it out and all of the other ones that are involved but there we are it is now Rewritten it um and it's gonna it says that the likelihood of detection is very very low or it's basically just giving it a green light on all of these as well and it even has a guarantee that it will pass AI detection or you get your money back so it's it's that sure the company is that sure that it will do the job that it that it actually gives you a refund guarantee and that's pretty impressive so now let's take this content I want to make sure I get it because for some reason my copy and paste is not very good so solar power is an eco-friendly and renewable source of energy that is the first thing it says so let's take the plunge here and go to originality we'll get rid of this article here and we'll paste in this one there it is you can see it is the same the same there and then we'll we'll go for the scan and why not we'll check for uh plagiarism as well just in case and fingers crossed it does the job let's see if their update works well like they said so originality is a is a good system by the way in most cases for detecting ai ai written content and you can go ahead and find a link to it underneath as well or just go to the site but there we go it did it you know undetectable.ai did it it is 99 original content it's coming up there and let's actually have a look at the readability of this as well or has it made it so crazy in terms of switching words around that it's no good well let's have a look uh solar power is an eco-friendly and renewable source of energy which uses the sun's Rays to produce electricity unlike fossil fuels such as natural gas or coal whose reserves are limited while their extraction process May negatively impact environmental health well one thing I can say there is that that is an extremely long sentence and it needs to have some kind of a comma in there otherwise we're going to collapse and we read it out um the following article explores why solar technology is increasing in popularity across borders particularly for its numerous benefits nothing wrong with that so it seems to have done okay I can see that there's full stops there as well so that's all right but there's nothing to stop you of course from just using something like grammarly or whatever just to polish up the content make sure that there's enough commas in there but the actual wording and the choice of words and synonyms whatever it's been used synonyms um it seems to have done actually a pretty acceptable job so as I say there's a link to this underneath teeth now let's just go through the pricing I've actually signed up for a a whole annual account now because it's so cheap if we get a pricing uh there you go if you do it yearly it's like sixty dollars for a year and you get uh where are we ten thousand words per month to rewrite so it's very very cheap and as it says there there's a money back guarantee if anything they produce is flagged as not being human will refund the cost of humanization so that's fair enough and then the more words that you order the bigger discount levels you get so it's it's it's just a very very cheap service so while you might be okay with Google detecting that your content for example is AI written they have said according to them that they don't mind too much as long as the content's good and people enjoy reading it they stay on the page that tells the algorithm that it's good content so they'll happy to rank it but things will things will change no doubt over the coming few I'd say months not years actually the whole search industry is going to go crazy Bard itself can produce Google's AI version of chat GPT can of course produce articles and blog posts as well so you know it's gonna it's just gonna be a really weird time but when you've got a tool like this that's so inexpensive to just rewrite the content have it humanized as they call it and then you can publish it and maybe relax at least for a while that your content is going to be thought of as human then I think it's probably worth doing it and it's a shame that uh quill bot doesn't work anymore but that's the truth and I try and keep you updated as to what works I'm always testing software tools out so uh subscribe to the channel and like it if you found it useful but subscribe if you want more videos about AI detection and chat GPT and so on and by the way whilst I have you um do check out this free group that I've set up with over 4 300 members now which um we all get in here and we talk about Ai and chat GPT and content writing and all of that kind of geeky stuff people in here have got access to the various plugin begins that chat gbt has now got such as here are Vegeta she's got the code interpreter we've got other people with the browser plug-in so we're getting amazing feedback all the time and prompts we've even got a dedicated section here on just people submitting awesome prompts so you may well want to join this again there's a link underneath this video um for you to do that and that's it so that is how right now um at this moment in time you can bypass AI detection uh using that free tool there's a link or not free um there is a link underneath this if you want to sign up it is free to sign up and try it out up to I think a maximum of a couple of hundred words but if you're going to do it seriously just get yourself an annual account and then you can do it on mass all right thanks ever so much for watching and I'll see you in another video in just a second [Music] thank you

https://www.vaslou.com/undetectable-ai-content-writing-tools