5. Acoustic Analysis of Speech Sounds as an Effective Technique for Pronunciation Teaching

Acoustic Analysis of Speech Sounds as an Effective Technique for Pronunciation Teaching

Dr.Sunita Vijay Kumar

Assistant Professor of English, MVSR Engineering College, Hyderabad

Abstract

In India it will be observed that a learner of English learns the language out of necessity, they are expected to competently master the language with added thrust on the spoken form of the language, especially the articulation and pronunciation of the spoken English must be without traces or influence of the mother tongue, it must match international standards. The buzz word that is most often used with pronunciation teaching in India is Neutralization of Indian English. We are aware of the manner in which corrections of pronunciation are generally made in the classrooms. Although research on the use and effectiveness of visual feedback for teaching with the help of computers began more than thirty-five years ago its potential is not completely explored. The paper explores the utility of speech analysis soft ware to be incorporated into pronunciation teaching in addition to the language teaching software to make it more productive.

The usefulness of teaching pronunciation is a widely debated subject in the language teaching world.

Need for learning pronunciation

  1. The ultimate object of a second language learner is to be able to pronounce properly without having to pay any particular attention to the way in which he does it, 'intelligible pronunciation is seen as an essential component of communicative competence' (Morley, 1991:513).

  2. Today’s approaches to second language teaching, world-wide recognize pronunciation as having a key role in the achievement of successful communication.

  3. It is one of the aspects of language to be taught properly at the very beginning of language study as can be observed from the major historical trends can be seen from the table given below.

Table - 1 The Major Trends in Pronunciation Teaching

Speech Analysis as a Tool for Feedback in Pronunciation practice

i) Speech analysis and use of speech analysis software have been reportedly used in pronunciation teaching classes. Sug­gestions by Spaai and Hermes (1993); Lambacher (1996b); Stib­bard (1996); Chun(1998); Eskenazi (1999); Wennerstrom (2000) reveal that a combination of audio and visual feedback may have a major impact on learners and enhance their ability to learn both segmental and suprasegmental aspects of pronunciation. The use of speech analysis software allows learners to record and visualize their speech output on their computer monitors to obtain real-time information about the acoustic properties of the output. These visualizations can be used by both learners and teachers to compare and evaluate learners’ productions with those of native speakers. Through these visualizations, learners have an objective measure of the distance or closeness of their pronunciation with respect to the target pronunciation. This method is recommended and considered to be highly effective by the re­searchers who have used it.

ii) Eskenazi (1999) maintains that the visual display of second language prosodic patterns may be crucial for correcting students’ inaccurate prosody. It allows them to visualize where exactly their prosodic patterns differ from those of the native speakers.

iii) Wennerstrom (2000) argues that the visu­alization of pitch ranges in speech makes it easier for the learner to increase pitch to signal topic shift, and this has a bearing on learners’ overall intelligibility in a second language learning situation.

iv) Lambacher (1996b) recommends that the function of this computerized training system is very appealing and effective as learning and teaching tool in pronunciation. It allows students to visualize their pronunciation as they learn to associate the patterns on the display with the sounds. The sound analyzer is also very motivating to students because it provides them with a deeper sense of their own articulation by allowing them to visually compare their own pro­nunciation with their teacher’s or with the native speaker’s. The meas­urement of phonetic details such as duration, frequency and intensity is a rather simple task and does not require much technical or theoretical expertise.

v) Speech visualization helps language learning. Both commercial and university research teams have shown growing interest in exploring the applications and potentials of speech analysis software for lan­guage pronunciation instruction. ‘Visemes’ are fast overtaking ‘phonemes’

In the case of a foreign accent, viewed as the effect of a confrontation of two phonological systems in contact from a native language (L1) and a target one (L2), the mastery of an L2 - like prosody may be difficult to teach, from pedagogical viewpoint, sometimes because teachers themselves are not well aware of their prosodic systems especially in rural Indian milieu. This kind of analysis can be made use of to overcome the lacunae.

. able-1. A brief look at the table above summarising the historical perspective shows emergence of holistic, communicative methods and approaches to pronunciation instruction in the contemporary era, which is addressed within the context of real communication (Celce-Murcia, Brinton, & Goodwin, 1996; Morley, 1998).

Pronunciation instruction tends to be linked to the instructional method being used (Celce-Murcia, Brinton, & Goodwin, 1996).The role of pronunciation in the different schools of language teaching has varied widely from having virtually no role to being the main focus where emphasis is on the traditional notions of pronunciation, minimal pairs, drills and short conversations. (Castillo, 1990:3), (Richards and Rodgers, 1986).

When the teaching of spoken English language in India is considered, especially of the teaching of pronunciation, Pronunciation teaching is emerging from its often neglected / marginalized place of instruction in the curriculum to hold a place of its own prominence especially with the language laboratories gaining prominence.

Pronunciation Teaching in the Language Laboratory

The advantages of teaching / learning environments in the language laboratories are many and widely agreed upon.

A realistic environment is created in integrating multimedia, as listening activities are combined with visual activities.

Skills such as reading, writing, speaking and listening can easily be integrated into a single activity using the hyper media. Students display greater control over their learning as they not only go at their own pace but also in the direction they please.

Use of computers accelerates, enriches and deepens basic language skills.

The results of perceptual feedback and correction of student errors, as practiced previously with great face validity, tend to be considerably variable due to the subjective nature of the analysis.

The figure shows the manner in which pronunciation is taught and corrections are

generally made in the classrooms, and how they are still continued to be made by many of the teachers.

In learning pronunciation in the language laboratory, the student often mimics and practices the speech model from audio-tapes or C.Ds and goes through the production tests; the teacher gives feedback to the student which is more or less perception based or impressionistic of the segmental and suprasegmental aspects of speech. the way is long and laborious, and so tedious that generally all attempts are given up after some time, with no visible result.

It would be better and more desirable if the student had an objective feedback of his or her self-managed progress. It not only makes the learners more independent but also the affective factor of feeling conscious of their errors in the presence of the other learners can be avoided.

Fig-2

Incorporating Objective Teaching of Pronunciation in Instruction

Pronunciation teaching these days uses particular technologies like audio-tapes, videos, computer based programmes and websites, it could even provide explicit information in pronunciation in the form of phonetic information, articulatory descriptions and vocal charts, Advances in technology have enabled automatic speech processing to be integrated into foreign language pronunciation training. The advantages of computer assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) software for improving English learners' pronunciation have been studied extensively (Molholt, 1988; 1990; Harless, Zier & Duncan, 1999; Holland, Kaplan & Sabol 1999; Kaplan, Sabol, Wisher & Seidel, 1998; LaRocca, Morgan & Bellinger, 1999; Eskenazi, 1999a, 1999b; Neri, Strik & Boves 2002; Butler-Pascoe & Wiburg, 2003; Kim, 2006). The untiring, non-judgmental nature of the computer allows students unlimited opportunities to review any part of the materials and receive additional assistance provided by the system. CAPT software enables students to study autonomously, choosing what function to use and how often they use it.

Visual feedback in Pronunciation Teaching

Visual feedback of learner errors could be very helpful where the learner could match his speech wave along with all its features, with that of the model speech. Speech analysis and synthesis now allow the users to sort out the role of segmental and suprasegmental features in the perception of a language or an accent.

While perceptual studies, as they were done earlier, present great face validity, their results tend to be considerably variable due to the subjective nature of the analysis.

The use of speech analysis software allows researchers, learners and teachers to record and visualize the speech output on their computer monitors to obtain real-time information about the acoustic properties of this output. These visualizations can be used by both learners and teachers to compare and evaluate learners’ productions with those of native speakers. Through these visualizations, learners can have an objective measure of the distance or closeness of their pronunciation with respect to the target pronunciation. Visual indication of the correct place of articulation is the most effective and useful feedback to the Second Language Learner. The objective feedback motivates the learners to correct their pronunciation in their subsequent attempts.

In recent years, the development of digital technology has greatly improved the efficiency in studying speech acoustics. Acoustic analysis, on the other hand, allows for more precise and objective tracking of subtle speech sound changes in guiding speech training and monitoring progress (Uchanski and Geers, 2003).

Fig-3.The Three Levels of Acoustic Analysis

Speeches analyzing windows or frames use animated views of the articulatory mechanics, video clips showing jaw, lip and tongue movement and waveform patterns of sound samples. Michael Ashby, in his talk (Michael Ashby, 2004) at University College, London demonstrated at a conference some of these new technologies which he is using, to very good effect, with his students. He demonstrated how it is possible to have available, on a laptop, all the equipment necessary for demonstrating and experimenting with sounds. Tools range from the widely available PowerPoint which is highly interactive and can incorporate sound and vision (audio and video files), to specialized speech analysis software such as WASP. With the addition of a microphone, or better still a wireless radio microphone, sounds for analysis can be generated in the classroom by both teacher and student. This is highly motivating and involves the students in the learning process much more closely.

Conclusion

Finally it may be concluded that, an aid to pronunciation teaching classes may come from the acoustic dimensions of speech analysis which aids students to be independent learners. With most teachers and learners having access to computers and the availability of low- or no-cost acoustic analysis software, there is little reason why the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of acoustic aspects of speech are not routinely incorporated into the teaching especially of pronunciation skills or the skills set of language teaching practitioner.

With adequate education, modeling, and support the application of speech analysis to pronunciation teaching and learning practice can lead to effective language teaching learning management.

Pronunciation can be one of the most difficult parts of a language for adult learners to master and one of the least favourite topics for teachers to address in the classroom. Nevertheless, with careful preparation and integration, pronunciation can play an important role in supporting learners' overall communicative power. Students enjoy practising at their own pace and receiving individualised, immediate feedback. There is an expressed need for more instruction on how to refine their pronunciation and for cumulative analyses of performances.

References

Ashby Michael. 2004 “Novel techniques in the class room”. (paper presented in the workshop on The Future Of Phonetics at University of Westminster, London

Butler-Pascoe, M. E. & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and teaching English language learners. Chapter 4, pp. 96-111.in Using technology to teach speaking and pronunciation skills

Castillo, L. (1990) ÎL2 Pronunciation Pedagogy: Where have we been? Where are we headed? The Language Teacher . Vol.XIV, No. 10. 3-7

Celce-Murcia, M. - Brinton, D. - Goodwin, J. (1996) Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages.

Chun, D.M. (1998) Signal Analysis Software For Teaching Discourse Intonation LLTJ, Language Learning & Technology 2, 1: 61-77.

.Eskanazi, 1999a, Using a Computer in Foreign Language PronunciationTraining: What Advantages?, in: “CALICO Journal” 16/3, 447-469.

Eskenazi,Maxine1999b, Issues in the Use of Speech Recognition for Foreign Language Tutors,in:“LanguageLearning and Technology Journal” 2/2, 62-76.

Flege, James Emil; David Birdsong, Ellen Bialystok, Molly Mack, Hyekyung Sung and Kimiko Tsukada. 1997 "Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults". Journal of Phonetics34 (2): 153-175

Gilbert, J. B. (1994). Intonation: A navigation guide for the listener (and gadgets to help teach it). In J. Morley (Ed.), Pronunciation pedagogy and theory. Bloomington: TESOL, Inc.

Harless, W. G., Zier, M. A., & Duncan, R.C. (1999). Virtual dialogues with native speakers: The evaluation of an interactive multimedia method. CALICO Journal, 16, 313-337.

Jones Daniel. 1972 . An Outline of English Phonetics, Cambridge University Press. ... Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Nineth Edition.

Kaplan, J. D., Sabol, M. A., Wisher, R. A., & Seidel, R. J. (1998). The Military Language Tutor (MILT) program: An advanced authoring system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11, 265-287.

Kaplan, J. D., Holland, V. M., & Sabol, M. A. (1999). Preliminary tests of language learning in a speech-interactive graphics microworld. CALICO Journal, 16, 339-359.

Kim, I. S. (2006). Automatic speech recognition: Reliability and pedagogical implications for teaching pronunciation. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 322–344.

Lambacher, Stephen. 1996a, “Ta­ching English Pronunciation Using a Computer Visual Display”. Paper presented at the IATEFL 29th Inter­national Annual Conference, York, England, 1995. Retrieved at: http://www.u-aizu.ac.jp/~steeve/york95.html.

Lambacher, Stephen (1996b), Spec­trogram Analysis as a Tool in Develo­ping L2 Pronunciation Skills, in: “Spe­ak Out!”, London, IATEFL, 32-35.

LaRocca, S. A., Morgan, J. J., & Bellinger, S. M. (1999). On the path to 2X learning: Exploring the possibilities of advanced speech recognition. CALICO Journal, 16, 295-310.

Liberman, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Shankweiler, D.P., & Studert-Kennedy, M. 1967.Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, (pp 431-461).

Molholt, G. (1988). Computer-assisted instruction in pronunciation for Chinese speakers of American

English. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 91-111.

Morley, J. (1994) "A multidimensional curriculum design for speech-pronunciation instruction", in Morley, J. (Ed.) Pronunciation Pedagogy and Theory: New Views, New Directions. Alexandria, Va: TESOL. pp. 64-91.

Neri, C. Cucchiarini, H. Strik & L. Boves 2002. "The pedagogy-technology interface in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training," Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15:5, pp. 441-467.

Ramus, F. & Mahler, J. (1999) Language identification with suprasegmental cues: A study based on speech resynthesis, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(1), 512-521.

Richards, Jack C. and Theodore S. Rodgers. 1986. Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 167pp.

Spaai, Gerard,W.G.Hermes,Dik J.1993, A Visual Display for the Teaching of Intonation, in: “CALICO Journal” 10, 3:19-30

Stibbard .1996, Teaching English Intonation with a Visual Di­splay of Fundamental Frequency, in: “The Internet TESL Journal” 2/8, August 1996.

Wennerstrom, Ann (2000), “The Role of Intonation in Second Lan­guage Fluency”, in: H. Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on Fluency. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.