THE REICHSTAG FIRE

Marinus van der Lubbe was blamed for the Reichstag fire and executed in 1934 

Who set the fire to the Reichstag Building?

Was it Blind Chance for Hitler to consolidate his power 

or was it a NAZI plot?


Watch this video to know what the Reichstag fire was all about. 

Some Background Information - Let's set the context! 


Almost 100 years ago, flames engulfed Germany's parliament building - the Reichstag - six days before a national election, which historians say helped Adolf Hitler secure re-election as chancellor.


Dutch communist Marinus van der Lubbe confessed to the attack and was sentenced to death, aged 24. Then, and for a longer time afterwards, he was considered the sole perpetrator of the fire.


There have been some debates among some historians over whether the fire was simple dumb luck, handing Hitler his re-election, or whether it was an orchestrated maneuver by the Nazi Party to regain power. 


Most agree that van der Lubbe acted alone, while some have accused senior Nazi figures of deliberately starting the fire to justify a crackdown on their opponents.


In 2008, Germany posthumously [ after his death] pardoned van der Lubbe under a law introduced in 1998 to lift convictions for people who committed crimes under the Nazi regime.

You are a group of journalists who want to investigate the cause of the Reichstag Fire. You became more interested in the case after the remains of Van der Lubbe’s were exhumed to find out if he was really buried as claimed and if he was drugged by the Nazis before the fire. This is your chance to help clear his name/ prove his guilt. 

You have a short window period to break this story before anyone else does. You can choose to do a short broadcast sharing what you have unearthed. Or you could write a piece for a History Tabloid - either way, you'd be making history!

HERE ARE THE DOCUMENTS YOU HAVE ACCESS TO...

This is an 18 min video - if you prefer reading evidences gathered, please scroll down...

DOCUMENTS FOUND IN RELATION TO VAN DER LUBBE HIMSELF - the man who confessed to settiing the fire and was executed via a guillotine. 

DOC 1:  A statement made by van der Lubbe to the police in March 1933. 


I decided to go to Germany to see for myself. Since the workers would do nothing, I had to do something by myself. I considered arson a suitable method. I did not wish to harm private people, but something that belonged to the state. I acted alone, no one helped me, nor did I meet a single person in the Reichstag.

DOC 2An account of the trial. 

Without warning, van der Lubbe who sat silent as though drugged or dazed for weeks on end, suddenly leaped to his feet, clear-eyed and bubbling with protests which he hurled at the judge.

“This trial began in Leipzig,” he shouted, “then moved to Berlin and now we are back in Leipzig but nothing ever happens. I don’t agree to that! I burned down the Reichstag and I want to have my sentence – twenty years in prison or death! I have been questioned for over 8 months. I want something to happen! This trial had now been going on for 2 months. How long is it going to take to get a verdict?”


“This trial has lasted so long, “ cut in the Chief Prosecutor, “because you will Not reveal your accomplices.”

DOCUMENTS FOUND IN RELATION TO KARL ERNST - the leader of SA who was eventually killed during the Night of the Long Knives. 

DOC 1: Confession written by Karl Ernst, a senior member of the SA, June 1934. He ordered that the document should ONLY be published if he met a violent death. He died in the Night of the Long Knives.

I was told that a young Dutchman had turned up in Berlin of whom we could make use. This Dutch communist van der Lubbe, would climb into the Reichstag and blunder about the conspicuously. Meanwhile, I and my men would set fire to the building…. We prepared a number of fires by smearing chairs and tables and by soaking carpets and curtains in paraffin. At exactly 9.05 we finished and left. I am writing this confession because the SA has been betrayed by the evil plans of Goering and Goebbels. I shall destroy it the moment these traitors have been removed.

DOC 2: Extract from the confession of Karl Ernst, a senior member of the SA. This confession was published in Paris by German Communists in 1934 after Ernst had been killed in the Night of the Long Knives. 

I and two colleagues set fire to the Reichstag. We hope that it would enable the Fuhrer to deliver a shattering blow against the Communism, the worst enemy of the German people.

We entered the Reichstag firs at 8.45 pm/ We prepared a number of fires by smearing chairs and tables with a phosphorus miture and by soaking curtain and carpets in paraffin. We had earlier been told about a young Dutch Communist called van der Lubbe who could be p[persuaded to climb into the Reichstag and blunder about conspicuously after we had set fire to the building. But he was to be left ot believe that he was working by himself.

I cannot bear the thought that the SA was betrayed. I am writing his confession as my only insurance against the evil plans of Goring and Goebbels. I shall destroy it the moment these traitors have been dealt with.

DOC 3: A British Historian writing about Ernst’s confession in a History journal in 1960.


Ernst’s confession conveniently only turned up when Ernst was dead – killed by Hitler in the great purge of 30 June 1934. But there was one thing Karl Ernst got wrong. He agreed that the Brown Shirts entered the Reichstag at 8.40 am This had to be the time, if they were to do their work before van der Lubbe was said to have pushed through the Reichstag by the Nazis.

 

Unfortunately, Ernst did not know that on 27 February At 8.45 pm, a postman cam  through the s-de door to collect mail. He entered as usual; walked through the deserted building; and left at 8.55 pm. He saw nothing out of the ordinarily – no shadowy figures, no smell of petrol or other inflammable liquid.

 

OTHER WITNESSES...  

DOC 1: “Mystery surrounds the infamous burning of the Reichstag in 1933.” From a history website.

Experts in Germany who conducted a reconstruction of the fire found that a liquid chemical agent of the type described by Gisevius at Nuremberg would indeed have started a blazing fire like a “chemical time bomb” and allowed the arsonists to get away. In addition, German newspaper Die Tagezeitung points out that a tunnel from the Reichstag building connecting to various federal buildings would have enabled SA men to reach the place quickly and undetected.

DOC 2: Extract from a biography, written by a German historian in 1944. The historian lived through Hitler’s  rule and was an opponent of Nazism.

Before the ashes of her Reichstag building were cold, the radio was alive with voices blaring forth the details about the murderous, fire-setting plans of the communists. The plans had been stooped just in time. SA men rushed about in trucks, drunk with victory and roaring threats at people. In the cellars of the SA barracks, woolen blankets stifled the cris of the Communist victims.

DOC 3: A government official who resigned after the Night of the Long Knives due to concerns about the illegal activities of the police. He later became involved in the July Plot against Hitler in 1944 and gave evidence against the leaders at the Nuremberg War trials.

 

It was Goebbels who first came up with the idea of setting fire to the Reichstag. Goebbels discussed this with the leader of the Berlin SA brigade, Karl Earnst, and made detailed suggestions on how to go about carrying out the arson. A until of ten reliable SA men was put together, and now Goering was informed of all the details of the plan, so that he coincidentally was not out holding an election speech on the  night of the fire but was still at his desk in the Ministry for the Interior, even at such a late hour. The intention right from the start was to put blame for the crime on the Communists.

DOC 4: A top Nazi General who was giving evidence during the War Crimes trial in 1946. 

On the occasion of a lunch on Hitler’s birthday in 1943, the conversation turned to the Reichstag building. I had with my own ears how Goering [the Number 2 man in the Nazi Party][ broke into the conversation and shouted, “The only one who really knows about the Reichstag is me, for I set fire to it.”

DOC 5: A 1955 affidavit found in the archives of a Hanover court. By Hans-Martin Lennings, a former member of the Nazis' paramilitary SA unit.

We [the SA] had to bring Marinus van der Lubbe to the Reichstag from an informary to the Reichstag on the night of the fire. When I drove him there with other members of my SA group, we noticed a strange smell of burning and there were clouds of smoke billowing through the rooms. The fire had already started by the time we arrived. 

Later when Van Der Lubbe was accused, we were convinced that he could not possibly have been the arsonist, because according to our observation, the Reichstag had already been burning when we dropped him off there.

We were detained and forced to sign a paper denying any knowledge of the incident. Later, nearly all of those with knowledge of the Reichstag fire were executed; I had been warned and escaped to the former Czechoslovakia.

I'm now asking for this account to be certified, in the event the Reichstag fire case ever goes back to trial.

DOC 6: From a historian


Van der Lubbe was later blamed for the blaze, convicted of arson and executed after admitting he committed the act alone. He said he had committed the arson to rally communists against fascism. Four other defendants in the trial were acquitted, a decision that angered Hitler.

Watch ONE last video if you want to know more...

Fritz Tobias, a historian in the Nazi party, was one of the more prominent of the speculators of the time. Benjamin Carter Hett, author of Burning the Reichstag, explains Fritz Tobias's devious manipulation of the incident, and how far his theories were from the truth. 

POWERFUL LESSONS WE CAN LEARN FROM THE REICHSTAG FIRE

The lessons from the Reichstag fire are relevant today as societies continue to grapple with threats to democracy and the rise of authoritarianism. It serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of extremism, propaganda, and the erosion of civil liberties.