Economic Growth

Learning Objectives

  • The meaning of economic growth
  • Causes of economic growth
  • Consequences of economic growth

The meaning of economic growth

  • Gross Domestic Product is the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time.
  • Nominal GDP is the value of the final goods and services produced in a given year valued at the prices that prevailed in that same year
  • Real GDP is the value of the final goods and services produced in a given year when valued at constant prices.

Economic growth rate is the rate of change of real GDP expressed as a percentage per year.

Growth rate = Real GDP year 2 – Real GDP year 1 /Real GDP year 1 x 100

For example, if real GDP in the current year is $8.4 trillion and real GDP in the previous year was $8.0 trillion, then the growth rate of real GDP is

Growth rate = Real GDP year 2 – Real GDP year 1 /Real GDP year 1 x 100

Growth rate = $8.4 trillion - $8.0 trillion / $8.0 trillion x 100 = 5%

The growth rate of real GDP tells us how rapidly the total economy is expanding. But it does note tell us anything about changes in the standard of living. The standard of living depends on the real GDP per person which is Real GDP divided by the population.


Task 1: Calculate the following

Suppose for example, that in the current year, when real GDP is $8.4 trillion, the population is 202 million. Then real GDP per capita is

$8.4 trillion/202 million = $

Suppose that in the previous year, when real GDP was $8 trillion, the population was 200 million. The real GDP per capita in that year was

$8.0 trillion/200 million = $

Growth rate of real GDP per capita = $ - $/$ x 100 = %

There is another way to calculate the growth rate of real GDP per capita. What is it?

This formula makes it clear that real GDP per capita grows only if real GDP grows faster than the population growth.

The Magic of Sustained Growth

Rule of 70 – the number of years it takes for the level of any variable to double is approximately 70 divided by the annual percentage growth rate of the variable

Task 2: Question on calculating economic growth

Mexico’s real GDP was 1448 billion pesos in 1998 and 1501 billion pesos in 1999. Mexico’s population growth in 1999 was 1.8%. Calculate:

  1. Mexico’s economic growth rate in 1999
  2. The growth rate of real GDP per capita in Mexico in 1999
  3. The approximate number of years it takes for real GDP per capita in Mexico to double if the 1999 economic growth rate and population growth rate are maintained
  4. The approximate number of years it takes for real GDP per capita in Mexico to double if the 1999 economic growth rate is maintained but the population growth slows to 1% a year

Economic growth in the short run and long run

What are the implications of the 5-year economic growth forecasts for these developed economies?

Causes of economic growth

Economic growth has two meanings:

1. Actual growth: Firstly, and most commonly, growth is defined as an increase in the output that an economy produces over a period of time, the minimum being two consecutive quarters.

2. Potential growth: The second meaning of economic growth is an increase in what an economy can produce if it is using all its scarce resources. An increase in an economy’s productive potential can be shown by an outward shift in the economy’s production possibility frontier (PPF).

Production Possibility Frontier

Production possibility curves are also known as production possibility frontiers. What a PPF curve shows is the total combination of goods and services a country can produce with its fixed level of resources. It highlights the concept of scarcity and opportunity cost. (e.g. how if you want more production of staple foods you would to reduce production of cash crops). A production possibility curve can show how the economy of a country is doing.

A production possibility frontier is curved because of the law of diminishing returns which occurs because the workers who specialize in the production of one service is not as efficient as the production of another good or service.

Economic growth is when the economy increases productivity or the level of resources. It is represented by the outward shift of the PPC curve from PPC1 to PPC2. The potential output of the economy rises.(Potential output is when resources are fully utilized at the maximal efficiency)

Actual growth occurs when the economy decides to utilize more resources or decides to use it more efficiently hence increasing output. This is represented by the movement of the production point X to point Y. The respective outputs can be found by drawing lines to the axis.

Source - http://ib-economics.blogspot.hk/2009/05/production-possibility-frontier.html

Methods of illustrating economic growth

The simplest way to show economic growth is to bundle all goods into two basic categories, consumer and capital goods. An outward shift of a PPF means that an economy has increased its capacity to produce.

What creates growth?

When using a PPF, growth is defined as an increase in potential output over time, and illustrated by an outward shift in the curve. An outward shift of a PPF means that an economy has increased its capacity to produce all goods. This can occur when the economy undertakes some or all of the following:

Employs new technology

Investment in new technology increases potential output for all goods and services because new technology is inevitably more efficient than old technology. Widespread 'mechanization' in the 18th and 19th centuries enabled the UK to generate vast quantities of output from relatively few resources, and become the world's first fully industrialized economy. In recent times, China's rapid growth rate owes much to the application of new technology to the manufacturing process.

An economy will not be able to grow if an insufficient amount of resources are allocated to capital goods. In fact, because capital depreciates some resources must be allocated to capital goods for an economy to remain at its current size, let alone for it to grow.

Employs a division of labour, allowing specialisation

A division of labour refers to how production can be broken down into separate tasks, enabling machines to be developed to help production, and allowing labour to specialize on a small range of activities. A division of labour, and specialization, can considerably improve productive capacity, and shift the PPF outwards.

Employs new production methods

New methods of production can increase potential output. For example, the introduction of team working to the production of motor vehicles in the 1980s reduced wastage and led to considerable efficiency improvements. The widespread use of computer controlled production methods, such as robotics, has dramatically improved the productive potential of many manufacturing firms.

Increases its labour force

Growth in the size of the working population enables an economy to increase its potential output. This can be achieved through natural growth, when the birth rate exceeds the death rate, or through net immigration, when immigration is greater than emigration.

Discovers new raw materials

Discoveries of key resources, such as oil, increase an economy’s capacity to produce.

An inward shift of a PPF

A PPF will shift inwards when an economy has suffered a loss or exhaustion of some of its scarce resources. This reduces an economy's productive potential.

A PPF will shift inwards if:

Resources run out

If key non-renewable resources, like oil, are exhausted the productive capacity of an economy may be reduced. This happens more quickly as a result of the application of ultra-efficient production methods, and when countries over-specialize in producing goods from non-renewable resources.

Sustainable growth means that the current rate of growth is not so fast that future generations are denied the benefit of scarce resources, such as non-renewable resources, and a clean environment.

Failure to invest

A failure to invest in human and real capital to compensate for depreciation will reduce an economy's capacity. Real capital, such as machinery and equipment, wears out with use and its productivity falls over time. As the output from real capital falls, the productivity of labour will also fall. The quality and productivity of labour also depends on the acquisition of new skills. Therefore, if an economy does not invest in people and technology its PPF will slowly move inwards.

Erosion of infrastructure

A military conflict is likely to destroy factories, people, communications, and infrastructure.

Natural disaster

If there is a natural disaster, such as the 2005 boxing-day tsunami, or the Haiti earthquake of 2010, an economy’s PPF will shift inwards.

Investment and economic growth

Allocating scarce funds to capital goods, such as machinery, is referred to as real investment. If an economy chooses to produce more capital goods than consumer goods, at point A in the diagram, then it will grow by more than if it allocated more resources to consumer goods, at point B, below.

To achieve long run growth the economy must use more of its capital resources to produce capital rather than consumer goods. As a result, standards of living are reduced in the short run, as resources are diverted away from private consumption. However, the increased investment in capital goods enables more output of consumer goods to be produced in the long run. This means that standards of living can increase in the future by more than they would have if the economy had not made such as short-term sacrifice. Hence economies face a choice between high levels of consumption in the short run and the long run.

Investment

If an economy chooses to produce more capital goods than consumer goods, at point A in the diagram, then it will grow by more than if it allocated more resources to consumer goods, at point B.

There is a trade-off between the short and the long run. In the short run, the economy must use resources to produce capital rather than consumer goods. Standards of living are reduced in the short run, as resources are diverted away from private consumption. However, in the longer run the increased investment in capital goods enables more output of consumer goods to be produced. This means that standards of living can increase by more than they would have if the economy had not made the short-term sacrifice.

Asymmetric growth

An economy can grow because of an increase in productivity in one sector of the economy - this is called asymmetric growth.

For example, an improvement in technology applied to industry Y, such as motor vehicles, but not to X, such as food production, would be illustrated by a shift of the PPF from the Y-axis only.

Factor mobility

If workers, or other resources, are moved from one sector to another, then the position of the PPF will change, with an increase in the maximum output in the industry receiving the resources, and a fall in the maximum output of the industry losing resources.

Source - http://www.economicsonline.co.uk/Competitive_markets/Economic_growth.html

Task 3

a) Country X’s economy produces fewer capital goods and more consumer goods than Country Z’s economy. Which country’s economy will experience more rapid growth? Draw two production possibilities curves demonstrating your answer

b) If a production possibilities curve between DVD players and mp3 players exists, how does a technological advance that increases the efficiency of mp3 player production affect the PPF?

c) Which of the following events is the least likely to shift a society’s PPF outward? A. Discovery of natural gas B. Training for workers that increases the amount of a good that can be produced per worker C. A shift in preference for one good compared to the other good D.Invention of a new process of production that reduces the resources necessary to produce a good

Task 4: Use Figure 1-2.7 to answer the following 5 questions. Each curve starts with Curve BE as a country’s curve.

a) Suppose there is a major technological breakthrough in the consumer-goods industry, and the new technology is widely adopted. Which curve in the diagram would represent the new PPC? Indicate the curve you choose with two letters.

b) Suppose a new government comes into power and forbids the use of automated machinery and modern production techniques in all industries. Which curve in the diagram would represent the new PPC? Indicate the curve you choose with two letters.

c) Suppose new sources of oil and coal are found within the economy and there are major technological innovations in both industries. Which curve in the diagram would represent the new PPC? ? Indicate the curve you choose with two letters.

d) IF BE represents a country’s current PPC, what can you say about a point like X?

e) IF BE represents a country’s current PPC, what can you say about a point like Y?

The sources of economic growth – importance of productivity

Real GDP grows when the quantities of the factors of production grow or when persistent advances in technology make them increasingly productive. All the influences on real GDP growth can be divided into those that increase

  • Aggregate hours
  • Labour productivity

Aggregate Hours

Over time aggregate hours increase. In developed economies, this growth in aggregate hours comes from growth in the labour force rather than growth in average hours per worker.

Population growth brings economic growth but it does not bring growth in real GDP per capita unless labour hours become more productive.

Labour Productivity

The quantity of real GDP produced by one hour of labour is called labour productivity. It is calculated by using the formula:

Labour productivity = real GDP/aggregate hours

For example, if real GDP is $8000 billion and if aggregate hours are 200 billion, then we can calculate labour productivity as:

Labour productivity = $8000 billion/200 billion = $40 per hour

You can turn this formula around and see that:

Real GDP = Aggregate hours x labour productivity

When labour productivity grows, real GDP per capita grows. So the growth in labour productivity is the basis of rising living standards. The growth of labour productivity depends on three things:

  • Savings and investment in physical capital – increase the amount of capital per worker and increase labour productivity
  • Expansion of human capital – human capital which is the accumulated skills and knowledge of people comes from education & training and job experience
  • Discovery of new technologies – the development of writing, development of mathematics which laid the foundation for the eventual extension of knowledge in the sciences and more advanced technologies embodied in physical capital have laid the conditions for great spurts in economic growth in the last 200 years.


Robert Solow’s One-third rule

This is an observation discovered by Robert Solow of MIT. One average, with no change in human capital and technology, a 1% increase in capital per hour of labour brings a one-third percent increase in labour productivity.

We can use the one –third rule to identify the contribution of capital growth to labour productivity growth. Suppose, for example, that in a year, capital per hour of labour grows by 3% and labour productivity grows by 2.5%. The one-third rule tells us that capital growth has contributed one-third of 3% which is 1%.

Labour productivity growth that is not attributed to capital growth arises from human capital growth and technological change. In the above example in which labour productivity grows by 2.5% and capital growth contributed 1%, the remaining 1.5% growth of labour productivity comes from human capital growth and technological change.

See - Why the cities you’ve never heard of are poised to lead China’s economic growth - http://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/2069534/why-cities-youve-never-heard-are-poised-lead-chinas-economic


Task 5:

Output Gap

The output gap is a measure of the difference between actual output (Y) and potential output (Yf).

The output gap = Y- Yf

Negative Output Gap

This occurs when actual output is less than potential output gap. This is also called a deflationary (or recessionary) gap. In this situation the economy is producing less than potential. There will be unemployment, low growth and / or a fall in output. A negative output gap will typically cause low inflation or even deflation.

Positive Output Gap

This occurs when actual output is greater than potential output. This will occur when economic growth is above the long run trend rate (e.g. during an economic boom). It will involve firms asking workers to overtime.

With a positive output gap, there will be inflationary pressures. It will also tend to cause a bigger current account deficit as consumers buy more imports due to domestic supply constraints.

Output Gap.

HM treasury forecast an output gap of -2.7% for 2012/13. This is the amount of spare capacity they feel the UK has.

Note: it can be difficult to measure the amount of spare capacity – See: What is the UK’s actual output gap?


Lost Output During 2008-12 Recession

This shows how actual real GDP fell behind the trend growth rate of GDP.

What Determines Size of Output Gap?

  1. Level of unemployment. Higher unemployment increases the negative output gap.
  2. Levels of spare capacity. If firms report they are under-utilizing capacity, there is a bigger negative output gap.
  3. Productivity growth. If productivity growth falls, this decreases the growth of potential output and therefore limits the negative output gap.
  4. Inflation. Inflation can be a guide to the output gap. If inflation is high and firms pushing up prices, this suggests there is a positive output gap.

Source - http://ib-economics.blogspot.hk/2009/05/production-possibility-frontier.html

Potential Output

Potential gross domestic product (GDP) is a theoretical concept that means different things to different people. To some, it reflects a world in which every worker is matched with the perfect job, every good idea is implemented, and the bad ones are ignored. In this world, resources are allocated optimally with no distortions from the tax code, information frictions, or suboptimal government policies.

But this theoretical “perfect world” is not the real world, and the scenario just described is not the concept of potential GDP monetary policymakers typically use when setting monetary policy. Instead, they estimate potential GDP by constructing measures of the trend in actual GDP that smooth out business cycle fluctuations. Looking back in time, potential output is relatively easy to measure because we have reliable methods to extract smooth trends from historical data. However, measuring potential output in real time is more difficult because only past data are available to estimate the trend. We cannot be confident about the estimate of potential GDP for 2012 until several years have passed and we see how GDP evolves—the accuracy of our estimate depends on the accuracy of our long-term forecast. But why does potential GDP matter? How do we use it? Potential GDP is important because monetary policymakers use the difference between actual and potential GDP—the output gap—to determine whether the economy needs more or less monetary stimulus.

One look at recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) data shows how much estimates of the output gap can change as time passes. According to CBO estimates of potential GDP, U.S. actual GDP fell about 10 percent short of potential during 2009: Q1. Since then, actual GDP has paralleled the potential GDP series forecast made by economists back in 2007—but, of course, along a considerably lower level path. The chart shows logged values of actual GDP and two estimates of potential GDP calculated by the CBO. The higher level of potential GDP was estimated in 2007 and the lower level in 2011. The reduced 2011 estimate reflects the impact of sluggish GDP growth over the past three years.

Based on revised estimates, we can now calculate the 2009: Q1 output gap to be –7.1 percent. Even more interesting is how the revision affects estimates of the output gap for 2011: Q4. If we use 2007 estimates, the output gap for 2011: Q4 would be –11.3 percent. When we use up-to-date estimates, the gap is much smaller: only –5.6%. Potential GDP is likely to be revised downward again if (i) growth remains moderate—say, less than 3 percent—and (ii) inflation continues to edge upward.

Continued moderate growth of GDP is forecast over the next few years. In the minutes of the January Federal Open Market Committee meeting, the participants projected, on average, that real GDP would grow about 3 percent over the next three calendar years. This growth rate is too slow to get GDP back to current estimates of the trend. If the projections hold true, the estimates of the level of potential GDP will fall even further. This pessimistic outlook is also supported by Keynesian (and New Keynesian) theory, which predicts that a negative output gap should lead to falling inflation. But instead, we have seen a modest rise in inflation. If the theory is correct, the gap may be closing faster than we thought because potential GDP is lower than we thought. And, if potential GDP is lower than expected, then interest rates may have to rise sooner than expected to prevent an acceleration of inflation.

Source - https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publications/es/12/ES_2012-04-20.pdf

What is potential output?

Calculations of Potential output

Potential GDP is how much a country would produce if all of its resources were fully employed. Typically, we assume that workers are the only resource in an economy which can be under-utilized*. Therefore, to calculate the potential GDP we wish to see how much actual GDP would be when we actually fully utilized all our workers - that is, there is no unemployment. However, instead of assuming that there is no unemployment, we look at the case where employment equals its natural rate of employment.

The formula for calculating potential GDP is:

Potential GDP = (natural rate of employment) ÷ (actual rate of employment) * (actual GDP)

alternatively, it can be calculated as:

Potential GDP = (1 - natural rate of unemployment) ÷ (1 - actual rate of unemployment) * (actual GDP)

since employment rate = 1 - unemployment rate

Example 1

Consider an economy where the natural rate of employment is 95% and the actual rate of employment is 90% and the GDP of the economy is 1.13 trillion dollars. We would calculate the potential GDP as follows:

(recall percentages can be converted to decimal by dividing them by 100 e.g 95%÷100% = 0.95)

potential GDP = (.95 ÷ .90) *1.13 = 1.19

Example 2

Consider an economy where the natural rate of unemployment is 3% and the actual rate of unemployment is 5% and the GDP of the economy is 1.42 trillion dollars. We would calculate the potential GDP as follows:

First, calculate the rates of employment:

natural rate of employment = 1 - 0.03 = .97

actual rate of employment = 1 - 0.05 = .95

potential GDP = (.97 ÷ .95) *1.42 = 1.45

The output gap

The output gap (also known as GDP gap) is the difference between the potential GDP and actual GDP. The output gap formula is:

Output gap = Actual output - Potential output (recall the output and GDP mean the same thing)

There is another formula that might be required which is the percentage GDP gap which is:

Percentage GDP gap = [(Actual output) - (potential output)] ÷ (potential output)

in Example 1 above the output gap is:

Output Gap = 1.13 - 1.19 = -0.06 trillion dollars

the Percentage GDP gap is

Percentage GDP gap = (1.13 - 1.19)÷1.19 = 0.05 (5%)

In Example 2 above the output gap is:

Output Gap = 1.42 - 1.45 = -0.03 trillion dollars

the Percentage GDP gap is

Percentage GDP gap = (1.42 - 1.45) ÷1.45 = 0.02 (2%)

When the output gap is negative the economy is said to be operating Below capacity or "under-heating". Conversely, when the output gap is positive the economy is said to be operating above capacity or overheating.

* Economies also employ "capital" which are machines etc. which can also be under-utilized. However, for simplicity we tend to assume that they are always fully utilized.

Source - http://econ101help.com/potential-gdp-formula-and-output-gap/

Calculation of output gap in Japan Q4 2012

What is the relationship between the output gap and economic variables (Inflation & Unemployment)?

The higher the output gap the lower the unemployment rate

The higher the output gap, the higher the rate of inflation

Task 7: What relationship would you expect to see in the case of Korea 2012-2016?

Task 8: Calculation of the output gap in Hong Kong. Take the natural rate of unemployment s 3.9% (natural rate of employment is 96.1%). Use the information in the following tables to help you calculate the output gap (absolute and as a % of potential GDP) in Hong Kong for the period 2014-2016

Task 9: What information can you glean about the Japanese economy over the period 1983-2016?

Okun’s Law

Okun's law states that a one point increase in the cyclical unemployment rate is associated with two percentage points of negative growth in real GDP. The relationship varies depending on the country and time period under consideration.

The math formula for Okun's Law is:

In other words, when unemployment rate goes up by 1%, GDP goes down by 2%.It's not a perfect fit, but in general the relationship seems to hold true:

Task 10 Okun’s Law

Suppose the natural rate of unemployment is 4.5% and the current unemployment rate is 6%.

a. According to Okun's law, what is the size of the GDP gap?

b. If potential GDP is $1,000 billion, how much output is being lost as a result of the economy being below its potential?

c. Recent data for the U.S. showed an unemployment rate of 9.5%. Suppose the natural rate at the time was 4.5%. What was the size of the GDP gap?

d. At that time, GDP was $14,592 billion. What was potential GDP?

Case Study: The Future of Agriculture - http://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2016-06-09/factory-fresh

Consequences of economic growth

Causes of potential economic growth

Potential economic growth can only occur when the vertical part of the AS curve shifts to the right, increasing the amount that the economy could produce. Using another model, potential economic growth increases when the PPF shifts to the right.

Constraints on growth

There are several factors constraining growth:

  • Absence of capital markets. One of the main reasons why Latin America grows more slowly than the Asian subcontinent is that Asia has more credible and efficient capital markets. In many economies in sub-Saharan Africa, the interest charged on credit, if credit is available at all, is typically over 50%. One of the issues is the asymmetric information in credit markets, where the lender knows very little about the borrower and charges high rates to cover the enormous risk. The only people able to afford these high rates are likely to be among the more corrupt borrowers, which makes it even less likely that people will lend. The market then becomes a missing market, in the sense that there is no equilibrium price of credit where buyers and sellers can agree on a rate of interest.
  • Government instability. When governments are incompetent or lack transparency or strong political backing, the economy cannot attract investment and the currency might become unstable. The government might have a fiscal deficit which means that it has very little power to encourage growth.
  • Labour market problems. A shortage of skilled labour is a major contraint on growth. As countries get richer, birth rates tend to fall dramatically in the long run this means that the labour supply will fall. One of the most effective policies for reducing this in high income economies is to allow increased immigration, although in low-income economies the exit of skilled workers (known as brain-drain) exacerbates the skill problems.
  • External constraints. Trade is a key driver of growth. Uneven access to world markets owing to tariffs and subsidies can prevent an economy from growing. Global recession or fears or terrorism also low down trade, as does volatility in exchange rate markets. Figures suggest that for every 3% growth in world trade there is a 1% increase in world GDP, and therefore anything that hold back international trade is likely to act as a constraint on growth.


Benefits of growth

Growth benefits employees, firms and governments in the following ways:

  • Employees. Incomes and wealth rise when there is economic growth. Standards of living rise as long as the costs of living do not increase at the same rate. In other words, real growth means that real incomes rise. Increases in growth can mean that wealth in the form of assets sch as shares and houses increases.
  • Firms. Firms tend to make more profit when there is economic growth. In times of growth, consumer spending usually rises, which means that firms sell more. As revenues and profits increase, firms can take on more workers and are more likely to invest. This increases future growth prospects.
  • Governments. When incomes and assets rise in price, people pay more income and capital gains tax. Governments also have fewer demands to pay unemployment benefits. So in times of economic growth the government is more likely to enjoy a healthier fiscal position.

Costs of growth

Despite the benefits listed above, growth incurs the following costs:

  • Income inequality. The unwaged and unskilled are less likely to benefit from increased incomes. While money might eventually ‘trickle-down’ to lower-income groups, there might equally be a two-speed economy where the incomes of some people accelerate, but the rest cannot get out of the low-skill ‘lane’. The type of production tends to change during periods of economic growth, so there is likely to be short-term unemployment for people who do not have labour market flexibility.
  • Environmental problems. Depletion of natural resources and external costs such as carbon emissions an other forms of pollution are likely to increase with economic growth. However, high-income governments can use their increased ta tax revenue to clean up the environment.
  • Balance of payments problems on the current account. With higher incomes, domestic consumers suck in more imports and there is less incentive for firms to export. However, if growth were export-led, the current account would improve.
  • Bottlenecks in the economy. When there is little spare capacity in the economy, factos of production such as skilled labour and fuel rise in price. Monopoly power might also develop, which can be used a a barrier to the entry of new firms. This can be shown by an increasingly elastic AS curve.
  • Social dislocation and stress. Higher incomes have to be earned. With increased pay there are usually increased responsibilities. There may be more travel and the need to move further afield as firms grow. However, with higher incomes people can often afford to work fewer hours, go on more luxurious holidays, pay for their children’s education, or retire early. So social life may or may not improve as the economy grows.
  • Problems of rapid growth. Rapid growth can cause short-term spikes in prices. If a country grows too quickly there might be bad planning, corner cutting and shoddy workmanship. However, rapid growth might just need time to settle down in terms of income distribution, and a strong government such as that in China can ensure that growth is planned efficiently.

Source: https://edecon.wordpress.com/2010/06/05/economic-growth/

Files to Download

2.3 macroeconomic objectives.pptx
production_growth.ppt