1.7. Organisational Planning Tools (HL only)

Syllabus Content

  • The following planning tools in a given situation: fishbone diagram, decision tree, force field analysis and Gantt Chart
  • The value to an organisation of these planning tools

Triple A Learning - Organizational Planning Tools

Fishbone Diagram

Cause and Effect Analysis

A fishbone diagram is a tool that can help you perform a cause and effect analysis for a problem you are trying to solve. This type of analysis enables you to discover the root cause of a problem.

This tool is also called a cause and effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram. These names can be used interchangeably.

Ishikawa Diagram Structure

The left side of the diagram is where the causes are listed. The causes are broken out into major cause categories. The causes you identify will be placed in the appropriate cause categories as you build the diagram.

The right side of the diagram lists the effect. The effect is written as the problem statement for which you are trying to identify the causes.

Ishikawa Fish Bone Diagram

The diagram looks like the skeleton of a fish, which is where the fishbone name comes from.

How to Create a Cause and Effect Diagram

A cause and effect diagram can be created in six steps...

  • Draw Problem Statement
  • Draw Major Cause Categories
  • Brainstorm Causes
  • Categorize Causes
  • Determine Deeper Causes
  • Identify Root Causes

Draw Problem Statement

The first step of any problem solving activity is to define the problem. You want to make sure that you define the problem correctly and that everyone agrees on the problem statement.

Once your problem statement is ready, write it in the box on the right hand side of the diagram.

Fishbone Diagram - Problem Statement

Draw Major Cause Categories

After the problem statement has been placed on the diagram, draw the major cause categories on the left hand side and connect them to the "backbone" of the fishbone chart.

In a manufacturing environment, the traditional categories are...

  • Machines/Equipment
  • Methods
  • Materials
  • People

In a service organization, the traditional categories are...

  • Policies
  • Procedures
  • Plant
  • People

You can start with those categories or use a different set that is more applicable for your problem. There isn't a perfect set or specified number of categories. Use what makes sense for your problem.

Cause and Effect Diagram - Major Cause Categories

Brainstorm Causes

Brainstorming the causes of the problem is where most of the effort in creating your Ishikawa diagram takes place.

Some people prefer to generate a list of causes before the previous steps in order to allow ideas to flow without being constrained by the major cause categories.

However, sometimes the major cause categories can be used as catalysts to generate ideas. This is especially helpful when the flow of ideas starts to slow down.

Categorize Causes

Once your list of causes has been generated, you can start to place them in the appropriate category on the diagram.

Ideally, each cause should only be placed in one category. However, some of the "People" causes may belong in multiple categories. For example, Lack of Training may be a legitimate cause for incorrect usage of Machinery as well as ignorance about a specific Method.

Ishikawa Diagram - Categorize Causes

Determine Deeper Causes

Each cause on the chart is then analyzed further to determine if there is a more fundamental cause for that aspect. This can be done by asking the question, "Why does it happen?"

This step can also be done for the deeper causes that are identified. Generally, you can stop going deeper when a cause is controlled one level of management removed from your group. Use your judgment to decide when to stop.

Fishbone Chart - Deeper Causes

Identify Root Causes

Identifying the root causes of the problem can be done in several ways...

  • Look for causes that appear repeatedly
  • Select using group consensus methods
  • Select based on frequency of occurrence

In Conclusion...

Fishbone diagrams are an excellent way to explore and visually depict the causes of a problem. They enable the root causes of a problem to be determined. This will help you be more effective by focusing your actions on the true causes of a problem and not on its symptoms.

Source - https://www.project-management-skills.com/fishbone-diagram.html

Advantages and disadvantages of Ishikawa Diagram

Advantages

● Fishbone diagrams permit a thoughtful analysis that avoids overlooking any possible root causes for a need

● The fishbone technique is easy to implement and creates an easy to understand visual representation of the causes, categories of causes and the need

● By using a fishbone diagram, you are able to focus the group on the big picture as to possible causes or factors influencing the problem/need

● Even after the need is addressed, the fishbone diagram shows areas of weakness that –once exposed- can be rectified before causing more sustained difficulties.

Disadvantages

● It doesn't solve any problems. It can only help in identifying possible causes of problems and does not offer any possible solutions or any analysis of the likelihood that a given cause is the real one.

● In addition, it is not very good at pointing out which of the possible causes is most likely or most important. Graphically speaking, it makes all possible causes look equally plausible and equally important.

● The simplicity of the fishbone diagram can be a weakness. It may make it difficult to represent the truly interrelated nature of problems and causes in some very large complex situations.

Source - https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_03.htm

Cause and Effect Analysis

Cause and Effect diagram in MS Excel

Task 1: Complete the following question using a Cause-and-Effect diagram/Fishbone Diagram/Ishikawa Diagram

Follow this procedure:

  1. Draw the diagram’s skeleton. Explain that the skeleton consists of a horizontal arrow pointing to the effect, and additional arrows—representing causes—pointing to the horizontal arrow.

Major causes can be separated into four basic categories:

• Equipment

• Environment

• Procedures

• People

These are only suggestions; teams should use the categories that best fit their improvement needs. Other sets of categories could be: Methods, Materials, Resources, and Measurement. Make them fit your problem.

2.Write the problem or desired outcome in the box at the end of the arrow. In this case it is: “Low show-rate for HIV medical appointments.”

3. Brainstorm potential causes and subcategories to fill in the "bones" of the skeleton. Review the potential causes in the handout. Note how major causes typically have subcategories, identified by asking: Why does this happen?

4. Review and refine causes

Use a template similar to the template below

  • McKinsey's 7S Framework -

A similar type of analytical tool

Gantt Charts

Gantt charts convey this information visually. They outline all of the tasks involved in a project, and their order, shown against a timescale. This gives you an instant overview of a project, its associated tasks, and when these need to be finished.

In this article, we'll look at why they are so useful, and we'll see how you can use them to organize projects and keep your team informed of progress.

Origins of the Tool

In the late 1800s, Polish engineer Karol Adamiecki developed a visual work flow chart that he called a "harmonogram."

In around 1910, Henry Gantt, a management consultant and engineer, took Adamiecki's concept to the next stage. His chart was designed to help manufacturing supervisors see whether their work was on, ahead of, or behind schedule, and it formed the foundation of the tool we use today.

Why Use Gantt Charts?

When you set up a Gantt chart, you need to think through all of the tasks involved in your project. As part of this process, you'll work out who will be responsible for each task, how long each task will take, and what problems your team may encounter.

This detailed thinking helps you ensure that the schedule is workable, that the right people are assigned to each task, and that you have workarounds for potential problems before you start.

They also help you work out practical aspects of a project, such as the minimum time it will take to deliver, and which tasks need to be completed before others can start. Plus, you can use them to identify the critical path – the sequence of tasks that must individually be completed on time if the whole project is to deliver on time.

Finally, you can use them to keep your team and your sponsors informed of progress. Simply update the chart to show schedule changes and their implications, or use it to communicate that key tasks have been completed.

Key Points

Gantt charts are useful for planning and scheduling projects. They help you assess how long a project should take, determine the resources needed, and plan the order in which you'll complete tasks. They're also helpful for managing the dependencies between tasks.

Gantt charts are useful for monitoring a project's progress once it's underway, too. You can immediately see what should have been achieved by a certain date and, if the project is behind schedule, you can take action to bring it back on course.

Advantages of Gantt Charts

It creates a picture of complexity. I am quite a fan of diagrams and charts. We think in pictures. Therefore, if we can see complex ideas as a picture, this will help our understanding.

It organises your thoughts. I am also a big fan of the concept of dividing and conquering. A big problem is conquered by dividing it into component parts. A Gantt chart will force you to do this.

It demonstrates that you know what you’re doing. When you produce a nicely presented Gantt chart with high level tasks properly organised and resources allocated to those tasks, it speaks volumes about whether you are on top of the needs of the project and whether the project will be successful.

It (should) help you to set realistic time frames. The bars on the chart indicate in which period a particular task or set of tasks will be completed. This can help you to get things in perspective properly. And when you do this, make sure that you think about events in your organisation that have nothing to do with this project that might consume resources and time.

It can be highly visible. It can be useful to place the chart, or a large version of it, where everyone can see it. This helps to remind people of the objectives and when certain things are going to happen. It is useful if everyone in your enterprise can have a basic level of understanding of what is happening with the project even if they may not be directly involved with it.

Disadvantages of Gantt Charts

They can become extraordinarily complex. Except for the most simple projects, there will be large numbers of tasks undertaken and resources employed to complete the project. There are some very good software programs that can cope with all this complexity (e.g. Microsoft Project). However, when the project gets to this level, it must be managed by a small number of people (perhaps one) who manages all of the details. Sometimes this does not work so well in a business that is not used to this type of management. Big businesses will frequently employ one or more project managers who are very skilled in this. For a range of reasons, this may not work so well in a smaller enterprise.

The size of the bar does not indicate the amount of work. Each bar on the chart indicates the time period over which a particular set of tasks will be completed. However, by looking at the bar for a particular set of tasks, you cannot tell what level of resources are required to achieve those tasks. So, a short bar might take 500 man hours while a longer bar may only take 20 man hours. The longer bar may indicate to the uninformed that it is a bigger task, when in fact it is not.

They need to be constantly updated. As you get into a project, things will change. If you’re going to use a Gantt chart you must have the ability to change the chart easily and frequently. If you don’t do this, it will be ignored. Again, you will probably need software to do this unless you’re keeping your project management at a high level.

Difficult to see on one sheet of paper. The software products that produce these charts need to be viewed on a computer screen, usually in segments, to be able to see the whole project. It then becomes difficult to show the details of the plan to an audience. Further, you can print out the chart, but this will normally entail quite a large “cut and paste” exercise. If you are going to do this frequently, it can be very time-consuming.

Source - https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_03.htm

Task 2: Question on Gantt charts

ST is the operations director of F Bakery. He is in the process of putting together a project plan for the introduction of a new production plant that will enable the bakery to expand its product range, moving into high quality cakes and desserts. ST has identified a number of activities that must be undertaken to set up the new bakery production plant. He now intends to construct a network analysis to assist ST in the planning of the project. This will also enable him to provide an answer for the HR manager who has asked him to provide advice on when she can start the recruitment campaign to select new employees needed to work in the new part of the bakery.

The activities can be broken down as follows:

a. Construct a Gantt chart for the introduction of the new production plant for the bakery and the overall duration of the project.

b. Identify the earliest time the recruitment campaign can start.

How to draw a Gantt Chart Part 1

How to draw a Gantt Chart Part 2

Gantt Chart construction using MS Excel

Using Excel to create Gantt charts - https://www.ablebits.com/office-addins-blog/2014/05/23/make-gantt-chart-excel/

3. Decision trees

A decision tree is a mathematical model used to help managers make decisions. A decision tree uses estimates and probabilities to calculate likely outcomes. A decision tree helps to decide whether the net gain from a decision is worthwhile.

Let's look at an example of how a decision tree is constructed. We'll use the following data:

A decision tree starts with a decision to be made and the options that can be taken. Don't forget that there is always an option to decide to do nothing!

The first task is to add possible outcomes to the tree (note: circles represent uncertain outcomes)

Next we add in the associated costs, outcome probabilities and financial results for each outcome.

These probabilities are particularly important to the outcome of a decision tree.

Probability is

  • The percentage chance or possibility that an event will occur
  • Ranges between 1 (100%) and 0
  • If all the outcomes of an event are considered, the total probability must add up to 1

Finally, we complete the Maths in the model by calculating:

Expected value:

The financial value of an outcome calculated by multiplying the estimated financial effect by its probability

Net gain:

The value to be gained from taking a decision.

Net gain is calculated by adding together the expected value of each outcome and deducting the costs associated with the decision.

Let's look at the calculations. What do they suggest is the best option?

Option: Launch loyalty card:

High sales: (0.6 x £1,000,000) = £600,000

Low sales: (0.4 x £750,000) = £300,000

Total expected value = £900,000

Net gain: £900,000 - £500,000 = £400,000

Option: Cut prices:

High sales: (0.8 x £800,000) = £640,000

Low sales: (0.2 x £500,000) = £100,000

Total expected value = £740,000

Net gain: £740,000 - £300,000 = £240,000

Both options indicate a positive net gain, suggesting that either would be better than doing nothing.

However, launching the loyalty card has a higher net gain & looks the best option of the two considered

Strengths of Decision Trees

a) The diagram may highlight possibilities that had not previously been considered

b) They require numerical values to be placed upon decisions – this tends to require research and thus improve the veracity of results

c) This method takes account of the risks inherent in decision making and makes the decision-maker aware of them

Limitations of Decision Trees

a) The time value of money may not be taken into account

b) Decision trees are not very suitable for use in complex situations

c) The outcome with the highest EV may have the greatest risks attached to it. Managers may be reluctant to take risks which may lead to losses.

d) The probabilities associated with different branches of the tree are likely to be estimates, and possibly unreliable or inaccurate.

e) Time lags may make the information used in the diagram obsolete

f) Process can be quite time-consuming.

Task 3: Question on Decision Trees and Decision Tree Analysis

Stockhausen, a German Clothing manufacturer, currently earns revenue of $150,000. It is earned mainly in the Bavarian retail sector in which it controls 30% of the market. It is contemplating extending its product range. If it decides to expand it has two options: expand small or expand large. The costs of individual options and expected profit for each option are:

a. Construct the decision tree

b. Determine the most appropriate for Stockhausen to choose

Task 4: Dowton Ltd needs to expand. It has identified three options:

● Option A Move to new premises at a cost of $40,000

● Option B Build an extension costing $25,000

● Option C Buy new, high-speed machinery to increase output at the same site cost $50,000

Fixed overheads and variable costs will be slightly in each case, so the profitability of each option depends upon the level of demand. The management believes that there is a 50/50 chance of demand being high or low. These forecasts have been made of the contribution of each option to Dowton’s profits:

a) Construct the decision tree

b) Calculate the expected payoffs and determine the best strategy

Task 5: Gralux plc must decide whether to use the €300 000 remaining in its marketing budget to launch a new product or to increase the advertising behind its top-selling brand.

If the new product is a great success, it should generate €1 200 000 of contribution; a moderate success will generate €600 000. But it may also fail, and achieve a contribution of only €60 000. Past experience leads Gralux to believe that the chances for each outcome are 0.1, 0.4, and 0.5 respectively.

The advertising campaign can be expected to yield €450 000 of extra contribution, though there is a 10% chance that the main competitor to Gralux may retaliate by doing the same. This would mean that the extra advertising would generate only €50 000 of contribution.

a) Construct a decision tree, carefully labelled with all the relevant figures.

b) Calculate the expected values and mark your decision on the diagram.

Task 6: Beethoven Ltd has a new wonder product, the vylin, of which it expects great things. At the moment the company has two courses of action open to it, to test market the product or abandon it. If the company test markets it, the cost will be $100,000 and the market response could be positive or negative with probabilities of 0.6 and 0.4.

(a) If the response is positive the company could either abandon the product or market it full scale. If it markets the vylin full scale, the outcome might be low, medium or high demand, and the respective net payoffs would be –$200,000, $200,000 or $1,000,000. These outcomes have probabilities of 0.20, 0.50 and 0.30 respectively.

(b) If the result of the test marketing is negative and the company goes ahead and markets the product, estimated losses would be $600,000. If, at any point, the company abandons the product, there would be a net gain of $50,000 from the sale of scrap.

a. Draw the decision tree

b. Evaluate what is the correct strategy to adopt

c. List the advantages and disadvantages of Decision trees

Supplementary question

Decision Trees as a quantitative tool

Decision Tree Construction

4: Lewin’s Force Field Analysis

Force Field Analysis is a useful decision-making technique. It helps you make a decision by analyzing the forces for and against a change, and it helps you communicate the reasoning behind your decision.

You can use it for two purposes: to decide whether to go ahead with the change; and to increase your chances of success, by strengthening the forces supporting change and weakening those against it.

About the Tool

Force Field Analysis was created by Kurt Lewin in the 1940s. Lewin originally used the tool in his work as a social psychologist. Today, however, Force Field Analysis is also used in business, for making and communicating go/no-go decisions.

You use the tool by listing all of the factors (forces) for and against your decision or change. You then score each factor based on its influence, and add up the scores for and against change to find out which of these wins.

You can then look at strengthening the forces that support the change and managing the forces against the change, so that it's more successful.

How to Use the Tool

To carry out a Force Field Analysis, use a blank sheet of paper or whiteboard, or download our worksheet.

Then describe your plan or proposal for change in a box in the middle of the paper. List the forces for change in a column on the left-hand side, and the forces against change in a column on the right-hand side.

As you do this, consider the following questions:

● What business benefit will the change deliver?

● Who supports the change? Who is against it? Why?

● How easy will it be to make the change? Do you have enough time and resources to make it work?

● What costs are involved?

● What other business processes will be affected by the change?

● What are the risks ?

Next, assign a score to each force, from, say, 1 (weak) to 5 (strong), and then add up the scores for each column (for and against).

For a visual representation of the influence that each force has, draw arrows around them. Use bigger arrows for the forces that will have a greater influence on the change, and smaller arrows for forces that will have less of an influence.

For example, imagine that you're planning to install new manufacturing equipment in your factory. You might draw up a Force Field Analysis like the one in Figure 1, below:

Figure 1 – Example Force Field Analysis

Using Your Analysis

Once you've done your Force Field Analysis, you can use it in two ways:

1. To decide whether or not to move forward with the decision or change.

2. To think about how you can strengthen the forces that support the change and weaken the forces opposing it, so that the change is more successful.

If you had to implement the project in the example above, the analysis might suggest a number of changes that you could make to the initial plan. For instance, you could:

● Train staff ("Cost" +1) to minimize the fear of technology ("Staff uncomfortable with new technology" -2).

● Show staff that change is necessary for business survival (new force that supports the change, +2).

● Show staff that new machines would introduce variety and interest to their jobs (new force that supports the change, +1).

● Raise wages to reflect new productivity ("Cost" +1, "Loss of overtime" -2).

● Install slightly different machines with filters that eliminate pollution ("Impact on environment" -1).

These changes would swing the balance from 11:10 (against the plan), to 13:8 (in favor of the plan).

Tips

● Tip 1:

Some factors – such as those affecting people's health and safety – don't fit well with this approach. Make sure that you deal with these appropriately, whatever the outcome of your analysis.

● Tip 2:

Bear in mind that while Force Field Analysis helps you understand the impact of different factors on your decision or change, it can be quite subjective. If you're making an important decision, use it alongside other decision-making tools such as Decision Matrix Analysis , Decision Tree Analysis , and Cost/Benefit Analysis .

● Tip 3:

Don't underestimate how much work a Force Field Analysis can involve. We've used a simple example here, but there will be many factors that you'll need to consider for complex decisions and changes.

Key Points

Force Field Analysis helps you think about the pressures for and against a decision or a change. The tool was developed by Kurt Lewin.

To carry out a Force Field Analysis, describe your plan or proposal in the middle of a piece of paper or whiteboard. Then list all of the forces for change in a column on the left-side, and all of the forces against change in a column on the right-side.

Score each factor, and add up the scores for each column. You can then decide whether or not to move forward with the change.

Alternatively, you can use your analysis to think about how you can strengthen the forces that support the change and weaken the forces opposing it, so that the change is more successful.

Source - https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTED_06.htm

Lewin's Model of Force Field Analysis

Lewin's Force Field Theory of Change

Task 7: Question on managing change, resistance to change and Lewin’s Force Field Analysis

PPP, an electricity generating company based in a European country, Z, was a monopoly supplier until 1995. Z’s Government de-regulated the electricity market in 1995 and since then PPP has faced increasing competition from eight other electricity generating companies competing in Z.

PPP currently generates its electricity using only fossil fuels. However, the electricity generating companies' customers (which supply electricity to the final users within Z) are increasingly concerned about environmental issues. Many of these customers are willing to change to a different electricity generating company which generates some of its electricity from renewable sources. Since 2010, PPP has lost 5% of its customers to competitors who generate electricity from a range of sources, including renewables.

PPP’s organizational structure is hierarchical, its decision making is often slow, and its management style is bureaucratic. Many of PPP’s employees belong to trade unions and there is usually much resistance to any new initiatives or changes to working arrangements.

In 2010, Z’s Government agreed to conform to an overall European Union target of generating 20% of electricity production from renewable sources such as hydro, nuclear and wind generated power by 2020. In 2011, Z’s Government announced plans for incentive payments to be awarded to those electricity generating companies investing in projects to generate renewable energy. Through a government initiative called the ‘Renewables Pledge’, Z’s electricity generators are all now required by law to provide a proportion of their electricity generation from renewable sources or pay a penalty fee to the Government.

In January 2012, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of PPP, who had been with the company since the 1970’s, retired. He had always been sceptical of the Government’s drive towards renewable energy and he had often blocked any initiatives for the company to move towards renewable electricity generation. The new CEO is a strong supporter of wind based electricity generation and he recently stated to the Board of Directors ‘if PPP is to survive and thrive, it must develop a strategy for wind powered electricity generation. However, this cannot happen overnight as the old style of management must change so that we remain competitive in the industry. We simply must not continue to lose customers’.

The new CEO wishes to exploit Z’s windy countryside in the north of the country for wind powered electricity generation. However, gaining planning permission for wind powered generators has proved to be difficult so far in Z. Many proposals have been delayed in the planning system, often due to local residents’ opposition. On average, the planning application for a wind powered generator in Z takes 2 years for a decision to be made by local government.

The national Government is introducing new laws to force local governments to make decisions more quickly. The new technology needed to operate and manage wind powered electricity generation will require extensive investment and training in new techniques and skills and require changes to PPP’s culture. PPP’s engineers have threatened strike action in order to gain large pay increases to compensate for the new working arrangements. Large pay increases would make PPP uncompetitive in the industry.

a) Illustrate using the Fishbone Model, the internal and external triggers for change which have prompted the need for PPP to develop a strategy for wind powered electricity generation.

b) Evaluate, using Lewin's Force Field Analysis model, the forces which are driving and restraining change in PPP.

Documents to download

1.7.OrganizationalPlanningTools
CIMA A4 STUDY DV1 210512.pdf