Universe expansion (physics)

Universe expansion — is imaginary process of almost homogeneous and almost isotropic expansion of a space after hypothetical emergence of the Universe, as a result of so-called "Big Bang". It is supposed that expansion of the Universe is observed in the form of implementation of the law of Hubble. Theoretically the phenomenon was predicted by A.Friedman at an early development stage the common relativity theory for all-philosophical reasons about uniformity and the Universe isotropy.

Direct proofs of existence of expansion of the Universe of the physicist at the moment has no, and also calls into question compliance to the nature of model of the "Big Bang" historically (by mistake) named the theory. Nobody measured precise distance to remote galaxies and didn't show that it constantly increases.

At the end of the XX century there were statements that the Universe not primly extends, and extends is accelerated. Such conclusion was made on the basis of overseeing by ranges super new the IA type. The deviation from Hubble's law that can speak about his discrepancy or incorrectness (within all Universe) was actually revealed.

Contents:

• • 1 Expansions of the Universe and red shift

  • 2 Expansions of the Universe and "Big Bang"

  • 3 "Acceleration" of expansion of the Universe

  • 4 Expansions of the Universe and "Relict radiation"

  • 5 Result

1. Expansion of the Universe and red shift

Main article: Red shift

The conclusion about existence of expansion of the Universe was made on the basis of interpretation of red shift in favor of a Doppler effect. But then the physics is still knew nothing neither about a neutrino, nor about photon-neutrino interactions. The hypothesis of expansion of the Universe then seemed convincing.

But time went. The physics everything deeper and is more substantial studied a microcosm. The huge set of elementary particles was open, their properties are studied. Then as synthesis of the saved-up experimental data there was the field theory of elementaryl particles which has established the electromagnetic nature of substance, including such imperceptible particle as a neutrino. Well and as (according to a classical electrodynamics) electromagnetic fields among themselves cooperate - means, will cooperate also a photon with a neutrino. Thus, a photon- neutrino interactions ignored by standard model, conduct to formation of red shift in ranges of stars of remote galaxies - that we and we observe.

Thus to argue that red shift is a consequence of expansion of the Universe, the physics is can't. - The red shift allowing ambiguity of interpretation can't be considered by physics as the proof of expansion of the Universe.

2. Expansion of the Universe and "Big Bang"

Main article: Big Bang

The physics denies possibility of the Big Bang in the history of the Universe, as events ignoring nature laws. Therefore, the invented Big Bang can't cause Universe expansion.

3. "Acceleration" of expansion of the Universe

Main article: Dark energy

The physics didn't establish existence of dark energy in the Universe. Moreover, the physics denies dark energy, as a separate form of energy (no less than a dark matter, as a separate form of a matter). Therefore, the physics didn't establish existence of physical forces expanding the Universe.

Let's take small endurance from Wikipedia: "For example, when the volume of the Universe doubles, the density of a baryon matter decreases twice, and the density of dark energy remains almost invariable (or precisely invariable — in option with a cosmological constant)". From the told follows that hypothetical "dark" energy will contradict the law of conservation of energy as at expansion of the Universe its total energy - undertaking of anything should increase. - It is possible to invent anything, watching in a telescope from big distance galaxies. It is possible even to get for it a Nobel premium - but it will change nothing in the Universe.

4. Expansion of the Universe and "Relict radiation"

Main article: Relict radiation

From existence in the nature of background space microwave radiation historically (by mistake) called by "relict radiation" Universe expansion in any way doesn't follow. Emergence of an electromagnetic radiation owing to expansion of the Universe will go with violation of the law of conservation of energy and electromagnetism laws. The statement that this radiation arose more than 13 billion years ago is proved is by nothing only one of assumptions of a source of background space microwave radiation.

Now the field theory of elementary particles established one of natural sources of background space microwave radiation corresponding to nature laws: it interactions of elemeentary particles, for example neutrino. The relativistic neutrinos which are let out by stars, in the majority leave galaxies and interfere with other neutrinos. As a result of such collision in intergalactic space of a neutrino pass to excited states. After fixed time of a particle pass to conditions with smaller energy with emission of quanta of an electromagnetic radiation. Thus, the electromagnetic radiation (judging by size of a rest-mass of a neutrino - including microwave) proceeding from all areas of space, even from where there are no stars should be observed. But the law of conservation of energy, as well as laws of an electromagnetism is thus carried out. The most intensive radiation will start with galaxies where neutrino sources - stars are concentrated. Thus, the radiation which is starting with space environmental Milky Way should be the most intensive for the terrestrial observer.

Thus, background space microwave radiation historically (by mistake) called by "relict radiation" isn't the proof of expansion of the Universe.

5. Result

The proof of expansion of the Universe of the physicist didn't establish. There are some oblique data interpreted by supporters of a hypothesis of the Big Bang as expansions of the Universe confirming existence, but the physics showed insolvency of these arguments. - It is necessary to look for scientific answers to nature riddles, instead of to be engaged in writing of fairy tales.

Vladimir Gorunovich