NIP has a lot of green on both tables, while BCC has some glaring red marks here. It should be fun to sift through these. NIP had 190 tags and 159 returns, ranking 3rd in both stats, while BCC had 163 tags and 136 returns, ranking 12th and 11th in those categories. That's a big disparity, but that's ok as long as BCC had way more prevent than NIP. Oh, they almost had the same amount of prevent as NIP? That's not good. What's even worse is that BCC's RIB% and QR% were lower than NIPs rates, with NIP having a 7% increase in RIB% and 3% increase in QR%, ranking 5th and 4th in those stats, respectively. NIP also had more QRs, more KRs, and more RIBs, with BCC actually coming 11th and QRs and KRs and dead last in RIBs. BCC also was dead last in NRTs with 27, while also ranking 11th in KD with 0.86, 0.24 less than NIP's KD. Yeah the NIP defense definitely had a better outing than the BCC defense.
For offense, their hold numbers are pretty similar, with NIP having the edge by just 22 seconds, but NIP also had a 10% score rate, while BCC had a 7.50% score rate. Those score rates are ranked 2nd and 8th for the week, respectively. NIP also placed 6th in H/G and F/G, while BCC lagged behind, ranking 9th and 10th in those same categories. Both teams had very few NDPs, while NIP had two more long holds than BCC. NIP had the least amount of pops this week at 175, which probably attributing to also having the third-least amount of NDPs this week. BCC's Chain% of 59.39% was 10th for the week, but NIP's chain rate wasn't that better, coming in 8th place. NIP's Spark% was 13% better than BCC's though, so that's nice. Overall, the NIP offense had the advantage in Score%, H/G, and F/G, which are three of the most important offensive stats, so that's why BCC didn't cap as much.