Research shows that walking paths or loops in neighborhood parks not only increase levels of moderate to vigorous physical activity, but also increase the number of users by up to 85 percent (Cohen et al, 2017). In another study, neighborhood parks with paved walking paths showed an increase in the number of users (Kaczynksi et al, 2008). The increase in users also leads to more opportunities for community members to interact with each other. Walking paths and loops might be a gateway to the psychological benefits of getting to know other community members that also regularly use the paths (Cohen et al, 2017).
Children are often visit public parks for the use of play equipment. Play equipment such as monkey bars, hidden cubby holes, and elements to jump off of provide children the opportunity to engage in risky play. “Risky play” includes play elements that allow for disappearing heights, loose parts play, high speed, and room for “rough and tumble” play (Brussoni et al, 2015). In a study conducted in 2015, it was reported that teachers thought students to be more “social, creative and resilient” after being exposed to loose parts play and reduced sedentary behaviors (Brussoni et al, 2015). Development of these social skills through risky play will allow the children to effectively socialize with their generation, thus building the groundwork for their adult lives and interactions within the community.
Neighborhood parks with facilities for organized sports benefit multiple populations within a community. Children that are involved in local sports with peers their age show signs of positive development of socialization skills (Sun et al, 2022). Sports facilities also create a social fabric for adults in the community. Research shows that when more sports fields are in use, combined with seating that encourages a crowd to gather, the number of conversations between members of the community during sporting activities also increases (Sun et al, 2022).
Acar, Habibe. 2013. “Landscape design for children and their environment in urban context” in Advances in Landscape Architecture. InTech. doi: 10.5772/55751
Allcock, A (2019) ESSS Outline: Healing environments for children who have experienced trauma. Iriss. https://doi.org/10.31583/esss.20190506
Browning, William, Catherine Ryan and Joseph Clancy. 2014. 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health & Well-Being in the Built Environment. New York: Terrapin Bright Green llc.
Burls, Ambra. 2005. “New Landscapes for Mental Health.” The Mental Health Review 10 (1): 26-29.
Connellan, Kathleen, Mads Gaardboe, Damien Riggs, Clemence Due, Amanda Reinschmidt, and Lauren Mustillo. 2013. “Stressed Spaces: Mental Health and Architecture.” Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD) (Vendome Group LLC) 6 (4): 127–68. doi:10.1177/193758671300600408.