[PROJECT INTRODUCTION]
The Evans County Community Center is a unique blend of history, culture, and community. The building that the community center occupies is a decommissioned Equalization School that was built in the 1950’s and was decommissioned after the integration of Black and white schools in 1971. The building now serves as the community center for the county hosting many public programs such as meal services, head start programs, after school programs, and community events. The goal of the project is to restore the elements of the site that the community has an emotional connection to as well as implementing desired outdoor activities and amenities that are highly favored.
The town of Claxton is a rural southern community in Georgia that is dependent on trade, manufacturing, and agriculture for economic development. With an average household income of about $25,000, poverty is apparent throughout the county. Nonetheless, a vibrant community with the desire and willpower to gather and make change resides in the quiet and quaint town.
The board of the community center reached out to the UGA Extension Agent Ross Greene to talk about possible avenues to achieve restoration and improvements to the center. Ross was able to get connected to the UGA-College of Environment and Design to submit the project as a possible service learning project. In Fall of 2022, the project was chosen by students Brooke Freeman, Elizabeth Swift and Nick Riker to be their project for the semester.
[Written by Elizabeth Swift]
Existing aerial image of Evans County Community Center. It sits on a 13.79 acre lot.
The curb appeal of the community center is lacking in its own right, but has ample room for improvement.
There are still living alumni of the school. There is a deep sense of pride and ownership of the school and grounds among the community.
To create spaces that are cared for, we need to design places that are desired. As a group we decided to pick activities that are open-ended to allow people to suggest their own ideas without being prompted one way or another. Activities were also chosen for people of all education levels and abilities: a drawing activity, a post-it note brainstorming activity, and a colored dot ranking system. Throughout these activities, individual interviews were held in an informal manner to create a safe place for people to be candid with their thoughts.
Two meetings open to the public were held: one in the evening and one during the day with the intent of making the meeting available to people with all types of schedules and age groups. A brainstorming post-it note and dot ranking activity was conducted in tandem with a “Design Your Park!” drawing activity. Both activities allowed us to gather convincing data about the programmatic elements that are the most important to the community via point ranking systems and creating aggregate drawings from the “Design Your Park!” activity. With this information, we are able to begin to create programmatic elements to include in the master plan for the community center.
During this phase, the greatest learning opportunities were from the participants themselves and the African American Museum within the community center (which documents the history of the school in relation to the community). Invaluable information was gathered via interviews with living alumni of the decommissioned equalization school. It was apparent that poverty, access to green space, and food security are a problem for the community. However, we also learned that the community is dedicated, activated, and engaged in the idea of making the community center a place for all ages and abilities.
[Written by Elizabeth M. Swift]
(Above) A bubble diagram from the early stages of design development. Drawing by Nick Riker.
After a successful visit to the Evans County Community Center, we had a large amount of data from the community, as well as a better understanding of the site and its history. Our team took that data and new site knowledge and began synthesizing it to turn it into a cohesive park design, creating an overall programming list of amenities and spaces we wanted to include. Each of us created a few different concepts using bubble diagrams (left), then talked about those with each other to nail down three concepts to develop further.
Those three concepts all had some common elements (like the restored football field and edible plantings) from the initial community input, but differed in style, probable costs, and other amenities. Along with a rendered master plan, we each produced perspectives and/or sections to illustrate each design's character to our clients.
Finally, we met with the clients via Zoom and presented our design alternatives. We each walked through our design, talking the clients through the illustrative plan and the perspectives/sections, describing certain features and important pieces of the design. The process was a little overwhelming for the clients, so we didn't get much immediate feedback during that call. After the call, we sent the clients our final design alternatives, a recording of the call (so that they could re-watch our walkthroughs if needed), and a short survey asking for some feedback on specific elements of the design.
Here, we were reminded that some people aren't as comfortable with technology as folks who are in school (and use computers all the time!). It seemed like our remote meeting didn't quite resonate with our clients, so we leaned on our UGA Extension agent, Ross, who is a part of the Evans County community and our go-between with the Community Center team. He took the initiative to get them together on a separate day and walk through a print out of each of our alternatives to pick out what they liked and disliked. On each plan, they circled elements in the key they really liked, and wrote notes on each about why they liked that thing. With Ross's help, we got great feedback from the clients to work on a final, combined master plan.
[Written by Nick Riker}
Next, we met with the community members and Ross via Zoom to present our final plan. We reminded them of the engagement process thusfar, and repeated our design goals to make sure everyone was on the same page. We received a few pieces of feedback from the community, and asked them some questions about which spaces on the plan they would like to be in a detailed design, or a volunteer project guide. Like our last engagement, they requested that we send along our materials for their review to send later. This method worked, as Ross was able to relay to us which volunteer project guides they prioritized the most.
After taking in the feedback from our final review, we got busy working on detailed designs, volunteer guides, construction documents, and polishing the master plan. We presented all of our final work via Zoom on 12/12/2022. The future for Evans County Community Center is a bright one. We look forward to the community using our materials to apply for grants, and we plan to make a physical visit down to Claxton in January 2023 to present our plan at their annual board meeting.
[Written by Brooke Freeman]
Working with the council of Evans County Community Center, the UGA Extension agent, community members of Claxton and our studio team, we were able to produce a master plan for the Community Center to use moving forward towards their goal of creating a public recreation space for all ages of the community. The final product is a culmination of all of the roles that took shape during the community engagement and design process. We as the designers are not the sole authors of the work that has been produced: the master plan and supporting concepts were informed by community input, design decisions made by the studio team, facilitated with help from the UGA extension agent, and given feedback by the council of Evans County Community Center.
The community of Claxton came in strong numbers to two community meetings in September. The people that came to the meeting to participate in the activity ranged from teachers, law enforcement officers, alumni from the equalization school, children and parents that live in Claxton. Their role was essential to the crux of the purpose of the project: to create a space that reflected the desires of the people in Claxton. This role was essential to create the base framework for programmatic elements that would be included in the master plan.
Our UGA Extension Agent was vital to the success of the project as well. He helped facilitate communication and scheduling between the council of Evans County Community Center and the studio team. For every review conducted over zoom, the UGA Extension Agent made sure there was proper equipment to conduct a fruitful meeting. In addition to this, he communicated feedback from the council after they had time to debate different design alternatives. This role served as a critical bridge between the studio team and the council to make quality design and engagement work possible from a distance.
The council of Evans County Community Center has been committed to the development of this project from the very first engagement. They helped set up meetings, spread the word to community members, encouraged conversations about visions for the future, and gave extremely detailed feedback on various design iterations and alternatives until a final product was produced that reflected the needs and desires for the future of the community center.
The studio team served as the people who brought all of the collected information together to produce a vision for the community. With our design expertise, we were able to produce a master plan for the community members of Claxton that we can honestly say reflects the desires of the community, the priorities of the council, and the feasibility of different programmatic elements.
Even if just one role were to be removed from the equation, the outcome of the project would have changed completely. Each role produced invaluable contributions to the master plan and further highlights the power of design through community engagement and feedback.
[written by Elizabeth Swift]
(above) A community member is taking their time to read other community member's suggestions and provide her own feedback in the form of dot ranking.
(above) A child reaching to add their thoughts about what activities or games they would like to be able to play at the community center.
Working with the folks from Evans County was an incredible experience; we felt welcomed throughout the process and they did a great job engaging with us to create a design that suited their needs. This process was pretty unique in terms of a school project in that we had an extended period of time to work with the clients, getting to know them and their goals for the project. The semester-long format gave us ample time to learn about the history of the site, what the community wanted and had been lacking, and create a design that responded to the community’s needs. It was especially interesting to have the chance to go down to the site and do engagement meetings in person—I felt like it gave the project a personal touch that I haven’t often gotten out of more traditional studio projects. I think having multiple instances of engagement and feedback was really important as it allowed our designs to change and adapt to best fulfill what our stakeholders were hoping for.
One of the challenges with getting to spend time learning about the community is that I’m not sure where the process goes from here. I feel like we created a really great design concept, with some awesome features that fill some holes in the community, but I am worried that it won’t be enough for the Evans County Community Center to get funding or get anything built. I hope that it will, and that our team will get to see something come out of this beyond our drawings. It would be a shame for everyone involved (our design team, the stakeholders, and the general community) if the momentum stopped here, so hopefully it won’t! I think that these concerns come from a place of caring deeply about the community, which could only happen with the extensive engagement we’ve done.
Finally, I want to show some appreciation for my teammates, Liz and Brooke, who were great to work with all semester. Having them to bounce ideas off and to help focus my designs was great, and really felt like what I imagine a landscape design office is like. We each had our own roles that we were fulfilling, but all got to work together to create a product that was better than anything we could have made on our own.
[Written by Nick Riker]
This semester, I got to work with some fantastic graduate students on a project with equally as fantastic clients. Liz, Nick, and I traveled a few hours away to Claxton, GA to hone our community engagement skills as we designed the grounds of the Evans County Community Center. We visited the town for two days, completing a site analysis, taking photographs, and leading two engagement sessions to collect feedback from the greater community. We worked closely with our UGA Extension Agent Ross and the Evans County High School alumni association. The ECCC was once home to a 1950’s equalization school with a rich history that has been anything but forgotten. Precious memories of the site’s past are found in a delicately coordinated African American Archive Museum on the northern wing of the building. There’s no photography allowed in the museum, but it would be hard to forget how intricately organized and displayed each artifact is. The museum was a deeply important piece of the design puzzle- but we learned early on that it was the voices of the community itself that would prove the most invaluable in our design process. In our initial engagement sessions, we led a sticky-note brainstorming activity, a dot ranking activity, and a “Design Your Park” map drawing activity. Though all of those pieces of our visit provided us with a wealth of physical data, I learned that the most important things we gathered were from informal conversations with members of the community.
The first thing I noticed was the way one community leader and Evans County High alumnus spoke to the crowd. She was very insistent that this design was meant for everybody. And that anyone, of any age or ability, could find a home at the ECCC. We took that and ran with it- making one of our themes Community Recreation- a theme that would guide us in creating spaces that encouraged intergenerational and interability play. Another integral piece to the puzzle was also learned through informal conversation- The old planter that once sat in the middle of the northern courtyard. Alumni spoke fondly of a large planter that they once took school photos on. This led us to recreate the planter, along with a memorial fountain in memory of its historic use.
Of course, there were a few challenges along the way. The first being nudging community members to feel comfortable drawing their ideas on a map. In the moment, I addressed this by encouraging folks to simply write out in words what they imagined in the area they saw fit. Some people wound up simply writing a list of their ideas on the back or margins of the page. In the future, I might provide cut-out elements that can be placed on a map to get the “spatial thinking” ball rolling.
Below is an image from before we began our engagement activities. when community members were chatting about the project and reminiscing on past memories of the high school
It’s important to evaluate the social constructs, histories, and dichotomies prior to engaging with a community. To make community members of all races, economic status, and age feel equal and comfortable with one another allows for more honest conversations, a greater variety of voices contributing to the conversation, and allows for community members who wouldn’t have previously connected to each other a chance to bounce ideas back and forth about an interest they have in common: the community project.
It’s also important to evaluate you, the designer and meeting coordinator, for pre-existing priviliges and experiences that you bring to the meeting. Creating a non-homogenous, informal seating for the activity is the beginning of creating dialouge that produces valuable content. The designers can achieve this by distributing themselves amongst the community members, acting as if the designer is there to support the conversation instead of leading it through open ended questions and conversation segue. Being the listening ear during these conversations deconstructs the idea that the designer is “above” the community, but rather that the designer is there to serve the community.
[Written by Elizabeth Swift]
I learned quickly after presenting our initial design ideas that the community members felt most excited by the elements that nodded to the site’s past use. Recreating the yearbook photo planter, for example, was appreciated greatly by the community. It is important to include these small, yet impactful elements to show to your client that you care about the existing soul of the space.
[Written by Brooke Freeman]
Between the logistics of planning meetings and the specifics of cost estimates, it can be a challenge to remember that design is supposed to be fun! The more you enjoy the work, the more your work will benefit the community. So take the time to make connections within your community, whether that’s through spending time drawing with kids at a community meeting or staying late to listen to what a community member has to say. These interactions will be more fun for you and will make the final product more meaningful by giving you insight into the community. Who knows, you might even end up designing a fruitcake-themed playground!
[Written by Nick Riker]
Blog entries and project content were developed by BROOKE FREEMAN, NICHOLAS RIKER, ELIZABETH SWIFT.