US Air Force White Paper states Cogscreen Math Problems Must Be Completed In 35 Seconds Otherwise It's A Fail
This cannot be stated enough about the fact that Gary Kay also says that he wants to keep the test is proprietary as possible even though he claimed studying for the test would not help performance is a direct contradictory statement. It would actually prove that the test is actually rigged to actually fail Pilots. Hence why the peer reviews of the Cogscreen in the United States have been very restricted and guarded and the only ones that actually say any bit of detail about how screwed the test is is either from the United States Air Force which says with the math portion if you don't answer Layered mental math questions and 35 seconds you're in the bottom 10 percentile and fail https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a554594.pdf page 19 (mirrored) https://drive.google.com/file/d/13tKfITjODx2bgI2Nx4yWGjiASueDsgFU/view
or from Canada with said that experienced pilot trade speed for accuracy, So most experienced pilots will fail. Page 61
https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/etd/e40f9124-679e-48af-9d1a-f91e65029547/etd_pdf/30c60c68d17834245fb1ca02037ec4aa/cass-cansituationawarenessbepredictedinvestigating.pdf mirrored https://drive.google.com/file/d/10BTax1aQkbrsNi-36h36efnYFHmNqU9t/view
And what type of math questions were asked on the Cogscreen you may ask, the same type of questions that 50% of Harvard students and 80% of students at other Universities would get wrong.
And this website points out that more intelligent people tend to "forget" minor details which points out that their brains are "more efficient" at retaining critical information and disregarding superfluous information. https://blog.sci-nature.vip/2022/08/science-confirms-that-forgetting-things.html This shows that cognitive tests that force the retention of said superfluous info and label people that are actually more intelligent as "mentally defective" are in fact nothing more than snake oil that are created to conduct biased profiling about as valid as the racist profiling of the 20th century.