Mark R Weaver forces Fabian to admit under oath under cross examination he is not a medical doctor psychiatrist and only a psychologist as well as separately never passed a State Bar and has never earned a law license.
1 hour :25 min;34 sec in Pt2 https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5134 Weaver asks Fabian if he's a Medical Doctor or can prescribe medicine which Fabian replies, no Weaver demonstrates that Fabian misrepresents his credentials to the public with his insistence of being referred to as "doctor" to deceive the public that he has credentials of a medical doctor with his doctorate of psychology which is similar to what many doctors of chiropractor also do, since he presents himself as Dr. John Mathew Fabian PsyD, J.D.
Weaver then illustrates Fabian's deception further by asking him, so you're a doctor and a lawyer? Fabian responds he is a doctor of psychology and has a law degree. Weaver then asks if Fabian took the bar which Fabian said he did and failed. (No state was given besides referring to Ohio) Weaver then asked Fabian, So you went to law school but can't practice law? Fabian's response, I don't want to practice law https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5145 which Weaver then states, but it would be illegal and unethical for you to practice law Look at Fabians response at 1:26;04 https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5164 when he says softly with a higher pitch, Yeah I don't practice law. Weaver has a pointed out a pattern of Fabian intentionally misrepresenting his credentials to the point where the public would think Fabian was a licensed attorney by list JD after his name along with PsyD and is praying on potential clients that don't realize that licensed attorneys don't list JD after their name, they list Esq if anything at all.
Weaver was probably unaware that Fabian was at the very least being financially compensated for giving formal legal advice without a law license with this letter he drafted to Cameron Crockett, an individual convicted of Involuntary Manslaughter (Fabian couldn't even get the charge correct). The advice was given across state lines to boot where Fabian drafted the letter with his Austin, Texas address and the Cameron Crockett case took place in Virginia. It also should be noted Fabian drafted the letter only days before his DUI on drugs arrest in Oklahoma. So its reasonable to assume Fabian was under the influence of drugs when he drafted the letter.
http://www.cameroncrockett.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DOC-8.pdf mirrored https://drive.google.com/file/d/1O6sWX2Obs2iY7fQqj09JfqgltiPKWKpK/view?usp=sharing
Section 39.122 of the Texas Penal Code (Criminal Law Statute) prohibits a person from holding himself out to be a lawyer “unless licensed to practice law if it is done with an intent to obtain an economic benefit”.
The State Bar of Texas further notes on its website’s “Frequently Asked Questions,” An individual cannot give legal advice, offer representation in court, or handle many other legal matters without a license to practice law in Texas.
Section 81.102(b)(2) of the Texas Government Code allows the state supreme court to establish rules for the limited practice of law by “bona fide law students.”
In May 2020, the Supreme Court of Texas adopted new Rules Governing the Supervised Practice of Law by Qualified Law Students and Qualified Unlicensed Law School Graduates in Texas. The rules apply to any qualified law students, including L.L.M. candidates, qualified unlicensed law school graduates, and law students enrolled in a law school clinical legal education program, who request eligibility to engage in the limited practice of law under the supervision of a licensed Texas attorney.
If Weaver was aware of this, judging by how he conducted his cross examination of Fabian, it's reasonable to assume Weaver would have brought this up and called Fabian out for perjury. Just to point out how Cameron Crockett actually conducted himself as a fugitive of Justice https://www.stsg-law.com/u-s-marshals-on-trail-of-virginia-beach-fugitive-stsg/
After the Judge stopped Weaver from laying into Fabian regarding not having a law license, Weaver asks, would it be unethical to practice psychology without a license? to which Fabian says, yes. Weaver then asked Fabian if he practiced psychology without a license, which Fabian was forced to answer yes. Fabian then tried to blow this off claiming that his human resources assistant forget to mail in the renewal paperwork. This fits Fabian's pattern of blaming others for his mistakes, shortcomings, outright deception, and fraud. It should also be pointed out that Fabian's leading questions to coerce an answer to fit his pre-conceived narrative are not lawful. Could explain one reason why Fabian never passed a bar exam.
At this Point (timecode 1 hour 27 min, 45 sec in PT2) https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5265 Weaver forced Fabian to read rebukes from Judges and persecutors from trial transcripts in past cases Fabian was called to testify in. The Aforementioned Drummond V Houk was brought up after the , the 2011 case of STATE OF OHIO V HALE referencing another case, STATE OF OHIO V BISSWANATH HALDER from 2006 where Halder was convicted of the shooting death of multiple people and sentenced to life https://www.rediff.com/news/2006/jan/23halder.htm
Weaver forced Fabian to read the caselaw 1 hour 29 min 10 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5350 which read off, isn't accurate and the ruling of the defendants competency to stand trial under the signature of Peggy Jones a jurist that your work product credibility were criticized and ultimately discounted in the jurist a matter? Weaver reiterated that the prosecutors from State V Hale stated in that trial that Fabian's "work product and credibility" were criticized by a judge in a previous case. That Judge ruled the defended competent to stand trial vs. Fabian's opinion was the defended incompetent. 1 hour 29 min 42 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5382 Fabian tried to state that the judge didn't agree with his opinion. Weaver then reiterated that the persecutors asked you whether or not a judge discounted your testimony right? Fabian gets flustered tries to over-talk Weaver stating it's a disagreement not discounting it. Weaver asks, did she criticized you because she disagreed with you, right?
Weaver uses this as a starting point to show Fabian has a track record of tagging people with multiple diagnoses with no actual basis for that. This shows Fabian's pattern of labeling people with a "broken brain" and having the intellect of elementary school students. Example Halder had a degree in electrical engineering West Bengal University and a degree in business management from Case Western Reserve University. How could anyone earn those degrees and not be competent to stand trial, yet Fabian stated just that and the Judge in that case rightly rebuked it.
In the same transcript weaver states, 1 hour 30 min 21 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5421 the prosecutor asked you did she (the judge) criticize the thoroughness of your work product in preparation for your testimony Which Fabian stated that she did.
1 hour 30 min 45 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5445 Weaver asks Fabian if he was told by judges in other cases that he was not well prepared well for testimony. Fabian just stares at Weaver, then stumbles as says, uh a lot, states, maybe one a fact witness, then Weaver says I can help you Fabian stumbles through a word salad, this is when Weaver brings up DRUMMOND V HOUK Where Weaver starts to read DRUMMOND V HOUK Judges opinion which I have posed above, While both parties conceded that Dr. Fabian did not perform well during his mitigation testimony, Dr. Fabian faulted counsel for his failures. He maintained that counsel did not provide him with adequate time to prepare
When Weaver asks Fabian if the DRUMMOND V HOUK judge was referring to him, Fabian states, Yeah I believe so. the video fades to black and returns to where the STATE V GTATE judges has this struck from the record. This is some of the most damaging documentation about Fabian calling his credentials and testimony suspect yet the Judge didn't want this as part of the record.