During both the direct and cross examination at STATE V GRATE John Matthew Fabian had some very disturbing comments about himself that would make anyone question this person's true intentions. First observation, his body language. He clearly isn't comfortable, stares all over the place smirking. It's almost if Fabian himself could be tagged with ADHD or on the Autism spectrum. Fabian also bounces around in his chair like he is on cocaine and/or other type of amphetamine . He also clinches his lips throughout the trial
16 min 4 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=964 Fabian says he charges $300 per hour... WTF and he claims his price is LOW, BS the national average is 13% of what he charges or $40 an hour. https://www.zippia.com/forensic-psychologist-jobs/salary/
18 min 07 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1087 when asked if Fabian's payment is depended on a particular outcome of a case, Fabian has a frustrated look on his face and says, No I don't get invested in the outcome of what you all decided to do. I'm here to follow the law evaluate and mitigation in this and so that's what I did and and (yes he says and twice) you all have to decide what you think you know our aggravating and mitigating factors and in your decision here. Then Fabian coughs
18 min 35 secs https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1115 Fabian admits he hurt his own practice by telling attorneys what they don't want to hear every week. 18 min 45 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1125 He claims that he tries to be Objective and thorough about these cases but so be it
19 min 40 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1180 claims that all of his opinions offered before the court are with definitive psychological and neurological certainty. Once again notice Fabian doesn't say that with a straight face and clinches his lips which is a telling visual indicator that Fabian knows he lying. He does this throughout the trail.
The very next question at 20 min 5 secs https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1205 Fabian admits he is not the advocate for the defense, so why is the defense pay him $18,000 which was ultimately paid for by the tax payers of Ohio?
22 min 11 sec, https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1331 the defense council asks Fabian about his past publications and Fabian gets very defensive and uncomfortable playing them off as, yeah I've written articles in the past, yeah, yup... and then sits in awkwardly silent with his lips clenched You'd think someone with a ego as big as his would talk everyone's ear off about them and it seems he hiding that he didn't exactly write them and plagiarized the content of the articles.
22 min 34 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1354 admits he doesn't do the evaluations himself, and that he used a mitigation specialist which called his technicians to me. How many of these evauls were done with technicians in training like what happened to me?
24 min 15 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1455 Fabian said he gets character references over the phone claiming other psychologists don't do that, however Fabian didn't with me he didn't want to talk one reference I tried to give him.
24 min 38 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1478 asked if he puts a biased slant on his investigation. look at Fabian's reaction 24 min 48 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1488 he sneers then begrudgingly admits mitigation is biased but then tries to back out what he just said by stating he was not hear to mislead the jury. Look at the way he answered this. Fabian did not want to answer this question and felt forced.
28min 43 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1723 is where Fabian is asked how many times did he see the defended, it was 4 dates amounting to 25 hours. He claims that he spent "quite a bit of time with him" With me he spent an hour
30 min 18 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1818 Fabian says his report is 81 pages claiming that this was a complex case when he probably threw a bunch of prewritten templates together. supposedly the report this quack did on me is 75 pages according to my AME but I'm not allowed to see it because the FAA claims ownership of a pilot's medical records. Once again how the hell does the FAA get away with violating HIPAA and the 4th Amendment?
31min 24 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1884 Fabian goes on about multi-generational mitigating factors, basically psychology can tag people with a "disorder" based on opinion as the 21st century version of racism similar to the supper predictor tag of the 1990s. Inner city minority youth according to those quacks were pre-destined to be a criminal compared to psychologists stating "your family was nuts or criminal in nature", so you are predestined to be the same junk pseudoscience. And he kept prying at me about how my father died. He is such a racist.
32 min 14 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=1934 Fabian clearly has bias against anyone tagged with ADHD,
46 min 36 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=2796 Then he goes through a bunch of documents and picks one and says "Lets start with the depressive disorder" then when he starts talking about it he looks up a the ceiling. Then he shuffles through his paperwork again
47 min 17 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=2838 keeps stumbling through his findings
49: min https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=2940 did Fabian just admit HE HIMSELF has bi-polar? Before the lawyer interrupted him?
54 min 47 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=3287 claims that half of children tagged with ADHD have it as adults. How about this, I'm siding with Dr. Bruce Perry where everyone has it so it shouldn't be a separate segregated class https://sites.google.com/site/no2cog/supporting-evidence/prominent-doctors-claim-adhd-is-not-a-real-disease
1 hour 37 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=3637 Did Fabian admit he himself has a language based learning disorder? Clearly Fabian has trouble with the English Language where he can't separate first and third person subject verb agreements in his word salad of testimony.
1 hour 34 min 30 sec Weaver gets Fabian to admit his assessment is biased. https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5670 where Fabian claims, "Mitigation by law is inherently biased"
1 hour 35 min 32 sec https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5732
as pointed out before Fabian burps on the stand, one of the Youtube commenters calls it out as unprofessional.
VIDEO 3
31 min 46 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=1906
the defense asks about Fabian's license. Fabian says he's licensed in Ohio and "a half dozen other states" says he first got licensed in 2000 and had to pay a fee to take the licensing exam. claims the reason why he practiced without a licensed is that his lapsed and didn't pay the renewal fee because "he didn't know about it" claiming it was "a mix-up in HR at his court psychiatric clinic." really?
33 min 33 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2013 Fabian claims he performed 25 tests on the Grate after spending a measured amount of time shuffling through his notes.
34 min 6 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2046 Fabian claims in the forensic world he supposes to be right 100% of the time Once again nothing it 100% correct, not even close. Fabian even admits another psychologist would have another opinion. I trust Joe Rogan over this clown. https://sites.google.com/site/no2cog/supporting-evidence/outside-of-dna-forensic-evidence-is-not-admissible Below I'll have a whole section on forensic psychology and psychology as a whole being a junk science which according to Chris Fabricant appealing on ABC News is nothing more than speculative opinion masquerading as science https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTB8YXO4YrQ which is not an isolated onion either. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-did-we-fall-for-the-junk-science-of-forensics/
34 min 24 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?si=Iomg0u5SZu-dFh_-&t=2064 "So the one psychiatrist I trained with in the jail setting you know I would do the interviews he'd do the pills and we talked about the case and he you know and I learned quickly a clinician may see someone for nine months 12 months and their symptoms overlap the DSM"
34 min 38 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2078 claims a clinician can see someone for 9 months/ 12 months and their symptoms overlap claims ADHD traits overlap with bi-polar disorder but then admits he can't get this exactly right 34 min 58 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2098
35 min 6 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2106 Fabian states We can quibble about diagnosis going off on how he cannot "perfectly diagnose." Fabian just admitted he has no idea about the ramifications about his shoddy diagnoses. What he calls "quibbling" most people would call malpractice, especially if it grounds them from their occupation to which they earned a living
35 min 22 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2122 then Fabian admits there never will be a perfect examination He just completely contradicted himself. This also means Fabian admitted the Cogscreen is not perfect or 100% accurate.
35min 25 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2125 Fabian says he spent quite a bit of time to come up with diagnosis that both side like and both side can pick parts and agree with basically admitting that psychology is opinion based and there is nothing scientific of absolute about it.
36 min :23 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2183 Fabian admits on his tests that the suspect only tested positive for depressions. So once again admitting that he pulled diagnosises out of his ass based on nothing but his opinion alone.
36 min 37 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2197 Fabian can't "cherry pick the test" and that would make him do his job unethically. Yet he didn't score the entire test before trial and use that as an basis to answer instead of lying his way out of it claiming that cherry picking certain questions is unethical
37 min 32 sec https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=2252 Fabian claims he didn't have all the information needed to evaluate the suspect even though he handed a laundry list of diagnoses, even after over a year and concerns from the Judge about Fabian's timetable and expenses of $18,000 billed to to the taxpayers of Ohio, Fabian more or less admitted even with 14 months are $18,000 he could not perform the job. However the the Judge tells the jury to disregard the statement from Fabian. Why cover for this fraud?