The On top of prosecutor in that case, Mark R. Weaver later forced Dr. Fabian to admit that he had to retract a publication because he was called out by the Supreme Court he was without a law license basically trying to tell lawyers how to do their job, https://youtu.be/nmO2yi59qOU?t=1652 and Forcing Fabian to admit that he failed the Ohio Bar Exam every attempt he took it and then indignantly claimed, "he didn't want to practice law." https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?t=5134 and when asked would it be unethical to practice law without a license, Fabian responded with "Sure" Then when asked the same question about it being unethical practicing psychology without a license, Fabian stated yes and was forced to admit he practiced psychology without a license claiming he forgot to pay the fee when it expired. https://youtu.be/0jnndclBzPM?si=KVEbJCAU8mSEwm3d&t=5179
in closing arguments Mark R Weaver stated that John Mathew Fabian did not follow the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM when coming up with his diagnoses which is outright malpractice since even though the DSM is garbage, it's the only approved guidelines which licensed psychology can grant diagnoses. https://youtu.be/5tRQUKn2leo?si=fsw3lWktrzur-MCm&t=282 Is Fabian admitting that the DSM is garbage by not using it and instead fabricated diagnosies based on his own opinion, vs the opinions of others. If that's the case Psychology is nothing more than sunjective snakeoil being used to take someone's civil rights away without due process.