pepe remey to neal chase january 1992

My "teasing" you in the past represented my way of trying to get you to understand the IMPOSSIBILITY of my taking you seriously because your production of "fantasy tales" "distortions of facts" "unfounded assumptions" and the myriad of "out-and-out lies" you have been shamefacedly publishing and distributing are so OUTLANDISH that you couldn't be SERIOUSLY convinced they would have any REAL effect on me. Your innocence can only be supported by the fact that, as Mr. Jensen's mouthpiece and die-hard disciple, you are dedicated to his dictates, with or without monetary interests.

With this most recent EXHIBITION in Mr. Jensen's Three-Ring-Circus entitled TWO ADMINISTRATIONS, your expert performances of "Jumping through Jensen's Hoops" proves you the best "Spiritual-Side-Show-Act" of his Troupe of Spiritual Clowns:

In Jensen's THREE RING CIRCUS, you have been running around Chasing yourself in circles and getting nowhere for so long you don't even realize you are TRAPPED in a MAZE - as a rat in a grated cage - much the situation Mr. Jensen must have suffered while confined in Prison. The obvious effects that experience has had on him should serve you as a warning of what may eventually befall yourself unless you rebel.

If I list the lies you have told in your "Two Administrations" paper, you will ignore them as you have in the past. Your deliberate distortions of my statements and Mason's can be PROVEN as such because you misquote statements that have been publicly made by both of us and a confrontation of what was stated by us with what you deliberately distorted can be attested to by any sane, level-minded unprejudiced reader.

Consider your DISTORTION of my statements on Page 9 of your treatise where you state: "Pepe has written that this is absurd because then even at some point the revealed laws would become stagnant"........

I mentioned "stagnation" in my Sept 30, 1991 "Clarification". On the first Page - par. 4, my statement read: "That FLEXIBILITY of interpretation of the Word, guarantees the Word from "STAGNATION".....and again, my closing statement on Page 2 reads: "If these Organs were infallible in themselves, they would not be subject to change and would be deprived of that FLEXIBILITY without which they might very likely fall into eventual STAGNATION."

You distort my statement to read: "at some point the revealed laws would become stagnant"......whereas I was referring to "these Organs". In the first quote I am stating "guarantees the Word from Stagnation". In the next quote I am warning that the Organs (the institutions) "might very likely fall into eventual STAGNATION".

It would be interesting for you to explain how you can be so blatantly GUILTY of such DISTORTIONS, yet in the [face] of ACTUAL PROOF of your TRANSGRESSION, go on ignoring my accusations while continuing to issue new material adding FUEL to your already FLAMING FIRE OF FALSITIES.

The above is ONLY ONE point in your statement which even yourself cannot fail to recognize as deliberate DISTORTION. That has been a TACTIC you have learned so well from your MENTOR, the GREATEST Distorter of Facts, Mr. Jensen, who, as yourself ABSOLUTELY REFUSES to face me on the many issues I have contested him on. When you see yourself reflected in the mirror, WHAT do you REALLY see? Can you REALLY ignore the LIAR you are ? ? ?

1

When you make references to what "Pepe said...or Pepe believes.....or Mason told Pepe.....etc." How in God's Good name can you KNOW what you state so FALSELY when you have never spoken to either of us. You cannot know what conversations transpired between myself and Mason. All you know is what that Shamefaced, lying, hypocritical dictator Mr. Jensen tells you to write. He uses you as his smoke-screen and you submit without attempting a verification of those false lies. Where are your scruples? Are these the "fruits" of your religion? Poor devils! Have you lost ALL capacity for SHAME? Go back and read over my many past communications to you and Jensen. Reconsider the countless PROOFS I have given you showing you are telling DELIBERATE LIES or DISTORTING already published statements, twisting the EVIDENT meanings simply to serve your DISHONEST purposes. How can you read these very words and go to sleep on an HONEST PILLOW this very night? It SHOCKS me to see what harm can befall a human mind that has allowed itself to fall prey to the demonic machinations of a despot!

Oh well......I know it is all a waste of time with you, but it seems necessary for me to persevere hoping that some of your innocently duped supporters may, by the Grace of God apart themselves even for a fleeting moment to consider the possibility that, Pepe may be right after all. It has happened in the past and word has reached me there are several amongst your RANKS who are beginning to question your VERACITY.

To those amongst your supporters who have the courage to HONESTLY consider FACTS, I propose one simple self-imposed TEST of CONSCIENCE:

Here I am in Florence. Living alone, doing my own shopping, cooking, house-cleaning, laundry, etc. I cut my own hair, and knit my own sweaters. When I send out 10 Air mail letters to the USA I have to go without food for the day. I was hospitalized for one month last year and, having no Insurance, have incurred a hospital bill of some $8,000 which is still unpaid. After Mason's death, NO ONE has been interested to know if I am needy or in good health, neither have I asked for any help which I should refuse were it offered. I belong to NO GROUP and have not even supported Donald Harvey in his Guardianship. I seek no position and have refused any offered me. I have no following, nor wish any. I do no proselytising but have ONLY written material in DEFENSE of Mason Remey, his Good Name, what he stood for and defend what I KNOW he DID or DID NOT state against the myriad of inconsistencies, lies, defamatory remarks and distortions of his intentions. Jensen criticizes me with the words: "This person had to be ultimately loyal to Mason even above God Almighty." How can he know that? Only God knows. That I shall continue to be loyal to Mason, you all may be assured. I'll not burden you with more. But, in spite of the above, please

TEST your CONSCIENCE and decide that under the circumstances, does Mr. Neal Chase have a right to make the following statements in his recently distributed paper titled TWO ADMINISTRATIONS?

"Mason Remey began by misleading and indoctrinating Pepe into his perverse scheme."

"Pepe understood the whole scam--but did Pepe know Mason was scamming him?"

"Mason needed an ignorant boy...to succeed him and continue his fabricated design."

"Pepe is not a Baha'i but is the pseudo-infallible Pope of the self-styled Mason Remey cult and nothing anybody says or does will change his mind but only an act of God."

Really, friends.....DO I NEED or DESERVE that?