Mason and Joseph Pepe Remey, image from wikipedia
Letters in Chronological Order:
letter joseph pepe to doc july 24 1975
letter pepe to jensen august 24 1975
letter pepe remey to brent mathieu october 25 1976
pepe remey to leland jensen may 13, 1990 (fragment)
pepe remey to leland jensen may 13, 1990
letter pepe remey to opal jensen july 25 1990
letter pepe remey to brent mathieu september 10, 1990
letter pepe remey to brent matheiu february 2 1991
letter pepe remey to brent matheiu april 29, 1991 (mentions three sub-Guardians)
letter pepe remey to brent mathieu may 15 1991 (denies reading the 7th Epistle of Leland Jensen)
letter pepe remey to neal chase september 9 1991 (critical of Chase)
letter pepe remey to brent mathieu september 27, 1991
pepe remey clarification of a statement september 30 1991
letter pepe remey to all concerned october 1 1991
letter pepe remey to ex-jensenites october 1, 1991
pepe remey to neal chase october 5, 1991 (one of the "My Boy" letters)
pepe remey outline of bahai administration october 9, 1991
pepe remey to whom it may concern november 19, 1991
pepe remey to kay woods november 20 1991
pepe remey to leland jensen january 19, 1992
pepe remey to neal chase january 1992 (critical of chase)
pepe remey to leland jensen, Jan. 22, 1992 (refutes chase as Guardian, refutes Dr. Jensen's claims, Pepe has his own claims for Guardianship)
letter pepe to brent mathieu february 2, 1992
pepe remey to leland jensen february 9 1992 (reconcilliation letter)
letter pepe remey to jensen january 31 1993 (critical of jensen again)
letter pepey remey to leland jensen january 18 1994 (somewhat conciliatory, refutes Harvey Guardianship)
This section is for the collected letters of Joseph Pepe who was considered by Dr. Leland Jensen as the third Guardian of the Baha'i Faith. Although, it is debatable whether Pepe accepted this understanding of his role in the Baha'i Faith there was a heated exchange between Dr. Jensen and Pepe Remey in which Pepe seems to waver from one position of denial of being the Guardian to acceptance of being the Guardian. However, it could be argued that he was not wavering at all but had his own publicly undisclosed plans for his Guardianship which included at one point naming Brent Mathieu his successor which was rejected by Brent Mathieu. Pepe used Brent to distribute his letters to ex-Jensenites, perhaps in the role of sub-Guardian. This is perhaps the most controversial aspect of Dr. Leland Jensen's teachings: that Pepe was the Guardian but rejected Dr. Jensen's claims. In the end it seems that Pepe made an attempt to name a successor Guardian based on the understandings of Dr. Leland Jensen's criteria for naming a successor Guardian based on Aghsan status and appointment. This successor is currently contended between different factions of followers of Dr. Leland Jensen's students, the current question lies between the claims of Glenn David Goldman and Neal Chase.