In this activity, you’ll work with prose summary questions, which test your ability to identify the main ideas of a passage. You’ll begin by reading and listening to an article about animal intelligence, focusing on how dogs think and respond to human cues. Then, you’ll answer questions that ask you to choose the most important points from a list of options. To succeed, you’ll need to recognize the structure of the passage, distinguish key ideas from minor details, and mentally organize the information. Use strategies like identifying the author’s purpose and avoiding overly specific or unrelated choices to build an accurate summary.
https://youtu.be/ltZev1lJ2ZEProse Summary Questions
Think you can identify the heart of a passage? Prose summary questions test exactly that. Your goal is to pinpoint the major ideas, not the minor details.
The Core Concept:
You will see six options and must choose the three that best summarize the passage's most important points. The incorrect choices are traps: they are either minor details or information not found in the text at all.
Key Features at a Glance:
Your Goal: Create an accurate summary by selecting the main ideas from the entire passage.
The Format: Choose 3 correct answers from a list of 6 options.
Scoring: You earn points for correct selections (typically full points for all three, partial for two).
The Traps: Avoid options that are too specific (minor details) or completely unmentioned.
In short: Focus on the big picture, not the small details, to successfully summarize the passage and earn valuable points.
Necessary Skills
Recognizing the organization and relative importance of information presented in the passage
Understanding and locating specific points in a passage key to the gist of a passage as a whole
Organizing information presented in a passage into a mental outline
Example Questions
An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. The question is worth 2 points.
[You will see a sentence in bold here.]
Strategies
Distinguish main ideas from minor ideas, and essential information from non- essential information.
Remember that correct answer choices will not be identical to any particular sentence in the passage.
T54
Nearly all pet owners believe that their animal companion has a personality of some sort. Although it is clear that animals act differently, it remains unclear if pets are capable of reasoning. A number of studies have been conducted in the past several years that suggest that animals are, in fact, quite intelligent, but are nonetheless influenced heavily by the presence of their owners. A recent case studying the cognitive ability of dogs was performed by researchers at a university in Budapest. It revealed that canines are incredibly able thinkers under the right circumstances.
The study took a sampling of forty-two adult dogs of varying ages and breeds. There were no limitations on the selection of the dogs except that they had to enjoy playing with toys. Each dog was brought into a room with a researcher, who would place a ball under several small pots and show the dog which pots did not contain the ball. The pots would then be shuffled around on a surface. In this first round of the study, the researcher would occasionally pause and pay attention to one of the pots that did not contain the ball. He or she would look at the pot, stare at the dog, and then go back to shuffling. In most cases, the dogs picked out the pot to which the researcher gave special attention, not the pot with the ball underneath it.
In the second round, the same dogs were placed in a room with the same pots. However, in this second round, the pots' movement was controlled with wires, and no human was visible. Once again, the pots not containing the ball would be revealed and the pots would then be shuffled. With no visible human cues, most dogs in the second round were able to quickly pick out the pot containing the ball.
Researchers concluded from this experiment that dogs were capable of deductive reasoning. Since the dogs were capable of picking out the correct pot in the absence of a human, researchers concluded that they had the ability to make deductions and solve simple problems. Other animals known for their remarkable intelligence, such as chimpanzees and grey parrots, have displayed similar reasoning abilities. The inclination to be influenced by researchers, however, suggests that the dogs are social animals as well and are open to being taught. The dogs' behavior was strikingly similar to that of infants, who possess basic problem-solving abilities but are strongly influenced by cues from their parents.
While the study is by no means conclusive, it does suggest that the domesticated animals people keep as pets are capable of thoughtful analysis. This analytical ability, however, may not always be readily apparent in the presence of humans, since dogs are influenced heavily by the behavior of humans. Furthermore, the study suggests that animals may be more psychologically advanced than we have traditionally thought. Clearly, further research will be necessary to determine the extent of animal intelligence.
VOCABULARY
capable: having the ability to do or achieve something
limitation: an imposed restriction
shuffle: to change the order of items in a group
strikingly: attracting attention for being unusual or remarkable
conclusive: offering strong proof; definitive
Testing Canine Intelligence
Round 1:
⬇
Round 1:
⬇
Round 2:
⬇
Round 2:
⬇
Conclusion:
1. An introductory sentence for a brief summary of the passage is provided below. Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some sentences do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.
The passage discusses the process by which researchers studied the intelligence of dogs and what they concluded.
🔵 ______________________________________________
🔵 ______________________________________________
🔵 ______________________________________________
Choose the correct alternative(s)
(A) When in the presence of researchers, dogs were more likely to rely on the researchers' hints.
(B) When the tests were controlled by wires instead of people, the dogs displayed deductive reasoning.
(C) The dogs chosen for the study were not chosen by their breed or specific age.
(D) Dogs possess problem-solving ability, but can be easily influenced by cues from humans.
(E) It is hard to understand how smart .a dog may be, as it is influenced by visual cues.
(F) Other intelligent animals, like chimpanzees and grey parrots, have similar reasoning
Fill in the blanks to complete the summary
A scientist study in Budapest looked into the intelligence of dogs. Researchers found that dogs are __________ of solving simple problems and that they are open to learning from their human masters. They also found __________ in dog's ability to find a ball when a human tried to hid it from them. The dogs would respond to __________ from the human, rather than simply follow the location of the ball. The researchers found evidence that dogs are __________ similar to human infants in their levels of intelligence, but the studies were not __________ enough to be certain.