What do you think motivates people to follow laws or authority figures?
Can you think of a time when a governing authority's decisions seemed to serve a larger purpose, even if it wasn’t immediately clear?
What values do you believe are essential for both leaders and citizens to live peacefully in a community?
Pre-Reading Question Task
Reflect on the role of authority in your life.
Write a short paragraph describing your perspective on authority figures (parents, teachers, government, etc.) and how you perceive their role in your day-to-day experiences. Consider if your view of authority is influenced by personal beliefs, cultural background, or past experiences.
Submission to Governing Authorities
Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.
Romans 13:1
While-Reading Tasks
Identify and underline any terms or concepts that show Paul’s views on the relationship between divine sovereignty and earthly authority.
Pay attention to phrases or sentences where Paul connects authority to God’s will or purpose, and consider why he might view authority this way.
Take note of any references to historical or cultural influences that shape Paul’s perspective.
As you read, list instances where Paul’s background as a Pharisee, Roman citizen, or missionary might impact his ideas about governance and submission to authority.
Paul’s unique background—his religious upbringing, Roman citizenship, and mission to the Gentiles—profoundly influenced his view on authority as expressed in Romans 13:1. His experiences as a Pharisee, Roman citizen, and apostle shaped a theology that emphasizes God’s sovereignty over all earthly powers, a perspective nuanced by both his practical engagement with Roman governance and his eschatological vision of Christ’s ultimate reign. In this passage, Paul’s outlook is informed by the intersections of his Jewish theological roots, Roman legal understanding, and missionary pragmatism, culminating in a vision that advocates respect for secular authorities within a framework of divine sovereignty.
1. Jewish Theological Foundation: Authority and Divine Sovereignty
As a Pharisee educated in Jewish law, Paul was deeply embedded in a tradition that viewed all authority as ultimately derived from God. This background informed his conviction that God is sovereign over all rulers, even those outside a covenant with Israel. The Hebrew Bible presents examples where God raises up and removes rulers (e.g., the stories of Saul and David) and uses foreign empires (like Babylon and Persia) for His purposes. Passages such as those in Jeremiah and Daniel even encourage submission to foreign powers as part of God’s broader plan. Paul’s theological stance suggests that earthly rulers, regardless of their personal beliefs, may serve divine ends, reinforcing his view that God’s authority extends over all nations.
2. Roman Citizenship: Practical and Legal Implications
Paul’s Roman citizenship afforded him significant privileges and protections under Roman law, which he strategically utilized during his ministry (e.g., in Acts 22:25-29, where he avoids flogging by declaring his citizenship). His citizenship likely gave Paul a more complex view of secular authority, allowing him to see both the benefits and obligations that came with being part of the Empire. Roman governance, while flawed, provided Paul with a legal system that upheld certain rights, which he used to protect himself and further his mission. His Roman identity could have contributed to his pragmatic encouragement of Christians to respect civil order, working within the structures of governance rather than rebelling against them.
3. Christian Apostleship and Eschatological Vision
Paul’s primary focus as an apostle was establishing Christian communities and promoting a Christ-centered life. He often encouraged believers to live peaceably and avoid unnecessary conflicts with the state, reflecting his eschatological vision: the expectation of Christ’s return and the ultimate fulfillment of God’s kingdom. For Paul, the believer’s primary allegiance was to Christ, yet he also emphasized a non-confrontational stance toward secular rulers. In passages like 1 Corinthians 9:22-23, Paul promotes adapting to cultural contexts to spread the Gospel. Submission to authority, in his view, enabled Christians to be seen as peace-loving, responsible citizens—a reputation he believed would facilitate the Gospel’s spread.
4. Missionary Pragmatism
Throughout his letters, Paul emphasizes the importance of reducing social friction and promoting harmony within the Christian community. His guidance in Romans 13:1 reflects this pragmatism: he sought to help believers avoid unnecessary persecution by living in compliance with secular authorities. Paul’s approach here is consistent with his broader teachings on respecting social conventions unless they directly conflict with allegiance to Christ, as seen in his guidance on issues like marriage, food sacrificed to idols, and circumcision. By advising submission to authorities, Paul provided a practical strategy to avoid societal conflict while remaining faithful to the Christian mission.
In Romans 13:1, Paul’s background and theological framework lend weight to his perspective that secular authorities have a place within God’s order, even if they don’t fully embody divine principles. His unique experiences allowed him to see government as a structure necessary for social order and a realm where God’s sovereignty operates indirectly. His advice for Christians to submit to authorities aligns with his belief that all authority ultimately falls under God’s control. This perspective is shaped by a blend of Jewish theological understanding, Roman pragmatism, and his overarching mission to spread the Gospel, encouraging Christians to live peacefully within the Roman Empire.
Philosophical and Theological Influences on Paul’s Vision
Paul’s vision in Romans 13:1 is predominantly theological, grounded in his belief in God’s sovereignty and divine order. Nevertheless, philosophical themes also emerge, such as justice, order, and ethical conduct, which he reframes within a theological context. Here’s how both theology and philosophy contribute to Paul’s stance on submission to governing authorities:
1. Theological Foundations: God’s Sovereignty and Divine Order
Paul’s view on authority is primarily theological, rooted in the belief that God is the ultimate source of all power and authority. His assertion in Romans 13:1 that “there is no authority except that which God has established” reflects a conviction that God governs all structures of authority, echoing the Jewish belief in a sovereign, actively involved God. Paul perceives earthly authority as part of a divine order, which serves to maintain peace and justice in society. His view implies that even imperfect authorities can contribute to God’s plan, aligning with Old Testament narratives where God uses non-Israelite rulers to accomplish divine purposes. Furthermore, Paul’s eschatological vision of Christ’s eventual return underscores his belief that submission to authority is a temporary measure, as God’s kingdom will ultimately replace all earthly systems.
2. Philosophical Influences: Justice, Order, and Practical Ethics
Paul’s call for submission to authorities resonates with Greco-Roman concepts of governance as necessary for societal order and justice. While his stance is rooted in theology, it echoes Stoic ideals that emphasize living in harmony with natural and societal order. Although Paul’s perspective is theologically driven, this overlap would have made his message relatable to his Roman audience. Additionally, by calling rulers “God’s servants for good,” Paul reflects an ideal found in classical philosophy: that just rulers serve the common good. This concept aligns with Greek philosophical ideals on justice but diverges in its theological grounding, as Paul sees rulers as instruments of divine order rather than embodiments of rational virtue.
3. Interplay between Theology and Philosophy in Paul’s Vision
Paul’s teachings imply a form of “dual citizenship”: Christians are called to live responsibly within secular society while maintaining a higher allegiance to God. This reflects a moral hierarchy that aligns with philosophical concepts of higher principles governing conduct, yet Paul’s allegiance is theological. His primary emphasis is on the sovereignty of God, to whom all authorities are ultimately accountable. Moreover, his non-confrontational stance aligns with Stoic ideals of accepting one’s circumstances, but Paul’s reasoning is theological: peaceful conduct reflects positively on the Gospel and avoids unnecessary suffering for the Christian community.
4. Theological and Philosophical Tensions in Paul’s Vision
Paul’s nuanced view respects the idea of secular authority but stops short of equating it with divine justice. He believes that secular governments may not always embody virtue, but they still function under God’s sovereignty. This view diverges from Greek philosophy, where rulers were expected to reflect moral virtue, and instead aligns with a theological understanding that God can use any authority—good or flawed—for His purposes. For Paul, the legitimacy of secular powers is not based on their intrinsic moral quality but on God’s permission for them to exist within His broader plan.
Paul’s vision in Romans 13:1 integrates his theological beliefs with philosophical themes, promoting a practical approach to authority that would have resonated with both Jewish and Greco-Roman audiences. By framing secular authority within God’s sovereign order, Paul offers a message that encourages Christians to be responsible citizens while maintaining a higher allegiance to God. Although philosophical ideas of justice and order are present, they are ultimately subsumed within a theological framework that places God as the ultimate authority. Paul’s teaching thus reflects a unique interplay of theology and philosophy, advocating for a peaceful coexistence with secular powers in anticipation of God’s kingdom.
Post-Reading Questions
How does Paul’s unique background shape his view on submission to governing authorities?
Explain the connections between his life experiences and his theological stance.
What might Paul’s stance on authority mean for Christians living under imperfect or secular governments?
Think about how his message could be interpreted in different political or social contexts.
Do you think Paul’s perspective could apply to other beliefs or religions that view authority as having a divine component? Why or why not?
Consider how similar or different religious traditions might interpret the relationship between divine will and earthly power.
How might Paul’s advice on peaceful submission to authorities serve his broader mission to spread the Gospel?
Discuss how a stance of respect and harmony could help or hinder the spread of his message within a diverse society.