Early Bird Ends 30 July | Only 20 Spots Available – Reserve Yours Today!
Coaching relationships don’t always fail in the coaching itself, they might and often do fail in the lack of clarity at the beginning.
Contracting is the foundation of effective coaching. It is the process where coach and client create a shared understanding of why we are here, how we will work together, what success looks like, and how we will know we are making progress.
At its core, contracting is not a formality. It is the container that holds the entire coaching relationship.
A strong coaching contract creates clarity in five key areas:
We define why coaching exists right now.
What brought you here?
Why now?
What feels most important to explore?
Purpose is not assumed. It is clarified and revisited.
We clearly define who does what.
The coach:
Does not give advice or instructions
Does not diagnose or provide therapy
Supports thinking, awareness, and reflection
Holds space, challenge, and structure
The client:
Owns their decisions
Brings real topics and context
Chooses what to act on
Is responsible for outcomes and actions
Coaching is a thinking partnership, not an instruction model.
We agree on what coaching is and is not.
Coaching is:
Forward-focused
Awareness-based
Action-oriented
Client-led
Coaching is not:
Therapy or psychological treatment
Consulting or expert advice
A guarantee of outcomes
The coach is not responsible for the client’s life decisions or results. The coach is responsible for the quality of thinking space created.
We define the practical container:
Session duration and frequency
Cost and payment terms
Confidentiality and its limits
Communication boundaries between sessions
Logistics (online, in-person, scheduling)
This creates stability so the coaching space can focus on thinking, not logistics.
We define how we will know coaching is working.
This includes:
Desired outcomes or direction of change
Behavioural shifts or decisions
Emotional or cognitive changes (clarity, confidence, awareness)
Observable indicators of progress
Success is not vague. It is defined, revisited, and refined over time.
A common misconception is that coaching is purely goal-setting.
At a deeper level, coaching is also about:
How you are thinking about the goal
What patterns influence your decisions
What assumptions shape your choices
What emotions and beliefs are driving behaviour
Sometimes the most important shift is not the goal itself, but the way a person relates to the goal.
We also contract on the relationship itself:
How you prefer to be challenged or supported
How you think best (reflection, action, discussion, silence)
What helps or hinders your thinking
How we give and receive feedback
This is often called the “working alliance,” and it is dynamic, not fixed.
We regularly ask:
“How are we working together right now, and is it helping your thinking?”
Coaching is not static.
As awareness increases, the original focus may no longer be the real focus.
We continuously re-contract:
What are we actually working on now?
Has the purpose shifted?
Is something more important emerging?
This makes coaching responsive rather than rigid.
While goals matter, coaching often moves beyond them into:
Awareness of patterns
Recognition of assumptions
Emotional and cognitive shifts
Identity-level insights
We focus less on just “what to do” and more on:
“How are you experiencing and interpreting this situation?”
Good coaching is not about fixing or leading.
It is about:
Staying present with what is emerging
Listening beyond words
Noticing shifts in thinking and emotion in real time
Allowing insight to arise rather than forcing direction
Sometimes the most powerful intervention is silence and reflection.
At deeper levels of coaching, we explore:
Who you are becoming through this situation
What meaning you are assigning to events
How your identity influences your decisions
What patterns you are ready to outgrow
This moves coaching from performance to transformation.
Accountability is not punishment or pressure.
It is reflection:
What did you commit to?
What happened when you acted or didn’t act?
What did you learn?
What will you adjust?
Progress is measured not only by completion, but by awareness gained through action.
Ultimately, contracting ensures that:
Expectations are aligned
Roles are clear
Boundaries are respected
Purpose is understood
Success is defined
The coaching space remains safe, structured, and flexible
Without contracting, coaching becomes unclear.
With strong contracting, coaching becomes powerful, focused, and deeply transformational.
A coaching contract is not just an agreement.
It is a shared commitment to:
“Think clearly, stay honest, remain aware, and allow meaningful change to emerge through conversation.”
Below is a peer assessment marking sheet for observing coaching contracting at ACC, PCC, and MCC levels, aligned with ICF-style expectations and your full contracting framework (admin, ethics, outcomes, alliance, awareness, emergence, identity, etc.).
It is designed so a coach can listen, tick behaviours, and give a score out of 7 per level.
Coach being assessed: _______________________
Observer: _______________________
Date: _______________________
Session type: Contracting (first session / re-contracting)
☐ Explained basic coaching purpose (what coaching is)
☐ Explained what coaching is NOT (therapy, advice, consulting)
☐ Set basic logistics (time, cost, duration, frequency)
☐ Mentioned confidentiality
☐ Clarified roles (coach vs client responsibility)
☐ Asked basic client expectation question
☐ Confirmed understanding of agreement
Mostly coach-led explanation
Administrative focus dominates
Limited exploration of learning or outcomes
Contract feels “one-way” or procedural
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Score: _______
☐ Co-created coaching purpose with client
☐ Explored client’s goals and motivations (“why now”)
☐ Defined success criteria with client (observable or experiential)
☐ Asked about learning style or how client thinks best
☐ Established working alliance (how coach + client work together)
☐ Clarified agenda ownership (client-led focus)
☐ Set accountability expectations (between-session action)
☐ Explored challenge preference (support vs challenge)
☐ Checked alignment and understanding of contract
☐ Agreed on process review or feedback loop
Shared ownership of agenda
Clear outcome definition
Structured yet collaborative conversation
Focus on clarity, alignment, and expectations
Some exploration of thinking and learning style
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Score: _______
☐ Contract treated as evolving (not fixed agreement)
☐ Coach explores how coach and client think together (meta-contracting)
☐ Focus shifts from goals to awareness or thinking patterns
☐ Coach invites reflection in real time (“what are you noticing now?”)
☐ Emergent themes allowed to reshape session direction
☐ Exploration of identity, meaning, or self-concept begins naturally
☐ Coach notices and uses relational dynamics (what’s happening between us)
☐ Systems/context awareness introduced (work, family, patterns)
☐ Process over outcome clearly emphasised
☐ Coach demonstrates presence over structure or control
☐ Contract is re-negotiated in session when needed
☐ Accountability reframed as learning and awareness (not compliance)
Fluid, dynamic contracting (not static checklist)
Strong presence and silence tolerance
Focus on “how the client is thinking”
Real-time awareness building
Shifts in direction based on emergence
Coaching relationship used as data
Depth beyond goals into identity/meaning
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Score: _______
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
ACC Score: _______ / 7
PCC Score: _______ / 7
MCC Score: _______ / 7
☐ ACC
☐ PCC
☐ Emerging PCC+
☐ MCC behaviours present
1–2: Minimal competence / unclear contracting
3–4: Basic functional contracting (ACC–early PCC)
5: Solid PCC-level contracting
6: Strong PCC with emerging MCC behaviours
7: Consistent MCC-level contracting (dynamic, emergent, presence-led)
Below is your complete coaching contracting facilitation guide.
For every line item on your ACC / PCC / MCC assessment sheet, I’ve given you:
2 practical questions OR coach statements
Designed so you can say them directly in session
Aligned to ICF ethics + PCC structure + MCC presence
“Coaching is a thinking partnership focused on helping you move forward. Does that make sense?”
“My role is to support your thinking, not to give advice or solutions.”
“Just to be clear, this is not therapy, consulting, or advice-giving.”
“You won’t be told what to do—we work through your thinking together.”
“Each session will be 60 minutes, and we’ll meet weekly unless we agree otherwise.”
“Let’s confirm the timing, cost, and structure so everything is clear upfront.”
“What we discuss stays confidential, except in legal or safety exceptions.”
“Your privacy is protected within professional ethical guidelines.”
“You bring your topics; I support your thinking process.”
“You are responsible for your decisions and actions; I’m responsible for the coaching space.”
“What are you hoping to get from coaching?”
“What would make this a valuable experience for you?”
“Does this all make sense so far?”
“Is there anything unclear about how we’ll work together?”
“What has brought you to coaching at this point in your life?”
“Let’s define together what you actually want from this process.”
“What is driving this desire for change right now?”
“What happens if nothing changes?”
“How will you know this coaching has been successful?”
“What will be different in your behaviour or thinking?”
“How do you typically process new ideas or decisions?”
“What helps you gain clarity when you feel stuck?”
“How do you want me to show up for you in this process?”
“What kind of coaching style supports you best?”
“What feels most important for us to focus on today?”
“You decide what we work on each session—what’s most alive for you?”
“What actions do you want to commit to between sessions?”
“How would you like to be held accountable?”
“How comfortable are you with being challenged on your thinking?”
“What does helpful challenge look like for you?”
“Are we aligned on what we are working toward?”
“Is there anything missing or unclear in our agreement?”
“We’ll regularly check if coaching is working for you—does that feel okay?”
“If something isn’t working, we’ll adjust together.”
“Let’s treat this as something we can keep refining as we go.”
“Our focus may change as new insight emerges.”
“How do you want us to think together in this space?”
“What helps or hinders your thinking when we talk like this?”
“What do you notice about how you are thinking right now?”
“What assumptions might be shaping that view?”
“What are you noticing in yourself as you say that?”
“What just shifted for you in this moment?”
“What feels most alive or important right now in this conversation?”
“Has your focus shifted as we’ve been talking?”
“What does this situation say about how you see yourself?”
“Who are you becoming through this challenge?”
“What’s it like for you talking about this with me right now?”
“What do you notice happening between us as we explore this?”
“What systems or environments might be influencing this pattern?”
“Where else in your life does this show up?”
“Let’s focus less on solving and more on how you are seeing this.”
“What matters most is how you are thinking about this, not just the outcome.”
“Let’s stay with what is emerging rather than forcing direction.”
“What feels most present right now in you?”
“Given what’s come up, do we need to adjust what we’re focusing on?”
“Let’s re-contract based on what is emerging here.”
“What did you learn from what you did or didn’t do?”
“What does this experience reveal about your thinking patterns?”
ACC = clarity + structure + ethics
PCC = shared meaning + outcomes + alliance
MCC = awareness + emergence + relational thinking space
Below is a full first-session contracting script you can use verbatim with a client. It integrates PCC structure + MCC presence, and includes:
Administration (logistics, ethics, boundaries)
Clear explanation of coaching (what it is / isn’t)
Purpose + agenda + success criteria
Working alliance (how we think together)
Learning style
Accountability agreements
Re-contracting language
Awareness + identity-level coaching
Process over goals
Real-time reflection moments
Flexibility and emergence
This is written as a natural dialogue, not a checklist.
Coach:
“Before we begin working together, I’d like to take some time to set the foundation for how this coaching relationship will work. This helps ensure clarity, safety, and effectiveness for both of us.”
“What we’re doing here is not just a conversation about goals—it’s a structured thinking partnership. So we’ll define how we work together, what coaching is and isn’t, and what success looks like for you.”
Coach:
“Let me explain what coaching is, and what it is not, so we are fully aligned.”
“Coaching is a forward-focused, reflective thinking partnership. My role is to support your thinking, awareness, and decision-making—not to give advice, solve your problems, or tell you what to do.”
“This is not therapy, consulting, or mentoring. I will not diagnose, prescribe solutions, or take responsibility for your decisions or outcomes.”
“You remain fully responsible for your choices, actions, and results. My responsibility is to hold a clear, safe, and high-quality thinking space.”
“Does that make sense so far?”
Client:
“Yes, that makes sense.”
Coach:
“Let’s also agree on the practical structure.”
“We’ll typically meet for [X minutes] sessions, [weekly/biweekly]. We’ll meet online/in person depending on what we agreed.”
“Confidentiality is maintained except where there are legal or ethical obligations to disclose risk of harm.”
“Sessions begin and end on time, and there is a cancellation policy in place which we’ve shared.”
“Your role is to bring topics that matter to you. My role is to hold the coaching space and support your thinking process.”
“Is everything clear and acceptable so far?”
Client:
“Yes, that all works for me.”
Coach:
“Let’s explore what brought you here.”
“What made you decide that now is the right time for coaching?”
Client:
“I feel stuck in my career and I’m not making decisions I need to make.”
Coach:
“And if coaching was useful for you, what would change as a result of our work together?”
Client:
“I would have clarity and start taking action instead of overthinking.”
Coach:
“Let’s define what success will look like so we both know what we are working toward.”
“How will you know that coaching has been valuable for you?”
Client:
“I’ll be making decisions faster and feeling more confident about them.”
Coach:
“What would someone close to you notice about you if that shift had happened?”
Client:
“I’d be more decisive and less anxious.”
Coach:
“In this coaching relationship, you own the agenda. You decide what is most important to bring each session.”
“My role is not to direct the conversation, but to support your thinking about what matters most.”
“If we ever need to, we can shift or refine the focus together in the moment.”
Coach:
“I’d also like to understand how we can work best together.”
“When you are thinking through something complex, what helps you most?”
Client:
“Talking things out and being challenged, but not pushed too hard.”
Coach:
“And what tends to block your thinking or shut you down?”
Client:
“If I feel judged or rushed.”
Coach:
“That’s important.”
“So let’s agree that I will slow you down when needed, challenge assumptions respectfully, and avoid giving advice or rushing solutions.”
“And I want you to feel free to tell me in the moment if something I say doesn’t work for you.”
Coach:
“How do you tend to learn or gain clarity best?”
Client:
“I need reflection time after talking things through.”
Coach:
“And when it comes to accountability, what works best for you?”
Client:
“Being asked what I committed to and reflecting on whether I followed through.”
Coach:
“So between sessions, you will decide your own actions, and we will reflect on what you learned from them—not just whether you completed them.”
Coach:
“One important part of coaching is that we don’t only focus on goals.”
“We also focus on how you are thinking about those goals.”
“Sometimes the most important shift is not the decision itself, but the awareness of what is influencing the decision.”
“So we will pay attention to your thinking patterns, assumptions, emotions, and internal responses as they arise.”
Coach:
“As we work, I may occasionally pause and ask what you are noticing in yourself—your thoughts, emotions, or reactions in the moment.”
“This is not to interrupt you, but to increase awareness of how you are experiencing your thinking.”
“Is that okay with you?”
Client:
“Yes.”
Coach:
“One final thing—our focus may change over time.”
“As you gain insight, what you think you need at the beginning may not be what is actually most important later.”
“So we will regularly check in and ask:
‘Is this still what we need to focus on?’”
“This means the contract is not fixed—it evolves as you evolve.”
Coach:
“At times, we may also go beyond decisions and goals into questions like:
Who are you becoming through this situation?
What patterns are repeating?
What meaning are you making of what is happening?”
“This is not about analysing you—it’s about increasing awareness of how you are interpreting your experience.”
Coach:
“Let me summarise what we’ve agreed on:
We are in a thinking partnership, not advice-giving or therapy
You own the agenda and decisions
I support your thinking, awareness, and reflection
We define success in terms of clarity, confidence, and action
We will explore both goals and how you are thinking about them
We will reflect on learning, not just task completion
We will stay flexible as new insights emerge
We will regularly check how the coaching process is working for you”
“Does that accurately reflect what you understand and agree to?”
Client:
“Yes, it does.”
Coach:
“Great. Then we have a clear foundation to work from.”
“Before we move into coaching, I’d like to ask one final question:
What feels most important for us to start exploring today?”
Client:
“I think I want to start with why I keep delaying decisions.”
Coach:
“Okay. Let’s begin there.”
This script achieves:
Full ICF PCC-level contracting structure
Embedded MCC meta-contracting and emergence
Clear ethical boundaries and administration
Strong working alliance formation
Deep psychological safety + clarity
Seamless transition into coaching
Here is a progression of contracting depth in coaching—from basic administrative agreement (Level 1) through collaborative psychological contracting (Level 2) to MCC-level co-created, reflective, and systemic contracting (Level 3).
Below is a practical coaching script + question bank you can actually use, structured across those levels, plus sample phrases you can say out loud in session.
(COMENSA / ICF baseline: clarity, ethics, boundaries, logistics)
You are establishing:
Purpose of coaching
Roles and responsibilities
Confidentiality and ethics
Time, frequency, fees, cancellation
Boundaries of coaching vs therapy/advice
“Before we begin, I’d like to set up how we’ll work together so we’re both clear on expectations, boundaries, and how coaching will function.”
“What has brought you to coaching at this point in your life?”
“What would make this coaching relationship valuable for you?”
“What do you understand coaching to be—and not be?”
“Have you had coaching before? What worked or didn’t work?”
“What do you expect from me as your coach?”
“What responsibilities do you believe you have in this process?”
“Are you comfortable with confidentiality boundaries as explained?”
“Are there any constraints I should be aware of (time, availability, commitments)?”
“How would you like to structure our sessions—frequency and duration?”
(This is where most professional coaching lives: shared agenda, outcomes, alignment, learning style, accountability)
Clarifying what the client REALLY wants (not just surface goals)
Exploring motivation and readiness
Co-designing success indicators
Understanding learning style and challenge tolerance
Aligning expectations of process
“What would you like to explore today that would make this session meaningful?”
“If this session was extremely valuable, what would have changed by the end?”
“What’s underneath that goal—what is it really about for you?”
“Why now?”
“Let’s go beneath the surface and understand what really matters here.”
“How will you know this coaching has been successful for you?”
“What will be different in your behaviour, thinking, or decisions?”
“What does success look like in observable terms?”
“What would someone close to you notice has changed?”
“How do you typically learn best—through reflection, action, structure, or discussion?”
“Do you prefer direct challenge, gentle exploration, or a mix?”
“When you’re stuck, what tends to help you shift?”
“How do you like to be held accountable?”
“How open are you to being challenged in this space?”
“What does helpful challenge look like for you?”
“Where do you tend to resist change?”
“What might stop you from following through?”
“Are we aligned on what we’re working toward today?”
“Is there anything important you’re not saying yet that could affect this work?”
“What would you like me to keep noticing or holding you accountable for?”
(Deep presence, co-creation, emergence, meta-awareness, identity-level work)
Contracting is ongoing, not one-time
Focus is on who the client is becoming
You co-create meaning in real time
You work with emotions, resistance, patterns, identity
You constantly re-contract based on emergence
“What kind of thinking partnership would best serve you right now?”
“How should I be with you for you to do your best thinking?”
“What tends to shut you down in conversations like this?”
“What helps you feel safe enough to be fully honest?”
“Let’s not just focus on the goal—let’s design how we think together.”
“What are you noticing in yourself as you say that?”
“What emotion is present right now?”
“What just shifted for you in this moment?”
“What is this situation revealing about you?”
“Who are you becoming through this challenge?”
“What does this situation say about how you see yourself?”
“What version of you is trying to emerge here?”
“What identity are you letting go of?”
“Where else in your life does this pattern show up?”
“What system (work, family, beliefs) is reinforcing this?”
“What do you get from staying stuck here?”
“What is this protecting you from?”
“Has what we’re focusing on changed as we’ve spoken?”
“Do we need to adjust our direction based on what’s surfaced?”
“What feels most alive to explore now?”
“Let’s re-contract based on what has emerged in this conversation.”
“What have you learned about yourself today?”
“What will you take forward beyond this session?”
“What might you do differently as a result?”
“What are you committing to—not just thinking, but doing?”
“What did you notice about how you showed up in this conversation?”
“What surprised you about your own thinking today?”
You can run a session like this:
“Let’s align on how we’ll work together today.”
“What would make this session most valuable?”
“What is really going on underneath this?”
“What are you noticing right now as we talk?”
“What is this revealing about you?”
“What will you do differently after this?”
“What do we need to carry forward or adjust for next time?”
Level 1: “Are we agreed on logistics?”
Level 2: “What do you want to achieve and how will we know?”
Level 3: “How are we thinking together, and who are you becoming in the process?”
Below is a PCC–MCC level first-session coaching contracting script designed to reflect ICF core competencies, COMENSA ethical contracting expectations, and MCC-level presence (meta-contracting, emergence, and co-creation).
It is written as a real dialogue you can actually use, including:
Coach opening script
Administrative contracting (Level 1)
Psychological contracting (PCC Level 2)
MCC-level meta-contracting and co-creation
Example client responses
Smooth progression into coaching
“Before we begin working together, I’d like to take some time to set up how this coaching relationship will function. This is so that we are both clear on expectations, boundaries, and how we create value together.”
“I’ll explain what coaching is and isn’t, how confidentiality works, and then we’ll explore what you want from this relationship—not just today, but overall.”
“Coaching is a forward-focused, thinking partnership. My role is not to give advice, diagnose, or tell you what to do. Instead, I will help you think more clearly, see blind spots, and access your own insight and decisions.”
“This is not therapy, mentoring, or consulting. We don’t go into clinical treatment, past trauma processing, or me giving you expert solutions. Instead, we work with your thinking, awareness, choices, and action.”
“Does that distinction make sense to you so far?”
“Yes, that makes sense. I’ve done mentoring before, so this feels different.”
“Let’s cover the practical agreements that allow this space to function well.”
Sessions are 60 minutes
Frequency: weekly / biweekly (confirm)
Confidentiality is maintained unless legal/ethical exceptions apply
You are responsible for your decisions and actions
Coaching can be paused or ended at any time with notice
Payment / cancellation terms (if applicable)
“Is there anything here you want to clarify or adjust before we continue?”
“No, that’s clear. I’m comfortable with that.”
“What has brought you to coaching at this point in your life?”
“I feel stuck in my career. I know I want to change direction, but I keep hesitating and second-guessing myself.”
“If this coaching was truly valuable, what would be different in your life as a result?”
“I would have clarity on my direction and actually be taking steps instead of overthinking.”
“What is the real cost of staying stuck in this pattern right now?”
“I’m losing time. I feel like I’m not progressing, and it’s affecting my confidence.”
“Let’s define what success would look like so we know what we’re working toward.”
“How will you know this coaching has been successful for you?”
“If I’ve made a clear decision about my next career move and started taking action within the next few weeks.”
“What would someone close to you notice about you if that shift had happened?”
“I’d be more decisive, less anxious, and more confident in how I talk about my future.”
“When you are at your best in thinking or problem-solving, how do you prefer to work?”
“I like structured conversations. I think out loud, but I also need time to reflect after.”
“When you feel challenged, what tends to support you most?”
“Direct but respectful challenge. I don’t like being pushed aggressively.”
“How do you want to be held accountable in this process?”
“I like being asked what I committed to and being asked why I didn’t follow through if I didn’t.”
“So far, I’m hearing that you want clarity, structured thinking space, and accountability that supports action. Is that accurate?”
“Yes, that sounds right.”
“Is there anything important about how you think, make decisions, or get stuck that would help me support you better?”
“I tend to overthink and delay decisions until I feel 100% sure—which never really happens.”
“Let’s take this a step deeper. Beyond goals and outcomes—how do you want us to think together in this space?”
“I’m not sure what you mean.”
“For example—when you are uncertain or stuck, do you want me to slow you down, challenge your assumptions, reflect patterns, or help you explore more possibilities?”
“I think I want you to slow me down and challenge my assumptions. I rush to conclusions.”
“And what might shut you down in a conversation like this?”
“If I feel judged or like I’m being told what to do.”
“That’s helpful. So we’re agreeing that this is a thinking partnership where we slow down assumptions, challenge thinking respectfully, and avoid directive advice. Does that feel right?”
“Yes, that feels right.”
“As we’re speaking, what are you noticing in yourself right now?”
“I actually feel relieved. Like I don’t have to figure everything out alone.”
“That relief—what do you think that’s telling you about what you’ve been carrying into this situation?”
“That I’ve been trying to solve everything in my head without support.”
“Given what’s emerging right now, do we need to adjust what we think we’re working on?”
“Maybe less about ‘finding the right career’ and more about learning how to think through decisions better.”
“That’s an important shift. Let’s re-contract that as our focus.”
“Let me summarise what we’ve created together so far.”
“You came in wanting clarity around career direction and action. What’s emerging is that the deeper work is developing your ability to make decisions without overthinking and self-doubt taking over.”
“Our agreement is:
We work as a thinking partnership, not advice-giving
We slow down your decision-making process to improve clarity
We challenge assumptions respectfully
We track patterns of overthinking and hesitation
You commit to experimenting with action between sessions”
“Does that accurately reflect what we’ve agreed?”
“Yes, that’s exactly it.”
“Before we close today, what are you taking away from this conversation about yourself?”
“That I don’t actually need more answers—I need a better way of thinking.”
“What do you want to commit to between now and next session?”
“I’ll make one decision I’ve been avoiding and reflect on how I made it rather than whether it was perfect.”
“Great. We’ll use our next session to explore what you learned from that process, not just the outcome.”
Clear outcomes and success criteria
Structured contracting
Learning style exploration
Accountability agreements
Meta-contracting (how we think together)
Emergent re-contracting during session
Identity-level insight (“how you think about thinking”)
Non-linear coaching focus (process over goal fixation)
Awareness-based reflection in real time
Session duration and frequency agreed
Fees, payment terms, cancellation policy
Confidentiality boundaries explained
Exceptions to confidentiality (legal/ethical limits)
Mode of coaching (online, in-person, hybrid)
Roles and responsibilities clarified (coach vs client)
Scope of coaching defined (non-therapy, non-consulting, non-advisory)
Client’s presenting issue or reason for coaching
Initial broad goals or focus areas
Exploration of what “success” might look like
Clarification of urgency or timing (“why now?”)
Alignment of expectations between coach and client
Clearly defined coaching outcomes (observable or experiential)
Indicators of success (what will be different)
Behavioural shifts expected (not just insights)
Emotional/mental shifts (confidence, clarity, etc.)
External impact (work, relationships, decisions)
Client-defined measures of progress
Agreement on session focus each time
Clarification of what is most important today
Prioritisation of topics if multiple issues exist
Agreement that agenda is client-led
Permission for coach to redirect focus when needed
Coaching style preferences (structured, exploratory, challenging, etc.)
Level of directness and challenge desired
Communication preferences (pace, reflection time, silence)
How feedback will be given and received
Trust-building agreements (honesty, openness, transparency)
How the client best processes insight (reflection/action/talking)
How awareness will be developed in sessions
Agreement that insight → awareness → action cycle is expected
Encouragement of reflection between sessions
Recognition of patterns, beliefs, and assumptions
What actions the client commits to between sessions
How progress will be tracked
How accountability will be held (self-reporting, reflection, review)
What happens if actions are not completed (non-judgmental exploration)
Focus on learning from action, not just performance
Coach does not diagnose, treat, or prescribe
Client retains full autonomy over decisions
Coaching is voluntary and can be ended anytime
Respectful communication boundaries
Awareness of dual relationships or conflicts of interest
Regular check-ins on coaching effectiveness
Permission to adjust coaching direction if needed
Feedback loops between coach and client
Reflection on what is working/not working
Adaptation of coaching style or focus
Contract is revisited and refined over time
Goals may evolve as awareness deepens
New insights can shift direction mid-engagement
Coach and client co-adjust expectations continuously
PCC-level contracting =
“Clear administrative agreement + defined outcomes + shared working alliance + ongoing review + flexible co-created direction.”
At MCC level (Master Certified Coach – ICF), contracting stops being a one-time “setup agreement” and becomes a living, co-evolving relational and perceptual field. The emphasis shifts from structure and outcomes → awareness, emergence, systems, and how thinking happens between coach and client.
Below is the structured MCC-level contracting elements list.
Basic session logistics agreed (time, format, frequency)
Confidentiality and ethical boundaries acknowledged
Roles understood (coach does not advise/diagnose)
Contract exists but is not the focus
Administrative elements fade into the background once established
Purpose is not fixed at intake
“What are we working on?” is revisited regularly
Initial goals are treated as hypotheses, not fixed targets
Focus may shift mid-session based on insight
The “real work” is discovered, not defined upfront
Emphasis on how the client is thinking, not just what they want
Focus on patterns of meaning-making and interpretation
Attention to awareness shifts as primary success marker
Outcomes are secondary to transformation in perception
Success = expanded awareness, not just goal completion
Agreement on the thinking partnership itself
Exploration of how coach and client influence each other
Real-time adjustment of coaching stance and style
“How are we working right now?” becomes an active question
Shared responsibility for quality of dialogue
Exploration of external systems influencing the client (family, work, culture)
Awareness of patterns repeating across contexts
Recognition that client issues are part of larger systems
Contract includes attention to relational and environmental dynamics
Focus extends beyond individual mindset into relational field
Continuous re-negotiation of focus during sessions
“What is emerging right now?” guides direction
Coach follows energy, emotion, and insight shifts
Client and coach jointly abandon outdated agendas
The contract evolves moment-to-moment
Commitment to increasing awareness as the core goal
Attention to thoughts, emotions, sensations, and patterns
Insight is treated as a doorway, not a conclusion
Client learns to observe themselves in real time
Awareness is valued over resolution
Exploration of “who the client is becoming”
Work with identity narratives and self-concept
Examination of meaning-making frameworks
Attention to shifts in perception of self and others
Contract includes transformation of worldview, not just behaviour
Awareness of what is happening between coach and client
Use of the coaching relationship as a mirror
Noticing transference, resistance, alignment, tension
Coach uses presence and self-awareness as intervention tool
Relationship itself becomes part of the coaching content
Accountability is not just task-based
Focus on insights, awareness shifts, and experimentation
“What did you notice?” is more important than “Did you do it?”
Learning from breakdowns is central
Progress is tracked through transformation, not compliance
Regular reflection on how coaching is working
Client reflects on their own experience of coaching itself
Coach and client jointly evaluate effectiveness in real time
Contract is rewritten as understanding deepens
Meta-learning becomes part of the process
Agreement that presence matters more than technique
Silence, intuition, and emergence are part of the process
Coach trusts not-knowing as a working stance
Less reliance on structure, more on awareness of the moment
Coaching unfolds rather than follows a plan
MCC-level contracting =
“A continuously evolving, awareness-based, relational agreement where purpose, direction, and meaning emerge in real time rather than being predefined.”
Administrative contracting: Let’s agree on how we’ll work together, including time, boundaries, confidentiality, and responsibilities.
Coaching purpose contract: Let’s clarify what brought you here and what you want from coaching right now.
Outcome / success contract: Let’s define what success will look like so we both know what change we are aiming for.
Agenda / session contract: Let’s agree on what is most important for us to focus on in today’s session.
Working alliance contract: Let’s agree on how we will work together in terms of communication, challenge, and support.
Learning and awareness contract: Let’s explore how you learn best and how insight will turn into awareness and action.
Accountability contract: Let’s agree on what actions you will take between sessions and how we will track them.
Ethical / boundary contract: Let’s be clear on my role as coach, what I do and don’t do, and your autonomy in decisions.
Process review contract: Let’s agree to regularly reflect on how coaching is working for you and adjust if needed.
Contract flexibility: Let’s stay open to refining our goals as your awareness and needs evolve.
Living administrative contract: Let’s establish the basic structure so it supports us but doesn’t limit how we think together.
Emergent purpose contract: Let’s stay open to what is actually emerging rather than locking into a fixed agenda.
Process-over-outcome contract: Let’s focus more on how you are thinking and seeing things than just what you want to achieve.
Meta-contracting: Let’s explore how we are working together and what helps or hinders your thinking in this space.
Systemic contracting: Let’s include awareness of the wider systems influencing your situation and choices.
Emergence contract: Let’s allow the focus of our work to shift as new insight emerges in the conversation.
Awareness contract: Let’s use this space to deepen your awareness of your thoughts, emotions, and patterns as they arise.
Identity and meaning contract: Let’s explore who you are becoming and how you are making meaning of this situation.
Relational field contract: Let’s pay attention to what is happening between us as part of the coaching process.
Non-linear accountability: Let’s focus on what you notice, learn, and shift rather than only what you complete.
Reflective contracting loop: Let’s keep checking how this coaching is working for you and what needs to change.
Presence-based contracting: Let’s stay present to what is unfolding rather than relying on a fixed plan or structure.
90-Minute Lesson Plan: Contracting (Macro & Micro) – ICF Aligned
Learning Outcomes
By the end, participants will:
Understand what contracting is and why it matters
Distinguish macro vs micro contracting
Apply ICF contracting competency in real conversations
Conduct a clean micro contract in under 3 minutes
Use a structured macro contract template
Q: What does Client Centered Mean in The Context of Contracting?
Client-centred in the context of contracting means:
The client defines what the coaching is about, what success looks like, and what matters — not the coach.
It’s a core expectation from International Coaching Federation under “Establishes and Maintains Agreements” and “Embodies a Coaching Mindset.”
Plain English Definition
Client-centred contracting =
The client owns the agenda, the outcome, and the meaning of success. The coach facilitates clarity.
What It Looks Like in Practice
1. The Client Sets the Topic
Client-centred:
“I want to figure out how to handle my boss”
Not client-centred:
“Let’s focus on your communication skills today”
The coach does not decide the direction
2. The Client Defines the Outcome
Client-centred:
“I want to leave with a clear plan for that conversation”
Not client-centred:
“Let’s aim to improve your confidence”
Outcome must be personally meaningful to the client, not generic
3. The Client Defines Success
Client-centred:
“If I feel clear and less stressed, this will be useful”
Not client-centred:
“We’ll know this worked if you have 3 action steps”
Success is subjective and owned by the client
4. The Coach Uses Neutral, Non-Leading Questions
Client-centred questions:
“What would you like to focus on?”
“What would make this session valuable?”
“What’s important about this for you?”
NOT client-centred:
“Do you want to work on your time management?”
“Should we look at your goals?”
Even subtle suggestions = shifting control away from the client
Key Principle
The moment the coach suggests the topic, outcome, or direction — it stops being client-centred
How It Shows Up in Macro vs Micro Contracting
Macro (Big Picture)
Client-centred means:
Goals are defined by the client (not imposed)
Coaching purpose aligns to what the client wants
Client agrees to how they want to be supported
Micro (Session Level)
Client-centred means:
Every session starts with:
Client topic
Client outcome
Client success criteria
Quick Comparison
Coach-Led
Client-Centred
“Let’s work on…”
“What would you like to focus on?”
Generic goals
Personal, meaningful outcomes
Coach defines success
Client defines success
Direction imposed
Direction emerges
Common Mistakes (Very Important)
1. Disguised Leading
“What would you like to focus on… maybe your workload?”
Still coach-led
2. Accepting Vague Answers
Client: “I just want clarity”
Weak coach: moves on
Strong coach:
“What kind of clarity specifically?”
3. Rushing Contracting
Leads to:
Shallow sessions
Advice-giving
No measurable outcome
Simple Test You Can Use
Ask yourself:
“Did the client clearly define what success looks like in their own words?”
If no → it’s not client-centred.
One-Line Summary
Client-centred contracting is:
Letting the client set the destination, while you manage the process.
----
0–10 min — Opening: Why Contracting Matters
Objective:
Create urgency and relevance
Ask:
“What happens when a coaching session has no clear agreement?”
Capture:
Rambling conversations
Advice-giving
No outcomes
Client dissatisfaction
Teaching Point:
Contracting = structure + clarity + accountability
10–25 min — ICF Contracting Explained
ICF Core Competency:
International Coaching Federation
“Establishes and Maintains Agreements”
What Contracting Actually Is:
A mutual agreement on:
What we are doing
How we will do it
What success looks like
What Contracting is NOT:
Admin only
Legal paperwork only
A once-off activity
Key Principle:
“No contract = no coaching, just conversation”
25–40 min — Macro vs Micro Contracting
Macro Contracting (Big Picture)
When:
Before coaching starts
Covers:
Purpose of coaching
Roles (coach vs client)
Confidentiality
Boundaries
Logistics (time, fees, duration)
Accountability
Micro Contracting (Session Level)
When:
At the start of EVERY session
Covers:
Session focus
Desired outcome
Measures of success
Comparison Table:
Macro
Micro
Whole journey
One session
Formal
Conversational
Broad goals
Specific focus
Done once
Done every session
Teaching Point:
Macro sets the container
Micro sets the direction
40–55 min — Micro Contracting Deep Dive
The 3-Part Micro Contract
Topic
“What would you like to focus on?”
Outcome
“What do you want to achieve?”
Success Measure
“What would make this session valuable?”
Strong vs Weak Examples
Weak:
“So what’s up today?”
“Let’s just chat”
Strong:
“What specifically do you want to walk away with today?”
“How will you know this was useful?”
Common Mistakes:
Accepting vague answers
Leading the topic
Skipping success criteria
55–70 min — Micro Contract Practice
Exercise (Pairs):
5 minutes per round
Only do contracting (no coaching)
Coach must:
Clarify topic
Define outcome
Confirm success measure
Observer Checklist:
Was outcome specific?
Did coach avoid leading?
Was success measurable?
70–80 min — Macro Contract Breakdown
Walk through the structure (below template)
Emphasize:
Clarity reduces conflict
Boundaries increase trust
Ownership stays with client
80–88 min — Rapid Practice (Integration)
Activity:
1 full micro contract (2–3 mins)
Immediate feedback
88–90 min — Wrap-Up
Key Takeaways:
Contracting = foundation of coaching
Micro contracting = most underused skill
Clarity upfront saves time later
MODEL MACRO COACHING CONTRACT (ICF-ALIGNED)
Coaching Agreement
1. Purpose of Coaching
Coaching is a collaborative, client-driven process designed to support the client in achieving personal and/or professional goals, increasing self-awareness, and taking effective action.
2. Roles & Responsibilities
Coach:
Facilitates thinking through questions and reflection
Maintains confidentiality
Does not provide advice, therapy, or consulting unless explicitly agreed
Client:
Is responsible for their own decisions and actions
Comes prepared and engaged
Owns outcomes and progress
3. Confidentiality
All coaching conversations are confidential unless:
Required by law
There is risk of harm to the client or others
4. Coaching Process
Sessions will be conducted (weekly/bi-weekly/monthly)
Each session will last (e.g., 60 minutes)
Sessions will begin with a clear focus (micro contract)
5. Duration of Engagement
Coaching engagement will run for (e.g., 3–6 months)
Progress will be reviewed periodically
6. Fees & Payment (if applicable)
Fee per session/package: ______
Payment terms: ______
7. Cancellation Policy
Minimum notice required: ______ (e.g., 24 hours)
Late cancellations may be charged
8. Boundaries
Coaching is not therapy, mentoring, or consulting
Coach does not diagnose or treat mental health conditions
9. Accountability
Client agrees to take action between sessions
Coach may check in on commitments
10. Agreement
By engaging in coaching, both parties agree to the terms above.
Client Name: ______
Coach Name: ______
Date: ______
Trainer Notes (Important)
Push participants to:
Get specific outcomes
Avoid vague language
Stop them when they:
Drift into coaching before contracting is clear
Reinforce:
“If the outcome is unclear, keep contracting”
Here’s a practical, certification-ready assessment rubric for Contracting (Macro & Micro) aligned to International Coaching Federation competencies.
This is designed so you can:
Assess beginner → advanced coaches
Use it in live sessions, recordings, or exams
Tie directly to ICF PCC-level expectations
ICF Contracting Assessment Rubric (Macro & Micro)
How to Use
Score each category 1–5
Use for:
Observed coaching sessions
Peer reviews
Certification assessments
Scoring Scale (Applies to All Criteria)
Score
Level
Description
1
Poor
No evidence / ineffective
2
Basic
Inconsistent / unclear
3
Competent
Adequate / functional
4
Strong
Clear / client-centered
5
Mastery
Precise / natural / fully aligned with ICF
SECTION 1: MACRO CONTRACTING (Pre-Coaching Agreement)
1. Clarity of Coaching Purpose
Score
Indicators
1
No clear purpose stated
3
General purpose stated but vague
5
Clear, specific, client-centered purpose defined
2. Roles & Responsibilities Defined
Score
Indicators
1
Roles not discussed
3
Basic explanation (coach vs client)
5
Clear distinction; client ownership emphasized
3. Boundaries & Scope
Score
Indicators
1
No boundaries set
3
Some mention (e.g. not therapy)
5
Clear, confident boundaries with examples
4. Confidentiality Explained
Score
Indicators
1
Not addressed
3
Mentioned briefly
5
Clearly explained with exceptions
5. Logistics & Structure
Score
Indicators
1
No structure defined
3
Basic timing discussed
5
Full clarity (duration, frequency, expectations)
SECTION 2: MICRO CONTRACTING (Session Level)
6. Topic Clarity
Score
Indicators
1
No topic defined
3
Topic identified but broad
5
Specific, focused topic defined
7. Outcome Definition
Score
Indicators
1
No outcome
3
Vague outcome (“clarity”, “help”)
5
Clear, specific, meaningful outcome
8. Success Measures
Score
Indicators
1
Not defined
3
Implied but unclear
5
Explicit: “How will you know this worked?”
9. Client Ownership of Agenda
Score
Indicators
1
Coach leads topic
3
Shared control
5
Fully client-led; coach follows
10. Flexibility & Renegotiation
Score
Indicators
1
No adjustment if session drifts
3
Some awareness
5
Actively checks and re-contracts when needed
SECTION 3: COACHING PRESENCE IN CONTRACTING
11. Avoids Leading / Fixing
Score
Indicators
1
Suggests topics or solutions
3
Occasional leading
5
Fully neutral, curiosity-driven
12. Depth of Exploration During Contracting
Score
Indicators
1
Surface-level
3
Some probing
5
Goes deeper to clarify meaning and importance
13. Clarity & Simplicity
Score
Indicators
1
Confusing / wordy
3
Understandable
5
Clear, concise, powerful
14. Confidence & Presence
Score
Indicators
1
Hesitant / unsure
3
Adequate
5
Calm, confident, grounded
SECTION 4: OVERALL CONTRACTING QUALITY
15. Contract Drives the Session
Score
Indicators
1
Session drifts aimlessly
3
Some alignment
5
Strong alignment between contract and session outcome
16. Efficiency of Contracting
Score
Indicators
1
Too long or skipped
3
Acceptable timing
5
Clear contract within 2–3 minutes
SCORING SUMMARY
Total Score: /80
Range
Level
0–30
Not Competent
31–50
Developing
51–65
Competent (ACC Level)
66–75
Strong (PCC Level)
76–80
Mastery
Red Flags (Automatic Concern Areas)
No clear outcome defined
Coach sets the agenda
No success measure
Coaching begins before contract is clear
What PCC-Level Contracting Looks Like (ICF Standard)
At PCC level, the coach:
Contracts quickly and cleanly
Gets specific outcomes
Ensures client ownership
Uses contracting to deepen thinking (not just admin)
Pro Tip for Your Training
When assessing:
“If I stop the session after 3 minutes, is the direction crystal clear?”
If not → contracting is weak.
Yes — a limited liability clause is standard and recommended in a coaching contract.
It protects the coach by clearly stating:
The client is responsible for their own decisions and results
Coaching is not advice, therapy, or professional services
The coach is not liable for outcomes arising from client actions
This aligns with good practice under International Coaching Federation (clear boundaries, roles, and expectations).
What “Limited Liability” Means in Coaching
In plain English:
The coach supports thinking — but does not take responsibility for what the client chooses to do.
Why You NEED This Clause
Without it, you risk:
Clients blaming you for poor decisions
Legal exposure if outcomes go wrong
Confusion about your role (coach vs advisor/consultant/therapist)
Key Elements of a Strong Clause
A proper limited liability clause should cover:
1. Client Responsibility
Client owns decisions, actions, and results
2. No Guarantees
No promise of specific outcomes
3. Not Professional Advice
Coaching ≠ legal, financial, medical, or psychological advice
4. Liability Cap / Exclusion
Limits financial/legal responsibility
MODEL LIMITED LIABILITY CLAUSE (Use This)
You can insert this directly into your macro contract:
Limited Liability
The Client acknowledges that coaching is a collaborative, non-directive process designed to support personal and/or professional development. The Coach does not provide advice, therapy, counselling, or consulting services.
The Client agrees that they are fully responsible for their own decisions, actions, and results arising from the coaching relationship. The Coach makes no guarantees regarding outcomes or results.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Coach shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from the coaching relationship or the Client’s use of the coaching services.
Optional (Stronger Version with Cap)
If you want more protection:
The Coach’s total liability for any claim arising out of or in connection with this agreement shall not exceed the total fees paid by the Client for the coaching services.
Important Notes (Don’t Skip)
1. This is NOT Legal Advice
Laws vary by country (especially in South Africa, UK, US, Australia)
Best practice: have a lawyer review your contract
2. You Cannot Waive Everything
Even with this clause, you cannot protect against:
Gross negligence
Fraud
Illegal conduct
3. Clarity > Complexity
Keep wording simple and understandable
Clients should clearly know what they’re agreeing to
Best Practice (Professional Setup)
A strong coaching agreement should include:
Limited liability clause
Confidentiality clause
Scope & boundaries
Cancellation policy
Payment terms
One-Line Summary
A limited liability clause ensures the client owns their outcomes — and protects you from being held responsible for them.
MCC-Level Micro Contracting Questions (By Stage)
1. Opening the Session (Direction Setting)
These establish client ownership immediately.
“What feels most important for us to focus on today?”
“What would you like to walk away with by the end of this session?”
“What’s the real challenge you want to work through today?”
“If this session were truly valuable, what would be different for you?”
MCC nuance:
Clean, simple, no leading
Lets the client choose what matters
2. Deepening the Topic (Sharpening Focus)
These move from broad → specific.
5. “What specifically about this do you want to explore?”
6. “Which part of this matters most right now?”
7. “What’s at the heart of this for you?”
8. “If we narrowed this down, where would you want to focus?”
MCC nuance:
Cuts through surface-level answers
Helps avoid vague sessions
3. Defining Outcome (Clarity & Precision)
These ensure the session has a clear destination.
9. “What outcome would feel meaningful for you today?”
10. “At the end of this conversation, what do you want to have clarity on?”
11. “What do you want to leave with — specifically?”
12. “How would you describe success for this session?”
MCC nuance:
Outcome must be client-defined and meaningful
Not generic (“clarity”, “help”)
4. Establishing Success Measures (Accountability)
These make success observable or felt.
13. “How will you know this session has been useful?”
14. “What will be different for you if we achieve that?”
15. “What would tell you this was time well spent?”
MCC nuance:
Moves from idea → evidence of value
5. Checking Alignment (Contract Confirmation)
These ensure coach and client are aligned before proceeding.
16. “Let me check — you want to focus on X and leave with Y. Is that right?”
17. “Is there anything else we need to include to make this worthwhile for you?”
MCC nuance:
Reflects back client language
Avoids assumption
6. Renegotiating Mid-Session (Advanced MCC Skill)
This is where MCC-level coaching stands out.
18. “We started with X — is that still where you want to focus, or is something else emerging?”
19. “Given what’s coming up now, would it be more valuable to shift the focus?”
MCC nuance:
Flexible, responsive
Follows the client, not the original plan
7. Closing the Loop (End-of-Session Contract Check)
Ensures the contract was fulfilled.
20. “To what extent did you get what you wanted from this session?”
What Makes These “MCC Level” (Important)
These questions are:
Clean (no coaching agenda hidden inside)
Non-leading
Client-language driven
Outcome-focused
Adaptive (not rigid)
Common Mistakes (Avoid These)
“Do you want to work on your goals today?” (leading)
“So the goal is confidence, right?” (imposing)
Skipping success measures
Locking the contract and never revisiting it
Pro Tip (This is MCC Thinking)
Contracting is not a step — it’s a thread through the whole conversation.
You are constantly:
Clarifying
Checking
Adjusting
Deepening
Simple Drill for Your Coaches
Force this constraint:
No coaching allowed until:
Topic is clear
Outcome is specific
Success is defined
One-Line Summary
MCC-level contracting = precision at the start, flexibility in the middle, and accountability at the end.
By the end, participants will:
Understand COMENSA’s ethical requirements for contracting
Differentiate verbal vs written contracts
Apply clear boundaries (coaching vs therapy vs consulting)
Build a legally and ethically sound coaching agreement
Demonstrate micro-contracting in-session
COMENSA requires clear, transparent, and ethical agreements between coach and client before coaching begins.
Clarity of Roles
Coach vs client responsibilities
No hidden agendas
Scope of Coaching
What coaching is (future-focused, developmental)
What it is NOT (therapy, consulting unless stated)
Confidentiality
Must be explicitly agreed
Include limits (e.g. legal obligations, harm risk)
Informed Consent
Client understands:
Process
Risks
Benefits
Their right to stop
Boundaries
Time boundaries
Communication boundaries
Dual relationships
Fees & Logistics
Pricing
Cancellation policy
Session structure
Record Keeping
Must comply with POPIA (South Africa privacy law)
Referral Clause
If client needs therapy → refer appropriately
COMENSA contracting is about protecting the client, the coach, and the profession.
Contracting supports:
Integrity
Professional conduct
Client autonomy
Confidentiality
If it’s not contracted, it’s:
A risk
A misalignment
A potential ethics violation
Ask learners:
“What’s the worst thing that can happen with no contract?”
Debrief:
Misaligned expectations
Client dependency
Legal disputes
Scope creep
Formal agreement signed before coaching
Includes:
Scope
Fees
Confidentiality
Duration
Used in early conversations
Still must include clarity
Unspoken expectations
MOST dangerous if ignored
Great coaches manage all 3 contracts simultaneously.
Here’s a COMENSA-aligned structure:
Nature of coaching
Non-therapy disclaimer
Client owns outcomes
Coach facilitates thinking
What is protected
Exceptions
Duration (e.g. 60 min)
Frequency
Cost per session/package
Payment terms
e.g. 24 hours notice
Contact outside sessions
No dual relationships
Storage of notes
Consent to retain data
Either party can end agreement
If coaching is no longer appropriate
Task:
Write a 5-line contract covering:
Scope
Confidentiality
Fees
Then refine to include:
Boundaries
Termination
Contracting within the session.
Keeps coaching ethical in real-time
Prevents drift into therapy/advice
“What would you like to focus on today?”
“This feels important—do you want to stay here or move back to your goal?”
“Would you like reflection or ideas here?”
“Are we still working toward your original outcome?”
Micro-contracting = continuous consent
Role play:
Coach lets session drift into therapy
Observer identifies where contracting failed
COMENSA is strict here.
Future-focused
Goal-oriented
Performance & growth
Trauma
Healing past wounds
Mental health diagnosis
Depression
Trauma response
Addiction
“This feels like something deeper than coaching. I’d recommend working with a therapist alongside or before continuing.”
Vague agreements
Skipping confidentiality
No cancellation policy
Overpromising results
Not revisiting the contract
Weak contracting = weak coaching.
Ask learners to demonstrate:
You can give this to students:
Coaching Agreement (Summary)
Coaching is a forward-focused developmental process
Client is responsible for their own decisions and results
All sessions are confidential unless required by law
Sessions are 60 minutes, once per week
Fee: R____ per session
24-hour cancellation policy applies
Coaching is not therapy; referrals will be made if needed
Either party may terminate with notice
“What kind of coach do you become when your contracting is world-class?”
Contracting is not admin — it’s ethical leadership
COMENSA expects clarity, consent, and boundaries
Mastery = macro + micro + psychological awareness
Act with integrity, honesty, and professionalism
Represent your qualifications truthfully
Stay within your scope of competence
Continue ongoing development (CPD)
Put the client’s interests first
Respect client autonomy (they make their own decisions)
Do not impose advice, beliefs, or solutions
Avoid dependency — empower independence
Keep all client information strictly confidential
Only break confidentiality if:
Required by law
There is risk of harm
Clearly explain confidentiality in the contract
Establish clear agreements upfront
Define:
Scope of coaching
Roles and responsibilities
Fees and logistics
Ensure informed consent
Maintain professional boundaries at all times
Avoid dual relationships (e.g. friend + client)
Do not exploit clients financially, emotionally, or sexually
Work only within your level of training and skill
Refer clients when:
Issues fall outside coaching (e.g. therapy, trauma)
Collaborate with other professionals when appropriate
Disclose any conflicts of interest
Do not allow personal gain to affect the client relationship
Treat all clients with respect and dignity
No discrimination based on:
Race
Gender
Religion
Culture
Background
Follow South African laws (e.g. POPIA for data protection)
Keep proper records
Be accountable for your practice and decisions
COMENSA ethics = protect the client, stay in your lane, be transparent, and act with integrity at all times.
Here are 20 realistic ICF-style exam questions on contracting, with clear, exam-level answers. These reflect how the International Coaching Federation assesses understanding (application, not theory).
Answer:
To establish clear expectations, roles, boundaries, and outcomes, ensuring alignment and creating a safe, ethical coaching environment.
Answer:
Macro: Overall agreement (scope, fees, confidentiality)
Micro: Ongoing alignment within each session (focus, outcomes, consent)
Answer:
At the start of the coaching relationship and continuously throughout the engagement (especially during shifts in direction).
Answer:
Ensuring the client fully understands the coaching process, risks, benefits, and boundaries, and agrees to proceed.
Answer:
Establishes and Maintains Agreements
Answer:
Pause and co-create clarity before proceeding; do not coach without a defined agreement.
Answer:
Re-contract:
“Would you like my perspective, or shall we explore what feels right for you?”
Answer:
Misalignment
Ethical breaches
Loss of trust
Ineffective coaching
Answer:
What is confidential
Limits (legal, harm risk)
How information is stored/used
Answer:
It ensures the client chooses the focus, outcomes, and direction, maintaining ownership.
Answer:
Acknowledge and re-contract the focus; if needed, refer to therapy.
Answer:
A clear, client-defined outcome for that specific session.
Answer:
“By the end of this session, what would you like to have achieved?”
Answer:
Pause and revisit the agreement, clarifying whether to continue or redefine the focus.
Answer:
To facilitate clarity, not impose structure; ensure alignment and ethical boundaries.
Answer:
Assuming alignment instead of explicitly confirming it.
Answer:
The coach and client jointly define the focus, process, and outcomes, not the coach alone.
Answer:
Ask clarifying questions to define a measurable or meaningful outcome.
Answer:
Clear agreements create psychological safety, reducing ambiguity and increasing trust.
Answer:
When goals change
When confusion arises
When progress stalls
At natural review points
ICF is NOT testing if you can:
Recite definitions
They ARE testing if you:
Maintain client ownership
Use contracting to guide the process
Avoid advice-giving traps
Stay within coaching boundaries
If stuck in the exam, choose the answer that:
Returns ownership to the client
Clarifies the agreement
Invites consent or alignment
Here are 20 COMENSA-specific contracting exam-style questions and answers, aligned to the expectations of COMENSA — with a stronger emphasis on ethics, legal context (POPIA), and professional boundaries than ICF.
Answer:
To ensure ethical clarity, informed consent, and protection of both client and coach.
Answer:
A clear agreement covering scope, roles, confidentiality, fees, and boundaries.
Answer:
The client understands:
Nature of coaching
Limits (not therapy)
Risks and benefits
Their right to withdraw
Answer:
POPIA (Protection of Personal Information Act) — governs how client data is stored and used.
Answer:
Full confidentiality statement
Legal limits (e.g. risk of harm, court orders)
Data handling practices
Answer:
Legal requirement
Risk of harm to client or others
Answer:
The distinction must be explicitly stated, and clients must be referred if issues exceed coaching scope.
Answer:
Pause and:
Re-contract the focus
Clarify coaching boundaries
Refer to a therapist if needed
Answer:
Full transparency:
Pricing
Payment terms
Cancellation policy
Answer:
A relationship where the coach has another role (e.g. friend, manager).
Must be avoided or clearly managed and disclosed in the contract.
Answer:
Disclose immediately and re-contract or terminate if necessary.
Answer:
They define:
Professional limits
Communication expectations
Ethical safety
Answer:
A statement allowing either party to end the coaching agreement under defined conditions.
Answer:
Ethical breaches
Legal exposure
Client harm
Loss of professional credibility
Answer:
Duration
Frequency
Format (online/in-person)
Answer:
Only contract work within their level of training and refer when outside scope.
Answer:
Explain:
What is recorded
How it is stored
Who has access
Retention period (POPIA compliance)
Answer:
Clarify the coaching approach and re-contract expectations:
Coaching facilitates thinking, not advice-giving.
Answer:
The client is responsible for:
Decisions
Actions
Outcomes
Answer:
At the start
When goals shift
When boundaries are tested
When ethical concerns arise
COMENSA questions typically test:
Ethical clarity (not just coaching skill)
Legal awareness (POPIA, confidentiality)
Boundary management
Client protection first
Choose the answer that:
Protects the client
Clarifies boundaries
Stays within scope
Aligns with ethical/legal responsibility
Accountability
You are responsible for complying with POPIA.
Processing Limitation
Only collect data lawfully and minimally.
Purpose Specification
Collect data for a specific, clear purpose.
Further Processing Limitation
Don’t reuse data for unrelated purposes.
Information Quality
Keep data accurate and updated.
Openness
Be transparent about what you collect and why.
Security Safeguards
Protect data from loss, misuse, or breaches.
Data Subject Participation
People have rights over their data.
Any info that identifies a person (name, ID, email, phone).
Includes opinions, correspondence, and online identifiers.
Covers both natural persons and juristic persons (companies).
Race, gender, religion
Health and medical data
Biometric data
Criminal records
👉 Requires extra care and usually explicit consent
Consent must be voluntary, informed, and specific.
You can also process if:
It’s necessary for a contract
Required by law
Legitimate interest (with caution)
Must have consent (opt-in) for marketing.
Must provide opt-out options.
Cold marketing is restricted unless prior relationship exists.
You must implement reasonable security measures.
If a breach occurs:
Notify affected individuals
Notify the Information Regulator
Keep data only as long as necessary.
Safely delete or de-identify when no longer needed.
Can only transfer data internationally if:
The other country has adequate protection
OR client consents
Right to access their data
Right to correct or delete data
Right to object to processing
Right to withdraw consent
Non-compliance can lead to:
Fines (up to R10 million)
Imprisonment
Reputational damage
POPIA = collect less, be clear, protect it, and give people control over their data.
Always include POPIA clause in your contract
Explain:
What notes you keep
Where they’re stored
How long you keep them
Get explicit consent