Early Bird Ends 30 July | Only 20 Spots Available – Reserve Yours Today!
ICF Core Competency 3 — Establishes and Maintains Agreements
Definition
Partners with the client (and relevant stakeholders when applicable) to create clear agreements about the coaching relationship, the process, and both session and overall goals.
3.01 – Coaching philosophy and framing
Clearly explains what coaching is and is not, and shares their coaching approach so clients understand the nature of the work.
3.01. Describes one's coaching philosophy and clearly defines what coaching is and is not for potential clients and stakeholders
3.02 – Roles, responsibilities, and expectations
Reaches agreement on:
What coaching includes and excludes
What each party is responsible for
Commitment to working toward goals
3.02. Reaches agreement about what is and is not appropriate in the relationship, what is and is not being offered, and the responsibilities of the client and relevant stakeholders, including commitment to working toward coaching goals
3.03 – Logistics and parameters
Agrees on the practical and formal elements of the coaching relationship, such as:
Fees
Scheduling
Duration
Confidentiality
Ending the coaching relationship
Involvement of third parties
3.03. Reaches agreement about the guidelines and specific parameters of the coaching relationship such as logistics, fees, scheduling, duration, termination, confidentiality and inclusion of others
3.04 – Stakeholder alignment (when relevant)
Works with both client and stakeholders to ensure clarity and alignment on goals, expectations, and the coaching arrangement.
3.04. Partners with the client and relevant stakeholders to establi –
3.05 – Coaching relationship fit
Partners with the client to explore whether the coaching relationship is a good match (compatibility, trust, readiness, alignment).
3.05. Partners with the client to determine client-coach compatibility
3.06 – Session purpose
At the start of each session, agrees on what the client wants to focus on or achieve in that session.
3.06. Partners with the client to identify or reconfirm what they want to accomplish in the session - list the icf core competency 3 word for word
3.07 – Session focus and need definition
Helps the client clarify:
What specifically they need to address
What problem or topic is most relevant for the session outcome
3.07. Partners with the client to define what the client believes they need to address or resolve to achieve what they want to accomplish in the session
3.08 – Measures of success
Defines or reconfirms how the client will know the session or engagement has been successful.
3.08. Partners with the client to define or reconfirm measures of success for what the client wants to accomplish in the coaching engagement or individual session
3.09 – Time and focus management
Coaches actively manage:
Time boundaries
Focus of conversation
Keeping alignment with agreed goals
3.09. Partners with the client to manage the time and focus of the session
3.10 – Maintaining direction
Keeps coaching aligned with the client’s desired outcomes, unless the client chooses to shift direction.
3.10. Continues coaching in the direction of the client’s desired outcome unless the client indicates otherwise
3.11 – Closing the engagement
Ensures the coaching relationship ends in a way that is:
Respectful
Clear
Reflective of the coaching journey and client experience
3.11. Partners with the client to close the coaching relationship in a way that respects the client and the coaching experience
3.12 – Revisiting agreements
Regularly checks and updates the coaching agreement when needed to ensure it still serves the client’s evolving needs.
3.12. Revisits the coaching agreement when necessary to ensure the coaching approach is meeting the client's needs - Definition: Partners with the client and relevant stakeholders to create clear agreements about the coaching relationship, process, plans and goals. Establishes agreements for the overall coaching engagement as well as those for each coaching session.
Below is a Level123 Standard Foundational Contracting Checklist for the very first coaching session with a new client. It combines the expectations of the International Coaching Federation (ICF) Core Competencies, the ICF Code of Ethics, and practices commonly demonstrated by high-performing PCC and MCC coaches.
I've used a 7-point rubric because it gives enough granularity for coach training, observation, and assessment.
Score
Meaning
7
Exceptional (MCC standard)
6
Strong PCC
5
Solid PCC
4
Competent ACC
3
Emerging
2
Minimal
1
Missing or ineffective
#
Requirement
/7
1
Welcome & Psychological Safety
7
2
Purpose of Discovery Session
7
3
What Led You to Coaching?
7
4
What Are You Hoping Coaching Will Help You Achieve?
7
5
Long-Term Vision & Desired Future
7
6
What Would Make Coaching Worthwhile?
7
7
Success Measures & Outcomes
7
8
Explain What Coaching Is
7
9
Explain What Coaching Is Not
7
10
Coach's Role
7
11
Client's Role
7
12
Partnership & Shared Responsibility
7
13
Confidentiality
7
14
Ethics & Professional Standards
7
15
Boundaries
7
16
Logistics & Practical Agreements
7
17
Feedback & Challenge Preferences
7
18
Accountability Agreement
7
19
Permission & Consent to Coach
7
20
Invitation to Begin Coaching
7
Create warmth, trust, presence and rapport before discussing coaching.
"Welcome, Gavin. Thank you for choosing to spend this time with me today."
"I'm really looking forward to getting to know you and exploring what matters most to you."
Explain why today's conversation exists.
"Today's session is about understanding what's important to you and deciding whether coaching is the right fit."
"We'll explore your goals, how coaching works, and what success might look like for you."
Discover the catalyst.
"What led you to coaching at this point in your life?"
"Why now?"
Explore expectations.
"What are you hoping coaching will help you accomplish?"
"If coaching worked really well, what would be different?"
Explore desired future.
"Imagine six months from now. What has changed?"
"What does your ideal future look like?"
Determine value.
"At the end of our coaching together, what would make you say this was absolutely worth it?"
"What would make this investment worthwhile for you?"
Define success.
"How will you know coaching has been successful?"
"What will success look like for you?"
Clarify the coaching approach.
"Coaching is a thinking partnership that helps you discover your own answers."
"My role is to help you create awareness, make decisions, and take action."
Clarify boundaries.
"Coaching isn't therapy or counselling."
"I won't tell you what to do or solve problems for you."
Explain responsibilities.
"I'll ask questions, listen deeply, and challenge your thinking."
"I'll support, encourage and hold you accountable."
Clarify client responsibility.
"Your role is to be honest, open and willing to experiment."
"You decide what actions to take between sessions."
Emphasise equality.
"This is a partnership—we work together."
"You're the expert on your life."
Explain confidentiality clearly.
"Everything discussed here remains confidential unless required by law."
"This is a confidential coaching relationship."
Reference ethical practice.
"I work according to the ICF Code of Ethics."
"If something falls outside coaching, we'll discuss appropriate support."
Clarify scope.
"We'll focus on coaching rather than consulting or therapy."
"If I believe another professional could better support you, I'll let you know."
Agree practical details.
Examples include:
session length
frequency
cancellation policy
communication
payment
"Our sessions will be 60 minutes every second Tuesday."
"What's the best way for us to communicate between sessions?"
Contract how challenge and feedback will work.
"How do you prefer to receive challenging feedback?"
"If I notice something important, would you like me to interrupt and share it?"
Agree how progress will be supported.
"How would you like me to hold you accountable?"
"What kind of accountability works best for you?"
Obtain consent before coaching.
"Would it be okay if I challenged your thinking when appropriate?"
"Do I have your permission to coach you today?"
Transition into coaching.
"Is there anything else you'd like to clarify before we begin?"
"Are you ready to begin coaching?"
A practical way to assess a coach is to score each criterion from 1 to 7.
Total Score
Interpretation
130–140
MCC-level foundational contracting
115–129
Strong PCC standard
95–114
Competent PCC with areas to strengthen
75–94
ACC level or developing coach
Below 75
Foundational contracting needs significant development
Initial Coaching Agreement in the first session with the client - practice.
The Foundational Coaching Agreement (sometimes called the Engagement Agreement or Initial Contract), not the session agreement. Surprisingly, the ICF doesn't prescribe a script or sequence—it specifies the outcomes that should be achieved. The structure below synthesizes ICF Core Competencies, the ICF Code of Ethics, and common practice among PCCs and MCCs.
I would teach it as a structured conversation rather than a checklist. A memorable framework is:
Connect → Explain → Agree → Commit → Begin
Here's the full structure.
Create psychological safety and begin building trust.
Welcome the client.
Build rapport.
Thank them for investing in themselves.
Explain the purpose of this first meeting.
Example questions:
What led you to coaching?
What are you hoping this experience will be like?
What would help you feel comfortable today?
Discuss:
Coaching is about helping clients think more clearly.
Coaching increases awareness.
Coaching helps clients make intentional choices.
Coaching supports accountability.
Coaching unlocks potential rather than providing answers.
The client should understand:
"The purpose isn't for me to solve your problems—it's to help you discover your own best solutions."
Explain that coaching is:
Client-centred
Future-focused
Collaborative
Non-judgemental
Creative
Reflective
Action-oriented
Based on powerful questions
Built on partnership
Clarify the boundaries.
Coaching is not:
Therapy
Counselling
Consulting
Mentoring
Training
Giving advice
Telling you what to do
Diagnosing problems
Legal advice
Financial advice
Explain when you would refer a client to another professional.
This is often overlooked but is essential.
Create a safe environment.
Listen deeply.
Ask powerful questions.
Challenge respectfully.
Maintain confidentiality.
Hold the coaching process.
Remain present.
Uphold ethical standards.
Set the agenda.
Be honest.
Be open to exploration.
Complete agreed actions.
Take responsibility for decisions.
Communicate if something isn't working.
Arrive prepared.
A useful statement is:
"This is a partnership. I own the process; you own the content."
Cover:
Everything discussed remains confidential.
Coaching notes are protected.
Any recordings require permission.
Explain any legal or ethical exceptions (for example, imminent risk of serious harm or where disclosure is required by law).
Explain how client information is stored and handled.
Ask:
"Do you have any questions about confidentiality?"
Discuss:
ICF ethical principles.
Respect.
No judgement.
No dual relationships that could impair objectivity.
The client's right to stop coaching.
The coach's right to end the relationship if appropriate.
Professional referrals where necessary.
Agree on practical arrangements.
Include:
Session length.
Frequency.
Number of sessions (if applicable).
Online or face-to-face.
Preferred communication methods.
Cancellation policy.
Rescheduling.
Payment.
Invoices.
Time zones (if relevant).
Homework or reflection between sessions.
Nothing should be assumed.
Explain how accountability works.
For example:
You choose your commitments.
I will ask about them.
There is no punishment.
Missed actions become learning opportunities.
Accountability serves your goals, not my expectations.
Many new coaches unintentionally become managers. PCC/MCC coaches use accountability to foster learning, not compliance.
Move from logistics to purpose.
Explore questions such as:
What would make coaching worthwhile?
What do you hope will be different six months from now?
What would success look like?
What would tell you this investment was worthwhile?
How will we know we're making progress?
This creates the overarching coaching agreement that guides the relationship.
Agree on how progress will be recognised.
Examples:
Increased confidence.
Better communication.
Stronger leadership.
Healthier relationships.
Career advancement.
Improved wellbeing.
These measures can be revisited throughout the engagement.
Invite the client to ask anything before starting.
For example:
What questions do you have?
Is there anything you're unsure about?
Is there anything you need from me to make this partnership successful?
This is the formal contracting moment.
Confirm that both parties agree to:
The purpose of coaching.
Their respective roles.
Confidentiality.
Boundaries.
Logistics.
Expectations.
Accountability.
Desired outcomes.
A simple summary might be:
"We've discussed how we'll work together, what coaching is and isn't, our respective responsibilities, confidentiality, logistics, and what you hope to achieve. Does this reflect your understanding, and are you happy to move forward on that basis?"
Only after the agreement is complete do you transition into coaching.
You might say:
"Wonderful. Now that we've agreed on how we'll work together, let's begin. What would you like to focus on in our first coaching conversation?"
1. Welcome and build rapport
↓
2. Explain the purpose of coaching
↓
3. Explain what coaching is
↓
4. Explain what coaching is not
↓
5. Clarify coach and client roles
↓
6. Discuss confidentiality
↓
7. Explain ethics and professional boundaries
↓
8. Agree on logistics
↓
9. Explain accountability
↓
10. Explore desired outcomes for the coaching engagement
↓
11. Agree on measures of success
↓
12. Invite questions and clarify understanding
↓
13. Confirm mutual agreement and informed consent
↓
14. Begin the first coaching conversation
Master coaches frequently include an explicit conversation about client autonomy and choice. They make it clear that the client can pause, challenge, redirect, or even decline a question at any point. This reinforces the coaching partnership from the outset. For example:
"You're always in charge of your coaching. If a question doesn't feel useful, or if you'd rather explore something different, please tell me. We can change direction at any time. This is your space."
While not a separate ICF requirement, this practice strongly reflects the ICF competencies of cultivating trust and safety, maintaining presence, and partnering with the client. It's a subtle but powerful distinction that often separates competent coaching from masterful coaching.
This is probably the single best place to start because it focuses on exactly what you're asking.
Search:
"ICF Core Competency 3 Establishing and Maintaining Agreements"
or
It explains:
Initial contracting
Session contracting
PCC vs MCC differences
How assessors evaluate the agreement process.
Sheri Boone is an MCC and mentor coach.
Search:
Sheri Boone Establishing the Coaching Agreement
This is part of the Brighton West competency series.
It discusses:
what assessors listen for
how to contract naturally
common mistakes.
Search:
Kirsten Dierolf Double Diamond Coaching
or
Kirsten Dierolf Agreements
She's an ICF PCC/MCC assessor and explains how master coaches establish agreements without sounding robotic.
Search:
Practice PCC coaching
Practice MCC coaching
MCC coaching demonstration
ICF coaching demonstration
PCC coaching recording
Look for demonstrations from schools such as:
These are generally much closer to credentialing standards than influencer-style coaching videos.
A PCC/MCC coach will typically cover these elements in the first meeting.
Welcome
Introductions
Learn about the client
Clarify:
coaching
mentoring
consulting
counselling
therapy
training
Help the client understand what coaching is—and isn't.
Discuss:
client responsibility
coach responsibility
partnership
client leads the agenda
Cover:
confidentiality
limits of confidentiality
informed consent
professional boundaries
ICF Code of Ethics
Agree on:
number of sessions
duration
cancellations
payment
rescheduling
communication between sessions
Explore questions such as:
What are you hoping coaching helps you achieve?
What would success look like six months from now?
Why is that important?
How will you know coaching has been worthwhile?
Agree on measurable outcomes.
Examples:
increased confidence
improved leadership
healthier relationships
career transition
better wellbeing
Ask:
Does this coaching approach work for you?
Is there anything you'd like to change before we begin?
Every session starts with a fresh agreement.
A strong PCC sequence is:
"What would you like to work on today?"
"What would you like to achieve by the end of this conversation?"
"What would make this session valuable?"
"How will you know we've been successful?"
"What would you like to leave with today?"
"What feels most important to explore first?"
Confirm the agreement.
"So today we're exploring..., and success will look like..., have I understood correctly?"
Only then do you begin coaching. This aligns with ICF's expectation that the coach and client mutually establish the session's purpose and evidence of success.
PCC
MCC
Clear session topic
Co-created, evolving agreement
Clear desired outcome
Explores deeper meaning behind the outcome
Defines success
Re-visits and refines success throughout the conversation
Maintains focus
Fluidly follows the client's emerging awareness while checking the agreement still serves them
Supports action
Supports transformation in identity, perspective, or being
An MCC doesn't simply set the agreement at the start—they continually partner with the client to see whether the original agreement still serves the client's deeper learning.
Before you ask your first "real" coaching question, make sure you can answer "yes" to all of these:
Client chose the topic.
Desired outcome is clear.
Success has been defined by the client.
You understand why this matters to the client.
The client agrees with your summary of the session focus.
The client knows they can change the agreement if something more important emerges.
Both of you have explicitly agreed to begin.
I'd also recommend creating a one-page contracting checklist and a 5-minute opening script that trainees can practice until it becomes natural. Those two tools alone can dramatically improve the quality and consistency of early coaching sessions.
I can give you a very high-level MCC-style peer coaching script + marker mapping, but I need to be clear about one thing first:
There is no such thing as a “100% guaranteed MCC script.” MCC evaluation is based on real-time relational quality, presence, and responsiveness, not memorised phrasing. If you try to perform a script, it will usually lower your score because MCC markers are about spontaneous precision, not scripted perfection.
That said, I can absolutely give you something very useful:
A realistic MCC-level sample coaching flow (peer coaching ready)
A rubric mapped to ICF MCC markers
A deconstruction showing what each line demonstrates
Coach:
“What would make this conversation valuable for you today?”
Client:
“I feel stuck… I don’t know whether to stay in my job or change careers.”
Coach:
“As you say that, what are you noticing in yourself right now?”
Client:
“A lot of tension… and confusion.”
Coach:
“Stay with that for a moment… what’s the confusion like for you?”
Client:
“It feels like I want change… but I’m afraid of losing stability.”
Coach:
“And as you notice both wanting change and wanting stability… what stands out to you most?”
Client:
“They both feel equally strong.”
Coach:
“If neither side needed to win right now, what becomes possible in that space between them?”
Client:
“I’ve always treated it like a decision I must get right… maybe it’s not just one or the other.”
Coach:
“What’s the new understanding forming for you?”
Client:
“It feels like I’m someone who is always trying to make safe choices.”
Coach:
“And who are you when you’re not making safe choices?”
(pause)
Client:
“I think I’m someone who wants to grow… but I’ve been afraid of that.”
Coach:
(silent – 6–8 seconds)
Coach:
“What are you taking away from this conversation so far?”
Client:
“That I don’t actually need to decide immediately… I need to understand what I value more deeply.”
Coach:
“As you leave this conversation, what feels most important for you to hold onto?”
Client:
“That growth matters… but so does safety. I don’t have to rush the decision.”
Below is how an assessor would evaluate this coaching.
Evidence in script:
No over-explaining
Short, precise questions
No multitasking or agenda-setting
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
Emotional (tension, fear)
Cognitive (decision conflict)
Identity (“someone who plays safe”)
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
No rigid model (no GROW forced)
Conversation evolves naturally
Coach follows client meaning shifts
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
Intentional silence after identity shift
No rushing to fill space
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
“What are you noticing?”
“What’s the confusion like for you?”
No assumptions or advice
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
No suggestions
No options offered
No “have you considered…”
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
“If neither side needed to win…”
Holding stability vs growth tension
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
Focus is meaning-making
Action emerges later naturally
No forced goal-setting
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
No urgency
No rescuing anxiety
Calm pacing
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
“Who are you when you’re not making safe choices?”
Moves beyond behaviour into being
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
Short questions
No layered explanations
One idea per question
✔ MCC marker achieved
Evidence:
Client summarises insight
Coach does not impose takeaway
✔ MCC marker achieved
ICF MCC presence is NOT:
Fancy language
Deep psychology talk
Heavy questioning
Over-coaching
ICF MCC presence IS:
Precision
Timing
Silence
Trust
Minimal interference
High-quality attention
If this script became “non-MCC”, it would be because of:
Over-talking
Giving advice disguised as questions
Interrupting silence too early
Leading the client to insight
Using multiple questions in one sentence
Trying to “perform coaching”
MCC coaching presence is the ability to stay deeply present, emotionally regulated, and minimally intrusive while trusting that client awareness will emerge without being forced, guided, or interpreted.
Below is a PCC-level peer coaching script + ICF marking rubric breakdown, aligned to what assessors actually look for in ICF Core Competencies (especially Presence, Listening, Evoking Awareness, and Partnership).
This is intentionally less “sparse” than MCC and more structured, supportive, and slightly more explicit, which is exactly what distinguishes PCC from MCC.
Coach:
“What would you like to get out of our conversation today?”
Client:
“I feel stuck between staying in my job or changing careers.”
Coach:
“What would be most helpful to focus on in this session?”
Coach:
“What makes this situation feel stuck for you right now?”
Client:
“I like my job, but I’m not growing anymore.”
Coach:
“What is it about not growing that matters to you?”
Coach:
“How do you feel when you think about staying where you are?”
Client:
“Frustrated… like I’m wasting time.”
Coach:
“When you say ‘wasting time,’ what does that mean for you?”
Coach:
“What have you already tried to resolve this for yourself?”
Client:
“I’ve thought about applying elsewhere, but I keep delaying it.”
Coach:
“What do you notice about the delay?”
Coach:
“What is the main tension you are experiencing between staying and leaving?”
Client:
“Stability vs growth.”
Coach:
“What is important about stability for you?”
Coach:
“And what is important about growth for you?”
Coach:
“What is becoming clearer for you as we talk about this?”
Client:
“That I’m afraid of making the wrong decision.”
Coach:
“What would making the ‘wrong’ decision mean to you?”
Client:
“That I fail… or regret it later.”
Coach:
“What makes regret something you are trying to avoid?”
Coach:
“What other ways could you look at this situation?”
Client:
“I guess it doesn’t have to be permanent… I could try something and adjust.”
Coach:
“What shifts when you see it that way?”
Coach:
“What feels like a possible next step for you?”
Client:
“Maybe I could start exploring roles without committing yet.”
Coach:
“What would taking that step give you?”
Coach:
“What are you taking away from this conversation today?”
Client:
“That I don’t need a perfect decision, I just need to start exploring.”
Coach:
“What will you carry forward from that insight?”
✔ Clearly asks focus + desired outcome
✔ Keeps client agenda central
✔ Does not impose direction
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Calm, structured, responsive
✔ Some silence allowed but not dominant
✔ Coach remains engaged and attentive
Marker achieved: YES (solid PCC level)
✔ Reflects key words (“wasting time”, “stuck”)
✔ Picks up emotional content
✔ Asks clarifying questions
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Uses “what does that mean for you?”
✔ Explores assumptions (“wrong decision”)
✔ Expands perspective
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Mostly single, clear questions
✔ Some coaching structure present
✔ Not overly complex or abstract
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Client identifies fear of regret
✔ Client reframes decision-making approach
✔ Awareness is verbally articulated
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Does not advise
✔ Does not lead decisions
✔ Uses collaborative tone (“what feels…”, “what matters…”)
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Logical progression:
current state → emotions → assumptions → options → action
✔ Some structure still visible (PCC hallmark)
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Client identifies exploring options
✔ Coach does not prescribe action
Marker achieved: YES
✔ Summarises insight
✔ Reinforces learning
✔ Leaves ownership with client
Marker achieved: YES
Structured conversation flow
Clear questioning progression
Some guiding by coach
Moderate use of reflection
Insight is supported, sometimes prompted
Slight “coaching framework feel”
Fully emergent conversation
Minimal structure
Deep silence + presence
No steering at all
Precision timing
Identity-level depth
No visible “process”
These are common failure points:
Too much advice-giving
Interrupting client thinking
Asking multiple questions at once
Overusing coaching models mechanically
Not exploring emotions or meaning
Staying only at surface level (“what will you do?” only)
PCC coaching is a structured, client-centred conversation where the coach actively listens, asks clear questions, follows a logical flow of exploration, and helps the client generate awareness and action while maintaining strong partnership and non-directive intent.
Below is an ICF ACC-level peer coaching script + marking rubric breakdown. This shows what assessors typically see at ACC level: basic structure, emerging coaching skills, but still inconsistent depth, presence, and evoking awareness.
Coach:
“So, what would you like to talk about today?”
Client:
“I feel stuck in my job and I don’t know if I should change careers.”
Coach:
“Okay… so you want to talk about your job situation?”
Coach:
“What is happening in your job right now?”
Client:
“It feels boring and I’m not growing anymore.”
Coach:
“Okay, so you’re bored.”
Coach:
“How does that make you feel?”
Client:
“Frustrated and tired.”
Coach:
“Okay, that must be hard.”
Coach:
“Why do you think you feel that way?”
Client:
“I think I’ve been in the same role too long.”
Coach:
“Right… maybe you need a change?”
Coach:
“What could you do about this?”
Client:
“I could look for another job, but I’m not sure.”
Coach:
“Maybe you should start applying and see what happens.”
Coach:
“What do you think is the best option?”
Client:
“I don’t know.”
Coach:
“Maybe staying is safer for now?”
Coach:
“So you’re stuck and unsure.”
Client:
“Yes.”
Coach:
“What will you do next?”
Client:
“I guess I could update my CV.”
Coach:
“Good, that’s a step forward.”
Coach:
“So today we talked about your job and updating your CV. Good session.”
Client:
“Okay, thanks.”
✔ Basic opening question used
❌ No clear contracting of outcome or success criteria
Marker: PARTIAL
✔ Some attention present
❌ Coach often shifts into advice/problem-solving
❌ Limited emotional regulation and curiosity
Marker: DEVELOPING
✔ Repeats some client words (“bored”, “stuck”)
❌ Mostly surface-level paraphrasing
❌ Misses emotional depth and meaning
Marker: BASIC
✔ Some “why” questions used
❌ Leads to assumptions instead of insight
❌ Limited exploration of meaning or identity
Marker: WEAK TO BASIC
✔ Simple questions present
❌ Closed or leading questions (“Maybe you should…”)
❌ Multiple coaching mistakes in phrasing
Marker: DEVELOPING
✔ Some coaching intent present
❌ Frequent advice-giving
❌ Solution direction imposed by coach
Marker: BELOW STANDARD RISK
✔ Client expresses feelings
❌ Insight mostly supplied by coach
❌ Client does not deeply reflect or reframe meaning
Marker: LIMITED
✔ Basic conversational exchange
❌ Coach leads conversation
❌ Little co-creation or equal partnership
Marker: DEVELOPING
✔ Surface issues explored
❌ No exploration of beliefs, identity, or values
❌ Conversation stays behavioural only
Marker: BASIC
✔ Action identified (CV update)
❌ Action suggested prematurely
❌ Not linked to deep awareness
Marker: FUNCTIONAL BUT SURFACE
Conversation is linear and simple
Coach often asks “why” and “what will you do?”
Coach may slip into advice or suggestions
Emotional depth is lightly explored
Awareness is limited or coach-driven
Structure is present but rigid or inconsistent
Presence is developing, not fully embodied
Common failures include:
Strong advising (“you should…”)
No coaching agreement
No listening beyond words
No curiosity or follow-up questions
Dominating the conversation
No reflection of client language
No exploration of meaning or feelings
ACC coaching is an emerging coaching conversation where the coach demonstrates basic listening, asks simple questions, and supports surface-level awareness and action, but still frequently defaults to advice, structure, or problem-solving rather than deep coaching presence.
Level
Focus
Coach Behaviour
ACC
Task + basic understanding
Asks simple questions, sometimes advises
PCC
Structured coaching flow
Clear listening, exploration, awareness
MCC
Emergent presence
Minimal, precise, deeply present coaching
Below is a high-level MCC-style script for establishing the coaching relationship, macro-contracting, roles, confidentiality, structure, and coaching boundaries.
This is designed to sound like a real MCC-level intake conversation, not a checklist. MCC here is about:
clarity without rigidity
presence without over-explaining
contracting without controlling
authority without dominance
Coach:
“Before we begin, what would help you feel most comfortable and supported in this conversation today?”
(pause, listen fully)
Coach:
“Just to align us, coaching is a space where I don’t advise, teach, or direct you. My role is to support your thinking, awareness, and decisions through questions, reflection, and presence.”
“What it is not is counselling, mentoring, or consulting where solutions are provided from me.”
Coach:
“What is your understanding of coaching as we begin this work together?”
(listen, reflect back if needed)
Coach:
“What are you hoping coaching will support you with?”
Coach (follow-up MCC-style depth):
“And what would success look like for you—not just in outcomes, but in how you experience yourself through this process?”
Coach:
“In this space, you bring your life, context, choices, and responsibility for your decisions. I bring full presence, attention, reflection, and questions that may help you see things differently.”
“How does that way of working sit with you?”
Coach:
“What feels important for you to take ownership of in this process for it to be meaningful?”
Coach:
“What we discuss here is confidential and stays between us, unless there is a legal or ethical requirement where safety is involved. If anything ever arises that affects confidentiality, I will be transparent with you.”
“How does that feel for you?”
Coach:
“Sessions are typically led by what feels most important for you in the moment. Sometimes we will explore deep awareness, sometimes we’ll focus more on decisions or action—but always guided by what emerges for you.”
“There is no fixed script we need to follow.”
Coach:
“I may sometimes ask questions, reflect what I notice, or offer observations—but I will always check in that it is useful for you.”
“What kind of coaching style supports you best when you’re thinking deeply?”
Coach:
“As we start this work together, what do you need from me in order to feel fully supported and challenged in a way that helps you grow?”
(pause, fully listen)
Coach:
“If at any point the coaching doesn’t feel useful, or you want to change how we work together, I invite you to say so directly. We can adjust in real time.”
Coach:
“You may experience clarity, discomfort, emotion, or silence during sessions. All of that is welcome here.”
“What matters is that you feel safe enough to think honestly.”
Coach:
“So as we begin, what feels most important for you to hold in mind about how we will work together?”
(client responds)
Coach (light reflection):
“Great. Let’s work from that together.”
✔ Clear confidentiality boundary
✔ Non-judgemental tone
✔ Emotional safety explicitly acknowledged
MCC marker: STRONG
✔ No rushing
✔ Uses pauses
✔ Responds rather than scripts
MCC marker: STRONG
✔ Asks client how coaching should work for them
✔ Invites feedback and preferences
MCC marker: MCC-LEVEL BEHAVIOUR
✔ Explicit boundaries:
no advice
no mentoring
no consulting
MCC marker: STRONG
✔ Client is framed as owner of decisions
✔ Coach is facilitator of awareness
MCC marker: STRONG
✔ Structure is flexible
✔ Adjustable in real time
✔ Not checklist-driven
MCC marker: HIGH MCC ALIGNMENT
✔ Invites client to comment on coaching style
✔ Adjusts in-session dynamics
MCC marker: MCC SIGNATURE BEHAVIOUR
✔ No over-explaining
✔ No teaching
✔ No frameworks imposed
MCC marker: STRONG
✔ Calm tone implied
✔ Normalises emotional experience
✔ No urgency
MCC marker: STRONG
✔ Confidentiality explained clearly
✔ Safety exception included
✔ Professional boundaries explicit
MCC marker: REQUIRED STANDARD MET
This is MCC because it:
does NOT over-explain coaching theory
does NOT dominate the space
does NOT rush to structure
does NOT “perform authority”
instead creates:
relational safety
shared ownership
real-time adaptability
deep clarity of roles
MCC contracting is a co-created, present, and flexible establishment of relationship boundaries where the coach creates safety, clarity, and partnership without rigidity, authority bias, or over-structuring the coaching space.
Below is a PCC-level macro contracting + relationship establishment script, followed by a clear MCC comparison section so you can see exactly what shifts at higher mastery level.
This reflects how PCC coaching is typically assessed:
structured but flexible
clear but not over-explained
client-centred but still somewhat “process-visible”
coach may still guide more than MCC
Coach:
“Welcome. Before we begin, what would you like to focus on in today’s session?”
Client:
“I want to talk about feeling stuck in my job.”
Coach:
“Okay. What would you like to achieve from this conversation today?”
Coach:
“Just to set us up, coaching is a space where I will ask questions, reflect what I hear, and support your thinking. You stay in control of the direction and decisions.”
“I won’t be giving advice, but I may offer observations if they’re useful.”
Coach:
“What has your experience of coaching been, if any?”
Coach (follow-up):
“And how does this way of working sound to you?”
Coach:
“In this relationship, you bring your experience, challenges, and goals. I bring structure, listening, and questions to help you explore and gain clarity.”
“How does that division of roles sit with you?”
Coach:
“Before we continue, I want to confirm that everything we discuss is confidential, except where there is a legal or safety requirement to share information.”
“Is that clear for you?”
Coach:
“Typically, we will start with what you want to focus on, explore your current situation, look at what’s getting in the way, and then identify possible next steps.”
“However, we can adapt this depending on what emerges in the session.”
Coach:
“What would make this coaching relationship successful for you?”
Coach:
“What responsibility do you feel you need to take in this process for it to work well for you?”
Coach:
“This is a collaborative process. I won’t be directing your decisions, but I will support you in thinking clearly and deeply.”
“How does that sound to you?”
Coach:
“Sometimes coaching can bring clarity, and sometimes it can bring discomfort or emotion. That’s all part of the process.”
“What support do you need from me to feel safe in this space?”
Coach:
“Before we move into the coaching itself, is there anything important we haven’t covered about how we will work together?”
Coach:
“Great. So with all that in place, where would you like to begin today?”
✔ Clear focus question
✔ Defines purpose of session
✔ Some structure present
PCC marker: STRONG
✔ Coaching defined explicitly
✔ Role boundaries stated
✔ Advice-giving explicitly excluded
PCC marker: STRONG BUT EXPLANATORY
✔ Client retains control
✔ Coach positions as facilitator
✔ Collaboration language used
PCC marker: STRONG
✔ Clear session flow explained
✔ Agenda framework provided
✔ Some predictability present
PCC marker: PCC CHARACTERISTIC (NOT MCC)
✔ Formal explanation provided
✔ Safety exception included
✔ Clear yes/no confirmation requested
PCC marker: REQUIRED STANDARD MET
✔ Ownership explicitly discussed
✔ Client asked about responsibility
PCC marker: STRONG
✔ Discomfort/emotion normalised
✔ Support needs explored
PCC marker: GOOD
✔ Roles clearly defined
✔ Coach vs client responsibilities explained
PCC marker: STRONG
✔ Structure can shift if needed
✔ Still slightly “planned framework feel”
PCC marker: DEVELOPING TOWARD MCC
✔ Clear entry into session
✔ Agenda handed back to client
PCC marker: STRONG
Explicit structure explained
Step-by-step coaching flow outlined
More “process visible”
Structure is implied, not explained
Emerges naturally in conversation
No framework presentation
Slightly formal and explanatory
“Coaching is a space where…”
More talking from coach
Minimal explanation
More questioning than telling
Language is lighter and more emergent
Present but still slightly “performing role”
Some planning visible
Fully present, no performance
No agenda holding
Coach still explains coaching
Coach defines structure
Client defines how coaching will work
Coach co-creates, not explains
“How does that sound to you?” used frequently
Agreement is checked explicitly
Agreement is continuously co-created in flow
Less formal checking, more natural alignment
Some need for clarity upfront
Structure reduces uncertainty
Comfortable entering ambiguity immediately
No need to fully define process upfront
PCC macro contracting is a structured, clear, and collaborative establishment of the coaching relationship where roles, confidentiality, expectations, and session flow are explicitly defined while still maintaining client ownership and flexibility.
Below is an ICF ACC-level macro contracting + relationship establishment script, followed by a marking rubric breakdown and key differences vs PCC/MCC.
ACC level is characterised by:
basic clarity
limited depth of contracting
coach-led structure
some coaching principles present, but inconsistently applied
occasional advice or directional framing
Coach:
“So, what do you want to talk about today?”
Client:
“I feel stuck in my job and I don’t know what to do.”
Coach:
“Okay, let’s talk about your job then.”
Coach:
“Coaching is where I ask you questions to help you think about your situation and find solutions.”
“I won’t tell you what to do, but I’ll help you figure things out.”
Coach:
“Have you done coaching before?”
Client:
“No.”
Coach:
“Okay, so this will just be me asking you questions to help you think through things.”
Coach:
“My role is to guide you through questions and help you find answers. Your role is to be open and honest so we can explore your situation.”
Coach:
“What we talk about here is private unless there is a safety issue. Is that okay for you?”
Coach:
“We’ll talk about your situation, what’s going on, and then try to figure out what you can do next.”
Coach:
“What do you think you want to achieve from this session?”
Coach:
“What do you think you need to do to make this coaching work?”
Coach:
“Okay, so let’s try understand your situation better. What exactly is going on at work?”
Client:
“I feel stuck and frustrated.”
Coach:
“Maybe you should start looking for other jobs then.”
Coach:
“So today we spoke about your job and maybe looking for other opportunities. That’s good progress.”
✔ Basic question asked (“What do you want to talk about?”)
❌ No clear contracting of outcome or success criteria
❌ No deeper exploration of expectations
ACC marker: PARTIAL
✔ Simple explanation given
❌ Oversimplified and coach-centred
❌ No exploration of client understanding of coaching
ACC marker: BASIC
✔ Coach engaged in conversation
❌ Limited depth of listening
❌ Some steering and advice interrupts presence
ACC marker: DEVELOPING
✔ Repeats some content (“your job”)
❌ Mostly surface-level listening
❌ Misses emotional and identity-level meaning
ACC marker: BASIC
✔ Simple questions used
❌ Leading questions and advice appear
❌ Limited exploration quality
ACC marker: WEAK TO DEVELOPING
✔ Some coaching intent present
❌ Advice given (“maybe you should…”)
❌ Coach shifts into problem-solving
ACC marker: BELOW STANDARD RISK AREA
✔ Basic exploration of situation
❌ No deep insight generation
❌ No reframing or perspective shift facilitation
ACC marker: LIMITED
✔ Some collaboration language
❌ Coach leads direction heavily
❌ Client not fully in control of flow
ACC marker: DEVELOPING
✔ Simple structure present (talk → explore → action)
❌ Rigid and coach-driven
❌ No flexibility or emergence
ACC marker: BASIC
✔ Confidentiality mentioned
❌ Very brief and not fully contextualised
✔ Minimum standard met
ACC marker: ACCEPTABLE
Basic introduction to coaching
Coach explains rather than co-creates
Structure is simple and linear
Focus is on “what’s the problem?”
Early move into action or advice
Limited exploration of expectations
Minimal depth of partnership creation
A candidate would likely fail if they:
Do not mention confidentiality at all
Only give advice instead of coaching
Do not ask any questions about client goals
Do not define coaching at all
Dominate conversation without listening
Show no coaching intent (pure conversation or mentoring)
Level
Structure
Coach Role
Depth
Language
ACC
Basic, linear
Directive/leading
Surface level
Simple, sometimes advising
PCC
Clear, structured
Facilitator
Moderate depth
Professional, consistent
MCC
Emergent, co-created
Fully present partner
Deep + identity level
Minimal, precise, adaptive
ACC macro contracting is a basic, coach-led introduction to coaching that explains roles, confidentiality, and structure in a simple way while beginning to explore client goals, but still lacks depth, consistency, and true co-created partnership.
In this transcript, Merci identifies elements of the coaching session that map across the ICF competencies. These highlights are extremely valuable to anyone wanting to improve their coaching or apply for an ICF credential.
Click here to get a copy of the annotated transcript
Aleka: Darcy, how are you
Darcy: Good. Good. How are you?
Aleka: I am good. I’m excited to meet with you today. So, what is on your mind?
Darcy: What I would like to look at today. I’m a student in the advanced Coaching program, and I am having particular trouble getting myself to participate in the mentor classes.
As a coach. I’ve been a client. But I just can’t make myself, for my hand up in the air and do it, and I’ve done my tell classes, my peer coaching client coaching as a pure client and peer coach.
And I have a small practice where I’m pretty comfortable.
I don’t know what it is about getting myself to jump into the mentor calls, and I don’t know if it’s the time frame. If it’s the number of people listening and I’m not… I really don’t know
Where the hesitancy is coming from.
Aleka: Gotcha. Well, first of all, that’s great news, and well done that you’ve got so much done at the ICA. That’s a huge win as well as you said that you have your practice with clients.
So, you’re doing it, you’re actually doing this coaching thing right here.
Just the mentor classes, and I believe, are these, if I’m right, at these classes where you have to demonstrate your coaching ability in front of a group of your peers.
Darcy: They’re typically, and see, I don’t know if this has a component of it as well. It’s typically, you know, the whole group calls and like for a teleclass. It’s the same time frame. And usually there’s three dyads, an attendee coach and attendee client and they work for 10 minutes and then the instructor will stop and ask the coach, you know, what their experience was, any feedback from the client and then they’ll, they’ll look at competencies and skills to think about or things to shift and then they’ll go on to the next. And usually there are three, three sets of people, and I’ve been the client a couple of times. I don’t know why I’m having… and I’ve got to do like 10, I think, or nine of them.
Aleka: Yeah, that sounds like an important step as far as practicing and getting that feedback. So today, would you like to really focus on that aspect of it? The fact that you would like to look at being able to do these mentor calls?
Darcy: Yes, please.
Aleka: And then, what, what would that look like, what would it look like to complete that goal?
Darcy: To motivate myself to give myself some accountability. I went ahead and registered for my observed coaching so that I could finish in order to participate in the observed coaching. My understanding is that you have to be nearly completed with your mentor calls. I gave myself a deadline of March 6th, and twice now, if chickened out. I put the class down in my day book, and then conveniently somebody else had to practice or something…I didn’t move.
Aleka: So, what I hear you saying is that you actually have taken a step forward to holding yourself accountable to this goal. So, what would be one more step forward?
Darcy: To do it.
That’s where we are. It sounds like I’m standing on the precipice of that. That moment I’m stepping into that moment where I’m doing it.
Aleka: Let me ask you just a bit about your coaching because you said that you were coaching as well in the office, and you’re practicing with clients, and you have that experience. How does that go for you?
Darcy: I think, well, I mean, the feedback that I’ve gotten is that it’s going well. And I thought about that. In relation to this, and I don’t know if it’s because both either on the phone or its live – but I have about a 60-minute session and I feel maybe that gives me – don’t know if this is going to be makes sense, but it gives me a good amount of time to come up with the right questions or get there, so I feel like there’s something about this sense of 10 minutes that I think that’s the resistance. I’m not sure.
Aleka: I appreciate that awareness, because at the beginning of our call you were, you were listing a few things, you said it time frame. You were a little bit unsure about what it was about this particular issue. And you mentioned the time frame. And you mentioned the number of people, but I’m hearing you say here that the issue is about time, ‘I have a whole 60 minutes to kind of formulate my questions’. Do you think that’s your block as far as moving forward?
Merci: We’re going to leave Darcy with that thought. You think about that, and I want to bring forward the observation that this is what it takes to create the coaching agreement within a session. This is not just the contract, we think of as, you know, how many sessions and how long they are. This is what has to happen every session. So, what Alexa has done is establish the coaching agreement -one of the markers for that is, ‘the coach helps the client to find what the client believes she or he needs to address or resolve in order to achieve what he or she wants to accomplish in the session’. So, it takes a few questions. Nice big open-ended questions. Curious questions that we saw demonstrated here. OK. Back to you and Darcy, we left you with that thought.
Darcy: I wonder if some of my hesitancy isn’t because of these mentor calls. It’s just 10 minutes, and I know we don’t have to resolve anything in the 10 minutes, but I’m not sure what’s standing in my way.
Aleka: Well, I think you’ve created some awareness about what could be standing in your way. I mean, you started talking about this time frame piece, which you’re speaking about it is, as I’m observing it is like when you’re coaching in the office you feel like I have all this time. You know, and there’s almost, as you’re talking about it, almost seem relaxed, like, but then when you’re doing the calls and you’re doing supervise coaching or observed coaching. It seems like there’s kind of a smaller time frame. And that’s creating this resistance, blocking for you moving forward. Is that correct?
Darcy: Think so. I think there’s also something about the,I mean I want the feedback.Compared to what we’re doing in the office.Not being directly observed I guess I feel like I have the freedom because they don’t have time pressure. If I’m not asking most helpful questions if I’m not you know, helping me move towards some clarity. I have some wiggle room.
Aleka: So, we have these two issues, now right? One is this time frame – sort of relaxed and then when you’re in this supervised coaching, it feels a little bit more uncomfortable and then we have this other piece where you you’re being observed. You’re sort of being watched. So out of those two issues if you could kind of feeling into those which do you think is, is the more significant block for you?
Merci: Okay, we’re going to interrupt again so Darcy gets to think a lot about this.I couldn’t help myself.There’s such awareness being created here, you can see how Aleka’s questions and posture is inviting this client to really think in an awareness kind of mode which is exactly what coaching is about. And in this competency, creating awareness, the coaches sharing what she notices about the client and the client situation and is, you know, curious, seeking the client’s input or encouraging their exploration. So, she’s left Darcy with two possibilities. So, we’ll get back to those…
Darcy: I actually think, even though I wanted to make it all about time, I think I’m a little intimidated by the immediacy, the feedback and not that I’ve ever heard anything on a call but fantastic feedback and information and I’m,I don’t know. I mean, this just isn’t how…when there’s a swimming hole, I’m the first one to jump off the cliff and in the swimming hole. This isn’t a usual area for me to have hesitancy around and I really want to complete the program on time. So, I have a lot of motivation to do it but unlike the teleclasses where I was taking them left and right, and I, you know, and I’m working on the written projects and I’ve done like I said, all my hours.I don’t know. I’m just I don’t know.
Aleka: Yes, and I can hear the frustration, a bit, you know as you’re talking about it like you’re right there and it’s just that little nudge forward. And you know, I also want to offer validation that
I think this is challenging. You know, to get up in front of people and perhaps practice doing something, you know, I think that’s a human thing. And I also know you as someone who’s been successful in a lot of different areas. And I know your background as a yoga teacher and a studio owner and I’m kind of thinking back to some of what we’ve talked about as far as doing yoga and I’m wondering if you’ve ever had that experience when you were, in that particular learning, where you’re getting up in front of people and having to be critiqued?
Darcy: Ah, that’s interesting. Yeah, we had…I hadn’t thought about that. We had a master series of master workshops, just for teachers at the studio over the course of the year, you know, teachers, not just my studio, any studio to come and work on their skills and it was actually taught by a friend of mine, and she called me out because I didn’t want my teachers to teach me on the mat, like I wanted them to be out there and provide… but I actually hid by moving all the time.I was never, not never, I was rarely, like, I would open a class and the class in the front of the room. But then I was on the go and she made me stand on a yoga block and teach standing on a yoga black because she’s like ‘you’re hiding’.
Aleka: What was that like?
Darcy: It was I felt like I was… Wow.Powerful
Aleka: Cool. Well, what I’m hearing is, you know… I’m getting this visual. Now you know you’re standing on a yoga block and you’re feeling like you’re being exposed. Right? So, what did you call upon within yourself enabled you to do it?
Darcy: I felt responsibility to do it because it was my studio. Respect for my friend and her assignment.
And I knew it was true. She addressed it, I was like, Oh, I do that and that’s not always helpful.
Aleka: So, what strength within yourself that you call upon to get through the challenging moment?
Merci: I’m going to stop us again Darcy, what strength? Hang on to that thought. You know, we often in coaching, say, you know, we’re looking for the aha moment. And so here we captured one. There’s not one in every session, but how can I let that go.So,how did she get there? Well, Aleka allowed Darcy to think. The first competency, I noticed was coaching presence – really being there for the client.Presence is an interesting word. It’s just being extremely, fully conscious to create a spontaneous relationship with the client.And employing a style that’s open, flexible and confident and that’s exactly what we witness here. Now, of course, powerful questions aided in that as well. But that’s the competency that stands out right now. Alright, Darcy back to your strength.
Darcy: I think that’s trying and I don’t know. I don’t think there’s, I don’t know what words, you’re gonna get a phrase.Desire to improve and, you know, since we’ve worked together before you know that’s a bit of a driver for me. Yeah, like if I find out that I’m not good at this thing. I’m inspired to do it and maybe because I was in that class setting. She literally took a block and said, now stand here. I’d no idea what she was going to do. Maybe I’ve built up some drama or something about this. I don’t know but my desire to get better at something rides me through it.
Aleka: So, a couple things I’m hearing is your tenacity, you know that grittiness, the part of you that goes, ‘because I want to’, you know, and ‘I want it’. And then the other part that I hear is, I didn’t get a choice but you know, I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but it sounded sort of like ‘because she put me there so …’
Darcy: What I meant was that I didn’t get a chance to think about it and like It was right then, thank you for that.
Aleka: It was just – do it, right? So, using those two strengths, you know, your tenacity and your desire of wanting it and this part that I just have heard, I’m hearing is that I just kind of have to do it. I just have just do it because that’s what I’m hearing ‘is that ‘I just have to do it’ through your story it was not like I was afraid and I waited to not be afraid, you know, and then I did it. I was…Is that an Ok word to use – afraid or apprehensive, or nervous. One of those words?
Darcy: All if that’s okay.
Aleka: That I did it anyway. So, applying that same kind of principle to this particular issue, what, what do you think would be a good action step, or forward step to meeting that goal?
Darcy: To make the commitment to myself.Really, you know, this one hour block by not picking anybody up from practice. I’m not rescheduling anything and committing to that. I thought I was doing that by giving myself the March 6th deadline.It’s given me too much wiggle room because I’m already doing the, like, did you ever do that in college where like, ‘okay, yeah, I can get, I can go as low as a C and get a good grade on this test”…like counting down the days and the number because I have the mentor classes all listed in my day planner.So, I think I just need to make a commitment and I haven’t done that.
Aleka: So, your first step to doing that was to create this March deadline. Right? But I’m hearing you say that that’s not necessarily as effective as you were hoping it would be. So, what would be another commitment that you could do?
Darcy: I think to commit to a very specific teleclass like this coming Thursday. They seem to be for my zone, Tuesdays and Thursdays at or 7 or 8pm and then there’s like a mid-morning Saturday.
So, but I feel like I need to, instead of just jotting them all down off the computer and like, ‘oh, I could do this, when I could do that’.Now, I find myself thinking in the morning that I’m going to do that one tonight. And then ah I’m like, well, I can just, I can just not do it and I’ve done that a couple times now like kind of kicked the can down the road, a few times.
And I think just being reminded of the experience of teaching on the block for some… I’m not able to put words to it, but that feels,I need to give myself my own yoga block to stand on, this is the day you’re going to stand on the yoga block. When you get into that call room.You’re not gonna wait for everybody else to volunteer, because that’s, I’ve done that as well. Like, I’ve gone into a call intending to volunteer to coach and then I wait and I wait and oh they got three.I’ll do it next time.
Aleka: I don’t know. I really appreciate that, you know, and the fact is, you’ve done this, you’ve done this, you have it in you to do it.And something you said a second ago was maybe I’ve traded a story around that or, maybe you used the word drama. ‘Maybe I’ve created drama.’
That answer when you’re talking about the yoga block. You seem very clear there doesn’t seem to be much drama there. ‘I’ve done this’.
Aleka: Do you feel like there’s any other story or any other drama that’s attached to this issue?
Darcy: Hey, that’s what I meant by wiggle room like why March 6th wasn’t motivating and that is,I have created story around failure that’s what I’ve done when I think about it. I’ve done all the things that I can’t really get graded on, not that I get graded on the mentor calls, but I’m going to get immediate feedback, and not that it’s going to be bad, but I just don’t want to not be really good at this.But I also know that to be really good at this,you’ve got to get that feedback. So,you know me.Every time I think I’ve messed something up.I reach out to you, like, how could this have gone differently or so it’s unlike me to resist this… to get feedback.
Aleka: Yeah! I so appreciate that you’re using two really important parts, you know, one is feedback and one is failure, as I hear those two words, one has a much bigger story it, you know. So, when you go to think about this ICA mentor call, which word are you connecting with?
Darcy: I don’t want to fail. And you can’t fail right, but…
Aleka: Yeah. Well, the thing about the story is, it’s not always accurate. Yeah, we can we can play with, we can change it. So, what would be more true around that?
Darcy: Feedback. I want to be seeking and receiving really good feedback because that’s all I’ve ever heard.
Aleka: Yeah. Me too. I remember my days there …yeah, important feedback, so what does it take to change that story? I know we get it up here (head). Right? What does it take to change that story here (heart), you know, bring it into our truth?
Darcy: I think just stopping the story. Yeah, when I start the story and I can feel the hesitancy rise.Because I can find myself like fooling around in the kitchen or starting a load of laundry or something that’s going to take me too close to the call time. I think I’m unconsciously in the story at that time.
Aleka: And you have such, you’re very aware that you’re able to identify that, you know, the awareness that it takes, a mindfulness to say, I know that I’m doing this thing. I think is a huge part of it.
And how can I support you, because these are huge steps, what? What can I do to support you in this really important goal?
Darcy: When you see me at work, say, “How many mentor classes have you done?”
Aleka: Perhaps, are you open to creating an action step with you, you know, holding, let me hold you accountable, like the date and the time of the class in the call, so perhaps you can tell me how it went?
Darcy: That would be helpful. Yeah.
Aleka: How’s that feel?
Darcy: Okay, so because I’m more afraid of you. (laughs)
Aleka: Perhaps you could email me, perhaps the date, the time of the call. If you don’t know, and we can. I can check in with you. Process it and go over the feedback. You can check in with me.
Darcy: OK, so when I finish this, I’m actually going to revamp my schedule, and then I will submit to you at least two dates, like in the near future, that I’m going to commit to being a volunteer.
Aleka: That’s awesome. And before we close, can we just take a minute to imagine how that’s going to feel when you’ve reached that goal? When you write that email or when you’ve gotten off that call. And you hang up that phone.
Darcy: No, I think it’ll be, I mean, I have nothing but good expectations. You know, I think it’s going to be useful information. Yeah.
Aleka: Absolutely! You’re phenomenal. Thanks. Yeah, will remember that. So, we will connect moving forward, and I look forward to hearing how amazing it was and how the feedback was
Darcy: Great, thank you.
Merci: Thank you so much. Darcy. That was great. I think everyone has been in Darcy’s shoes one way or another. Amazing. And I’m sure Alexa has been there, and you notice that she didn’t bring anything from her experience; she focused on her client. But you could hear the empathy, and you could hear the, you know, that sort of encouraging. This was something that Aleka clearly didn’t find unusual. So, the last two competencies kind of go together, planning and goal setting. You know the coach supported the client to develop a plan that was, you know, really driven by the client, and then managing progress and accountability here the client asks to be held accountable to her new plan, and then the coach doesn’t just say will call me you invite what would be helpful. Would that be helpful? And I want to appreciate the lightness. You know, we could hear the significance in the beginning, and then Darcy kind of lightened up, and Aleka went right with it. She didn’t hold back from her lightness, if there was a chuckle there, she kind of leaned into it and, I think, we often think of coaching as something that has to be super serious and here it can be, can have an aha moment, it can have all the aspects of good planning and good goal setting and still be light. So, I’m just going to wrap up here. So, Aleka, what did you notice in regards to the competencies in this coaching session?
Aleka: Will you, I think you’re probably better to judge that than I was, since I was in it, but it’s been a while since I was able to do a laser session. A lot of my sessions tend to be just longer by nature. So, it was fun to create the contract, create the agreement of what we are going with, and then get to it really quickly. You know, I forget sometimes that, like you, I don’t always need long sessions, so it is great to, kind of, I felt that we got some pretty good closure through the whole thing with some really important action steps. There were some good questions. And that really opened that up. We did have that great moment where I love it when clients go ah.
Merci: It’s a sign of a powerful question when they don’t have a ready answer, you know, often we’ve already asked ourselves that obvious question and we have a pat answer when someone pauses and I think Darcy did that two, she was thoughtful and then ahhh…That’s a very, very powerful stuff. That was good. Yeah. 27:57 Yeah.
Aleka: Like we did have … I honestly feel that even though we’ve worked together before, like this was actually a coaching session, we will follow up with this. So, it felt good that there were some clear action steps. 28:11
Merci: 28:12 Thank you again. I can’t say thank you enough for letting people see what live coaching looks like. So, thank you very much.
Aleka and Darcy: Thanks for having us.
Aleka Thorvalson is a true holistic life coach bridging the gap between mind, body, emotion, spirit, and science to assist clients on their own paths of understanding, discovery, healing, and transformation. Aleka is a Certified Professional Coach trained through the International Coach Academy in the Advanced Coach Training Program. She is also a member and a Professionally Credentialed Coach (PCC) with the International Coaching Federation (ICF). Additionally, Aleka is a
This transcript is not a first-session foundational contracting conversation. It is a session contracting demonstration between a coach and an existing client. Aleka and Darcy have coached together before, so many foundational contracting elements (confidentiality, coaching definition, ethics, logistics, roles, fees, etc.) are assumed to have already been completed.
That means this transcript demonstrates ICF Core Competency 3: Establishes and Maintains Agreements (session agreement) at a strong PCC level, but not the complete foundational contracting process you would use in the first meeting with a new client.
Below I've analysed it against the checklist you are building.
Contracting Element
Transcript Evidence
PCC
MCC
Comments
Welcome
✅ Yes
✓
✓
Warm, human welcome
Thank you/Appreciation
✅ Yes
✓
✓
Appreciative throughout
Purpose of today's session
✅ Excellent
✓✓
✓✓
Strong example
What brought you today?
✅ Yes
✓✓
✓✓
Excellent open question
What are you hoping for?
⚠ Partly
✓
✓
Could have been explored more
Desired outcome
✅ Excellent
✓✓
✓✓
Very strong
Success for today's session
✅ Excellent
✓✓
✓✓
Excellent contracting
What would make coaching worthwhile?
❌ No
Missing
Six-month vision
❌ No
Missing (not appropriate for this demo)
Investment worthwhile
❌ No
Missing
Purpose of coaching
❌ No
Existing client
Coaching is / isn't
❌ No
Existing client
Coach role
❌ No
Existing client
Client role
❌ No
Existing client
Confidentiality
❌ No
Existing client
Ethics
❌ No
Existing client
Boundaries
❌ No
Existing client
Logistics
❌ No
Existing client
Accountability
✅ Later
✓✓
✓✓
Excellent ending
Ready to begin?
❌ No
Missing
"Darcy, how are you?"
"I am good. I'm excited to meet with you today."
The coach
establishes rapport
demonstrates presence
creates psychological safety
Although simple, it is authentic.
MCC observation
An MCC might spend a few more seconds arriving together before moving into coaching.
This is textbook PCC.
"So, what is on your mind?"
This is beautifully open.
No assumptions.
Client chooses.
ICF Competency:
Establishes and Maintains Agreements
After Darcy explains...
Aleka asks:
"Today, would you like to really focus on that aspect of it?"
Excellent.
Notice she narrows the topic without changing it.
Then...
"What would that look like?"
This is excellent.
She immediately moves from
Topic
↓
Desired outcome
This is exactly what ICF wants.
Excellent example.
Coach:
"What would that look like to complete that goal?"
This is much stronger than
"What do you want?"
It asks
"What does success actually look like?"
Very PCC.
Aleka repeatedly checks.
Examples
"Is that correct?"
"Do you think that's your block?"
"Out of those two issues..."
This is excellent re-contracting.
She doesn't assume.
She verifies.
Very PCC.
Approaching MCC.
Notice she never says
"So your problem is confidence."
Instead
"What do you think?"
"Which feels bigger?"
"What do you notice?"
This is client-led.
Excellent.
Excellent ending.
Coach asks
"How can I support you?"
Beautiful.
Then
"Would you like me to hold you accountable?"
Notice
Permission first.
Very ICF.
Later
Client chooses
Email dates
Coach accepts
Perfect.
Coach says
"Can we just take a minute to imagine how that's going to feel..."
Excellent.
Future pacing.
Celebration.
Closure.
Everything below would normally happen before this conversation with a brand-new client.
Thank you for choosing me.
I'm looking forward to partnering with you.
What led you to coaching?
Missing.
Missing.
Only explored for today's session.
Not the coaching journey.
Missing.
Missing.
Example
"When we finish our coaching programme, what would make you say it was worth every rand?"
Missing.
Example
Coaching is a thinking partnership.
Missing.
Examples
therapy
mentoring
consulting
advice
Missing.
Missing.
Missing.
Missing.
Missing.
Missing.
Missing.
Missing.
Instead of
"Let's begin."
ICF increasingly prefers
"Are you ready to begin?"
or
"Would now be a good time to start coaching?"
★★★★★
This is one of the best publicly available demonstrations of PCC-level session contracting. It shows:
Clear topic exploration
Collaborative agreement
Outcome definition
Ongoing re-contracting
Strong accountability
Client-led coaching
★★☆☆☆
It is not intended to demonstrate the first meeting with a new client, so it understandably omits foundational elements such as confidentiality, ethics, coaching definitions, logistics, roles, and long-term coaching outcomes.