There are many ways of classifying assessment but one basis of classifying is the nature of the assessment task required of learners, whether the assessment task is done through paper-and-pencil tests (traditional assessment) or through non-paper-and-pencil tests (authentic assessment).
Moreover, you need a rubric for a reliable scoring of products or processes or a portfolio of these products and processes. If you intend to give a single score to the students, you use a holistic rubric. If, on the other hand, you wish to give specific scores on the different criteria for every dimension of the product or process, or portfolio, you use an analytic rubric.
During my observation, the assessment task aligned with the learning outcomes. Everything is aligned to anchor the learning outcomes. Since the teacher followed a strict way of constructing an assessment to ensure the quality of a certain task, I can say that both traditional and authentic tasks are formulated in accordance with the principles of test construction.
Compared to traditional assessments, authentic assessments have a number of advantages. They are more likely to be accurate than traditional assessments, especially for learning objectives that call for a higher-order cognitive skill.
If I will become a teacher in the future, I can make the assessment process more meaningful and more acceptable to students in a way that the assessment should be connected with the lesson that the teacher stressed during the discussion. In that way, students will be able to answer the task given by the teacher.