Chroma Contrast and Detail Preserving in Color to Grayscale Conversion
In Color Space
Linear
Nonlinear
In Image Space
Pixels (RGB)
Using colors in the image
Different gray for different color
Relative difference
Using colors in the image and their position in image space
Colors can map to same gray…..
=>
Fig. 1, Color to Grayscale Conversion
Dimension reduction 3D to 1D;
Information loss
Color to Gray;
Luminance vs. chrominance
Display has less than [0,100] Y-range.
Contrast
Fig. 2, Color-to-Grayscale – Extreme Case: Constant luminance [Neumann et al. 07]
=>
Fig. 3, Isoluminant Colors
Local changes, contradictions, comput. costs;
Color contrast map to enhance gray image;
Same color may output different gray value;
Appearance of constant color regions distort.
Haloing artifacts may produce.
Same luminance for the same RGB triplets;
Speed, naturalness, luminance range;
Color feature optimized in conversion;
Mostly, color order is strictly satisfied, might be ambiguous (culture, person).
Local enhancement via high-frequency chrominance information in the luminance;
Spatially adaptive;
Image enhancement, possible artifacts.
Global technique maintain luminance consistency;
Constrained MDS with color quantization;
Enormous computational demands.
Color2Gray: Saliency preserving based on local contrasts;
Express locally visible changes;
Use conjugate gradient iterations.
Globally decolorize algo for contrast enhancing;
Express grayscale as continuous, image dependent, piecewise linear mapping.
Perceptually based color to grayscale transform;
Gradient-inconsistency (COLOROID ) correction;
Simple iteration and the 2D integration.
Globally assign grey values, determine color ordering;
Helmholtz-Kohlrausch color appearance effect;
Locally enhance greyscale to reproduce original contrast;
Introduces lost discontinuities in regions of color contrast.
No conversion produces universally good results;
Decolorize: good for images with narrow gamuts;
Smith08: good for colorful images.
Fig. 4, Evaluation example.
Relax the color order constraint based on human perception;
Automatic selection of suitable gray scale;
Bimodal distribution constrains spatial difference.
(a) Original color image example. (b) Luminance only (CIELab) Conversion. (c) Lu, Xu, Jia's Conversion.
(d) Color2Gray(Gooch)05's conversion. (e) Decolorize05(Grundland)'s Conversion. (f) Smith08's Conversion.
(d) Rasche(MDS)05's conversion. (e) Bala04(HF chroma)'s Conversion. (f) Neumann07(Coloroid)'s Conversion.
Fig. 5, Latest Color2Gray Method's Result.
1. R Bala,R Eschbach, Spatial Color-to-Grayscale Transform Preserving Chrominance Edge Information, Color Imaging Conference, 2004.
2. K. Rasche, R. Geist, J. Westall, Re-coloring images for gamuts of lower dimension, Computer Graphics Forum 24 (2005) 423–432.
3. A. Gooch et al., Color2Gray: salience-preserving color removal, ACM Trans. Graphics 24(2005) 634–639.
4. M. Grundland, N. Dodgson, The decolorize algorithm for contrast enhancing, color to grayscale conversion, Tech. Report, Computer Laboratory, Cambridge University, 2005.
5. Neumann et al., An Efficient Perception-based Adaptive Color to Gray Transform, Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging, 2007.
6. K. Smith, et al., Apparent greyscale: A simple and fast conversion to perceptually accurate images and video, Computer Graphics Forum 27, 3 (2008).
7. M Cadik, Perceptual Evaluation of Color-to-Grayscale Image Conversions, Pacific Graphics, 2008.
8. Lu, Xu, Jia, Contrast Preserving Decolorizatio, ICCP, 2012.