Short
The 9th circuit court disagrees with you.
On August 13, 2021 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ignored scientific evidence and failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its 1996 regulations adequately protect the public against all the harmful effects of wireless radiation
https://sites.google.com/site/mocosafeg/...”
In their suit against FCC, EHT presented 11,000 pages of testimony going over the harms of cell tower radiation. See: SCIENTIFIC, POLICY AND TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE FILED IN EHT ET AL., V FCC CASE https://ehtrust.org/environmental-health-trust-et-al-v-fcc-key-documents/
[ in this NextDoor thread
https://nextdoor.com/p/2z7YJjjSn5fn/c/829139586?post=239601828&comment=829139586&ct=rCQcNAcqAEzxkwHFmzvjsbU1tn8yhDNWw2DUJyDkd-Xh67j5Lo3h5jO2k4VDnXch&ec=OsTQaK5EfsnyavzwbSdG6xCsaFBVDChIdtlFdebAXMw%3D ]
Kent Chamberlin : Is Cellphone Radiation Harmful?
The Conway Daily Sun: Aug 2, 2023 Updated Aug 2, 2023