Observations of the Population
If I observe it within people, how are they not capable of the act themselves?
The defining characteristic of observation is that it involves drawing conclusions, as well as building personal views about how to handle similar situations in the future, rather than simply registering that something has happened. -Wiki
"Observe always that everything is the result of a change, and get used to thinking that there is nothing nature loves so well as to change existing forms and to make new ones like them." Meditations. iv. 36. -Marcus Aurelius
People don't like to be called on their 'game'. It's like you found out their secret. And once exposed loses the appeal to them which they will hold against you.
The Body reflects the mind. If one feels they are consciously aware of not only themselves but everything around them, why does one lack the discipline to reflect that in their own body?
Don't assume others have the same capacity for inner monologue and reflection as yourself. Don't assume you have a greater capacity for inner monologue and reflection as others. What if inner monologue is a mental tick and creates a facade within your head?
Profiling a person is valid within your head. Not verbally. It's how humans learn through pattern recognition. To deny this is to deny how we learn and perceive. But of course, don't make it obvious you are doing it
Subtle sarcasm isn't as subtle as one thinks. Humanity has a great capacity to understand and detect it
People find comfort in knowing others vices. Either to have a "ace in the hole" for later use, to leverage power over them in the present now, or to humanize them and further accept them. (Helps to relate)
People think like they walk (Borders on the body reflecting the mind)
Attraction is within the eyes. The pathway to the soul.
Routine breeds complacency. Humanity finds it so easy to fall into a routine, and resists change once established as a routine. By the same token, one could use a routine as an advantage. By allotting a majority of chores to routine one would free up an exorbitant amount of time to further facilitate other interests one might find enjoyable.. I find that is not the case for the majority.
Seniority gives a false sense of security. Linked to routine that people feel safe within. Just because you're necessary doesn't mean you're important.
As one ages, it becomes harder to keep everything aligned. More responsibilities as we age in a linear scale makes is harder to keep up on them
People with no visible vice are the ones to observe the most as they may be the most interesting, or most disturbed. Based off perception of profiling, if one thinks about it, it becomes easy to see what the vice of a person is based off of body, language, appearance, attitude. Those that mask all those well are either masters of observation themselves or innocent beings that don't curse themselves with such thoughts.
Assumption is justified if you are willing to deal with the repercussions if u are wrong
Majority of humanity likes to take their consciousness off-line to relax (Veg out). Excessive discipline or routine in this procedure strengthens neuronal pathways to encourage this behavior when it is not warranted. Which makes those people easy to spot when they are confronted with learning new abilities
People fear change due to lack of faith in their ability to adapt to the change
People believe easier if u have a 2nd piece of information to confirm what you state. Even if there is no proof of validity within that second piece of information. ( People use Statistics to believe)
People that consider themselves to have an abundance of inner monologue tend to be shy, uneasy, retracted and don't seek popularity to the normal extent. Observer in social situations vs participator
Humanity lacks the ability to entertain themselves. Humanity as a whole likes to be entertained rather then to entertain. Which is linked to taking their consciousness off-line (sloth)
Females main hobby is relationships. Men tend to have other interests that they value more then a relationship, which is why there is conflict between men and women. A women sees a relationship as engaging as a males favorite hobby.
Majority of females tend to be histrionic based off the relationship/hobby theory. Women would be far more capable if not dictated by emotional responses
Humanity puts as much thought towards living as they do dying. People neither put fortitude of thought towards death nor living in the present now. They seem to somehow blanket themselves with enough distractions to not warrant this action
Voice of a parent carries more weight then that of a bachelor. Society is set up to believe parents as a lone bachelor is seen as a recluse/questionable in cases of eye witnessing, valor, opinions etc. However I link that to majority rules, as the majority of adults 30> have children
People allow themselves dark thoughts. Pushing people down the stairs, driving into a bridge bunker at high speeds etc. People test the water with their dark thoughts but rarely act upon them. Freedom within the mind allows them that reprieve from a situation in which they would like to see a different outcome then the norm. If exposed it could be linked to jealously, rage, hate which is why people find solace in keeping that to themselves. One should never discount a persons ability to do this
A person who strives to gain power over others, lacks the power over themselves. It takes a great deal of drive and time to leverage power over others, that could only mean they distract conscious thought away from themselves.
To defeat an argument, think of every counter argument of your opinion and expose it before others do while sticking to your original argument. Staying positive in the face of adversity creates your moral diversity
Insecure people judge. Helps to facilitate a feeling of superiority within ones mind to help combat the feelings of jealousy or inability to realize people are allowed their own opinion/style
People put up walls to hide their flaws. Linked to insecurity, these people are consciously aware that others like them may judge them. To combat that they put up a wall of facades to defeat feeling judged within their mind to feel secure. What is interesting is the person stops their conscious observation at that point, never growing into the idea of one shouldn't care what others think of them, as long as they act within the societal norm
People who claim to be %100 sober %100 the time never realize life's vast contrast of mental perspectives. If one never tests themselves voluntarily how do they learn to handle other stressors that are forced upon them in life.
People keep the obvious to themselves.
It feels good to be right, but you learn more by being wrong
People depend on others too much. Stop putting faith in others when you have no faith in yourself. I understand it's easier/efficient to simply ask someone that is informed of the topic under question for the conclusion. But humanity doesn't learn anything by doing that and all too often fall into the routine of never discovering the answer for themselves. Which propagates the weak-minded mentality to always ask for help, and thus one will always be dependant upon others.
Humanity means well consciously, not inherently morally. There is a redundant check within ones head when one strives to mean well outside of routine. What that means is inherently, people have to consciously force themselves to mean well.. (example: I will give $ to a homeless person) Which in turn creates a facade of meaning well since meaning well should be second nature and require no conscious thought of the act itself. That is of course until that act of "meaning well" becomes routine (2nd nature)
A sheen/shine on the face reflects unawareness of oneself in outside situations. Chances are they are looking at themselves in one light when they prepare themselves. One should account for outside light and fluorescent light to be different/brighter then your bathroom light. If one cannot observe what is right in front of them, then one should profile them accordingly. Same could be said for obvious unsightly hair exposed out of the social norm (arms, legs, unshaven)
Auditory input has an effect on not only the pattern of thought, but the mood of thought as well. Auditory input also has the distinct ability to be processed subconsciously without direction from one's conscious (One finds themselves foot tapping to the music = mind/body connection). I theorize it's similar to breathing which without conscious recognition becomes second nature.
Realtime conversations are almost subconscious compared to reflective thinking. Reflective conscious forethought (in a comfort zone) programs your ability to carry on a fluid subconscious conversation at a later time.
The order of perceptions based off of order of importance: Visual/Auditory/Touch/Smell/Taste/Equilibrioception
Hesitation is a visual representation of ones indecision. So often I find myself finishing peoples sentences within my mind, or making choices for them in place where I have no power for such a decision. Three paths of thought enter me when I observe hesitation. The first being the obvious, the person hasn't dedicated the resources to be confident within their choice. The second being a Freudian slip of the mind or a mental stutter. When one has 2 or more choices for 1 conclusion, often the mind battles back and forth trying to justify the better choice or the more accepted choices vs their personal preference. The pressure of the immediate time line amplifies this problem for those that have ignored pressure in the past causing an almost endless loop of indecision until a 2rd conscious trigger attempts to stop it and rationalize it. Or until someone makes a choice for them. The third being hesitation based off of lack of time. The mind can only process it's observations so fast, if one is given a fraction of that time to base a choice off of, one might hesitate instinctively because they haven't had ample time to formulate a conclusion of the observation. (Pulling out in front of traffic)
Sarcasm is a powerful mental solvent. A well placed clever line of sarcasm has the ability to sit in someone's head and dissolve their view and/or confidence of the given topic. The ability to formulate sarcasm on the fly is linked to *real time conversations, in which the time given after a sarcastic comment is so small one cannot bring conscious thought into the equation to help them think of a retort. That is what bothers people upon reflection after being removed from the conversation, as sarcasm is a battle of the minds ability to adapt and formulate a rebuttal on the fly. Far too often people think of a clever line too far after the fact. However I make the stance quick retorts are a learned trait
Humanity wallows in awe of it's minor accomplishments while more important ones are left unattended. Americans have justified leveraging their smaller, easier accomplishments with more merit then what it's actually worth. While the larger ones go unattented as almost they are defeated before even attempting. American Defeatism justifying their Activism.
The immediate justification of one's experience by leveraging their education, children, relationship, military experience etc on the given topic before an attempt on the answer is given, shows lack of confidence to inspire respect based off one's presentation alone. Seen as a shortcut in justifying yourself as having merit to the audience within your mind without the discipline to create that through your personality.
The problem I find is I think of every possible angle of a scenario, then as I live it out exactly as I had foreseen within one of those mental foresights. I see it's distorting my perception of time and reality. I suppose now that i'm conscious of that fact written out in front of me, it should merely be a matter of faith to trust which mental path I perceive as being correct with the highest statistical probability to predict the future. lol.. .
Humanity averts blame on failures towards a chaos factor or a 3rd party trigger (another person, bad luck etc) rather then putting the blame on themselves.(even on small failures) The hypocrisy is when something positive happens which may not be their doing at all, they place the success of that on themselves when they may or may not have had the decisive factor in the success. The self sustaining cyclic self encouraging facade they've developed to protect themselves against their fears.
%75 of females require to be in a relationship %95 of the time. Allowing only a month or two between relationships max.
© Kiehl 2006