Introduction
Assessment for learning (AFL) is an important approach for teachers at all levels. It opens opportunities for students to receive feedback and improve their learning and performance. It also helps students to be more involved in the learning process and help them gain confidence in in learning and meet the teachers' expectations and the standards outlined for their levels.
One way of thinking about AFL is that it aims to ‘close the gap’ between a learner’s current situation and where they want to be in their learning and achievement. Skilled teachers plan tasks which help learners to do this.
AFL involves students becoming more active in their learning and starting to ‘think like a teacher’. They think more actively about where they are now, where they are going and how to get there.
There are a number collaborative tools that can help assessment for learning.
Edit this menu via the Pages tab
Show me
Digital Learning and Teaching
Edit this menu via the Pages tab
Show me
Digital Learning and Teaching
Research overwhelmingly supports that online peer assessments can support a student-centered approach when assessments are implemented through collaborative peer-to-peer communication, active participation, and interactivities. The ability to provide constructive feedback helps learners to process new information, which is not a naturally acquired skill in eLearning. Learners who participate in collaborative assessments and peer-to-peer feedback activities are better prepared for real-world situations. Lastly, it is important for online instructors to view assessments as a process for learning as well as an assessment of learning.
As mentioned previously, the planning and design of collaborative activities are critical in supporting effective interactions. One benefit of assessment and feedback activities is learner motivation, which is fostered within learners by engaging them in real-world assessment situations. Another benefit of collaborative activities is that they encourage learners to use external evaluations to provide internal self-assessments of their own learning.
Additionally, by sharing assessments and allowing learners to provide peer-to-peer feedback creates transparent learning environments and supports developing skills within a growing learning community. Another benefit to allowing learners to provide each other with constructive feedback facilitates two-way learning; once when the learner participates in the assessment and, again, when the learner provides peer feedback.
Planning for collaborative learning requires a different approach to pedagogy and learning. Instructors should take advantage of the technology and tools available, continuously monitor student interactions, and manage time wisely to overcome these challenges. Feedback and assessment activities require instructors to understand assessment processes and the factors that influence these collaborative online activities. This can pose a challenge to instructors who do not have the training needed to design and facilitate these activities within an eLearning environment. One way to overcome this challenge is for online instructors to develop and share best practices that facilitate feedback and assessment activities.
Create an infographic on two tools that can be helpful for assessment for learning (include, what tool is? how to use it, how does it help for student collaboration and teachers' assessment for learning)
1. BE AS SPECIFIC AS POSSIBLE
For example, feedback like “Great job!” doesn’t tell the learner what he did right, and likewise, a statement such as “Not quite there yet” doesn’t give her any insight into what she did wrong and how she can do better the next time around.
Instead, researchers suggest taking the time to provide learners with information on what exactly they did well, and what may still need improvement. They also note that it can be helpful to tell the learner what he is doing differently than before.
2. THE SOONER THE BETTER
Numerous studies indicate that feedback is most effective when it is given immediately, rather than a few days, weeks, or months down the line.
In one study that looked at delayed versus immediate feedback, the researchers found that participants who were given immediate feedback showed a significantly larger increase in performance than those who received delayed feedback.
Another research project, from the University of Minnesota, showed that students who received lots of immediate feedback were better able to comprehend the material they had just read.
3. ADDRESS THE LEARNER’S ADVANCEMENT TOWARD A GOAL
Timperley and Hattie note that effective feedback is most often oriented around a specific achievement that students are (or should be) working toward. When giving feedback, it should be clear to students how the information they are receiving will help them progress toward their final goal.
4. PRESENT FEEDBACK CAREFULLY
The way feedback is presented can have an impact on how it is received, which means that sometimes even the most well-meaning feedback can come across the wrong way and reduce a learner’s motivation.
Psychologist and author Edward Deci has identified three situations in which feedback could be counterproductive:
When learners feel too strictly monitored: If learners feel that they are being too closely monitored, they might become nervous or self-conscious, and as a result, disengaged from learning.
When learners interpret feedback as an attempt to control them: Learners may sometimes interpret feedback as an attempt to control them or tell them how they should be doing something rather than guidance on how to improve.
When learners feel an uncomfortable sense of competition: Feedback shared in a group setting could cause learners to feel like they have to compete with their peers. This can be another source of disengagement in learning.
To avoid these situations, Deci suggests fully explaining the purpose of any monitoring, and ensuring that learners understand how the feedback is meant to help them compete against their own personal bests rather than each other.
5. INVOLVE LEARNERS IN THE PROCESS
The importance of involving learners in the process of collecting and analyzing performance-based data cannot be understated. Pennebaker says, “Students must be given access to information about their performance.... At the broadest level, students need to know if they actually have mastered the material or not. Giving them information about the ways they are studying, reading, searching for information, or answering questions can be invaluable.”
When students have access to this information, they develop an awareness of their learning, and are more easily able to recognize mistakes and eventually develop strategies for tackling weak points themselves.
Group activities range from informal discussions to highly structured collaborative grouping activities. Collaborative group learning is one way for learners to establish communication with others in the course. Research and practitioners of online learning environments largely support the benefits of true collaboration through discussions and sharing of new information.
A successful collaborative group activity allows learners to feel a sense of community and provides learners with an active role and responsibility, which is shared among his or her established groups. Online learners in well-designed learning environments experience meaningful learning, develop higher order thinking, and begin to develop an eLearning community where collaborative group activities are encouraged.
Research supports a number of benefits to collaborative online group activities such as modeling group norms and posting expectations. Collaborative group activities should be group -entered to begin forming a collaborative online sense of community support. This can be easily achieved through introductory activities that require learners to get to know one another. Therefore, later, more complex collaborative activities can be presented to learners without them feeling overwhelmed or anxious because the collaborative community support has already been established.
When learners engage in discussions with other learners instead of just the instructor, the opportunities for knowledge retention is great. The use of online discussion activities within online learning continues to grow. A number of researchers have conducted investigations into online collaborative discussion groups, focusing on the ways in which discussion activities move learners from learner to expert. It is important to provide learners with opportunities to reflect and share viewpoints; this can be done through collaborative online discussion activities.
In collaborative group discussions, learners learn to listen attentively to each other and value the efforts of shared knowledge and input. Online discussion technology also helps learners respond to questions, participate, and offer peer feedback to support the sharing of new information. Successful discussion groups include learners who are actively engaged in accountable and responsible talk. Accountable talk between learners emphasizes logical connections and allows learners to draw reasonable conclusions to new information. Learning through collaborative online discussion groups is reciprocal and the most direct way for instructors to assess learning online.
Online discussions require instructors to moderate the discussion activities and this requires time. In a primarily asynchronous learning environment, this can be tedious and time-consuming for instructors. The development of collaborative online discussions requires instructors to include sufficient time for learner discourse and moderation. To ensure learner success, instructors must actively work to ensure discussions are engaging and lead learners to high-quality learning outcomes.
The challenge for online instructors becomes how to construct a collaborative discussion activity, which is engaging and meets the needs of all learners. A way this can be addressed is for instructors to develop discussions that are specifically focused on 1 or 2 specific learning goals.
Questioning enables a student, with the help of their teacher, to find out what level they are at.
The teacher provides feedback to each student about how to improve their learning.
Students understand what successful work looks like for each task they are doing.
Students become more independent in their learning, taking part in peer assessment and self-assessment.
Summative assessments (e.g. the student’s exam or portfolio submission) are also used formatively to help them improve.
What is the difference between formative and summative assessment?
Activities associated with summative assessment (Assessment of Learning) result in an evaluation of student achievement - for example, allocation to a level or standard or allocation of a letter or numerical grade, which might later appear in a report.
Activities associated with formative assessment (Assessment for Learning) do not result in an evaluation. Information about what a student knows, understands and is able to do is used by both the teacher and the learner to determine where learners are in their learning and how to achieve learning goals.
What are Assessment for Learning strategies?
Research has identified a number of classroom strategies that are particularly effective in promoting formative assessment practice.
Assessment for Learning strategies are:
the strategic use of questioning
Questioning is used not only as a pedagogical tool but also as a deliberate way for the teacher to find out what students know, understand and are able to do.
effective teacher feedback
Effective teacher feedback focuses on established success criteria and tells the students what they have achieved and where they need to improve. Importantly, the feedback provides specific suggestions about how that improvement might be achieved.
peer feedback
Peer feedback occurs when a student uses established success criteria to tell another student what they have achieved and where improvement is necessary. Again, the feedback provides specific suggestions to help achieve improvement.
student self-assessment
Student self-assessment encourages students to take responsibility for their own learning. It incorporates self-monitoring, self-assessment and self-evaluation.
the formative use of summative assessment
Summative assessment is a necessary aspect of education. Formative use can be made of summative assessment, both before and after the assessment event.
Skim through all the content provided in the site and complete the following on PowerPoint Slides and save the work on GOOGLE DRIVE share it with aminath.shafiya@mnu.edu.mv
Provide a simple, brief, summary of each video included (one slide for each)
Provide a summary of the content included under each heading (one slide for each)
Complete each task included in the site (one slide for each)