by Jon Davy

This statement earned the author a suspension from the FB Police.

The excuse given was that it “violates community standards” as it contradicts “recognised medical authorities” and presents “disinformation” that “could be harmful”. Or words to that effect.

These vague generalities gave no specifics as to:

What community standards specifically? It all sounds very noble and self righteous but how precisely are they violated?

What recognised medical authorities? And on what bases and on whose say-so are they the final word in whatever matter (unspecified) the post caused the (unspecified) offence?

Which disinformation exactly? Which points made are not true and based on what evidence (somebody’s opinion won’t do).

In what specific way do these alleged items of disinformation contradict the truth, what truth, what evidence establishes it as the truth?

What specific harm or threat of harm is caused to whom and what is the “specific”harm” that will allegedly occur?

Getting these self righteous notifications based upon the “judgement” of some faceless paid nerd who cannot distinguish between a fact and an opinion is tantamount to being banned from the library by the librarian of “breaking the rules”.

And you say, “What rules are those then?”

And the answer you get is, “Oh I don’t need to tell you that.”

The origins of the fact checking and community standards lie in Zuckerberg testifying before Congress a few years back that FB does not engage in censorship pursuant to its own political agenda.

So some other way had to be found to do the censorship without it looking like censorship and hence the “fact” checking” and “protecting people from harm”, directed against the Freedom Movement whilst criminal organisations such as, for example, the British government are never censured for their endless stream of disinformation upon which the justifications for immense economic, social and personal harm is done to millions of people.

Apparently a government lying to its people and trying to bludgeon them into submitting like guinea pigs to a dodgy, untested vaccine does not violate FB’s high ethical standards .

Here is the offending post. Excuse the block capitals as that was how it was originally written.

Looking it over, we conclude that the assertions in it are basically correct but the disinformation occurs in the final paragraph where Boris Johnson is addressed as a “cretinous lump”.

This is a bit rude and, to be entirely accurate, it should have read “treasonous cretinous psychopath” whilst the danger to others lies in the author’s neglecting to demand that he be removed from his post and stand trial for his crimes against the British People.

RIGHT SO FROM EARLY ON I STATED THAT THIS COVID SCAM IS A PSYOP – A PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE OPERATION AGAINST THE PEOPLE BEING WAGED BY ENEMIES OF THE NATION VIA TREASONOUS SUBVERSIVE COLLABORATORS AND FRONT MEN INFILTRATED INTO OUR OWN GOVERNMENT.

TAVISTOCK PSYOP CENTRE CONNECTIONS TO WHO AND TO A SAGE COMMITTEE OVERLOADED WTH “PSYCHOLOGISTS” AND MIND-GAME EXPERTS IS THETE FOR ALL TO SEE

UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF THE ARCH-SUBVERSIVE AND HIS CRONIES THE PSYOP CONTINUES WITH THE CURRENT “TIER 4”, “NEW VIRAL STRAIN” PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC TWADDLE AND THE FRAUDULENT USE OF THE DISCREDITED PCR TEST.

THIS LATEST MOVE IS DESIGNED TO INFLICT ON THE PEOPLE THE MAXI,MUM UPSET THEY THINK THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH.

THESE PEOPLE ARE SLY, DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSIVES BUT THEY ARE NOT INFALLIBLE.

MY ADVICE TO BORIS AND HIS FELLOW TWATS IS, HAVE A CARE. YOU REALLY DO NOT WANT TO PISS OFF THE BRITISH PEOPLE MORE THAN YOU ALREADY HAVE YOU CRETINOUS LUMP.