Embedded Files
A message to the Vice Chancellors@JNTUA and @JNTUH
Figure z1:RTI Application to which the response is in Figure 1 below
Figure 1:Response letter of the Registrar&the PIO to an RTI Application
Pabulum1/2=Pabulum2/2:The name of the Research Supervisor should be mentioned first and the name of the C0-Supervisor should be mentioned next. This is the right practice for ordering the names of the Supervisor and the Co-Supervisor. Right practice is followed in JNTUH. Wrong practice is followed in JNTUA. The RTI response letter of the PIO@JNTUA is misleadingly ambiguous. Perhaps, the Registrar&PIO@JNTUA was himself misled by his own colleagues. The misleading administration@JNTUA is ridiculously violative of the RTI Act 2005. This is, however, better than the cybercrime-orientedly ridiculously misleading administration@JNTUH.
In a nut shell, the administrations of both JNTUA and the JNTUH are of ridiculously misleadingly ambiguous performance. They should respond to correct the malpractices in the administration.
Figure 2:Coverpage replica of a typical Ph.D. thesis innerpage@JNTUH.
Pabulum2/2=Pabulum1/2:The name of the Research Supervisor should be mentioned first and the name of the C0-Supervisor should be mentioned next. This is the right practice for ordering the names of the Supervisor and the Co-Supervisor. Right practice is followed in JNTUH. Wrong practice is followed in JNTUA. The RTI response letter of the PIO@JNTUA is misleadingly ambiguous. Perhaps, the Registrar&PIO@JNTUA was himself misled by his own colleagues. The misleading administration@JNTUA is ridiculously violative of the RTI Act 2005. This is, however, better than the cybercrime-orientedly ridiculously misleading administration@JNTUH.
In a nut shell, the administrations of both JNTUA and the JNTUH are of ridiculously misleadingly ambiguous performance. They are solicited to respond to correct the malpractices in the administration.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse