Comparative analysis of Strategies

With the aim of identifying unique and common epitopes across all the strategies, comparisons were made.

Table displaying the logic and result achieved by strategies:

Strategy 1 vs 2:

From this comparison, some protein were found to be retained and rose to the top of shortlisted candidates. It includes XP_809166.1 mucin-associated surface protein (MASP) & XP_818708.1 trans-sialidase .

Strategy 1 vs 3:

As mentioned above, Strategy 1 and Strategy 3 comprises of same filters, they have resulted in to same shortlisted proteins.

Strategy 1 vs 4:

With the binarization of protein features, the top ranking feature candidates were compared and we have not found any similar protein.

Strategy 1 vs 5:

No proteins were identified as common protein vaccine candidate.

Following Image depicts top 8 proteins in each of the strategies:

It denotes Strategy 3 has no new proteins. On the other hand, XP_818708.1 trans-sialidase & XP_816522.1 (Mucin TcMUCII) were found to be conserved in Strategy 1, 3 & 5.


The attached excel file shows top 100 proteins for each of the strategies in an excel format:

Comparitive_work_strategies.xlsx