Web Posts
Thomas Kuhn, the author of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Christian Forum Posts
Hidden Text at St. Catherine's Monastery
Evidence for 53 Bible Characters
The above links are to the posts that I make in the various forums around the net. I post mostly in the science areas and usually get swarmed by the atheist trolls that squat there. Their arguments are typically poorly constructed and without merit.
I call them trolls not to be mean or to belittle them, but because their online behavior is best described succinctly by the word 'troll.' As far as trolls go, they are however fairly polite. They have to be. Otherwise they would get kicked off the forum. They mostly attack the scientifically under-educated who respond with tangential spiritual proclamations to no effect.
My personal experience with proclaimed atheists* is that they are all trolls. What I mean by this, is that a troll is someone who is clever but mean. Clever they may be, but they are not wise.
It is perfectly intellectually legitimate to be an agnostic, this is a simple and humble confession of not being sure. However, to be an atheist one is saying that they know with all certainty that there is no God. This is intellectually untenable and unsupportable.
No human being can know that there is no God. Only someone who knows everything could know that there is no God. The only being in all possible universes that could know that, is God himself. Therefore only God himself could be a true atheist and since that in and of itself is a contradiction, not even God can be an atheist. Therefore atheism is rationally unsupportable.
Atheism is rationally unsupportable.
Philosophy and science in the 20th Century proved that logical certainty about complex questions is an intellectual impossibility for human beings (see Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem and the work of Karl Popper). We can only argue from probability and most probably indeed God does exist. This website is proof of it.
For much of the 20th Century secular atheists have had the upper hand in the great debate over the existence of God. That advantage has just shifted to the Theists of this world.
Hallelujah.
We are currently experiencing two scientific revolutions. One in mathematics and one in genetic biology (see the work of the fellows at the Discovery Institute).
These sorts of revolutions are filled with crisis, intellectual calamity and a lot of nasty debate. The outline of these revolutions has been given to us by Thomas Kuhn in his famous and important work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The same book that was inspiration to Steve Jobs, who recommended it to everyone he met.
Like prophecy, how ever the atheist trolls respond to these scientific revolutions, their responses, denunciations and outright lies have already been outlined in this book.
The more the establishment denies that these are true scientific revolutions the more they are proving that they are true scientific revolutions.
Read about here: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Evidence for 53 Bible Characters
* A close friend of mine some years ago suddenly** declared himself an atheist. This was a surprise to a lot of his friends, as he had grown up Christian, in a strong Christian family and his father was a famous Christian author, professor and former head of a major Christian missionary group.
I attempted to convince him that this 'decision' was unwise. Here is an example of our debate, it is typical of theist/atheist debates:
ME: There is a lot of good evidence to support a rational belief in a deity.
HIM: You believe in unicorns.
ME: Excuse me?
HIM: You believe in unicorns and fairy tales, like Adam and Eve.
ME: I don't pretend to know anything unicorns. What I am talking about is science and reason.
HIM: You do believe in unicorns and myths. God is nothing more than a myth. Science has proven there is no God.
ME: That's what I'm talking about. I'm talking about science. There is scientific evidence for a deity.
HIM: That's not science. It's make believe.
And on and on it would go. When atheists are presented with evidence that is contrary to their belief structure, they either ignore it or mislabel it. They do this because they are afraid of the truth. It scares them.
** My former friend's sudden departure from the faith was preceded by a gross public humiliation.*** He had been cheating on his wife for some time. The woman he was having an affair with was a hot blooded Latino who nearly ran him over twice with her car when he tried to break up with her.
Her ultimate revenge was made public when she befriended all his Facebook friends, displaying pictures of the two of them together in obvious and compromising romantic positions.
Humiliated my friend got divorced and declared to the world he was an atheist. It is easy enough to see that he made this 'decision' so that he would not have to face up to the moral implications of the public humiliation.
*** Incidentally and accidentally it was me who informed his wife of the Facebook postings. When I saw what this woman was doing to my friend I immediately texted him to alert him. What was unknown to me was that he had given his wife that phone and hence phone number. So in fact I was not texting him but actually his wife. Moments later she learned truth of the affair.
To that lovely lady I hope that God may find a better man than my former friend for you.
-John Elias