Lundahl vs. Henke
May 14, 2022; Updated Periodically; Updated September 26 through December 4, 2022
Embedded Files
I met Mr. Hans Georg Lundahl in the comments section of a YouTube video. Mr. Lundahl is a geocentrist, young-Earth creationist and conservative Roman Catholic. I'm a geologist and an agnostic about the existence of God. We agreed to have a debate over the existence of the supernatural, the historicity of the Talk Snake of Genesis 3, the importance of archeology in investigating the life of Alexander the Great and other topics. By the way, geocentrism is NOT a major topic in this debate.
Background Information: Raw Emails between Henke and Lundahl (February 13 to December 1, 2022)
My Post on March 1, 2022:
Posts Received from Mr. Lundahl on March 15, 2022:
Lundahl (2022a) (3.III.2022), posted March 15, 2022: "Several Types of 'Supernatural' Featured in Stories Believed to be True"
Lundahl (2022b) (2.III.2022) posted March 15, 2022: "On Verifying the Supernatural"
Lundahl (2022c) (2.III.2022), posted March 15, 2022: "Four Hypotheses of Kevin R. Henke for Historicity of Genesis 3"
Lundahl (2022d) (7.III.2022 and March 14, 2022) posted March 15, 2022: "The Real Reason Why we Can and Could All the Time Say we Know Alexander's Carreer"
Lundahl (2022e) (9.III.2022), posted March 15, 2022: "Real Confirmation : Too Late and Too Little Outside Greco-Roman Sphere"
Lundahl (2022f) (5.III.2022), posted March 15, 2022: "Two Arguments for Alexander that Atheists (and Likeminded) Should Not Use - Or Three"
Lundahl (2022g) (8.III.2022), posted March 15, 2022: "Undecisives"
My Reply May 15, 2022:
Henke (2022b) Essay May 15, 2022: "Responding to Lundahl (2022a-g): No Evidence for Demons Assisting David Copperfield’s Stage Shows, Nuclear Wars before Noah’s Flood, the Talking Snake of Genesis 3, God Helping Alexander the Great, and Other Claims" Plus CORRECTION from September 15, 2022; Footnote also added to Section 5.3 on November 25, 2022
Posts Received from Mr. Lundahl on May 16, 2022:
Lundahl (2022h): “Henke Can’t Read”
Lundahl (2022i): “Henke Can’t Argue Philosophy Very Well Either”
Post Received from Mr. Lundahl on May 18, 2022:
Lundahl (2022j): “Henke Still Can’t Read – Or Hasn’t Done So To Lewis”
Posts Received from Mr. Lundahl on July 3, 2022:
Lundahl (2022k): “To Reaffirm ‘Earliest Known Audience’”
Lundahl (2022m): “He Applies It”
Lundahl (2022n): “Excursus on William Tell and Catholic Saints”
Lundahl (2022o): “Continuing on Section 5”
Lundahl (2022p): “We’re into Section 6!”
My Replies to Lundahl (2022h-p) on September 15, 2022:
Henke (2022c): “Mr. Lundahl’s Nonsensical Ordering of His Disjointed March 15 Essays and Why I labelled them as Lundahl (2022a) through Lundahl (2022g)”
Henke (2022d): “An Unavoidable Change in My Formatting for this Debate: The Formats in Lundahl (2022i) and His Other Essays are an Unacceptable Mess and How I Must Unfortunately Respond”
Henke (2022e): “Bibliographies are Important”
Henke (2022f): “Readers Shouldn’t have to Search the Internet, Libraries or Bookstores to Figure out Mr. Lundahl’s References Just Because He Won’t Make a Simple Bibliography with His Essays”
Henke (2022g): “Who is Bishop Challoner? Another Adverse Consequence from the Absence of Proper Referencing in Lundahl (2022a)”
Henke (2022h): “Circular Reasoning in Lundahl (2022a) and Lundahl (2022h) When Citing Bishop Challoner and Numbers 22:21-28”
Henke (2022i): “Remembering Our Readers and Why We Must Honor Them by Writing for Their Benefit”
Henke (2022j): “Proper Spelling is Essential in Communication and not a “Fetish” or an ‘Art’”
Henke (2022k): “Mr. Lundahl Won’t Even Use His Own Oxford English Dictionary and Spell Correctly: The “Carreer” Example”
Henke (2022L): “Another Deliberate Misspelling of Career from Mr. Lundahl: No Justification for Harassing and Confusing Our Readers”
Henke (2022m): “Using English Dictionaries: Merriam-Webster is Good”
Henke (2022n): “Mr. Lundahl Can’t Communicate and He won’t Read His Own Oxford Dictionary and Spell Correctly: The Imaginary “Undecisives” Example”
Henke (2022o): “Mr. Lundahl’s Vague Writing, Lack of References and Misspellings Don’t Serve the Needs of the General Public”
Henke (2022p): “COTUS: Mr. Lundahl’s Undefined Abbreviations Cause More Senselessly Bad Communication and Confusion”
Henke (2022q): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to Concentrate on Becoming a Good English Writer and Forget about Being a Comedian”
Henke (2022r): “We All Need Mentors, Mr. Lundahl”
Henke (2022s): “I Misread a Section of Lundahl (2022d). The [Citation Needed Markers] Were Not Mr. Lundahl’s. However, There’s Still No Excuse for Mr. Lundahl Cutting, Pasting and Using Untrustworthy Wikipedia Articles, Especially Those with [Citation Needed] Markers”
Henke (2022t): “Lundahl (2022a), Lundahl (2022i) and the Pool Game Analogy in C.S. Lewis’ Miracles: All Fail to Demonstrate the Existence of the Supernatural”
Henke (2022u): “The Pool Game in C.S. Lewis’ Miracles and Its Citation in Lundahl (2022a) Fail to Demonstrate the Miracles Cannot Violate Natural Law”
Henke (2022v): “Lundahl (2022i) Limits God’s Omnipotence”
Henke (2022w): “Lundahl (2022i): How does Mr. Lundahl Know What Christ’s Hair and Clothes Looked Like When He Supposedly Walked on Water or During His Purported Ascension? Was He There?”
Henke (2022x): “Mr. Lundahl Contradicts Himself About Miracles Not Violating Natural Law”
Henke (2022y): “Mr. Lundahl Tries to Tell God and Everyone Else What God Does and Doesn’t Do”
Henke (2022z): “The Bible Claims that with Jesus Around, Nature was Unpredictable”
Henke (2022aa): “Lundahl (2022i) is Wrong Again: Miraculous Healings Would Violate Natural Law”
Henke (2022ab): “Lundahl (2022i) Does not Understand the Fallacy of Circular Reasoning and, Yes, the Wizard of Oz is Fiction”
Henke (2022ac): “No Circular ‘Proofs’ from Me: Mr. Lundahl Isn’t Comprehending My Essays at All”
Henke (2022ad): “Why Can’t Mr. Lundahl Comprehend My Essays? Lundahl (2022e), (2022f), (2022i), (2022j), (2022k), (2022L) and (2022m) Keep Mistakenly Discussing “Proof” and “Proving” When I Only Asked Him to Provide Demonstrable Evidence”
Henke (2022ae): “Contrary to the Misrepresentations in Lundahl (2022i; 2022L), I Don’t Say that Miracles or Other Supernatural Events are Impossible”
Henke (2022af): “God’s Actions Need Not Always be Miraculous”
Henke (2022ag): “Mr. Lundahl Made a Big Mistake in Even Mentioning David Copperfield in Lundahl (2022a) and He Ignored the Numerous Times I Said that Mr. Lundahl was Only Making a Suggestion that Demons Help David Copperfield Do His Magic Tricks”
Henke (2022ah): “Angels at Jesus’ Feet: Lundahl (2022i) is Open to that Possibility”
Henke (2002ai): “Lundahl (2022i) Misinterprets and Improperly Limits the Effects of Gravity”
Henke (2022aj): “Contrary to Lundahl (2022i), Philosophy Shouldn’t be Separated from Historical or Scientific Evidence”
Henke (2022ak): “Mr. Lundahl’s Acts of Imagination Need to be Backed Up with Evidence of Reality”
Henke (2022aL): “Mr. Lundahl is a Geocentricist”
Henke (2022am): “Ex Nihilo (Something Out of Nothing) Creation Violates Natural Law No Matter Who Does It”
Henke (2022an): “Nuclear Explosions Don’t Violate Natural Law, but Again Ex Nihilo Creation of Bread in this Universe Does”
Henke (2022ao): “130 Years from When?? More Obscure Writing from Mr. Lundahl and Evidence Refutes the Young-Earth Creationist Claims in Lundahl (2022a) and Lundahl (2022j)”
Henke (2022aq): “If Lundahl (2022j) is Going to Criticize My Writing Abilities, How Many University Students has He Had and Where’s His Publication Record?”
Henke (2022ar): “Lundahl (2022j): C.S. Lewis’ Miracles Doesn’t Demonstrate the Reality of Miracles”
Henke (2022as): “I Certainly Read Lewis (1960) Before Commenting on It in Henke (2022b). Meanwhile, Lundahl (2022j) Shows Great Impatience in Wanting to Discuss the Resurrection of Jesus Christ before Providing Good Evidence for Genesis 3”
Henke (2022at): “Lundahl (2022a-p) Avoids Using or Checking My Peer-Review References and Prefers Less Reliable Websites and Outdated Books”
Henke (2022au): “Lundahl (2022j): Miracles: Past and Present?”
Henke (2022av): “No Evidence that Magic is Involved in the Ability of Humans to Reason”
Henke (2022aw): “Where’s the Evidence of Anything Beyond Our Environment (Universe)?”
Henke (2022ax): “Lundahl (2022j) and Lewis (1960) Continue to Fail to Demonstrate that There is Anything Beyond Nature (Our Universe)”
Henke (2022ay): “Where do Morality and the Universally Valid Rules of Reason Come From? Not Where Lundahl (2022j) and Lewis (1960) Claim”
Henke (2022az): “I Didn’t Forget about the Title of Lundahl (2022a), I Disagreed with It”
Henke (2022ba): “No Historic Evidence for Any of His Greek and Hebrew Examples No Matter How Lundahl (2022a) and (2022k) Classify Them”
Henke (2022bb): “Additional Ramblings in Lundahl (2022k) Involving a Racist Term”
Henke (2022bc): “The Hovind Reference in Lundahl (2022a) and (2022k): Why Would Mr. Lundahl Ever Cite Such an Unreliable Source?”
Henke (2022bd): “If Mr. Lundahl Wants to Debate, It’s His Responsibility to Obtain the Necessary References”
Henke (2022be): “Lundahl (2022k) Doesn’t Know What an Agnostic is and He Continues to Make Claims Without Providing Any Suitable Evidence”
Henke (2022bf): “No Evidence that Anything Miraculous Occurs in Transubstantiation”
Henke (2022bg): “Lundahl (2022k): More on Alchemy and Why Bother Classifying Fiction?”
Henke (2022bh): “Lundahl 2022k – More Nonsense Involving the ‘Earliest Known Audience’”
Henke (2022bi): “Don’t Trust Everything that was Said in the Enlightenment, the Bible or the 21st Century”
Henke (2022bj): “Lies About the Past”
Henke (2022bk): “Misinterpretations about the Past”
Henke (2022bL): “A Lot of Gullible People Believe Lies”
Henke (2022bm): “Mr. Lundahl Must Fulfill His Wishes and Demonstrate Both the Historicity and Inerrancy of Genesis 3. He has Totally Failed to Do So in Lundahl (2022d), Lundahl (2022k) and His Other Essays and Emails”
Henke (2022bn): “Dating Genesis 3 and Who Wrote It”
Henke (2022bo): “Why Believe in Any Accounts in Ancient Documents if They are Not Supported by Archeological or External Other Evidence?”
Henke (2022bp): “Snake Biology and Genesis 3”
Henke (2022bq): “Mr. Lundahl Still Fails to Respond to Secular Hypotheses #3 and #4, which Rationally Explain the Origin of the Talking Snake Myth of Genesis 3”
Henke (2022br): “Lundahl (2022k) is Wrong. Mr. Lundahl Has the Burden of Evidence to Demonstrate that the Talking Snake of Genesis 3 Actually Existed”
Henke (2022br2): “Warped and Inaccurate Views of History and Fiction in Lundahl (2022L)”
Henke (2022bt): “No Circular Reasoning Fallacy in Henke (2022b): Again, History Cannot Demonstrate the Reality of Miracles”
Henke (2022bu): “The Supernatural Might be Real, but Lundahl (2022L) Fails to Provide Any Evidence of It”
Henke (2022bv): “Bad Analyses of False Prophets in Lundahl (2022L)”
Henke (2022bw): “Lundahl (2022L) is Again Wrong About How Mormons View the Book of Mormon, the Bible, Joseph Smith Jr. and Themselves”
Henke (2022bx): “Lundahl (2022L) Rambles On and Fails to Make Any Mythology Look Believable”
Henke (2022by): “Where did I Say that I Was Referring to Greek Mythology?”
Henke (2022bz): “Separating Myths and Possible History with Hercules and Samson”
Henke (2022ca): “Unreferenced Mythology?”
Henke (2022cb): “Claims for ‘Evidence’ of Demons in Lundahl (2022L) Demonstrates that Mr. Lundahl has a Poor Understanding of What is Good Evidence”
Henke (2022cc): “The ‘Earliest Known Audience’ Rule is Unreliable and We Saw It Forming after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election”
Henke (2022cd): “The Relevance of Science in Evaluating Claims about Past Events”
Henke (2022ce): “Gods’ and Demons’ Procreation Myths”
Henke (2022cf): “Demons and Sperm Donors”
Henke (2022cg): “Lundahl (2022m) Fails to Recognize that Skepticism Must be the Default Position for Any Unsubstantiated Claim”
Henke (2022ch): “Lundahl (2022m) does not Understand C.S. Lewis’ Position on Miracles”
Henke (2022ci): “Science Cannot Demonstrate Any Past Miracles”
Henke (2022cj): “Who is Taine? Mr. Lundahl Again Throws Out Names without Identifying Them or Their Qualifications”
Henke (2022ck): “More Failed Proclamations in Lundahl (2022m) on Materialism, Biological Evolution and the Origin of Language”
Henke (2022cL): “Incoherent Rambling about “Indeterminism” and Determinism in Lundahl (2022m)”
Henke (2022cm): “No Evidence of Miracles in Lewis (1960)”
Henke (2022cn): “’Metaphysical’ Arguments are Worthless without Evidence”
Henke (2022co): “Cat Resurrection Proposal in Henke (2022b) would be a Superior Test of the Supernatural than Any Arguments for Genesis 3”
Henke (2022cp): “How does Lundahl (2022m) So Confidently Know that Future Technologies will Never be Able to Resurrect the Dead?”
Henke (2022cq): “What Right does Lundahl (2022m) and Lewis (1960) have to Tell God How He Might Do Miracles?”
Henke (2022cr): “Are the Claims of the Raelians Really Any Worse than Genesis 3?”
Henke (2022cs): “Education in Technology and Skepticism, and not Ivory Tower Metaphysics, are Needed to Allow People to Distinguish Advanced Technologies from Magic”
Henke (2022ct): “How Does Lundahl (2022m) Know What Supernatural Beings Can’t or Won’t Do?”
Henke (2022cu): “Where are the Test Results?”
Henke (2022cv): “Again, Lundahl (2022m) is Wrong. History Can’t Demonstrate the Existence of Miracles”
Henke (2022cw): “High Standards are Needed for Investigating History and Mr. Lundahl’s Approach is Totally Inadequate”
Henke (2022cx): “Mr. Lundahl in Lundahl (2022m) Still Doesn’t Understand How to Investigate Claims about Past Events”
Henke (2022cy): “Mr. Lundahl’s Proposed Experiment and What are His Qualifications?”
Henke (2022cz): “Unlike Mr. Lundahl, My Standards for History are Rational and Consistent”
Henke (2022da): “Tyrants Controlling the Media and Writing ‘History’ Allow Lies to Spread and Become Widely Believed”
Henke (2022db): “Mormons Want Archeological Evidence for the Book of Mormon and They Wouldn’t Care About Mr. Lundahl’s Worthless ‘First Known Audience’ and ‘Memory of Events’ Arguments”
Henke (2022dc): “Still No Evidence for Genesis and Exodus”
Henke (2022dd): “Finding a Talking Snake”
Henke (2022de): “More on Hypothesis #3 of Henke (2022a; 2022b): Genesis 3 is Based on Misinterpretations of a Work of Fiction”
Henke (2022df): “The Force and Star Wars: Lundahl (2022m) Omits Important Issues from Henke (2022b)”
Henke (2022dg): “Misconceptions about Christopher Columbus: How History Can Be Easily Corrupted with Lies and Propaganda”
Henke (2022dh): “Both the Provenance of the Book of Mormon and the Biblical “Normal Historic Collective Memory” are Untrustworthy”
Henke (2022di): “False Prophets Now and Then”
Henke (2022dj): “We Can’t Blindly Trust Copies of Copies of Copies… of Accounts Written Long after the Supposed Events”
Henke (2022dk): “Sincere Beliefs don’t Equate to History”
Henke (2022dL): “Memories and Mr. Lundahl has No Evidence for the Initial Transmission of Genesis 3”
Henke (2022dm): “How does Mr. Lundahl Reliably Separate Lies from Truth in Historical Accounts?”
Henke (2022dn): “Tradition, ‘Collective Memory’ and the ‘Earliest Known Audience’ are Not Evidence of Adam or Moses. Mr. Lundahl Needs to Do Better”
Henke (2022do): “The Genealogy of Adam to Moses: The Septuagint vs. the Masoretic Text and Lundahl (2022m) vs. Lundahl (2022d)”
Henke (2022dp): “Untrustworthy Genealogies: Genesis and the Book of Mormon”
Henke (2022dq): “Astrology and Other Nonsense”
Henke (2022dr): “Geology Explains the Past, Genesis Does Not”
Henke (2022ds): “Does Mr. Lundahl Want References or Not? Dealing with Urban Legends”
Henke (2022dt): “Lies Never Qualify as History”
Henke (2022du): “The Honesty of My Dutch Ancestors”
Henke (2022dv): “Skepticism is the Default Position. The Person Making the Claim has the Burden of Evidence”
Henke (2022dw): “No Confidence that Moses was the Author of the Pentateuch”
Henke (2022dx): “Still No Evidence Moses Ever Existed”
Henke (2022dy): “Gullible People Are Far Too Common”
Henke (2022dz): “An Angel Uses a Snake Puppet? Really?”
Henke (2022ea): “Unfortunately, Fiction is Often Passed Off as History”
Henke (2022eb): “Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum Again. Why Should Anyone Blindly Trust the Bellum Gallicum?”
Henke (2022ec): “More Unjustified Claims in Lundahl (2022m) About the Origin of Genesis 3”
Henke (2022ed): “We Weren’t There So That’s Exactly Why We Need Archeology and Other Forensic Sciences”
Henke (2022ee): “Another Baseless Appeal to the “Earliest Known Audience”
Henke (2022ef): “Finally, Lundahl (2022m) Tells Us Who Haydock Was”
Henke (2022eg): “Lundahl (2022m) Rambles On About Monty Hall and the “Let’s Make a Deal” Gameshow”
Henke (2022eh): “Claims in 1 Maccabees About Alexander the Great Still Need Confirmation”
Henke (2022ei): “1st and 2nd Century AD Chaos and Uncertainty in the Development of Christianity: Lundahl (2022m) Makes Unsubstantiated Accusations and Ignores the Preservation Bias Problem”
Henke (2022ej): “Mr. Lundahl’s Endorsement of Hypothesis #1 is Unreliable”
Henke (2022ek): “Did William Tell Exist? Lundahl (2022n) Doesn’t Take the Issue Seriously and His ‘First Known Audience Rule’ is a Failure”
Henke (2022eL): “St. Veronica: History or Likely Fable?”
Henke (2022em): “St. Euphrosyne: Possible History or Fable? More Flippant Non-Answers from Mr. Lundahl”
Henke (2022en): “St. Catherine of Alexandria: History, Fiction or Uncertain?”
Henke (2022eo): “More Stories about Saints and More Bad Methodology on History from Lundahl (2022n)”
Henke (2022ep): “St. Eustace: History, Fable, or Uncertain? More Outdated Non-Answers from Lundahl (2022n)”
Henke (2022eq): “St. George and the Dragon: Any Evidence that Any of This is History? Mr. Lundahl’s Continuing Erroneous Approach to Studying the Past”
Henke (2022er): “St. Christopher: History or Fiction?”
Henke (2022es): “How the 19th Century Roman Catholic Church and Lundahl (2022n) Took the St. Philomena Hoax as Fact”
Henke (2022et): “Lundahl’s Erroneous Methodology for Doing History as Seen with the Ten Questionable Saints of Jimenez (2014)”
Henke (2022eu): “Lundahl’s Erroneous Methodology for Investigating the Past as Seen in his Dismal Reponses to the Ten Questionable Saints of Jimenez (2014)”
Henke (2022ev): “Lundahl (2022o) is Ineffective in Distinguishing the Genre of Bible Stories”
Henke (2022ew): “Lundahl (2022o) Versus Hypothesis #2: Could Genesis 5 have been in a Vision from God?”
Henke (2022ex): “Lundahl (2022o) Fails to Understand the Need for Contemporary Archeological Evidence Even Though the Requirement is Mentioned Numerous Times in Henke (2022a) and Henke (2022b)”
Henke (2022ey): “A Hellenistic Error in Lundahl (2022o): I Never Said That, Mr. Lundahl!”
Henke (2022ez): “It’s the Archeology that Demonstrates that Alexander the Great Existed and Not Any ‘Hellenistic Community’”
Henke (2022fa): “Centaurs as Misinterpretations and Products of the Human Imagination”
Henke (2022fb): “Pre-Flood Nuclear Wars? REALLY? No Evidence of Them and the Perils of Imposing Modern Views and Biases When Interpreting Old Myths”
Henke (2022fc): “No Evidence that the Young-Earth Creationist RATE Project Ever Endorsed Nuclear Wars before Noah’s Flood”
Henke (2022fd): “Lundahl (2022o) Still Fails to Realize that When Compared with post-1770 US and European History, the History of Ancient Israel is Incomplete and Full of Knowledge Gaps that Make It Unreliable”
Henke (2022fe): “Huge Strawman Fallacy in Lundahl (2022p). I’m not Ignoring the Five Ancient Histories, Mr. Lundahl!”
Henke (2022ff): “No Comparison between the Evidence for Alexander the Great and Genesis 3”
Henke (2022fg): “There’s A Big Difference between Thinking that You Know Something and Actually Having Evidence to Demonstrate It”
Henke (2022fh): “No Problems for Me”
Henke (2022fi): “Having Reliable Information About Alexander the Great”
Henke (2022fj): “Alexander the Great had the Power and Authority to Put His Name in Egyptian Temples. Ordinary People Could Not Have Done That”
Henke (2022fk): “Who Paid for the Alexander Coins?”
Henke (2022fm): “Crater Lake, Oregon, USA: How Geology Used and Corrected an Earliest Known Audience’s Mythical Description of a Volcanic Eruption”
Post Received from Mr. Lundahl on September 17, 2022:
Lundahl (2022q): “When Henke Responded – Up to ‘Henke2022aa’ (with ab and ai Looked Up in Advance, Since Referred to in Previous)”
Posts Received from Mr. Lundahl on September 20, 2022:
Lundahl (2022r): “Ah, Some New”
Lundahl (2022s): “Back to Philosophy”
Lundahl (2022t): “Beginning on Henke2022az? Nope”
My Replies to Lundahl (2022q) through Lundahl (2022t) on September 23 through October 28, 2022:
Henke (2022fn): “Lundahl (2022q) is No Entertainer and He Fails to Take the Format and Content of this Debate Seriously”
Henke (2022fo): “I agree with Lundahl (2022q) that Donkeys and Snakes Cannot Biologically Talk. Yet, My Explanation of Numbers 22 is More Probable than the Supernatural Explanation Given in Lundahl (2022a, 2022k, 2022q)”
Henke (2022fp): “Lundahl (2022q) has Never Met my Nieces and He has no Grounds to Comment on My Relationship with Them”
Henke (2022fq): “Mr. Lundahl Fails to Recognize What Reliable Sources of Information are. Young-Earth Creationists, especially Kent Hovind, are Unreliable. The References in Wikipedia Can be Useful. Otherwise, Wikipedia Must be Used with Caution”
Henke (2022fr): “Still No Evidence of Miracles in Lundahl (2022q), But At Least He Now Recognizes that Miracles May Be ‘Contrary’ to Natural Laws”
Henke (2022fs): “More Discussions on the Phrase ‘Circular Reasoning’: Mr. Lundahl Gets Needlessly Sidetracked with Terminology”
Henke (2022ft): “Another Unsatisfactory Reply in Lundahl (2022q)”
Henke (2022fu): “Mr. Lundahl Finally Openly Admits in Lundahl (2022q) that God Will Break the Laws of Nature”
Henke (2022fv): “Natural Laws Exist, but No Evidence of God Being Involved”
Henke (2022fw): “More on C.S. Lewis’ Pool Table Analogy”
Henke (2022fx): “Speculating on Christ’s Hair”
Henke (2022fy): “Lundahl (2022q) Further Misunderstands Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation and Makes Up More Stories”
Henke (2022fz): “Natural Laws as Effective Descriptions of Reality”
Henke (2022ga): “Certainly, Nature and Human Behavior are Not Fully Predictable”
Henke (2022gb): “Healing Miracles, if They Occur, Would Unavoidably Violate Natural Law”
Henke (2022gc): “Lundahl (2022r) Does Not Need to Remind Us that the Wizard of Oz is Fiction and His “First Known Audience” Scheme is Worthless in Identifying Fiction”
Henke (2022gd): “The New Testament Gospels are Not History”
Henke (2022ge): “Logic and Evidence Must Support Each Other and Work Together”
Henke (2022gf): “No Historic Evidence for Either Genesis 3 or Christ Walking on Water”
Henke (2022gg): “More on the Bogus ‘First Known Audience’ Scheme”
Henke (2022gh): “Invalid Comments on Finkelstein and Silberman (2001) in Lundahl (2022r)”
Henke (2022gi): “Lundahl (2022r) is Still Wrong. ‘Acts of Imagination’ Need to be Supported with Evidence”
Henke (2022gj): “A Little More on Geocentricism and Then Mr. Lundahl Needlessly Rushes”
Henke (2022gL): “Lundahl (2022r) Totally Ignores Henke (2022aq) and Doesn’t Discuss His Publication Record – I Wonder Why?”
Henke (2022gm): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to Understand that Some of Us Have Studied C.S. Lewis’ Works and Find Them Outdated and Substandard”
Henke (2022gn): “Lundahl (2022r) Tries to Misdirect Our Debate By Citing Irrelevant Critiques of Richard Carrier and John Loftus”
Henke (2022go): “Still No Evidence from Lundahl (2022r) that Genesis is History”
Henke (2022gp): “What does the Trojan War Have to Do with the Resurrection of Christ??”
Henke (2022gq): “Convenience is Not a Good Excuse to Use Low-Quality Wikipedia Webarticles. Mr. Lundahl Needs to Strive for Scholarly Excellence”
Henke (2022gr): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to Avoid Old and Outdated References”
Henke (2022gs): “For This Debate, Mr. Lundahl Needs to Get My Recommended References and Study Them”
Henke (2022gt): “If Mr. Lundahl is Unable to Locate My Recommended References, Then How Can He Debate Me?”
Henke (2022gu): “Mr. Lundahl Uses His Own Radiocarbon Dating Calibrations Based on Groundless Bible Genealogies and Stories Rather than Science”
Henke (2022gv): “Lundahl (2022r) Continues to Take an Erroneous Approach to History”
Henke (2022gw): “How Many Times Do I Have to Tell Mr. Lundahl that I DO NOT Think that Miracles are Impossible?”
Henke (2022gx): “Lundahl (2022r) Refuses to Correct the Misleading Title of Lundahl (2022a)”
Henke (2022gy): “Lundahl (2022s) is Terribly Referenced and Improperly Formatted. Mr. Lundahl Also Condemns Literature without Reading It”
Henke (2022gz): “Who Said What? A lot of Poorly Formatted Texts in Lundahl (2022s)”
Henke (2022ha): “Lundahl (2022s) and I agree that Undefined Acronyms can be Annoying”
Henke (2022hb): “The Unjustified Use of a French Video in Lundahl (2022s): Who is Diane Vibert? What is She Saying? What is her Expertise?”
Henke (2022hc): “Mr. Lundahl is Again No Expert on Consciousness and His Invoking of the Supernatural to Explain It is Groundless”
Henke (2022hd): “Lundahl (2022s) vs. Pinker (2007) on Consciousness”
Henke (2022he): “Again, Where’s the Evidence that Anything Exists Beyond Our Universe?”
Henke (2022hf): “Repetitious Lecture on Logic in Lundahl (2022s)”
Henke (2022hg): “No Reason to Trust the Gospels”
Henke (2022hh): “Skepticism First”
Henke (2022hi): “Phony Modern ‘Miracles’”
Henke (2022hj): “No Evidence that the Supernatural is Involved in Our Ability to Confirm Our Observations”
Henke (2022hk): “Rational Humans Can Derive Humane and Effective Rules without the Bible”
Henke (2022hL): “No Need to Invoke an Imaginary Devil to Explain Psychic Powers that Don’t Actually Exist”
Henke (2022hm): “I didn’t Need a Lodge or Anyone Else to Tell Me that C.S. Lewis’ Arguments in Miracles are Bad. I Saw the Bad Arguments for Myself”
Henke (2022hn): “Lundahl (2022s) Continues to Make Groundless Proclamations about Consciousness”
Henke (2022ho): “Lundahl (2022s) Inappropriately Comments on Harris (2010) and Dennett (2006) Without Reading Them”
Henke (2022hp): “More on Our Environments (Surroundings)”
Henke (2022hq): “Still No Evidence of Anything Beyond Nature (Our Universe)”
Henke (2022hr): “Lundahl (2022s) Can’t Reasonably Speculate Beyond the Observations”
Henke (2022hs): “Mr. Lundahl, Those MRI Studies Have Already Been Done. Why Don’t You Look Them Up for Yourself?”
Henke (2022ht): “Logic Needs Evidential Support”
Henke (2022hu): “Where Do Universally Valid Rules of Reason Come From?”
Henke (2022hv): “Morality Certainly Involves Trial and Error, but Rationality is Also Involved”
Henke (2022hw): “Philemon, Slavery and Cohesion Within the Tribe”
Henke (2022hx): “Morals on the Environment Protection”
Henke (2022hy): “Mr. Lundahl Repeating His Groundless Proclamations about the Origin of Moral Rules Doesn’t Not Make Them True”
Henke (2022hz): “People Create Morals Because They Need to Live Together”
Henke (2022ia): “Lundahl (2022s) Again Uses Improper Definitions and Makes Groundless Proclamations about Logic”
Henke (2022ib): “The Evidence that Lundahl (2022s) Wants is in My Recommended References, but Mr. Lundahl Refuses to Look Them Up and Read Them”
Henke (2022ic): “What Do the Discussions About Forced Sterilization and Eugenics in Lundahl (2022s) Have to Do With Finland Joining NATO??”
Henke (2022id): “Logic Can’t Provide Knowledge of Anything Without Evidential Support”
Henke (2022ie): “The Origin of Mathematics”
Henke (2022if): “Zero is a Mathematical Entity”
Henke (2022ig): “More on Primitive Counting in Young Children and Non-Human Animals”
Henke (2022ii): “Lundahl (2022t) Continues to Misdefine History”
Henke (2022ij): “Henke (2022bh) is Not Discussing Deliberate Works of Fiction, but Lies and Made-Up Stories Being Passed Off as History”
Henke (2022ik): “Mr. Lundahl is Still Wrong. He has the Burden of Evidence to Demonstrate that the Far-Fetched Story in Genesis 3 Actually Happened”
Henke (2022iL): “Lundahl (2022t) Again Fails to Address the Knowledge Gap in Genesis”
Henke (2022im): “No Evidence to Support Matthew 28, the Gospel of Thomas or the Book of Mormon”
Henke (2022in): “The Genesis Knowledge Gap and the Book of Mormon’s Gap”
Henke (2022io): “Separating History from Fiction When They’re Both Present in the Bible or Another Document”
Henke (2022ip): “More on Mormonism and Scientology”
Henke (2022iq): “I Don’t Limit the Options to Only All or None”
Henke (2022ir): “We Don’t Know Who Wrote Pentateuch and When”
Henke (2022is): “No Reason to Think that the Pentateuch was Well-Preserved from the Time of the Originals”
Henke (2022it): “’Burden of Proof’ (Onus Probandi) Doesn’t Belong in Science”
Henke (2022iu): “Contrary to Lundahl (2022t), I Clearly Stated in Section 4.0 of Henke (2022b) that I’m Only an Agnostic about God”
Henke (2022iv): “More on the Four Hypotheses for Genesis 3”
Henke (2022iw): “The Failed Two-Step in Lundahl (2022t)”
Henke (2022ix): “Lundahl (2022t) Continues to Take the Wrong Approach to Ancient Documents and History”
Henke (2022iy): “Lundahl (2022t) Continues to Take the Wrong Approach towards Oral Traditions and Exodus”
Henke (2022iz): “Too Bad. Hand-Written Copies of Copies of Copies … Over the Centuries Just Aren’t Good Enough To Be Trusted Without External Confirmation”
Henke (2022ja): “I’m Not Interested in Tacitus, Mr. Lundahl, Deal with Carrier (2014) Like I Asked You to Do”
Henke (2022jb): “Without Archeology or Other External Evidence, There’s Still No Reason to Believe the Stories in the Bible”
Henke (2022jc): “Mr. Lundahl is Unfamiliar with Battlefield Archeology and the Use of Archeology at Garrett Farm – The Site Where John Wilkes Booth was Killed”
Posts Received from Mr. Lundahl on September 25, 2022:
Lundahl (2022u): “Why Catalogue the Supernatural? Why Catalogue Fiction?”
Lundahl (2022v): “Henke(2022bi) Starts It Today! But I only get to Henke(2022bk) For Now”
Lundahl (2022w): “New Batch of Henke Essays”
Lundahl (2022x): “Resuming at Henke(2022bL) after Interruption, up to 2022br”
Lundahl (2022y): “Why Did I Bring Up Greek Myth?”
Lundahl (2022z): “Historicity of Certain Religious Stories, Notably Genesis”
Post from Mr. Lundahl on November 28, 2022:
Lundahl (2022aa): “Revisiting Henke2022b, 5:3”
My Replies to Lundahl (2022u) through Lundahl (2022aa) on October 29 through December 4, 2022:
Henke (2022jd): “Lundahl (2022u) Gives More Illegitimate Excuses for Using Racist Terms. Also, Does Mr. Lundahl Even Own a Copy of Lewis (1960)?”
Henke (2022je): “Why is Mr. Lundahl Debating Me If He Can’t or Won’t Access My Recommended References?”
Henke (2022jf): “Mr. Lundahl Still Does Not Understand How Science and Historical Investigations are Done. “Proof” Does Not Belong in Scientific and Historical Investigations”
Henke (2022jg): “More on the Roman Catholic Transubstantiation”
Henke (2022jh): “Avoiding Superstition and There’s No Need to Take Rumors Seriously if There’s No Evidence That They Ever Happened”
Henke (2022ji): “Evidence Needs to be Involved Rather Than Including Potentially Limitless Supernatural Speculations in an Investigation”
Henke (2022jj): “More Racist Rambling in Lundahl (2022u). Evidence and Not Cataloging is Needed to Determine if a Story is True”
Henke (2022jk): “Among Mr. Lundahl’s Racist Rambling, No Good Answers to the Critical Questions in the Title of Lundahl (2022u): ‘Why Catalogue the Supernatural? Why Catalogue Fiction?’”
Henke (2022jL): “Fortunately, 21st Century Christianity in the West Has Largely Abandoned Superstitious and Barbaric Witch Hunts”
Henke (2022jm): “Contrary to Lundahl (2022v), I Don’t Think that Skeptics are Always Right, but At Least We Strive to Question All Claims and Avoid Being Gullible”
Henke (2022jn): “Geology is Reliable Science, But Genesis 3 Has All the Characteristics of a Far-Fetched Myth”
Henke (2022jo): “Don’t Trust Wikipedia or Newspaper Accounts for Reliable Information on Science. Instead, Look for a Consensus, if There is One, in Peer-Reviewed Science Journals”
Henke (2022jp): “Mr. Lundahl Fails to Properly Cite Yet Another Article, but It’s Old News Anyway”
Henke (2022jq): “Skepticism is Learned and Comes with Experience”
Henke (2022jr): “Evidence Decides Whether or Not to Accept a Claim and Not Preferences Among Competing ‘Stories’”
Henke (2022js): “The Two Main Principles of Disagreement between Mr. Lundahl and Myself as Promoted by Lundahl (2022v)”
Henke (2022jt): “The “Earliest Known Audience” Scam is Neither Good Nor a Proof”
Henke (2022jw): “More on Mormonism and Demons are Not Needed to Explain Xenu”
Henke (2022jx): “Unfortunately, Lies are Often Not Exposed, At Least Not Often in Time to Prevent Irreversible Damage”
Henke (2022jy): “Over Time, False Stories Can Become False History”
Henke (2022jz): “Genesis Is No Better than the Book of Mormon”
Henke (2022ka): “Biological Evolution and the Ancient Earth are Supported by Evidence, A Talking Snake and Magic Fruit Trees Are Not”
Henke (2022kb): “Even Though We Can’t Identify the Culprits that Wrote the Lies in Genesis, Their Lies Still Have Been Totally Discredited”
Henke (2022kc): “Mr. Lundahl Has No Idea on How I Use the Media”
Henke (2022kd): “More on How I Use the Media”
Henke (2022ke): “History Needs Science. Mr. Lundahl Continues to Have the Wrong Approach to Science and History”
Henke (2022kf): “More Groundless Proclamations in Lundahl (2022v) About the Supposed Reality of the Supernatural, Demons and Angels Guiding the Planets”
Henke (2022kg): “Mr. Lundahl Continues to Fail to Understand the Requirements of an Effective Debate”
Henke (2022ki): “Circular Explanations?”
Henke (2022kj): “Still No Historical Evidence for Miracles”
Henke (2022kk): “Lundahl (2022w) Continues to Misrepresent My Position on Miracles”
Henke (2022kL): “Mr. Lundahl Misreads Lewis (1960) AGAIN”
Henke (2022km): “Mr. Lundahl is Still Not Carefully Reading My Essays, As Well As His Own Recommended Reference, Lewis (1960)”
Henke (2022ko): “Why Does Mr. Lundahl Keep Judging My References Without Even Looking At Them?”
Henke (2022kp): “What Rational Reason Does Mr. Lundahl Have for Questioning the Moon Landings, But Believing that the Talking Snake and Magic Fruit Trees of Genesis 3 are Real?”
Henke (2022kq): “Natural Laws are Effective Descriptions of How the Universe Works, While the Bible Is Not”
Henke (2022kr): “If God Doesn’t Violate Any Laws of Physics, Why Couldn’t Physicists Hypothetically Derive Equations to Describe His Actions?”
Henke (2022ks): “Additional Comments on Miracles and Natural and Human Behaviors Not Being Fully Predictable”
Henke (2022kt): “Mr. Lundahl Plays Around with Words Again. What is a “Sth”? Why Couldn’t God’s Actions Either Break Natural Laws or Not?”
Henke (2022ku): “Where’s Mr. Lundahl’s Evidence that God is a Precondition for Gravity and the Electromagnetic Force?”
Henke (2022kv): “Mr. Lundahl Still Can’t Explain How Instantaneous Healing Miracles Could Occur Without Violating Natural Laws”
Henke (2022kw): “Lundahl (2022w) Fails to Recognize that God Is Ultimately Responsible for Miraculously Breaking the Natural Laws Describing the Immune System”
Henke (2022kx): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to Use the 21st Century Peer-Reviewed Literature to Establish that Free Will Exists. He Also Needs to Demonstrate that Souls and Spirits Exist Before Claiming What They Can Do”
Henke (2022ky): “The Scientific Method Provides the Same Set of Rules for Mr. Lundahl, Me and All Other Investigators”
Henke (2022kz): “Mr. Lundahl in Lundahl (2022x) Still Doesn’t Understand That He Has the Burden of Evidence (NOT PROOF!!) When Investigating Miracles”
Henke (2022La): “More on Mr. Lundahl’s Two-Step Failure”
Henke (2022Lb): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to Provide Evidence that Moses Existed. He Has the Burden of Evidence”
Henke (2022Lc): “No Reason to Accept Untrustworthy Traditions”
Henke (2022Ld): “Lundahl (2022x) Continues to Make Bad Assumptions About the Pentateuch and Book of Joshua”
Henke (2022Le): “Archeology is Important in Confirming History and Mr. Lundahl’s Dating Scheme is All Wrong”
Henke (2022Lf): “Who’s Doing the Speculating?”
Henke (2022Lg): “Lundahl (2022x) is Absolutely Wrong. Traditions Shouldn’t Be Blindly Trusted and His “First Known Audience” Approach is a Scam”
Henke (2022Lh): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to be Evaluating the Critical 21st Century Scholarship on the Claims of the Bible and Not Getting Distracted by Irrelevant Greco-Roman Stories”
Henke (2022Li): “Just Because a Billion People Believe a Story That’s No Reason to Accept It as History”
Henke (2022Lj): “Hypotheses #3 and #4 are Still Far More Probable than Genesis 3 Actually Being History”
Henke (2022Lk): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to Do His Own Leg Work in the Libraries of Paris Rather than Just Criticizing an Article by Richard Cohen”
Henke (2022LL): “Genesis 3 and the Rest of the Pentateuch are Likely Works of Fiction Pretending to be History and I Present a Probable ‘Method of Deception’ for Their Origin”
Henke (2022Lm): “Despite Statements in Lundahl (2022x), There’s No Evidence of Significant Voter Fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election”
Henke (2022Ln): “The St. Philomena Hoax is an Example of the Roman Catholic Church Abusing Archeology”
Henke (2022Lo): “Mr. Lundahl Fails to Deal With Hypotheses #3 and #4 by Demonstrating Hypothesis #1 is More Probable As Part of His Burden of Evidence”
Henke (2022Lp): “External Evidence is Needed to Successfully Separate Out History from Plausible Stories and Outright Lies”
Henke (2022Lq): “Good Confirmation is Needed for Claims About the Past. We Shouldn’t Trust What People Say About Their ‘Histories’ and ‘Scriptures’”
Henke (2022Lr): “Lundahl (2022x) Has No Excuse for Defaming Dr. Israel Finkelstein”
Henke (2022Ls): “Mr. Lundahl Needs to Read Better”
Henke (2022Lt): “Peer-Reviewed Science is Not Perfect, but It’s Better than Mr. Lundahl’s “First Known Audience” Scam and Bible Stories about Talking Animals and Magic Fruit Trees”
Henke (2022Lu): “Mr. Lundahl Still Can’t Separate Fiction from Fiction Pretending to be History”
Henke (2022Lv): “Rambling Doesn’t Belong in This Debate. Mr. Lundahl Needs to Write Clearly and Stay on Topic”
Henke (2022Lw): “Mr. Lundahl has the Burden of Evidence to Demonstrate that Any of the Stories about Romulus or the Talking Snake of Genesis 3 Ever Happened”
Henke (2022Lx): “More Groundless Speculations in Lundahl (2022y) About Hercules, Demons and Samson”
Henke (2022Ly): “Mr. Lundahl Continues to Ignore the Genesis Knowledge Gap and He Still Doesn’t Have Any Evidence that Moses Ever Existed”
Henke (2022Lz): “Mr. Lundahl’s Division of Genesis between “Prophecy” and “History” is Arbitrary and Senseless”
Henke (2022ma): “Bogus Chains of Transmission in the Book of Mormon and the Old Testament”
Henke (2022mc): “Yes, Historic and Prophetic Claims Aren’t the Same Thing. However, Both First Require Skepticism Followed by Good Evidence Before They’re Accepted”
Henke (2022md): “Legitimate Peer-Review Does Not Support Baseless Dogmas”
Henke (2022me): “Visions in Genesis: Mr. Lundahl’s Hypothesis #1 Is No More Valid Than Hypothesis #2 in Henke (2022a) and Henke (2022b)”
Henke (2022mf): “More on the St. Philomena Hoax and Genesis as a Work of Fiction Pretending to be History”
Henke (2022mg): “My Replies to Lundahl (2022aa) on Section 5.3 of Henke (2022b)”
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse