Research supporting the use of Proactive, Instructive and Restorative Practices
Provide staff PD - What are the Effective Classroom Practices:
Overviews: ECP - Overview; ECP - Proactive & Instructive; ECP - Proactive; ECP - Instructive; ECP - Restorative
Provide staff PD - How to implement Effective Classroom Practices:
Proactive - Developing/Teaching Classroom Expectations; Co-Regulation Strategies Handout; Active Supervision - 1; Active Supervision - 2; Active Supervision - 3;
Instructive - Precorrection Article; Precorrection; Acknowledgment & Correction;
Restorative - Affective Statements; Restorative Questions; Restorative Conversations; Community Building Circles (Greeting Round; Activity Round; Sharing Round; Elementary Lesson Plan; Secondary Lesson Plan; Reading; Manual)
Sample Effective Classroom Practices Resources: Action Plan, Fidelity Tool; Effective Classroom Practices Data Collection Tool; ECP Feedback Tool; Self Monitoring and Request for Assistance Form
Schools benefit from proactive, instructive, and restorative policies because behavior is not just something to control—it is something students can learn, practice, and improve. These approaches allow schools to maintain clear expectations and accountability while also addressing the skills, relationships, and circumstances that influence behavior.
The three approaches work together:
Proactive (Prevent): Build relationships, establish predictable environments, explicitly communicate expectations, actively supervise, and proximity.
Instructive (Teach): Treat behavioral expectations like academic expectations. Model them, practice them, provide feedback, reteach when mistakes occur, and give students opportunities to demonstrate the skill successfully.
Restorative (Repair): When behavior causes harm, maintain accountability while helping students reflect, understand impact, repair relationships, and reconnect with the school community.
A zero-tolerance approach tends to ask, “What rule was broken, and what is the consequence?” A proactive, instructive, and restorative approach asks additional questions: “How could we have prevented this? What does the student need to learn? What harm occurred? How do we repair it? What will help the student succeed next time?”
This isn't an argument for eliminating consequences. Accountability and support can coexist. Serious behavior may require significant consequences or safety responses. The difference is that the consequence becomes part of the response—not the entire intervention.
In the Tardy Policy example identify when the Proactive, Instructive & Restorative Approaches were used:
Line 1 teaches students the expectations through the use of acknowledgments and corrections
Lines 2 - 4 helps to prevent future tardies by building relationship throuhg active supervision and proximity.
Line 5 helps to repair the relationship between the teacher and the student as a result of the tardy