1_WriteReview

    • What is the main question addressed by the research? Is it relevant and interesting?

      • How original is the topic? What does it add to the subject area compared with other published material?

      • Is the paper well written? Is the text clear and easy to read?

      • Are the conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented? Do they address the main question posed?

      • If the author is disagreeing significantly with the current academic consensus, do they have a substantial case? If not, what would be required to make their case credible?

      • If the paper includes tables or figures, what do they add to the paper? Do they aid understanding or are they superfluous?

    1. I would like to see the following contents in your reviewer's comments

      • A summary on your evaluation (What is the key idea proposed. Is it important (worthy of publication: novel ideas, major improvements, new applications, new modeling approaches, etc. Rejection: lack of contributions, wrong methodology, old material, etc.)

      • Comments

        • Methodology (comments on the main modeling approach, problem formulation and algorithms)

        • Case set up (Data sources, assumptions, etc.)

        • Result analysis (sufficient explanation on results, generalizable, tested on enough cases, compared with other approaches, etc)

        • Conclusion

        • grammar

        • format (figure, table, etc.)

        • Clarifications on ambiguous statements