MAE3 Intermediate
Peer Evaluation Web Form Instructions
The intermediate peer reviews are for feedback purposes and
the results do not affect course grade, but the final peer reviews have a large
grade component! Each
student will receive 10 points (equivalent to a HW assignment) for completing
the intermediate peer review by the due date.
Important:
-
A student who allocates less than 900 points to
another team member (1000 point is average) must include comments to the
instructor to justify their scoring. For less than 800 points the
comments must be specific in nature. Each 100 points corresponds to a
grade level, e.g. A to B.
-
A student who receives 900 or lower in their
intermediate peer review should take immediate and significant action;
otherwise one's final peer review and course grade could take a
significant hit.
- The
peer reviews will be kept anonymous from other students in the class, but
the averaged results and combined comments from one’s teammates will be
emailed to the students being reviewed.
- It is
not proper etiquette to ask your teammates how they reviewed you.
- Review
by peers can be difficulty, but also among the most helpful learning tool.
- If you
choose to add comments in “Areas for Improvement” then comments should
also be entered under “Helpful Actions.” Effective feedback focuses on the
impact of certain actions rather than on a team member’s personality.
Connect to: http://maeservices.ucsd.edu/peerreview
Login to your individual peer
review form using:
Lower case
email address (e.g. ndelson@ucsd.edu):
PID number with upper case A (e.g. A00000002):
Your peer review can only be
submitted once, so be prepared to complete the form in one sitting.
When all team members have completed the review, the
averaged results will be emailed back to each team member | 