神说到我们的形象Dios habla de “nuestra imagen”

人的交通

神说“我们”是神在一些特殊背景里说话采用的一种方式，如，耶稣道成肉身的时候他就提到“父”，为什么提到“父”呢？因为他要是说他是神，人接受不了，耶稣怕人拒绝不接受，所以只能提“父”。因为人眼不能直穿灵界，看不见神的神性实质，所以神跟不能直穿灵界的这么一个人类说话就得采用一种方式，这样，“父”也出来了，“子”也出来了，有时候“我们”也出来了，实际上神就是一位真神。一提到“父”、“子”或者“我们”，这就是说话的方式问题，就是在一个特殊背景里采用的一种方式。那不这么说行不行呢？行，等你完全明白真理了，神再说这个事的时候神的话又变了。神跟外邦人说话一种语气，跟真正信他的人说话又一种语气，跟外邦人为啥用比喻呢？天国的奥秘不让他们听见，只对信的人说，所以用比喻，他们听完也不明白、不理解，信的人听完了一交通，神一开启就明白了。神作工有方式、有智慧，所以有时候就采用各种说话的方式，就用“圣父”，或者“父”“我的父”“我们”“圣子”。这里提到“我们”，为啥叫“我们”呢？一说“我们”就把以后要作拯救工作、要向人显现的道成肉身的神加在里面了，所以就来个“我们”，这个“我们”绝对是指子和父说的，一个是道成肉身，一个是灵，你如果光说神，光说灵，灵怎么有人的形象呢？这不对呀，一说“我们的形像”就是指道成肉身的神，道成肉身有人的形象，所以说神造人的时候提到“我们”，就是预表以后道成肉身的神要来。神道成肉身来作工作，按照这个“形像”道成肉身发表真理，把这些真理作到人里面，以后人就活出了神所说的“我们的形像”。那你说这个“我们的形像”是不是就光代表神的形像啊？这里还有人的形象，“我们”有道成肉身的形像，“我们”就是指有人的形象，里面还有神的实质，就是神的话、神的所有所是，这样一种形像叫“我们”。“我们”不能说完全就是神的形像，要是说神的形像，那人没法活出神的形像，达不到，一说“我们”就相当客观了，就是人能达到的了，好比说今天神道成肉身说这些话，如果我们把这些神话活出来，这是不是应验神的话了？神说“我们要照着我们的形像，按着我们的样式造人”这句话就能成就，如果神说照着神的形像造人，那这句话咱们就不知道怎么成就，人能活出神的形像吗？他一说“我们的形像”，这个就指道成肉身所发表的那些真理，这个形像人就能达到了，就现实了，所以这个“我们”是相当有意义的。如果按人的观念说“神就照着神的形像造人就完事了，以后人都活出神的形像来”，你们说这可能吗？绝对不可能，这里一说“我们”，就变成可能了。神话的意义太深，我不能解释透，只有这么点浅显的认识，以后我们经历到最终也可能对这句话更加明白，现在我不能说真正明白这句话。

Man's fellowship

When God said “Us,” it’s a manner of God’s speaking under some special backgrounds. For example, when Jesus became flesh, He mentioned the “Father.” Why did He mention the “Father”? Because if He had said He was God, man wouldn’t have accepted at all. Afraid that man would not accept Him, Jesus had to mention the “Father.” Man’s eyes cannot directly penetrate the spiritual world or see the divine substance of God, so God had to adopt a way to speak to such a mankind who can’t directly penetrate the spiritual realm. For this reason, the term “the Father” came into being, “the Son” came into existence too, and sometimes God also claimed Himself to be “Us.” In fact, God is one true God. Whenever the Father, the Son, or “Us” is mentioned, it’s a way of saying, that is, it’s a manner adopted by God in a special background. Then, is it all right not to say in this way? Of course. After you fully understand the truth, God will change His way of saying when talking about it again. God used one tone when speaking to unbelievers, and another tone to the true believers in Him. Why did God speak in parables to unbelievers? Because God didn’t want them to understand the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but only wanted to let the believers know. This was why He used parables. The unbelievers can’t comprehend even after hearing the parables, but the believers will get God's enlightenment after having a fellowship. God does His work in different ways and with wisdom, so sometimes He adopts various speaking manners, such as the “Holy Father,” or the “Father,” “My Father,” “Us,” or the “Holy Spirit.” Here, God said “Us.” Why is it “Us?” At the mention of “Us,” it includes the incarnate God who was to do the work of salvation and appear to man. This was the reason God used “Us.” Here “Us” definitely refers to the Son and the Father. The former is God incarnate, the latter is the Spirit. Supposing only God, the Spirit, is mentioned, how can the Spirit possess the image of man? It doesn’t make sense. But at the mention of “Our image,” it refers to the incarnate God. God incarnate has the image of man, so God’s mention of “Us” when He created man foreshadows that the incarnate God would come in the future. God becomes flesh to do His work, and it is according to this image that God is incarnated to express the truth and work the truth into man, and then man will live out what God says about “Our image.” Do you think “Our image” represents God’s image merely? No, here man’s image is also included. “Our image” includes the image of God incarnate. “Our image” means that there is man’s image, as well as God’s substance within, which is God’s word and what God has and is. Such an image is called “Our image.” We can’t say that “Our image” is entirely the image of God. If God says God’s image here, there’s no way that man can live out the image of God. It’s beyond man’s ability. But when God said “Our image,” it’s quite objective, and the image is attainable to man. In other words, if we can live out the words expressed by God incarnate today, won’t God’s word be fulfilled? God’s words that “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness” will then be fulfilled. If God says He made man in God’s image, we have no idea how these words will be fulfilled. Is man able to live out God’s image? When God says “Our image,” He refers to the truth expressed by God incarnate, and such an image can be lived out by man and is practical. So, “Our” here is quite meaningful. If you explain the words with man’s notion and say that “God just made man in God’s image. That’s it. And man will live out God’s image,” do you think it’s possible? Absolutely not. But when God said “Our image,” it becomes possible. The meaning of God’s word is so profound. I can’t fully explain it. I only have a little bit of shallow knowledge. Maybe we’ll understand more of it after experiencing to the end. But I can’t say I’ve truly understood these words now.