Embedded Files
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 10:28 PM · Jul 13, 2020·
£2m pay out by AVIVA due from 9/2014, last of 9, that would have stopped enabling, failing which terror + harassment would continue until death cert public. Alistair McIntyre Fulton decided that as MM is excrement in his eyes, he would not give her records needed for surety on 8.5.17
638
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 10:11 PM · Jul 13, 2020·
No statement of costs filed Jan19 to 13.7.20. 22:00 by AM Fulton (or NE Burrows). Other MM statements of costs defending TRD + its staff + members, are public together with records of 2009 STAY which blocks use of bankruptcy court (attempt would be contempt). Relied on 12.2.19+13.2.20 twitter.com/folio336/statu…pic.twitter.com/aIxQM26Q8Q
296
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 10:06 PM · Jul 13, 2020
No statement of costs filed Jan19 to 13.7.20. 22:00 by AM Fulton (or NE Burrows-handed to A&O 18/19 Jan 05, loose cannon + trouble maker). Other statements of costs defending TRD+ its staff + members, together with records of 2009 STAY blocking use of bankruptcy court are public (contempt)
675
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 4:08 PM · Jul 13, 2020
Oh, dear! Explains why they abandoned claim HQ06XO1803 by 18.3.11 + 21.4.11, leaving counterclaim £21m unchallenged, equivalent to cash. Why on earth would Alistair McIntyre Fulton not want me to have such liquidity, I wonder?
twitter.com/Carlier_J87/st… pic.twitter.com/Sibzt3C8FX
323
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 3:01 PM · Jul 13, 2020
By 29.7.17, AM Fulton called MM using mobile paid for by TRD. He notified MM within earshot of her late mother, that MM is excrement. He promised to apologise if MM gave the name of the surety. She gave the name. He yelled it out in front of JCR + SMS. Audio hidden 12.2.19 +since twitter.com/folio336/statu…pic.twitter.com/ZgZLfOnZfn
266
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 2:36 PM · Jul 13, 2020
Alistair McIntyre Fulton has already secured witness testimony for which he paid A&O £1.5m to spew all over the public courts, despite being intensely private. Now he has to explain himself why he called MM a bankrupt which he did on 10.1.17+why she should give in to his bullying pic.twitter.com/wLvJpZjxsv
295
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 2:19 PM · Jul 13, 2020·
Somebody needs to find Alistair McIntyre Fulton + explain to the chump that Mira Makar is not bankrupt+ that it is an offence to benefit from relief to which one is not entitled. His repeated listing of name of Triad Group Plc is unacceptable. More than time he was sacked for 2nd time
331
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 1:47 PM · Jul 13, 2020
Monday 13.45 13 July 2020 inthepublicdomain.net under instructions of SFO from April 2011, 21.4.11 QBD, HQ08XO2310 with HQ06XO1803, funder by ALLIANZ pic.twitter.com/GI5QgeangD
374
2012Folio336 @folio336 Jul 13 8:32 AM · Jul 13, 2020
Plight of refugees with aspiration: "EU member states demand that asylum seekers integrate, work, + contribute to society." I can relate to this. Holland, where I grew up, was most welcoming after nationalisation opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-traf…
266
13 July 2020 10.28 pm
13 July 2020 10.11pm
13 July 2020 10.06 pm
13 July 2020 4.08 pm
13 July 2020 3.01 pm
13 July 2020 2.36 pm
13 July 2020 2.19 pm
13 July 2020 1.47 pm
13 July 2020 10. am
As at Tuesday 30 March 2021, Triad Group Plc, those interested, those prejudiced, minorities, shadow officers, market are waiting for Alistair Fulton
to decide for himself, consult with Eileen Fulton and anyone else he chooses, whether he wishes to drop his previous alignment with FRP.
If he is, he needs to decide whether he is ready to be alongside MM in collecting £2m from AVIVA re September 2014 instrument, and deciding whose Client Monies Account will receive the cash (Burges Salmon / A&O).
OPEN LETTER
Mira Makar to Alistair Fulton
Alistair
There is nothing that cannot be unscrambled once you have made this decision. The regrettable circus at the TRD "AGM", that you could have avoided by JR/me withholding our votes, after my sung contributions were received but not played (contrary to my request), has left you without officers and no means of deciding a TRD balance sheet as at 31 March 2021.
Never in the history since February 1982 have JR/me gone into any meeting without all issues resolved in advance. There is a reason - consensus gives stability and certainty of outcome. Silence and a refusal to communicate deprives you of any chance of doing this, triggering uncertainty.
If you close TRD's year end with that uncertainty, there is nothing you can do afterwards because the date will have passed.
TRD is not involved in this alignment of yours. You chose not to attend the lunch meeting at Cote, an ideal opportunity to find out about the AIM float, and how to protect those to whom you have responsibilities in whatever capacity.
You were in a good position to do so, as CENKOS, sponsor, includes the ex Evo sales team who moved in 2006, with whom I have maintained relations and who are insiders from the time of my subject to contract offer to buy RSM Tenon in 2013. Those 2013 papers are not public. "RSM corporate finance" (admission document) is Baker Tilly Corporate Finance, which went down with the rest in 2012, causing a false file to be created (MM v Rider One) and papers hidden in the basement until found by Master Leslie on 7 November 2014. (£200m Nominal float value of FRP was £190m) Mazars signed an auditor's report for a short accounting period to drop historic liabilities, and go ahead with them unbooked. The insurer is Markel, the same as Baker T ; Kingston Smith, their auditor; PFK Littlejohn, IPA auditor: Markel were notified in June 2010 by KS.
Laurence Longe MD of BT had omitted to notify when I told him to, September 2007; December 2007; February 2008; January 2009 (letters). Carl Hassan attended meetings Dec 07 and Feb 08 and the late Tony Egan FCA and the late Philip Hollins FCA (ICAEW council) in January 2009, when formal confirmation was given that the insurer had not been notified. The partners were sanctioned by exclusion (specifically assurance reporting i.e. being auditor/reporting accountant) in January 2005. It was unfortunate you allowed NEB to use the TRD phone to contact them saying PwC had resigned, in circumstances in which you yourself must have known and chose to keep that info from me.
I knew, and was ready to share with you, what Chris Maidment told me on 27 May 2005 when he attended 333 Cromwell Tower EC2Y 8NB, accompanied by Kelsey, the decoy they used with you. He said that unless I had unfettered access and could draw up the books and ledgers and sign off Companies Act compliance, they would not report. That was no different to previous years, as the auditor treats the person they rely on as a form of assurance for themselves. Had you not been avoiding me I would have told you: you have seen in my comms to Equiniti I requested a complete report that I was proposing to give you as I told Equiniti, you like the solution when being alerted.
FRP was hired by BT using intermediaries RPC, called "introducer" although not AML registered with FCA (must do AML unless both sides FCA accredited for these instruments, which they won't be because they are not lawful - should be declared particularly in court and relate to VAT registered sole traders who are not undeclared bankrupts, have a practicing certificate in accounts prep, operate Client Monies, have a power of attorney registered with some principal.)
Your decision align yourself with this third party, not check who they are, and go against Equiniti's fraud alert machinery, which binds TRD, is hard to understand. TRD picks up liability for Equiniti being overridden. Why would you want to do this? Since 2016 I have been unable to answer that question. I have met no-one who does not ask me the question, why? I say, I do not know.
As you know TJE asked me not to communicate from May 2005. You yourself repeated that position a decade ago, and again on 10 January 2017, saying you would put the phone down on me if I called you. You invited email communication but ignored it. I wrote in connection with regular diarised get-togethers in January 2017 but you did not respond.
The position on the AVIVA bond (number 9) (you said you would apologise for calling me a shit if I gave you the name) is that it is issued without risk evaluation and pays out on the fraud/dishonesty of a numbered individual including with the collusion of others and/or others with his connivance. We had to take RSA through this because it is all off balance sheet by intermediaries. The agent identified it as good on 8 May 2017.
Because of the definition any person is either for FRP or not (all arrangements are in the platform's name, the named individual only requisitions payments from Paymaster and gets cheques with a compliments slip, the paperwork is destroyed so he is not identifiable). You are (party to) claiming on the instrument or you are colluding /connaiving with the wrongdoer. There is no correct or lawful version of the scheme which is why it is secret. My late Mum was the first not part of the scheme (from 1995) to successfully claim.
The years we have spent in this research, statutory compliance /reporting, education are only partially public. I am glad it was EY who invested the most time in understanding. They were auditor of Arthur J Gallagher, US intermediary supplying FRP with insurance after they "took their file back" from Contractsure (Hendersons) purged it of notifications, passed it on. They are CENKOS auditor.
EY's Phil Haberman was Mum's proxy at the TRD AGM on 31 October 2005. His name and record as her proxy, is in the attendance record of that AGM, which, although a private shareholder meeting, you have taken and filed in court in 2006. As you attended that meeting and made that court filing, I was somewhat taken aback to see you had signed a sworn statement saying you did not know who she was and whether she was dead or alive. You could not have been cross examined on your statement (signed 22 Jan 19 from memory) without being discredited on this anomaly in the first minute.
Had I acknowledged or defended, the papers would have been public. I did not, meaning that unless you entered unilateral default judgment, none of the court file such as it is, is public on inspection, including claim number, and names.
That is an advantage to you.
To do anything else is a disadvantage to TRD, NEB and to you and aligns you with FRP. The further decision to bring Reuben Comiskey into court on 12 February 2019 is odd: the transcripts from 2015 I have not got round to making public show he was tied up with the Mental Capacity Act, various medics who would not play ball, adding to that of 2013, A Reveley, plus a false report of Security removing me from Rolls, which the head of security confirmed in writing was untrue (recorded also on preserved CCTV).
RSA had already accepted my instrument as good in 2015, as the first eight instruments are theirs. The ninth is AVIVA.
This is now a very personal decision for you and Eileen consulting with the rest of the family if you so choose. I asked you not to talk about me or comms between us on 9 August 2016. You ignored me, even though it was not in your interest. Please try to keep my name out of any further dialogue.
Finally ALLIANZ cover the ETA (2012 Folio 336): Herbert Smith (incl PwC); A&O and under the rules I am obliged to protect them (hence included in 2012 Folio 336 on the instructions of FOS / Trading Standards/FSA as was). They are entitled to the protection of the AVIVA bond as Ed Brittan of JLT got AVIVA on the hook in 2014, got sacked and had to get them out by shifting to ALLIANZ in Jan 2018, when the death cert became public and FRP sought to "exit" before the pay out that would automatically have turned off their "enabling bond" (done on a platform basis) and stopped the hostilities.
If you do not drop your current alignment, you will be going against ALLIANZ. This does not help Freeths / Jonathan Hambleton who are in the Herbert Smith court case on their own account already. I cannot see why you would want to get caught up or drag others with you.
You have not attempted any informal channel of comms and allowed Simon Hobbs to reject my dinner invitation in February 2020 (before your hearing) to explore whether you wanted one, to release you from the entanglement created from 2016, when third parties got access. I do not know why you hired intermediaries to block comms. You allowed JVM to refuse an introduction in May 2020. You have spoken about me to others as though the ball were in my court somehow. It is not because your championing of FRP (essentially RPC /Baker T /RSM / Markel insurer) is your own. I am not involved.
I have a PRIVACY ruling in court (operational Jan 13) and am protected by Goldring's Stay permanently (HS counterclaim £21m protected). The Baker T activities related to their refusal to return my TRD files (letter 11 April 2007, heard in C of A 18 Feb 2010) .
The internal lawyers of BT conned RPC by pretending that the work of my TRD team spreadsheets; utilisation etc, commissioned by the DTI was their work. They bought some product because I am "rich" (HS £21m; 2 flats; Headway; various recoveries). Laurence Longe wanted 25% of the gross upside of HS; first rights over two properties; and £90k cleared funds in June 2009 to stop the "trial" without claim form or claimant. We could not have done more to seek to recover these files. It is not a surprise they burgled Cromwell where court files were held and is address for service.
I can see no good reason why you should wish to align yourself with FRP and the genesis which triggered the creation of the platform in 2010, when Vantis belatedly went down. I fear you may have not been well served by advisers.
I hope that over the next hour or so you can reflect and decide with Eileen what you want to do.
You are assured the joint principal shareholders will support your decision, to the extent it is their concern, if you decide to decouple from FRP. You are both entitled to make your own decision. The TRD nominal 31.3.21 should reflect that decoupling - once the decision is made, it works its way through the numbers.
Mira
Tuesday 30 March 2021 15.30
INSERT Sunday 4 April 2021 - drafted 18:15 - published 19.00 ish
Appendix To Open Letter To Alistair Fulton, with Eileen Fulton, 30 March 2021 15.30
Alistair,
This letter to which this insert is now an Appendix, concluded:
"You are assured the joint principal shareholders will support your decision, to the extent it is their concern, if you decide to decouple from FRP. You are both entitled to make your own decision. The TRD nominal 31.3.21 should reflect that decoupling - once the decision is made, it works its way through the numbers."
Those reading that open letter may have wondered how it is that you know that support comes from the Joint Principal Shareholders, in whose name I was writing that paragraph.
The answer is that on 8 December 2005, witnessed by Allen & Overy LLP, my lawyers, using my file reference number, and filed in court, with a document reference number, by you yourself, JCR (witnessed also by IMH), notified you that as far as I was concerned (the other joint principal shareholder), you were on your own, at liberty to make your own decisions, and that, by allowing you to do as you choose, there is no inference of endorsement.
There was no "authority" that the concert party of JCR/IMH had in order to delegate it to you. Therefore this reads as a permission on behalf of the two of them, with no come-back on JCR/IMH from your decision.
At the members' meeting on 24 September 2020, JCR (my proxy) ducked out of chairing the meeting at the last minute, omitted to agree withholding his and my votes with me, ending up with the disenfranchisement of members continuing, and no officers appointed. Members' proxy poll votes were given to an unidentified third party with discretion to do as they choose. No-one has admitted responsibility for this ploy and why avoiding consensus at all costs is thought to be "good" (and who by).
You will have reminded yourself of this document and the fact you had forgotten you had already filed it in court . It means that you and Eileen can decide what you want to do re the AVIVA bond, knowing that JCR agreed on 8.12.05 of your independence of thought, and this agreement is already in court.
Accordingly:
"You are assured the joint principal shareholders will support your decision, to the extent it is their concern, if you decide to decouple from FRP. You are both entitled to make your own decision. The TRD nominal 31.3.21 should reflect that decoupling - once the decision is made, it works its way through the numbers."
stands, and can be relied on by you; that you can choose and will be supported by JCR if you decide to de-couple yourself from FRP, and encash the AVIVA bond, together with the RSA previous.
On a date in May 2017, you shouted "AVIVA, AVIVA, AVIVA" witnessed by SMS and JCR, using a Triad Group Plc paid for mobile. You have recorded everything else on voicemails, so why can't you now ask SMS to confirm hearing this and just get on with it?
Alistair, you owe it to Eileen to get her out of this mess by making the right decision, as you appeared to be trying to highlight to SMS and JCR. It is a pity that SMS did not support you at the time or since. That is just life. It does not alter the position re Triad Group Plc those interested and otherwise prejudiced.
This filed document tells you JCR will live with whatever decision you both make.
However there are consequences for the rest of us. Unless you de-couple from FRP, the TRD balance sheet for 31.3.21 cannot be drawn up because the supply chain and third parties will claim Part 20 Contributory Damages. It is more complex even because of Liontrust getting caught up with FRP and not being warned by you or anyone else. You did not attend 27 February 2021 regretfully.
Although Mr Leer was present, he told me his name and we shook hands, I do not consider this any introduction. I would not start talking to strangers without your introduction, especially as you have had experience of floats and Mr Leer has not.
You were not warned about any of this by Freeths, who were too busy selling Part 36 offer products to Allianz for customers suffering fatal brain injury in hospital and making money on both sides of the transaction (February 2017).
You remain assured of the support of the joint principal shareholders, if you decide to de-couple, and cash in on the AVIVA bond, guaranteeing TRD its financial stability.
There is a contract from November 2002 that you concluded with me and for which JCR and I spent £860k before stamp duty to buy out the de-stabilising Dill Faulkes. He wanted to flog TRD to Parity for a song because he had run out of cash to fund his toys and holidays.
This remains enforceable by TRD, and those interested, guaranteeing JCR and MM unity. For the avoidance of doubt this means neither of us is at liberty to go off and do our own thing, and you are TRD's authorised policeman, to deliver that unity from that date.
Mira
Easter Sunday 4 April 2021
Gift from Triad Group Plc; its minorities; its Chartered Accountants, past and present; to all those interested severally and collectively in the six RSA / Willis bonds 22 August 2013; deployed to allow the bust Baker T partners to go around again branded "RSM Tenon" then "RSM": It was too late as MM objected 22 August 2013 before midnight and made a subject to contract offer to buy early 23 August 2013. RSA has admitted instrument nr 7 to MM's named benefit self certified 31.12.13, into which these six are subsumed.
The AVIVA instrument was self-certified by FRP for September 2014 (these are "corporate" bonds as FRP is the operator not the named individual who has no involvement apart from use of his name, anonymised to dole out proceeds of embezzling). This was after MM put Deloitte on notice on 21 August 2014, re the events of 22 August 2013, when RSM de-listed, MM objected and made her subject-to-contract offer. The RSA instruments are subsumed into the AVIVA one.
You remain able to seek further clarifications as you sees fit using whatever channel (s) you choose. You seem to be amenable to speaking to EB. You know she is circumspect but does not appreciate being threatened by Simon Hobbs.
Mira
Wednesday 31 March 2021 by 12 pm
MM's clarification points provided to AMF and others (slightly edited).
“These instruments pay out (without further proof because they are issued without risk assessment) on the fraud/dishonesty of the platform with the collusion of others and third parties with their connivance. The operators “self-certify”. Surety is blind: it pays out mechanically.
“The position is therefore black and white. Either you are with the platform or with its target and entitled under the instrument. There is no mid-course. Instrument operators seek to compromise others in order to shift risk and exit.
“I am automatically entitled as I am named and the agent of the surety did ID checks on me on 8 May 2017, confirming the instrument is good. Although he said that YYYYY had copies of the instrument, and therefore to take it to them for encashment as the voucher could be matched.
However that proved a bit complex for operational reasons.
This was the work being done from May 2017, which got de-railed as a result of the events from the meeting MM with AMF on 22 September 2016. For reasons I (MM) do not understand, TRD proxy poll voting results in 2016 was suppressed from the TRD RNS, and communications amongst members were cut, just when re- starting after more than a decade.
“The delays on encashment have been occasioned by the need to formalise declarations (as insurance is “utmost good faith”). It has not been practically possible to complete this while dealing with the consequences of the non communicationss between fellow shareholders and the discovery that my name (MM) was on the RNS again and my stolen share certificate had been handed in to Equiniti (early April 2017) but bizarrely blocked from return to me. We are left with a paralysed TRD register because blocking trading affects all members /the market.
“That means that everyone who has championed the instrument purchaser (FRP) has to decide whether they want to continue doing that (“collusion / connivance”) or want to wash their hands.
“Importantly the insurer has no interest in my (MM) judicial standing or wealth. They do not ask and do not need to know. The value is a default number. Once encashed, the operators have their enabling bond turned off. Hostility thereby ends.
“In this particular case, FRP cheated even on the instrument vendors as well as the IPA and ICAEW (including the government whose scheme this is using the Paymaster General / RBS). This was because their first instrument was self-certified on 31 December 2013 (as you have seen on the voucher) and yet was number 7 in the series (the first six were bought by Deloitte re RSM Tenon and Premier Strategies). Under the commercial instrument rules they should have made a proposal to RSA / Willis but deliberately omitted to do it. The transactions are part of a continuum and intertwined.
“This hits the balance sheet of the IPA for 31 December 2013, because their raison d’etre is to police that (1) there was a proposal to RSA (over £5m) (there was not); (2) they had the paperwork and could give it to me.
“In this case the IPA did not do this (did not even have the paperwork). The IPA proceeded to renew the mandate of the operators for 2014 et seq. incorrectly, as well as not making provisions in their own accounts on these issues. This was fundamental to their survival after 2013, the year the secrecy was blown, as Farringdon Insurance Guernsey pulled out. This was not made public until September 2017 (although I was told by the government by 2015).
“The IPA was erroneously and unlawfully receiving records with my name and did not hand it over. Its CEO was apologetic. The IPA records referred to an “introduction from Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP”. I (MM) was referred to as “client” for money laundering records, which I was not. I first approached them in January 2014: it was in 2017 that the delayed apology arrived. They replied to a subject access in 2015 but could not give me what was hidden from them, including the voucher for instrument nr 7, self certified 1 April 2014. .
“RSA had already admitted the first instrument in my name to my benefit (Dec 2013) (the seventh instrument), with the history of the previous six, so there is no more “proving” to do. It had to be reported to RSA auditor KPMG and SFO at the same time, all of which took place.
“FRP cheated again the next time as well by conning the IPA and not logging instrument nr 8 self-certified on 1 April 2014. The insurer assumes risk “blind”. This is a further contravention.
“Instrument 9 is the AVIVA one, capturing the rest. Alistair said he would apologise for calling me (MM) a “shit” three times in front of Steve Sanderson and JR if I gave him the surety’s name. These are important people in my life. I (MM) gave it. AMF shouted it out in front of the other two without my agreement. He refused to apologise. This apology remains outstanding. There is no point in any apology which is not sincere.
“I cannot explain, and do not understand, anything that AMF has done since as he has been silent to me yet continued to use my name with others, (or allowing it to be used) on listing boards; RNS; BAILII; subscription services as Bloomberg and ADVFN.
“The paperwork I asked for was held up from 18 May 2017 because, according to JR, AMF was away from Guildford for a few days. I do not know why he did not provide it before going away but he did not provide it on his return or since.
“I do not know why AMF has any interest in or knowledge of anything to do with my estate or judicial standing, or my (MM) insurance claims. I do not know why he roped in Equiniti.
“If AMF does not wish to de-couple from FRP, he can choose to remain but I (MM) would counsel talking to his family first. Whatever he decides, he should communicate his decision to me, because if he de-couples, I would want the sureties to know he is aligned with me (“me” already includes TRD) and is not out on a limb alone with FRP.”
“I hope this helps. These are the first pay-outs to non-industry people (as the whole thing has been secret on account of there being no “correct” version) and there has therefore been no claims path. We have suffered industry retaliation on account of the research and evidence we provided at the request of the government and particularly the NAO, from 2014.”
MM 31 March 2021
Sunday 28 March 2021
St George Cathedral
Coptic Orthodox Diocese of London
start 2806 (46 mins 46 secs)
WITNESS INTIMIDATION OF EMILY BUCHANAN BY FREETHS LLP
KICKED OFF AFTER UNSOLICITED EMAIL TO HER FROM JOHN RIGG, WITH ALISTAIR FULTON AND ADRIAN LEER DATED 6 JANUARY 2019 TO WHICH SHE DID NOT OBJECT AT THE TIME OR SINCE
WITNESS INTIMIDATION OF EB
BY SIMON HOBBS OF FREETHS LLP
CARRYING ON UNABATED
15 FEBRUARY 2019 TO 1 APRIL 2021 16.29 incl.
ILLEGAL WITNESS INTIMIDATION
UPDATED NOTIFICATION TO ALLIANZ
BY 1 APRIL 2021 17.00
July 2018 - 15 Feb. 2019 (Freeths LLP threat of imprisonment of journalists-Emily Buchanan) reporting on TWITTER)- Deletion Of Insurers' Evidence @MiraMakar Insurance Notifications Allianz Group Plc MM v Allianz & Ors 2012 Folio 336
July 2018 - 15 Feb. 2019 (Freeths LLP threat of imprisonment of journalists-Emily Buchanan) reporting on TWITTER)- Deletion Of Insurers' Evidence @MiraMakar Insurance Notifications Allianz Group Plc MM v Allianz & Ors 2012 Folio 336
From: "John Rigg" <jcrigg@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: RE: MIra Makar
Date: 6 January 2019 at 22:42:48 GMT
To: <emilybuchanan10@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Adrian Leer'" <adrian.leer@triad.co.uk>, <amfulton@compuserve.com>
Erratum: First line should read “I see that you” not “I see you that”
From: John Rigg [mailto:jcrigg@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: 06 January 2019 22:34
To: 'emilybuchanan10@gmail.com' <emilybuchanan10@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Adrian Leer' <adrian.leer@triad.co.uk>;
'amfulton@compuserve.com' <amfulton@compuserve.com>
Subject: MIra Makar
Dear Ms Buchanan
I see you that are continuing to tweet on the subject of Mira Makar. Please be advised that a claim in
The High Court of Justice has been lodged in this matter (Claim Number QB-2018-000581).
Kind regards
John Rigg
Executive Chairman
Triad Group Plc
6 January 2019
The Mystery of the Stolen Share Certificate
as told by Emily Buchanan on TWITTER
During Midnight Mass 6 January 2019 Holy Nativity Christmas 7 January 2019
From: "John Rigg" <jcrigg@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: RE: MIra Makar
Date: 6 January 2019 at 22:42:48 GMT
To: <emilybuchanan10@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Adrian Leer'" <adrian.leer@triad.co.uk>, <amfulton@compuserve.com>
Erratum: First line should read “I see that you” not “I see you that”
From: John Rigg [mailto:jcrigg@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: 06 January 2019 22:34
To: 'emilybuchanan10@gmail.com' <emilybuchanan10@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Adrian Leer' <adrian.leer@triad.co.uk>;
'amfulton@compuserve.com' <amfulton@compuserve.com>
Subject: MIra Makar
Dear Ms Buchanan
I see you that are continuing to tweet on the subject of Mira Makar. Please be advised that a claim in
The High Court of Justice has been lodged in this matter (Claim Number QB-2018-000581).
Kind regards
John Rigg
Executive Chairman
Triad Group Plc
SECOND ANNIVERSARY JR; AMF; AL to EB
Midnight Mass 6 January 2021 Holy Nativity Christmas 7 January 2021
Place holder for John Rigg, Alistair Fulton and Adrian Leer
to acknowledge that they are wrong to stop Equiniti
from returning MM's stolen share certificate
handed into Equiniti on 7 April 2017
MM: 4,507,951 TRD
Whilst MM cannot trade, no-one can and TRD register is paralysed as at 2016
15 February 2019
following JR/AMF/AL email dated 6 January 2019
From: Wendy Ince <Wendy.Ince@freeths.co.uk>
Subject: Triad Group Plc (1) Nicholas Burrows (2) and Alistair Fulton (3) -v- Mira Makar.
Claim Number: QB-2018-000581
Date: 15 February 2019 at 17:02:57 GMT
To: "emilybuchanan10@gmail.com" <emilybuchanan10@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Hobbs <Simon.Hobbs@freeths.co.uk>
Dear Madam
Please see attached correspondence sent on behalf of Simon Hobbs.
Yours faithfully
Freeths LLP
Routeco Office Park, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill
Milton Keynes MK5 8HJ
Legal 500 Guide 2018: 'Top Tier' in 22 categories | 144 'Recommended' Lawyers | 24 'Elite Leading Lawyers'
Chambers UK Guide 2018: 'Ranked' in 37 categories | 66 Lawyers 'Leaders in the field'
To see our additional awards, please click here
Please read our Data Protection Notice at www.freeths.co.uk
Please be aware of the increasing risk of cybercrime and online fraud. If you ever receive an email stating a change in bank account details purporting to be from Freeths LLP, do not send any funds to the account and contact us immediately. We will never send you an email telling you that we have changed our bank account details.
Freeths LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales, Partnership number OC304688. Registered Office, 80 Mount Street, Nottingham NG1 6HH. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. You can find a copy of the SRA Handbook, which includes the SRA Code of Conduct at www.sra.org.uk/handbook You can inspect a list of the names of the members of Freeths LLP at our registered office during normal business hours. This message is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you have received this in error, please delete this message and let us know by emailing Postmaster@freeths.co.uk telephoning us on +44 (0)115 936 9369. Freeths LLP does not accept the service of legal proceedings by email unless by prior agreement.
Malicious Comms to EB-journalist- from Freeths for Leer, Rigg, Fulton with threats
of seizing assets and penal warning dated 15 February 2019
Malicious Comms to EB-journalist- from Freeths for Leer, Rigg, Fulton with threats
of seizing assets and penal warning dated 15 February 2019
This QB file has no public documents. This is because the named "defendant" did not reply
to any claim form. The named "claimants" severally did not enter unilateral default judgment.
Had they done so, the public could inspect and they (and/or others) could obtain audios and transcripts of proceedings. There is no public template or title of proceedings.
MM's name is subject to a privacy ruling from December 2012
ONE WEEK AFTER 15.2.19 THREATS
TO EMILY BUCHANAN
FIRST DRAFT OUTPUT IS NOT PUBLIC
EMBARGO'ED 22 Feb 2019:
REUBEN COMISKEY HEARD
PAID BY DMH STALLARD LLP
HIRED BY SUSAN MALLON
OPERATING WITH DAWN MCCAMBLEY
2012 Folio 336
re damages files
3630 - 2013; 2020 BR000345
TO BREAK AND ENTER
333 CROMWELL TOWER
(BURGLARY; VANDALISM; SQUATTING)
AND
218 BEN JONSON HOUSE
218 BEN JONSON HOUSE DOOR BROKEN DOWN BY CITY POLICE 11 JAN 2021 TRAUMATIZING THE PERSON INSIDE WHO
WAS IN COVID SELF-ISOLATION
TEACHING ON SKYPE
TRAUMATIZED TARGET TRD HOLDER 1 SHARE WITNESS TO SHAM
"APPEAL"BY NEB/AMF Feb 2006 - MM FAMILY
UNLIMITED DAMAGES UNDER WHISTLEBLOWING LAWS INCLUDING
FOR THIS ACT OF WANTON VANDALISM, TERROR AND MULTIPLE CONTRAVENTIONS OF PUBLIC ORDER ACTS
ACTION NOW COMPELS CITY POLICE TO SELF REPORT TO IPCC
NOT ONE PERSON CHOOSING TO PUT THEIR NAME ON TRD RNSs
HAS TAKEN A SINGLE STEP TO GET NICHOLAS LAVENDER'S ARREST
WARRANT WITHDRAWN, 22.9.20 3.40 - 4.40 pm
HEARING TRANSCRIPT PURCHASED BY TOM HOLDEN FREETHS LLP AND HIDDEN
ALL HAVE COLLUDED TO ADVERTISE THE ADDRESS ON BAILII
ALL HAVE COLLUDED TO CLAIM 218 BEN JONSON BELONGS TO THEM ,ADVERTISING IT ON THE LONDON GAZETTE AND BAILII TO BE REPEATED ON ADVFN (CALLING THEMSLVES "TRD" WITHOUT ANY MANDATE FROM TRD MEMBERS AND HAVING NO STANDING)
THEREFORE BEHAVING AS PERFECTLY FREE TO SMASH DOWN THE DOOR (TREATING THEMSELVES AS OWNERS) TO GET ROUND BANHAM LOCKS AND ALARM SYSTEM AND CITY OF LONDON SECURITY, WHO WERE ENGAGED BY TIM ECKES ON 27.2.20 COTE BRASSERIE, BASE OF BEN JONSON HOUSE
The embargo'ed draft output
requiring a NIL return
from each of those named before
it could go further
No return was received from TRD; NEB; AMF. MM made a return objecting
From: Lloyd, John
Sent: 22 February 2019 16:34
To: 'oliviasmith@5rb.com' <oliviasmith@5rb.com>
Subject: Triad Group PLC and others v. Mira Makar
Olivia,
As discussed. Please can I have comments/corrections from Jacob Dean by 10:00am Tuesday 26th Feb 2019 via my email.
I estimate the handown to be on the 27th Feb.
Many thanks,
John
Mr John Lloyd | Clerk to The Hon. Mr Justice Soole and Temporary Clerk to Mr Justice Julian Knowles
Room W14| Royal Courts of Justice | Strand| London| WC2A 2LL | DX44450 Strand
Tel: DD (020) XXXXXXX| Mobile: XXXXXXXXXX | john.lloyd@justice.gov.uk
Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
IN CONFIDENCE
This is a judgment to which the Practice Direction supplementing CPR Part 40 applies. It will be handed down on at in Court No . This draft is confidential to the parties and their legal representatives and accordingly neither the draft itself nor its substance may be disclosed to any other person or used in the public domain. The parties must take all reasonable steps to ensure that its confidentiality is preserved. No action is to be taken (other than internally) in response to the draft before judgment has been formally pronounced. A breach of any of these obligations may be treated as a contempt of court. The official version of the judgment will be available from the shorthand writers once it has been approved by the judge.
The court is likely to wish to hand down its judgment in an approved final form. Counsel should therefore submit any list of typing corrections and other obvious errors in writing (Nil returns are required) to the clerk to Mr Justice Julian Knowles, by fax to or via email at , by on , so that changes can be incorporated, if the judge accepts them, in the handed down judgment.
Neutral Citation Number:
Case No:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
Royal Courts of JusticeStrand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date:
Before :
MR JUSTICE JULIAN KNOWLES
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jacob Dean (instructed by Freeths) for the Claimants
[] (instructed by DMH Stallard) for the Trustee in Bankruptcy
The Defendant did not appear and was not represented
Hearing date: 12 February 2019
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DRAFT JUDGMENT
If this draft Judgment has been emailed to you it is to be treated as ‘read-only’.
You should send any suggested amendments as a separate Word document.
Triad Group Plc (TRD)
Friday 01 March, 2019
High Court Hearing
RNS Number : 6497R
01 March 2019
Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) No. 213800MDNBFVEQEN1G84
Triad Group Plc
Statement re Recent High Court Hearing
I refer to my announcement dated 3 January 2019.
At a High Court hearing on 12 February 2019 the Company
sought, and successfully obtained, default judgment in respect
of the claim referred to in my announcement (High Court of
Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Media and Communications
List, Claim Number QB-2018-000581: Triad Group Plc,
Nicholas Burrows, Alistair Fulton v Mira Makar).
The Company was also awarded, in full, its associated legal
costs in bringing the matter before the Court.
The Court's written judgment was handed down yesterday and
can be viewed at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2019/423.html.
Mira Makar is the registered holder of 3,951,452 shares in the Company (24.74%) which makes her the second largest
shareholder by a substantial margin. We trust she will lend
her full support to the current successful efforts to take the
Company forward. The Company remains as always open
to a constructive dialogue with Ms Makar in order to describe
and explain current developments and progress.
Dr J C Rigg
Executive Chairman, Triad Group Plc
1 March 2019
RNS 5.8.19 2.11pm
Triad Group Plc (TRD)
Monday 05 August, 2019
Directorate Resignation
RNS Number : 9388H
Triad Group Plc
05 August 2019
Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) No. 213800MDNBFVEQEN1G84
Director Resignation
Triad Group plc announces that Steven Sanderson, a
non-executive director, has decided to step down from the
Board and tended his resignation on 4 August 2019.
He will remain a director until 4 September 2019.
The Board wishes to thank Steven for his contribution to the
Company and wish him every success in the future.
For further information please contact:
Alistair Fulton
Senior Non-Executive Director
Tel: 01908 278450
RNS 23.9.19 2.34pm
Monday 23 September, 2019
Triad Group Plc
Directorate Resignation
RNS Number : 3329N
Triad Group Plc
23 September 2019
Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) No. 213800MDNBFVEQEN1G84
Director Resignation
Triad Group Plc announces that Nick Burrows, Finance
Director and Company Secretary, has decided to step down
from the Board for personal reasons and tendered his
resignation on 20th September 2019. He will remain a
Director and Company Secretary until 19th March 2020.
The Board wishes to thank Nick for his contribution to the
Company over the past 18 years and wish him every
success in the future.
For further information please contact:
Alistair Fulton
Senior Non-Executive Director
Tel: 01908 278450
Good Friday 2 April 2021
Gift from Triad Group Plc; its minorities; its Chartered Accountants, past and present; to all those interested severally and collectively in the six RSA / Willis bonds 22 August 2013; deployed to allow the bust Baker T partners to go around again branded "RSM Tenon" then "RSM": It was too late as MM objected 22 August 2013 before midnight and made a subject to contract offer to buy early 23 August 2013. RSA has admitted instrument nr 7 to MM's named benefit self certified 31.12.13, into which these six are subsumed.
Neville Kahn head restructuring / corporate finance, Deloitte "this is serious".
Formerly same post at C&L, adviser to MM (TRD) in negotiations with Carrier 1 Administrator. Creditors received $ 0.03 in $1 and TRD $1, total £1/4m on account of the IPR in the billing system TRD built reverting to TRD on appointment of C1 administrator. Standard term in Ts & Cs of Triad Special Systems prior to 1996, adopted by AMF and retained by MM as his CFO (1994).
28 August 2013
"Cease and desist" is hot air and meaningless. Used to record that Matt Smith Clare Boardman Nick Edwards have trafficked MM objections to the suspension of RSM Tenon shares in anticipation of transaction by Laurence Longe, which did not come (pre ordained, advisers Cannacord Genuity, ex Collins Stewart platform. "we are going to continue doing this until someone stops us. " (compliance).
Also her subject to contract offer to buy and restore to main list under auspices of Numis, Sponsor.
Triggers fraud / dishonesty bonds. Transaction value over £5m so any further bond required proposal to RSA which never came. RPC vicariously liable for Jonathan Wyles and Martin Westwood. JW introducer to FRP and sender of forged emails to INSS 17.12.13 after Lisa Young Land Charges had written to the court rejecting the paperwork as not being MM.
JW email triggered postings in various public platforms. Trauma caused blood vessel eruption and scabbing in retina blinding late SM in stronger eye as continued so each laser healing replaced by new trauma.
Papers and statements filed in court related to late SSR, and Jersey courts to which demands were made on late SM to travel or lose (joint executor and trustee). Involved Mourante and Appleby ie profiting from death and stance saying "when you pass, this comes to us, give it to us now and you can have a bit of left overs, if any."
FRP platform created as corporate partner "shendish ltd" in September 2013, with short accounting period, to drop accumulated liabilities and go around again. "Accounts" made up by Nick Carter- Pegg, BDO, doubling up as "auditor of FRP, front for Catherine Elford / Kewish.
TRD used as money laundering front as £200m claim v BT partners (served copy) buried in court file 3630-2013 by Joseph Wigley, returning as a £190m valuation on AIM float March 2020, with £80m pocketed by FRP "partners". Conned IPA; ACCA; ICAS; and ICAEW.
Easter Saturday 3 April 2021
Gift from Triad Group Plc; its minorities; its Chartered Accountants, past and present; to all those interested severally and collectively in the six RSA / Willis bonds 22 August 2013; deployed to allow the bust Baker T partners to go around again branded "RSM Tenon" then "RSM": It was too late as MM objected 22 August 2013 before midnight and made a subject to contract offer to buy early 23 August 2013. RSA has admitted instrument nr 7 to MM's named benefit self certified 31.12.13, into which these six are subsumed.
RESPONSE TO DELOITTE ADMINISTRATORS
28 August 2013
on receipt of letter from Wyles
introducer to FRP
From: Mira Makar <mira.makar@btinternet.com>
Subject: 13 08 28: RE RSM TENON & BAKER TILLY UK Group –
Fwd: 12 01 03: letter to trading standards with exhibit
Date: 28 August 2013 at 18:50:23 BST
To: "dsoden@deloitte.co.uk" <dsoden@deloitte.co.uk>
Cc: "cboardman@deloitte.co.uk" <cboardman@deloitte.co.uk>, "nedwards@deloitte.co.uk" <nedwards@deloitte.co.uk>,
miramakar <mira.makar@btinternet.com>,
MARTINWHEATLEY <martin.wheatley@fca.org.uk>,
STEPHENWINTOUR <stephen.wintour@fca.org.uk>,
MARKFIELD MP <fieldm@parliament.uk>,
BarryCollins <Barry.Collins@sfo.gsi.gov.uk>,
"Chris.Duggan@bis.gsi.gov.uk" <Chris.Duggan@bis.gsi.gov.uk>, "gay.burns@cib.gsi.gov.uk" <gay.burns@cib.gsi.gov.uk>,
"s.haddrill@frc.org.uk" <s.haddrill@frc.org.uk>,
AnitaMatthews <a.matthews@jerseyfsc.org>,
DS JeremyPhillips <j.phillips@jersey.pnn.police.uk>,
SallyOakley <Sally.Oakley@cityoflondon.gov.uk>,
miramakar <mira.makar@btinternet.com>
SUBJECT TO CONTRACT
28 August 2013
David Soden Esq
Director, Restructuring
on behalf of the Joint Administrators, RSM Tenon
Matt Smith Esq
Nick Edwards Esq
Ms Clare Boardman (Leeds)
Dear David
I have just now received what I regard as a rather threatening communication from a Jonathan Wyles, employee of Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP ("RPC").
RPC is a defendant in 2012 Folio 336, against whom I entered Judgment in default on 18 July 2012, together with its auditor Baker Tilly UK Audit LLP, Baker Tilly Holdings Ltd (consol)and Kingston Smith.
The effect of this default judgment, was that the underwriting agreement entered into by RPC and Baker Tilly UK Group, that effectively merged their balance sheets, was disabled. Therefore when HQ12XO3512 was issued on 24 August 2012, there was nothing that could be done, apart from to attempt to prevent me from serving, within the four calendar months allowed.
In fact I served on time.
There was a futile attempt on 15, 16, 19 November 2012 to use the ISSUED not SERVED Claim Form in the Commercial Court. I had given it to Kingston Smith on 24 August 2012, in accordance with what was CA85 s389B (obligations to notify auditor etc). Only date, number and identity of parties is properly public. This had the purpose of attempting to block service but failed.
I have flagged concern over the independence of CMS Cameron McKenna, as advisers to Lloyds, and, as I understand, your advisers, as at last week. I have informed you that they are my advisers from February 2006, last contact 2011, and that they turned up on the event above, with this document, apparently for my insurer (ALLIANZ) and their lawyer (FLEET), in the attempt to block service of HQ12XO3512.
It is my firm belief that the Deloitte Administrators require independent legal advice, since CSM McKenna was informed about HQ12XO3512, from at least November 2012. This information ought properly to have had bearing on their advice to Lloyds, and indeed, whether a pre pack involving Baker Tilly UK Group could even be contemplated. There will be questions if Lloyds has lost its £80m.
I am attaching a power-point that was the genesis of 2012 Folio 336. As the prosecutors had taken no publicly visible action by the six year deadline, I asked the court to issue on 5 March 2012, the dead line, which it duly did.
I am also attaching a record of the use of "litigation weapons" that are used to attempt to demolish reputation. These proved sterile, as you can see by the RNS of November 2006, and the accolades from Andrew Smith J in the Commercial Court, six years later.
The Baker Tilly UK Group is not represented by any lawyers in HQ12XO3512, and did not acknowledge service.
Please confirm receipt of this communication. I have been told that there has been a communication to you that attempts to deny HQ12XO3512. Doubtless if you want me to look at it, you will give it to me.
As before, I am circulating those with files for reasons of transparency.
Kind regards
Mira
Mira Makar MA FCA (Miss)
00 44 (0)7768 610071
Christos Anesti!.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Mira Makar <mira.makar@btinternet.com>
To: Mira Makar User <mira.makar@btinternet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013, 17:43
Subject: Fwd: 12 01 03: letter to trading standards with exhibit
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mira Makar <mira.makar@btinternet.com>
Date: 3 January 2012 01:06:41 GMT
To: "nora.walsh@cityoflondon.gov.uk" <nora.walsh@cityoflondon.gov.uk>
Cc: MARKFIELD MP <fieldm@parliament.uk>,
JIMSHANNON <jim.shannon1@btopenworld.com>,
"Lisa.Campbell@city-of-london.pnn.police.uk" <Lisa.Campbell@city-of-london.pnn.police.uk>,
"richard.alderman@sfo.gsi.gov.uk" <richard.alderman@sfo.gsi.gov.uk>,
ROBERTBURNS <robert.burns@cib.gsi.gov.uk>,
"Phillippa.Williamson@sfo.gsi.gov.uk" <Phillippa.Williamson@sfo.gsi.gov.uk>, "Andy.Morling@sfo.gsi.gov.uk" <Andy.Morling@sfo.gsi.gov.uk>,
BarryCollins <Barry.Collins@sfo.gsi.gov.uk>,
FSA re Evo <stephen.wintour@fsa.gov.uk>,
"peter.hill@oft.gsi.gov.uk" <peter.hill@oft.gsi.gov.uk>,
"dan.rawling@oft.gsi.gov.uk" <dan.rawling@oft.gsi.gov.uk>, "Geoffrey.Kenton@oft.gsi.gov.uk" <Geoffrey.Kenton@oft.gsi.gov.uk>, "danielrobinson@hsbc.com" <danielrobinson@hsbc.com>, "helene.newman@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk" <helene.newman@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, "a.matthews@jerseyfsc.org" <a.matthews@jerseyfsc.org>, "j.phillips@jersey.pnn.police.uk" <j.phillips@jersey.pnn.police.uk>,
Joanne <Joanne.Hall@cityoflondon.gov.uk>,
JacquiMcKeating <Jacqui.McKeating@cityoflondon.gov.uk>,
Sally <Sally.Stratton@cityoflondon.gov.uk>,
"vince.cullen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk" <vince.cullen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, "john.laverick@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk" <john.laverick@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, "michael.izza@icaew.com" <michael.izza@icaew.com>,
ICAEW <vernon.soare@icaew.com>,
SHARRONGUNN <sharron.gunn@icaew.com>,
Vivienne Muir <vmuir@icas.org.uk>, miramakar <mira.makar@btinternet.com>
Subject: 12 01 03: letter to trading standards with exhibit
3 January 2012
Dear Mrs Walsh
Please see attached letter and exhibit.
yours sincerely
Mira Makar
00 44 (0)7768 610071
Trading Standards powerpoint January 2012 is on this website
pp1112 COLLATERAL TOXIC ATTACKS ON REPUTATION.pdf also
letter to City Trading Standards (working with City Police and SFO) is not public - anyone wanting a copy can ask for it from Triad Internal Support who will find a way of providing it and deciding its status
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse